He will be in the game at some point on Sunday wearing a wristband for play calls.C-blocking? This is a great move for their own team. They're in the playoff race, their starting qb is hurt, the backup stinks, and they have some decent weapons.How long until Orton is starting? Two weeks?
I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
Can he do that? Unless he pulls a Carson "I retire till you trade me" move I'm not sure he has the authority to sit out here (assuming he desires to play somewhere else). Has anyone ever been claimed by one team and then immediately traded to another? I have to imagine it's happened at some point.John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
This prolly says more about the mileage on Kitna than it says anything about Romo.As per league source, Cowboys and Bears also put in a claim
He probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicagoHe probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
Come again?he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicagoHe probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicagoHe probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
He can't be traded - trade deadline has passed. If he indeed did "unofficially" tell the Chiefs not to claim him and then they did anyway... I don't think this will end well for them.Can he do that? Unless he pulls a Carson "I retire till you trade me" move I'm not sure he has the authority to sit out here (assuming he desires to play somewhere else). Has anyone ever been claimed by one team and then immediately traded to another? I have to imagine it's happened at some point.John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
He means he hates Haley.Come again?he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicagoHe probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
That's what she said.Come again?he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicagoHe probably just doesn't want to play for Haley.I can't believe Orton would turn down this opportunity unless there was a deal with the Broncos to turn down any offers from teams within the division as a condition of his release.I don't care how much he likes Chicago - he's being given a chance to start and if he plays well he'll get the contract he's looking for from someone in the offseason.John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
wow. I was about to drop him. amight still-but worth reconsidering.Great news for Bowe owners!
well damnJohn Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
I'm more of a hot dog buy too.he might just not lieke barbecue my brothers maybe he is more of a hot dog buy and that is why he wants to be at chicago
Yeah OK Clayton. I typically like Clayton but he is way off here. Even if Orton is ticked about going to the Chiefs, he's not abotu to blow his last opportunity at a contract and also the chance to blast the broncos. And to your first point, definitely do not drop Bowe. he is gonna beast from here on out. Orton may stink but he can sling it better than Cassel.wow. I was about to drop him. amight still-but worth reconsidering.Great news for Bowe owners!well damnJohn Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
Thanks for this. I'm still in a quandary but there's room to play and your post helped put it into perspective. These are backups, after all.Yeah OK Clayton. I typically like Clayton but he is way off here. Even if Orton is ticked about going to the Chiefs, he's not abotu to blow his last opportunity at a contract and also the chance to blast the broncos. And to your first point, definitely do not drop Bowe. he is gonna beast from here on out. Orton may stink but he can sling it better than Cassel.wow. I was about to drop him. amight still-but worth reconsidering.Great news for Bowe owners!well damnJohn Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
...and this would also explain why Orton does not want to report to KC. Why not report if you are going to be the starter on a decent team? Isn't that what he wanted?
Since that pretty much defeats the point of the waiver system, I would say there's a rule against this.if orton is any kind of professional he will report.
the only good reason I can see him not reporting is if he requested to be released onto waivers and the condition of such release was that he would not report if a division rival claims him.
And fair enough. Denver could have let him sit. At least they gave him a chance.
Agree with Dr. A that this is nonsense - Orton picks up $2+ million AND a chance to audition for a job as a starter for next year and loses both if he fails to reportJohn Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
Better question: why would he want to? He'd be getting the chance to step in and start immediately for a playoff team. That won't happen in too many places.Can he do that?John Clayton suggested that Kyle Orton might not report to Chiefs if they claimed him off waivers.
This WILL happen.per @KCChiefsBlog:Michael Lombardi (Scott Pioli's buddy) said on the NFL Network he believes Kyle Orton will start on Sunday
Yeah, it has to be an empty threat. He needs a chance to get a big free agent contract. He should get to throw the ball a lot in KC.if orton is any kind of professional he will report.the only good reason I can see him not reporting is if he requested to be released onto waivers and the condition of such release was that he would not report if a division rival claims him.And fair enough. Denver could have let him sit. At least they gave him a chance.
Man I hope so...I need an early Christmas gift.I remember orton locking on marshall heavily two years ago against indy, week 15 . perhaps he finds bowe again?
I imagine Lombardi said more than just that..I understand twitter N all, but ...It'd be fortunate for the Chiefs if he knew enough of a stripped down offense to be able to start this sunday. He loses at least a day due to thanksgiving, don't forget, and he already had a brief time to learn.This WILL happen.per @KCChiefsBlog:Michael Lombardi (Scott Pioli's buddy) said on the NFL Network he believes Kyle Orton will start on Sunday
Speaking Wednesday evening, Kyle Orton indicated that he fully intends to report to the Chiefs after they were awarded him on waivers."Just wanted everybody to hear it from me first," Orton said. "I am happy to be a part of the Kansas City Chiefs. ... I am excited about the last few days and I am looking forward to getting to know my teammates with the Chiefs." ESPN's John Clayton reported early Wednesday that Orton might not report to K.C. because he wanted to be a Bear. It appears The Professor's report was inaccurate, which we've noticed is becoming a recurring theme for Clayton. Orton will probably be the Chiefs' starting quarterback by Week 13.
The Kansas City Star confirms that Tyler Palko is "likely" to be the Chiefs' starting quarterback in Week 12, despite Wednesday's acquisition of Kyle Orton.It's welcomed news for owners of the Steelers' fantasy defense. Orton will report to the Chiefs and even perhaps practice on Thursday, but has just two days to learn the offense. We would expect Orton to be more fully incorporated by the Chiefs' Week 13 game against the Bears. Todd Haley's offense is not all that dissimilar from the one Josh McDaniels ran in Denver.
He loses at least a day due to thanksgiving...
teams don't practice and even if they do it's a joke of oneHe loses at least a day due to thanksgiving...![]()
teams don't practice and even if they do it's a joke of oneHe loses at least a day due to thanksgiving...![]()
Please explain.Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".ETA: By week 17 - say the AFC West title is on the line, if Orton throws for 250 and 2 TDs & 1 INT, while Tebow throws for 85, 0 TDs and 1 INT and the Broncos lose 27-13, most will blame Tebow for the loss (and credit their "former starting QB with a good game) and will have long forgotten that it was the Denver brass that handed a division opponent the bullet needed to shoot Denver's playoff chances to smithereens.Please explain.Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
Okay, if that notion isn't absurd enough, explain the part about Elway being able to use the Jedi Mind Trick to get the Chiefs to sign him.I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".Please explain.Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".ETA: By week 17 - say the AFC West title is on the line, if Orton throws for 250 and 2 TDs & 1 INT, while Tebow throws for 85, 0 TDs and 1 INT and the Broncos lose 27-13, most will blame Tebow for the loss (and credit their "former starting QB with a good game) and will have long forgotten that it was the Denver brass that handed a division opponent the bullet needed to shoot Denver's playoff chances to smithereens.Please explain.Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".ETA: By week 17 - say the AFC West title is on the line, if Orton throws for 250 and 2 TDs & 1 INT, while Tebow throws for 85, 0 TDs and 1 INT and the Broncos lose 27-13, most will blame Tebow for the loss (and credit their "former starting QB with a good game) and will have long forgotten that it was the Denver brass that handed a division opponent the bullet needed to shoot Denver's playoff chances to smithereens.Please explain.Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
Actually this part I can answer. I don't think Denver was hoping KC would sign him - but I do think they stupidly ignored the fact that it was a distinct possibility. In other words, I don't think Elway was trying to screw Tebow.Okay, if that notion isn't absurd enough, explain the part about Elway being able to use the Jedi Mind Trick to get the Chiefs to sign him.I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".Please explain.Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.
I know.That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.I think the point is that KC - a team within Denver's division and a team the Broncos play at the end of the season - just got better (considerably so at the QB position) = better chance for a "Tebow loss".ETA: By week 17 - say the AFC West title is on the line, if Orton throws for 250 and 2 TDs & 1 INT, while Tebow throws for 85, 0 TDs and 1 INT and the Broncos lose 27-13, most will blame Tebow for the loss (and credit their "former starting QB with a good game) and will have long forgotten that it was the Denver brass that handed a division opponent the bullet needed to shoot Denver's playoff chances to smithereens.Please explain.Kind or ironic how Elway appears to attempt to screw Tebow again with this transaction.I was just trying to explain what I thought the OP meant - not responding with my thought.