Not sure if I added this tidbit to the thread or not. If I did, sorry, but it's worth a repeat. I read an article on a blog somewhere that Weise was 2-16 against teams with .500 records or better in his "career" at ND....this was a few weeks ago so that loss column has gone up a few, but I couldn't believe it. Sure enough....it's spot on....unreal.
This is incorrect.He has 9 wins against teams who ended the year with winning records over his career.
Got me...should have qualified that the record was when they played....my bad. Regardless, 2 wins or 9 for the best offensive coach ever is pretty laughable isn't it?
It is pathetic.Not to argue the point but it is not possible he is 2 - 16 against teams with a winning record when they played, he beat 2 teams under that qualification this year alone (SDSU and Purdue). That stat is just a made up time frame. Basically 2 - 16 over the last 18 times he played a team that ended the year with a winning record. The problem is, ABC put up the stat during the BC game "Over the last 15 games he played against teams who ended the season with winning records, Weis is 1 - 14." and people ran with it and ignored the opening qualifier.
But, yes, he is unable to win the big game. He held 2 score or more leads against North Carolina, Pitt and Syracuse and failed to close the deal. He almost did the same against Navy. I don't know how you fix that. Is is a killer instinct that is lacking or an unwillingness to go for the jugular when you have a guy down on the ground?
I would be interested to hear who people think Notre Dame could hire to replace him. Although that conversation seems a bit premature at this point. Does Notre Dame still carry enough prestige that they could steal a very successful coach away from another BCS conference team? Would they have to go for a less experienced up and comer and would that up and comer be an improvement?