What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Chester Taylor (1 Viewer)

Overrated? Try Cadillac....or McGahee. Taylor put up what I thought he would, and wasn't the touted stud the other two are.

 
I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.

 
skillz said:
I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
I have the same gut feeling as you do, that's why I'm trying to move him right now,...especially with the roster I have. --- I have no "biters".
 
skillz said:
I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, as he was out of shape and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
skillz said:
I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.
Baltimore.
 
skillz said:
I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
isnt that what exactly happened last year, its not like brad johnson was any threat to throw it further than 15 yards and they had loads of three and outs, hell they could hardlyscore a td last year in most games. I guess I don't see how he could be any worse unless he gets less touches somehow :yes:
 
skillz said:
I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
I see him as the Edge of 2006. Lots of touches and very little in terms of YPC and a very anemic O.
 
skillz said:
I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.
Baltimore.
:goodposting: :bye: :( Now I could be totally wrong. Honestly, I think people are low on him just because his name is Chester (not a usual football name, save Chester McGlockton). If it was something "cooler" sounding I think he'd get more respect. Just throw that out there, because all this guy does is perform.

 
skillz said:
I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.
Baltimore.
XMinny Oline > B oline

 
skillz said:
I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.
Baltimore.
XMinny Oline > B oline
I think you missed his point. He is saying Chester performed while in Baltimore. You are just undercutting your point by arguing that Minny's O-line is better than Baltimore's.
 
Chester isn't the most talented back but he's got a coach that loves to run, a good line and no one behind him in terms of competition. So NFL wise he's not a great back but fantasy wise he's a good 2nd back.

 
What has changed on the Minnesota D? As long as they keep holding RBs to 14/34 type days, Chestor Taylor is going to continue to keep getting fed the rock.

 
I think Taylors value is as high as it's going to get right now al la Droughns last off-season.
exactly sell sell sell
That's what I'm talking about,... sell, sell, sell,.......and I'm trying........hard.
If you're trying and there aren't any buyers then he must not be overrated. :goodposting: Personally I think Taylor's value is lower now than it was going into last season. Last year Minnesota had high hopes with Taylor, Hutch and people thought the Vikes were a playoff team. Now alot of people think they are a bad team with one of the worst offenses in football. I just don't see Taylor's value being all that high right now.
 
It's interesting how middle of the road RBs get #### on. RB 12-16, what a choker! He sucks! Overrated. Junk. Sell sell sell.

Yet, lets look at AJ.

First year, hype, shat the bed.

Second year, more hype, shat the bed.

Third year, oOoOoo WR 3rd year, shat the bed.

AJ fourth year, pretty good.

So we'll talk up a WR for 3+ years, but Taylor in his first year as a starter was a top 15 RB.

Caddy has played 2 years, is 25, but he's pretty much washed up if you listen to people around here.

WRs get so much hype, even after horrible years (calling Michael Clayton), but a RB doesn't put up 15 tds, he's "broken". And if the RB does put up 15 tds, but isn't 6'2 220, he's not reliable (MJD).

Taylor had a decent year. He has a great o-line. I expect RB 13-15 range again. Very solid RB2.

 
I think Taylors value is as high as it's going to get right now al la Droughns last off-season.
exactly sell sell sell
That's what I'm talking about,... sell, sell, sell,.......and I'm trying........hard.
If you're trying and there aren't any buyers then he must not be overrated. :porked: Personally I think Taylor's value is lower now than it was going into last season. Last year Minnesota had high hopes with Taylor, Hutch and people thought the Vikes were a playoff team. Now alot of people think they are a bad team with one of the worst offenses in football. I just don't see Taylor's value being all that high right now.
It's funny how people can perceive players differently. I look at Chester and see a very solid back that can do anything you ask him to do. Maybe not the most talented, but has a solid all-around game. Also, he had a pathetic passing game that had to throw the ball way too much much but couldn't do anything with it (13 passing TD's, are you kidding me?). With any semblance of a passing attack and *any* pass defense for the Vikes, Chester could be a top 10 back.
 
I think Taylors value is as high as it's going to get right now al la Droughns last off-season.
exactly sell sell sell
That's what I'm talking about,... sell, sell, sell,.......and I'm trying........hard.
If you're trying and there aren't any buyers then he must not be overrated. :o Personally I think Taylor's value is lower now than it was going into last season. Last year Minnesota had high hopes with Taylor, Hutch and people thought the Vikes were a playoff team. Now alot of people think they are a bad team with one of the worst offenses in football. I just don't see Taylor's value being all that high right now.
It's funny how people can perceive players differently. I look at Chester and see a very solid back that can do anything you ask him to do. Maybe not the most talented, but has a solid all-around game. Also, he had a pathetic passing game that had to throw the ball way too much much but couldn't do anything with it (13 passing TD's, are you kidding me?). With any semblance of a passing attack and *any* pass defense for the Vikes, Chester could be a top 10 back.
I completely agree. I'd bet there will be at least 20 RB's drafted before Taylor in most leagues yet he'll outperform a number of them. If anything he's under not overrated.
 
He's definitely close. I won't blink if the Vikes take Peterson on draft day. Taylor is a scary dynasty RB because he's good enough to produce decent numbers when he has a starting job, but he's not necessarily good enough to keep a starting job. I would probably be looking to move him if I owned him in any leagues.
 
He's definitely close. I won't blink if the Vikes take Peterson on draft day. Taylor is a scary dynasty RB because he's good enough to produce decent numbers when he has a starting job, but he's not necessarily good enough to keep a starting job. I would probably be looking to move him if I owned him in any leagues.
There isnt a current viking RB on the roster that cant take his job, Chris Brown isnt good enough either and with the Vikings in need of a QB or WR i would think they would look for help in those areas early in the draft. Chester actually ran well the few games I watched last year which is amazing considering how the defense almost always had 8 men in the box. The D's just werent very frightened of the passing game, cant blame them.
 
He's definitely close. I won't blink if the Vikes take Peterson on draft day. Taylor is a scary dynasty RB because he's good enough to produce decent numbers when he has a starting job, but he's not necessarily good enough to keep a starting job. I would probably be looking to move him if I owned him in any leagues.
There isnt a current viking RB on the roster that cant take his job, Chris Brown isnt good enough either and with the Vikings in need of a QB or WR i would think they would look for help in those areas early in the draft. Chester actually ran well the few games I watched last year which is amazing considering how the defense almost always had 8 men in the box. The D's just werent very frightened of the passing game, cant blame them.
:thumbup:
 
In PPR league, I believe Taylor is underrated.

People forget he was the 3rd down back in Balt and caught 42 passes in 2006. I expect those numbers to go up.

Taylor is not a Droughns. Droughns was a coverted fullback from Denver run scheme who was exposed for the true fullback he is when he went to Cleveland.

There is one reason to sell Taylor, and sell fast. It's not because of TJax or because Chester overachieved. It's because if AD is sitting there at the #7 overall, the Vikings better buy, and CT's value plummets.

 
He's definitely close. I won't blink if the Vikes take Peterson on draft day. Taylor is a scary dynasty RB because he's good enough to produce decent numbers when he has a starting job, but he's not necessarily good enough to keep a starting job. I would probably be looking to move him if I owned him in any leagues.
:loco:you always seem to echo the exact things Im thinking
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's definitely close. I won't blink if the Vikes take Peterson on draft day. Taylor is a scary dynasty RB because he's good enough to produce decent numbers when he has a starting job, but he's not necessarily good enough to keep a starting job. I would probably be looking to move him if I owned him in any leagues.
There isnt a current viking RB on the roster that cant take his job, Chris Brown isnt good enough either and with the Vikings in need of a QB or WR i would think they would look for help in those areas early in the draft. Chester actually ran well the few games I watched last year which is amazing considering how the defense almost always had 8 men in the box. The D's just werent very frightened of the passing game, cant blame them.
I agreeSincerely LaMont JordanI say move him, because I definitely think RBBC is coming in Minnesota. Chester isnt a very talented back, move him if you can for someone talented, ala Michael Turner, Caddilac Williams, someone who's underachieved because of their situaion not their talent. And the first law of dynasty, talent always wins out over opportunity.
 
I thought he was a solid RB 2 last year but unfortunately he broke down at the end of the year when I needed him in the playoffs. My concern for him in 2007 is that although I think Childress will try to get him a ton of touches again, the QB situation in Minnesota is horrible. Defenses are going to stack the box against him big time since Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger aren't going to be a threat. I see a lot of three and outs which will keep him from repeating his numbers from last year. Just my gut feeling on the situation. Give him a better QB and I think he thrives with the OL he has in front of him.
Exactly. I think this is going to be similar to LaMont Jordan 2006, they were both not very good RBs in ideal situations, I mean where else would a below average RB like Taylor put up those kind of stats? Childress wasnt thrilled with Taylor's conditioning last year, as he was out of shape and I really wouldnt be surpised if he's replaced in the not to distant future.I would definitely move him in a dynasty league, you can probably get someone like Caddy for him.
:goodposting:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top