What does this mean for Floyd and Naanee?Naanee has 13 receptions so far on the season, but only one yesterday. Floyd had 11 receptions on the season, but has been a little more involved recently - 7 catches the last three games. I don't even think Naanee played the last couple games before this week.ETA - look like Floyd got the start over Chambers yesterday anyway.Per Schefter:'WR Chris Chambers has been released'
Per Schefter:'Chargers released WR Chris Chambers'

I know you're not sure, but Schefter's word is good enough for me.When I find a like, I'll post it.Per Schefter:'Chargers released WR Chris Chambers'![]()
I wasn't questioning Schefter's word.I know you're not sure, but Schefter's word is good enough for me.When I find a like, I'll post it.Per Schefter:'Chargers released WR Chris Chambers'![]()
Chargers released WR Chris Chambers.Per Schefter:
'Chargers released WR Chris Chambers'![]()

Horn was productive right up to age 34. Chambers peaked at 27 and was done by 29.It's amazing how some WRs age gracefully (Mason, Driver, Owens) while others hit a wall and vanish overnight (Horn, Moulds, Chambers).
plus you could add Chambers back on the squad for depthwowThe 2nd round pick the Dolphins got in return in that trade turned out to be Chad Henne.
I see what you're saying...But please, no....plus you could add Chambers back on the squad for depthwow
The 2nd round pick the Dolphins got in return in that trade turned out to be Chad Henne.
Wow.wowThe 2nd round pick the Dolphins got in return in that trade turned out to be Chad Henne.
But how many snaps/game and targets/game did he have?How much could this possibly help any WRs? Chambers had what, like 15 yards/game on average?
9 catches from 31 targets for 122 yards and a TD. Thats about 4 additional targets/game between Jackson, Gates, Sproles, etc. I dont know, I guess I dont see this as having a HUGE impact that everyone is getting excited over.And if Floyd has additional snaps, who is he stealing targets from if you think him starting will get him more targets than Chambers was?But how many snaps/game and targets/game did he have?How much could this possibly help any WRs? Chambers had what, like 15 yards/game on average?
Exactly. I'm stashing Floyd on my bench and fine with it............The Chargers targeted WR's 18 times yesterday and Floyd got 4 targets with Chambers being in the lineup. This is also a game where Rivers only attempted 25 total passes (his lowest of the year). With Chambers gone now and Floyd starting you have to think he'll be targeted at least 4-6 times per game. The way Jackson is playing he is going to start drawing lots of doubles and top corner coverage so I have to think Floyd will see plenty of single coverage with Jackson and Gates being who they are.But how many snaps/game and targets/game did he have?How much could this possibly help any WRs? Chambers had what, like 15 yards/game on average?
With calvin's status mum and Rice on a bye this week, I will welcome the opportunity to start the WR lining up on the oppostie side of Jackson against the Giants. Everyone else has abused that secondary lately, why not Malcom?9 catches from 31 targets for 122 yards and a TD. Thats about 4 additional targets/game between Jackson, Gates, Sproles, etc. I dont know, I guess I dont see this as having a HUGE impact that everyone is getting excited over.And if Floyd has additional snaps, who is he stealing targets from if you think him starting will get him more targets than Chambers was?But how many snaps/game and targets/game did he have?How much could this possibly help any WRs? Chambers had what, like 15 yards/game on average?
The difference is that Chambers was never really that good to begin with.It's amazing how some WRs age gracefully (Mason, Driver, Owens) while others hit a wall and vanish overnight (Horn, Moulds, Chambers).
The difference is that Chambers was never really that good to begin with.It's amazing how some WRs age gracefully (Mason, Driver, Owens) while others hit a wall and vanish overnight (Horn, Moulds, Chambers).
True, Chambers really doesn't deserve to be in the same conversation with Mason, Driver, Owens, Horn and Moulds. All those guys were better players in their prime than Chambers ever was.Most of those guys are still better in their decline than Chambers was in his prime. He was one of those guys people always thought would break out, but outside of 2005 (82-1118-11) he was nothing but disappointing.The difference is that Chambers was never really that good to begin with.It's amazing how some WRs age gracefully (Mason, Driver, Owens) while others hit a wall and vanish overnight (Horn, Moulds, Chambers).True, Chambers really doesn't deserve to be in the same conversation with Mason, Driver, Owens, Horn and Moulds. All those guys were better players in their prime than Chambers ever was.
I remember at Wisconsin he had a flair for making the circus grabs but constantly dropped the easy ones.Chambers was a good guy, never any of the big problems like a lot of players, however he never lived up to his potential.He never positioned his body well and never fought for a ball, he would sit back and let the ball come to him and time and again the corner would jump it while he's sitting there waiting.d
What was the name of that movie with Robert Downey Jr.? Oh, right, Less Than Zero.what is his fantasy value?
Not much. He was the #2 wr on an offense light years ahead of KC and he did nothing. I guess he won't have as many targets as they did in SD but they also throw for probably 1/2 as many yards. Learning a new system, bad team, deteriorating talent....not a great mix.what is his fantasy value?
<hijack>I wonder who the chiefs will release to make room for him. Hmmmm...</highjack>

Ha ha...I don't think they can release him. Can they? Probably just leave him deactivated?Did he go off Waivers? So SD off the hook for like $2.5M?Will Haley threaten Bowe (or Cassell or the fans) that he will start Chambers?<hijack>I wonder who the chiefs will release to make room for him. Hmmmm...</highjack>
Yeah, pretty much. Sad that hacks like him continue to fool NFL GM's.Chris Chambers should not even be in the news....apart from one year, the guy is flat out useless. He drops more passes than anyone I have ever seen in the NFL. I would pick up Keenan Burton or Danny Amendola off the WW right now before Chris Chambers....especially when he is on the Chiefs.