Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Charlie Weis: 2 wins over a top 25 (barely) team in 4 years (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Tiger Fan
- Start date
John Mamula
Moderator
if they're top notch what's stopping them from playing now?
I think Charlie ate his top 3 recruits from last year
John Mamula
Moderator
he is the biggest ####### slob.i saw that hutt slithering around on the sidelines at the USC/ND game and could not believe that was their head coach representing their school.Can't wait to make up some signs for this game
_4_
Footballguy
Charlie Weis had major complications from gastric bypass surgery that almost led to his death. I don't believe that even with the botched operation he could consume two recruits much less three.
belljr
Footballguy
UCLA don't count?And what were the teams ranked when they played?2006
Ga. Tech - not ranked in BCS
Penn St. - not ranked in BCS
2005
Michigan - finished #20 in BCS
Way go to domers
LHUCKS
Footballguy
If I'm not mistaken 17 of their 22 starters were Seniors this year.
Politician Spock
Footballguy
John Mamula
Moderator
ucla isn't ranked.it only matters where they are ranked now. who cares if some team was overrated early in the season?UCLA don't count?And what were the teams ranked when they played?2006
Ga. Tech - not ranked in BCS
Penn St. - not ranked in BCS
2005
Michigan - finished #20 in BCS
Way go to domers
Jimmy is still in highschool
belljr
Footballguy
My bad...I added UCLA (#25 right now)Oh and it doesn't matter what the teams were ranked when they played.....those are misleading rankings.UCLA don't count?And what were the teams ranked when they played?2006
Ga. Tech - not ranked in BCS
Penn St. - not ranked in BCS
UCLA - #25 in BCS
2005
Michigan - finished #20 in BCS
Way go to domers
Was Michigan really the #3 team in the country last year
belljr
Footballguy
No I agree it doesn't "usually" matter what teams are ranked when they play for the most part.My bad...I added UCLA (#25 right now)Oh and it doesn't matter what the teams were ranked when they played.....those are misleading rankings.UCLA don't count?And what were the teams ranked when they played?2006
Ga. Tech - not ranked in BCS
Penn St. - not ranked in BCS
UCLA - #25 in BCS
2005
Michigan - finished #20 in BCS
Way go to domers
Was Michigan really the #3 team in the country last year
No I agree it doesn't "usually" matter what teams are ranked when they play for the most part.My bad...I added UCLA (#25 right now)Oh and it doesn't matter what the teams were ranked when they played.....those are misleading rankings.UCLA don't count?And what were the teams ranked when they played?2006
Ga. Tech - not ranked in BCS
Penn St. - not ranked in BCS
UCLA - #25 in BCS
2005
Michigan - finished #20 in BCS
Way go to domers
Was Michigan really the #3 team in the country last year
Glad we agree that ND is the most overrated team in NCAA history
John Mamula
Moderator
belljr
Footballguy
um - ND fan hereNo I agree it doesn't "usually" matter what teams are ranked when they play for the most part.My bad...I added UCLA (#25 right now)Oh and it doesn't matter what the teams were ranked when they played.....those are misleading rankings.UCLA don't count?And what were the teams ranked when they played?2006
Ga. Tech - not ranked in BCS
Penn St. - not ranked in BCS
UCLA - #25 in BCS
2005
Michigan - finished #20 in BCS
Way go to domers
Was Michigan really the #3 team in the country last year
bialczabub
Lord of the Flies
mmmm....barley
boubucarow
Footballguy
You better hate on the Irish when you can. They will be USC part two five years from now.
John Mamula
Moderator
How long is two five years? 10 years? 25 years? Please clarify.TIA
Last edited by a moderator:
Weis throws up the 3 Blue Chip recruits he ate in 2005. They take ND all the way to whatever bowl ND an overrated 10-2 team goes to.what happens in 5 years?do they fire weiss?
B/c he hasn't beaten a good team
He's 2-3 against top 25 BCS teams, losing to USC twice and OSU once. Please explain to me why that's something he should be embarrassed about.
B/c the only reason he is in a BCS game is b/c he coaches a school that is a big $ draw
B/c he is a fat slob of a human being
boubucarow
Footballguy
Be sarcastic all you want. There is a really good chance that in five years, Notre Dame will be in a different stratosphere than the LSUs of the world. And yes, I know how good LSU is.
LSU is one of the top 5 college FB schools in the past 5 years. For ND to be in a different stratosphere than them would imply that ND will rattle of 5 straight BCS titles.....not likely.
Spartans Rule
Footballguy
Weis led Notre Dame to 9-3 last year and they will finish 10-3 this year. That's much better than what they had been doing. And he's bringing in recruiting classes that will put the talent he's working with now to shame.
Yeah, they still don't deserve to be in a BCS Bowl, and LSU will kick the crap out of them. But that's hardly Weis's fault.
Yeah, they still don't deserve to be in a BCS Bowl, and LSU will kick the crap out of them. But that's hardly Weis's fault.
I agree....still an overrated team tho
Who is calling for him to be fired?
NY/NJMFDIVER
Footballguy
Does his weight somehow interfere with your masturbatory fantasies about him?
Seriously, who cares what a guy looks like, that's ####.
Seriously, who cares what a guy looks like, that's ####.
Because it makes it more fun to make fun of him for being overrated
Last edited by a moderator:
boubucarow
Footballguy
LSU is not USC. ND can easily become USC. You know there is a huge difference between USC and LSU. A different stratosphere. That stratosphere means a good year is a national title, an average year is one loss, and a bad year is still a BCS game. LSU is not on that stratosphere, sorry.
Last edited by a moderator:
You are very misled. In the last 5 years, LSU = 1 BCS title; USC = 1 BCS titleLook at the who is playing in the NFL for LSU versus USC. It is very comparable.LSU and USC are in the same stratosphere. LSU will whip Notre Dame in the Sugar Bowl, sorry.LSU is not USC. ND can easily become USC. You know there is a huge difference between USC and LSU. A different stratosphere. That stratosphere means a good year is a national title, an average year is one loss, and a bad year is still a BCS game. LSU is not on that stratosphere, sorry.
I never said LSU has been better than USC over the past 5 or so years. USC has clearly been the best CFB program. But is there a huge difference? I don't think so.LSU is not USC. ND can easily become USC. You know there is a huge difference between USC and LSU. A different stratosphere. That stratosphere means a good year is a national title, an average year is one loss, and a bad year is still a BCS game. LSU is not on that stratosphere, sorry.
at bad year = BCS game and average year = 1 loss
NY/NJMFDIVER
Footballguy
Keep dreamin. I hate USC, but there's not a year in the last 5 they wouldn't have torched you.
NY/NJMFDIVER
Footballguy
But if you thought he were hotter, they'd be better?Because it makes it more fun to make fun of him for being overrated
Whatever man...LSU could have beaten USC in 2003 when they were the NATIONAL CHAMPIONS.
NorvilleBarnes
Footballguy
harryhood
Footballguy
exactly. USC(58-6 over the last five years) has been far more dominant than LSU(52-13 over the last 5 years). You are not in the same class. And as for ND. Keep thinking this is a cake walk over ND and you are going to get embarrassed. ND is better than you think and you are vastly overrating your squad.By the way....does LSU feel it should schedule the "sisters of the poor" for out of conference games because they play in the SEC???
Village Idiot
Pokerguy
UCLA is 25th in the latest BCS rankings. I'm just saying.I predict Notre Dame will get destroyed by LSU.ucla isn't ranked.it only matters where they are ranked now. who cares if some team was overrated early in the season?UCLA don't count?And what were the teams ranked when they played?2006
Ga. Tech - not ranked in BCS
Penn St. - not ranked in BCS
2005
Michigan - finished #20 in BCS
Way go to domers
This is probably as big of a risk to predict this as me predicting LHUCKS will pimp the Pac 10 again sometime before the bowl season is over.
Village Idiot
Pokerguy
exactly. USC(58-6 over the last five years) has been far more dominant than LSU(52-13 over the last 5 years). You are not in the same class. And as for ND. Keep thinking this is a cake walk over ND and you are going to get embarrassed. ND is better than you think and you are vastly overrating your squad.
By the way....does LSU feel it should schedule the "sisters of the poor" for out of conference games because they play in the SEC???
Games played on the field this year say otherwise.Notre Dames defense has been destroyed by good teams, hell Michigan State blew up Notre Dames defense and look where Michigan State is.
Unless the SEC is overrated, this year and I'll agree it's hard to tell since they for the most part scheduled weak out of conference schedules, i don't see Notre Dame having a chance in this game.
Notre Dame's offense = good enough. Their defense = :X
Maybe they should, but most coaches are fired within their first 5 years
This is true. The only equalizer would be Les Miles. LSU has more talent by a long shot.exactly. USC(58-6 over the last five years) has been far more dominant than LSU(52-13 over the last 5 years). You are not in the same class. And as for ND. Keep thinking this is a cake walk over ND and you are going to get embarrassed. ND is better than you think and you are vastly overrating your squad.
By the way....does LSU feel it should schedule the "sisters of the poor" for out of conference games because they play in the SEC???
Notre Dames defense has been destroyed by good teams, hell Michigan State blew up Notre Dames defense and look where Michigan State is.
Unless the SEC is overrated, this year and I'll agree it's hard to tell since they for the most part scheduled weak out of conference schedules, i don't see Notre Dame having a chance in this game.
Notre Dame's offense = good enough. Their defense = :X
Similar threads
