What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Chiefs claim Kyle Orton (1 Viewer)

C-blocking? This is a great move for their own team. They're in the playoff race, their starting qb is hurt, the backup stinks, and they have some decent weapons.

How long until Orton is starting? Two weeks?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
C-blocking? This is a great move for their own team. They're in the playoff race, their starting qb is hurt, the backup stinks, and they have some decent weapons.How long until Orton is starting? Two weeks?
He will be in the game at some point on Sunday wearing a wristband for play calls.
 
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.

 
I think it says the jusry is out on Cassell. They paid about as much to get Orton as they would to have paid Cassell his bonus next sping. Plus they get to use a guy now and they are still in a divisional race. Makes sense to me.

 
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
Can he do that? Unless he pulls a Carson "I retire till you trade me" move I'm not sure he has the authority to sit out here (assuming he desires to play somewhere else). Has anyone ever been claimed by one team and then immediately traded to another? I have to imagine it's happened at some point.
 
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.
He probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.
 
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.
He probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.
he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicago
 
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.
He probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.
he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicago
Come again?
 
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.
He probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.
he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicago
:goodposting: brother. gll peas
 
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
Can he do that? Unless he pulls a Carson "I retire till you trade me" move I'm not sure he has the authority to sit out here (assuming he desires to play somewhere else). Has anyone ever been claimed by one team and then immediately traded to another? I have to imagine it's happened at some point.
He can't be traded - trade deadline has passed. If he indeed did "unofficially" tell the Chiefs not to claim him and then they did anyway... I don't think this will end well for them.
 
What kind of effect would Orton have on Bowe and Baldwin? I thought his strengths were the deep ball and he was fairly accurate...?

 
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.
He probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.
he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicago
Come again?
He means he hates Haley.
 
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.
He probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.
he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicago
Come again?
That's what she said.
 
Great news for Bowe owners!
wow. I was about to drop him. amight still-but worth reconsidering.
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
well damn
Yeah OK Clayton. I typically like Clayton but he is way off here. Even if Orton is ticked about going to the Chiefs, he's not abotu to blow his last opportunity at a contract and also the chance to blast the broncos. And to your first point, definitely do not drop Bowe. he is gonna beast from here on out. Orton may stink but he can sling it better than Cassel.
 
Great news for Bowe owners!
wow. I was about to drop him. amight still-but worth reconsidering.
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
well damn
Yeah OK Clayton. I typically like Clayton but he is way off here. Even if Orton is ticked about going to the Chiefs, he's not abotu to blow his last opportunity at a contract and also the chance to blast the broncos. And to your first point, definitely do not drop Bowe. he is gonna beast from here on out. Orton may stink but he can sling it better than Cassel.
Thanks for this. I'm still in a quandary but there's room to play and your post helped put it into perspective. These are backups, after all.
 
I am not sure what the rules are as far as not reporting to a wavier team, but my best guess is that there are rules in place to protect the wavier team.

The whole point of having waviers is so that teams struggling get the first crack at released players...if a player is able to force his way to a better team, it defeats the purpose.

My gut tells me that when Cutler went down, the Bears made a phone call to either the Broncos or Orton's agent to see if they could work something out. It is just pretty coincidental that the former Bears starter is released right after the current Bears starter breaks his thumb.

...and this would also explain why Orton does not want to report to KC. Why not report if you are going to be the starter on a decent team? Isn't that what he wanted?

...unless you know that a better team wants you as their starter (Bears). It also explains why Dallas put in a wavier claim as well, since Chicago is in front of them for the wildcard. My guess is that Dallas will eat the 2 mil of Orton's contract just to keep him off the Bears.

 
if orton is any kind of professional he will report.

the only good reason I can see him not reporting is if he requested to be released onto waivers and the condition of such release was that he would not report if a division rival claims him.

And fair enough. Denver could have let him sit. At least they gave him a chance.

 
per @KCChiefsBlog:

Michael Lombardi (Scott Pioli's buddy) said on the NFL Network he believes Kyle Orton will start on Sunday

 
Last edited by a moderator:
...and this would also explain why Orton does not want to report to KC. Why not report if you are going to be the starter on a decent team? Isn't that what he wanted?
:unsure: I do agree with your bit about the Cowboys blocking the Bears though. The odd part though, is that Hanie would likely have been the starter even if the Bears had gotten Orton. Orton was being brought in as Hanie's backup - just in case he got hurt.

The other thing that doesn't really make sense is that it seem KC is only picking him up so they don't go 4-12. Honestly, with their schedule, even if Orton is decent - they may only go 6-10...all that does is give them a slightly worse draft pick in 2012. With the 25th ranked in defense in terms of points allowed, games against PIT, @CHI, @NYJ and GB - then closing out vs. OAK and Denver...sorry, I just don't see them winning 3 of those, let alone 4 or 5.

 
if orton is any kind of professional he will report.

the only good reason I can see him not reporting is if he requested to be released onto waivers and the condition of such release was that he would not report if a division rival claims him.

And fair enough. Denver could have let him sit. At least they gave him a chance.
Since that pretty much defeats the point of the waiver system, I would say there's a rule against this.
 
if orton is any kind of professional he will report.the only good reason I can see him not reporting is if he requested to be released onto waivers and the condition of such release was that he would not report if a division rival claims him.And fair enough. Denver could have let him sit. At least they gave him a chance.
Yeah, it has to be an empty threat. He needs a chance to get a big free agent contract. He should get to throw the ball a lot in KC.
 
I remember orton locking on marshall heavily two years ago against indy, week 15 . perhaps he finds bowe again?

 
per @KCChiefsBlog:Michael Lombardi (Scott Pioli's buddy) said on the NFL Network he believes Kyle Orton will start on Sunday
This WILL happen.
I imagine Lombardi said more than just that..I understand twitter N all, but ...It'd be fortunate for the Chiefs if he knew enough of a stripped down offense to be able to start this sunday. He loses at least a day due to thanksgiving, don't forget, and he already had a brief time to learn.
 
Two posts at Rotoworld:

Speaking Wednesday evening, Kyle Orton indicated that he fully intends to report to the Chiefs after they were awarded him on waivers."Just wanted everybody to hear it from me first," Orton said. "I am happy to be a part of the Kansas City Chiefs. ... I am excited about the last few days and I am looking forward to getting to know my teammates with the Chiefs." ESPN's John Clayton reported early Wednesday that Orton might not report to K.C. because he wanted to be a Bear. It appears The Professor's report was inaccurate, which we've noticed is becoming a recurring theme for Clayton. Orton will probably be the Chiefs' starting quarterback by Week 13.
The Kansas City Star confirms that Tyler Palko is "likely" to be the Chiefs' starting quarterback in Week 12, despite Wednesday's acquisition of Kyle Orton.It's welcomed news for owners of the Steelers' fantasy defense. Orton will report to the Chiefs and even perhaps practice on Thursday, but has just two days to learn the offense. We would expect Orton to be more fully incorporated by the Chiefs' Week 13 game against the Bears. Todd Haley's offense is not all that dissimilar from the one Josh McDaniels ran in Denver.
 
Definitely good news for Bowe owners, but for those talking about dropping him... really?? He's still getting a ton of targets, went 7/87 on Monday and is obviously going to be a huge part of the offense regardless of who's at QB. Not sure what kind of leagues you play in but I have a very hard time believing there's anything on the WW worth dropping him for.

 
Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
Please explain.
I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".ETA: By week 17 - say the AFC West title is on the line, if Orton throws for 250 and 2 TDs & 1 INT, while Tebow throws for 85, 0 TDs and 1 INT and the Broncos lose 27-13, most will blame Tebow for the loss (and credit their "former starting QB with a good game) and will have long forgotten that it was the Denver brass that handed a division opponent the bullet needed to shoot Denver's playoff chances to smithereens.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
Please explain.
I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".
Okay, if that notion isn't absurd enough, explain the part about Elway being able to use the Jedi Mind Trick to get the Chiefs to sign him.
 
Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
Please explain.
I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".ETA: By week 17 - say the AFC West title is on the line, if Orton throws for 250 and 2 TDs & 1 INT, while Tebow throws for 85, 0 TDs and 1 INT and the Broncos lose 27-13, most will blame Tebow for the loss (and credit their "former starting QB with a good game) and will have long forgotten that it was the Denver brass that handed a division opponent the bullet needed to shoot Denver's playoff chances to smithereens.
That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
 
Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
Please explain.
I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".ETA: By week 17 - say the AFC West title is on the line, if Orton throws for 250 and 2 TDs & 1 INT, while Tebow throws for 85, 0 TDs and 1 INT and the Broncos lose 27-13, most will blame Tebow for the loss (and credit their "former starting QB with a good game) and will have long forgotten that it was the Denver brass that handed a division opponent the bullet needed to shoot Denver's playoff chances to smithereens.
That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
:shrug: I was just trying to explain what I thought the OP meant - not responding with my thought.
 
Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
Please explain.
I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".
Okay, if that notion isn't absurd enough, explain the part about Elway being able to use the Jedi Mind Trick to get the Chiefs to sign him.
Actually this part I can answer. I don't think Denver was hoping KC would sign him - but I do think they stupidly ignored the fact that it was a distinct possibility. In other words, I don't think Elway was trying to screw Tebow.
 
Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
Please explain.
I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".ETA: By week 17 - say the AFC West title is on the line, if Orton throws for 250 and 2 TDs & 1 INT, while Tebow throws for 85, 0 TDs and 1 INT and the Broncos lose 27-13, most will blame Tebow for the loss (and credit their "former starting QB with a good game) and will have long forgotten that it was the Denver brass that handed a division opponent the bullet needed to shoot Denver's playoff chances to smithereens.
That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
:shrug: I was just trying to explain what I thought the OP meant - not responding with my thought.
I know.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top