FUBAR
Footballguy
Why are we leaving them ranked where projected instead of where we know they performed?
Take Willie Parker for example, he's ranked at his projected 13 points, but only scored 4. I can respect that you don't want to change your rankings based on hindsight, but IMO it would make more sense to look at the list, see where Ben/Holmes/Parker are now ranked, and know that everyone above them are projected to have better games than they did, while everyone below are projected to do worse.
Or perhaps it could be marked similarly, like "53. (15)Willie Parker - PIT vs CIN - Thursday"
Take Willie Parker for example, he's ranked at his projected 13 points, but only scored 4. I can respect that you don't want to change your rankings based on hindsight, but IMO it would make more sense to look at the list, see where Ben/Holmes/Parker are now ranked, and know that everyone above them are projected to have better games than they did, while everyone below are projected to do worse.
Or perhaps it could be marked similarly, like "53. (15)Willie Parker - PIT vs CIN - Thursday"
Last edited by a moderator:
