Denny Green couldn't have said it any better.Taylor put up what I thought he would
Which, my 'no' or the popcorn guy...?Nice analysis.
The originator of the thread.Which, my 'no' or the popcorn guy...?Nice analysis.
I have the same gut feeling as you do, that's why I'm trying to move him right now,...especially with the roster I have. --- I have no "biters".skillz said:I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, as he was out of shape and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.skillz said:I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
Baltimore.Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.skillz said:I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
isnt that what exactly happened last year, its not like brad johnson was any threat to throw it further than 15 yards and they had loads of three and outs, hell they could hardlyscore a td last year in most games. I guess I don't see how he could be any worse unless he gets less touches somehowskillz said:I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
I see him as the Edge of 2006. Lots of touches and very little in terms of YPC and a very anemic O.skillz said:I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
Baltimore.Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.skillz said:I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
exactly sell sell sellI think Taylors value is as high as it's going to get right now al la Droughns last off-season.
XMinny Oline > B olineBaltimore.Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.skillz said:I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
That's what I'm talking about,... sell, sell, sell,.......and I'm trying........hard.exactly sell sell sellI think Taylors value is as high as it's going to get right now al la Droughns last off-season.
I think you missed his point. He is saying Chester performed while in Baltimore. You are just undercutting your point by arguing that Minny's O-line is better than Baltimore's.XMinny Oline > B olineBaltimore.Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.skillz said:I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
Aaronstory said:
If you're trying and there aren't any buyers then he must not be overrated.That's what I'm talking about,... sell, sell, sell,.......and I'm trying........hard.exactly sell sell sellI think Taylors value is as high as it's going to get right now al la Droughns last off-season.
It's funny how people can perceive players differently. I look at Chester and see a very solid back that can do anything you ask him to do. Maybe not the most talented, but has a solid all-around game. Also, he had a pathetic passing game that had to throw the ball way too much much but couldn't do anything with it (13 passing TD's, are you kidding me?). With any semblance of a passing attack and *any* pass defense for the Vikes, Chester could be a top 10 back.If you're trying and there aren't any buyers then he must not be overrated.That's what I'm talking about,... sell, sell, sell,.......and I'm trying........hard.exactly sell sell sellI think Taylors value is as high as it's going to get right now al la Droughns last off-season.Personally I think Taylor's value is lower now than it was going into last season. Last year Minnesota had high hopes with Taylor, Hutch and people thought the Vikes were a playoff team. Now alot of people think they are a bad team with one of the worst offenses in football. I just don't see Taylor's value being all that high right now.
or maybe Travis HenryDr. Evil said:Overrated? Try Cadillac....or McGahee. Taylor put up what I thought he would, and wasn't the touted stud the other two are.
I completely agree. I'd bet there will be at least 20 RB's drafted before Taylor in most leagues yet he'll outperform a number of them. If anything he's under not overrated.It's funny how people can perceive players differently. I look at Chester and see a very solid back that can do anything you ask him to do. Maybe not the most talented, but has a solid all-around game. Also, he had a pathetic passing game that had to throw the ball way too much much but couldn't do anything with it (13 passing TD's, are you kidding me?). With any semblance of a passing attack and *any* pass defense for the Vikes, Chester could be a top 10 back.If you're trying and there aren't any buyers then he must not be overrated.That's what I'm talking about,... sell, sell, sell,.......and I'm trying........hard.exactly sell sell sellI think Taylors value is as high as it's going to get right now al la Droughns last off-season.Personally I think Taylor's value is lower now than it was going into last season. Last year Minnesota had high hopes with Taylor, Hutch and people thought the Vikes were a playoff team. Now alot of people think they are a bad team with one of the worst offenses in football. I just don't see Taylor's value being all that high right now.
He's definitely close. I won't blink if the Vikes take Peterson on draft day. Taylor is a scary dynasty RB because he's good enough to produce decent numbers when he has a starting job, but he's not necessarily good enough to keep a starting job. I would probably be looking to move him if I owned him in any leagues.
There isnt a current viking RB on the roster that cant take his job, Chris Brown isnt good enough either and with the Vikings in need of a QB or WR i would think they would look for help in those areas early in the draft. Chester actually ran well the few games I watched last year which is amazing considering how the defense almost always had 8 men in the box. The D's just werent very frightened of the passing game, cant blame them.He's definitely close. I won't blink if the Vikes take Peterson on draft day. Taylor is a scary dynasty RB because he's good enough to produce decent numbers when he has a starting job, but he's not necessarily good enough to keep a starting job. I would probably be looking to move him if I owned him in any leagues.
There isnt a current viking RB on the roster that cant take his job, Chris Brown isnt good enough either and with the Vikings in need of a QB or WR i would think they would look for help in those areas early in the draft. Chester actually ran well the few games I watched last year which is amazing considering how the defense almost always had 8 men in the box. The D's just werent very frightened of the passing game, cant blame them.He's definitely close. I won't blink if the Vikes take Peterson on draft day. Taylor is a scary dynasty RB because he's good enough to produce decent numbers when he has a starting job, but he's not necessarily good enough to keep a starting job. I would probably be looking to move him if I owned him in any leagues.
He's definitely close. I won't blink if the Vikes take Peterson on draft day. Taylor is a scary dynasty RB because he's good enough to produce decent numbers when he has a starting job, but he's not necessarily good enough to keep a starting job. I would probably be looking to move him if I owned him in any leagues.
I agreeSincerely LaMont JordanI say move him, because I definitely think RBBC is coming in Minnesota. Chester isnt a very talented back, move him if you can for someone talented, ala Michael Turner, Caddilac Williams, someone who's underachieved because of their situaion not their talent. And the first law of dynasty, talent always wins out over opportunity.There isnt a current viking RB on the roster that cant take his job, Chris Brown isnt good enough either and with the Vikings in need of a QB or WR i would think they would look for help in those areas early in the draft. Chester actually ran well the few games I watched last year which is amazing considering how the defense almost always had 8 men in the box. The D's just werent very frightened of the passing game, cant blame them.He's definitely close. I won't blink if the Vikes take Peterson on draft day. Taylor is a scary dynasty RB because he's good enough to produce decent numbers when he has a starting job, but he's not necessarily good enough to keep a starting job. I would probably be looking to move him if I owned him in any leagues.
I like to start a thread posing a question, and not to influence what people's reply are, I dont give my oppinion until later.The originator of the thread.Which, my 'no' or the popcorn guy...?Nice analysis.
Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, as he was out of shape and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
I am not a Jets fan.Take a back seat buddy!!!!!:jetsfan:Wanna know who the jets took a 1.9 once?Kyle BradyThank you,
So you can throw them under the bus like the other "exports"? That Whitner pick sure looks smart now doesn't it? "Reach."I want to see what the Bills do before I start mocking Miami. See you in 30 minutes or so.