I'm not sure I would be excited about any RB going to Dallas from a fantasy perspective. MBIII is clearly the starter and a "change of pace" back will have little impact in the fantasy world. Outside of an injury, I see any RB taken by Dallas as a fantasy killer. Am I wrong??He's not just fast, but explosive. His videos are hard to get a read on because everyone just takes bad angles on him constantly. But the one thing that stands out to me are the moves... he deflects his hits like Tomlinson when he lowers his shoulder. He has that last split-second decision making... you constantly see him spinning off tackles, jumping over defenders, stiff arms to tack on some more. Gotta love that balance! I just don't see many people getting any good hits on him, of course this is just the highlights. The one thing I don't like is his cutting ability. A guy with his burst would be deadly if he could change directions on a dime. Might be his downfall. I'm definitely watching to see what line he'll get to play behind. Agreed that Dallas would be an excellent fit whoever mentioned that
Barber is on the last year of his contract. Dallas isn't married to him yet.That still hangs in the balance for his fantasy value.I'm not sure I would be excited about any RB going to Dallas from a fantasy perspective. MBIII is clearly the starter and a "change of pace" back will have little impact in the fantasy world. Outside of an injury, I see any RB taken by Dallas as a fantasy killer. Am I wrong??Agreed that Dallas would be an excellent fit whoever mentioned that
I don't know if he can run between the tackles well. At least he didn't get arm tackled by 1 opponent like plenty of the other prospects.I don't like watching highlight films where the guy is returning kicks for half the plays and most of the rest are on wide sweeps.I'm always leary of speed RBs who are afraid to mix it up between the tackles. Am I wrong about Johnson?
Yeah, I agree. Also agree that he is video game fast. Continuously beating guys who looked liked they had the angle on him. It will be interesting to see where he gets drafted.I don't know if he can run between the tackles well. At least he didn't get arm tackled by 1 opponent like plenty of the other prospects.I don't like watching highlight films where the guy is returning kicks for half the plays and most of the rest are on wide sweeps.I'm always leary of speed RBs who are afraid to mix it up between the tackles. Am I wrong about Johnson?
ANALYSIS Positives: Has a compact frame with good overall muscle tone, thick chest, broad shoulders, tapered thighs and legs and room on his frame to carry at least another 10 pounds of bulk without having it affect his explosive quickness … Efficient route runner whose speed makes him a valid deep threat when lining up wide … Shows good athletic agility and vision, doing a nice job of planting and driving to reach the cutback lanes, showing excellent lateral movement and explosion … Has a superb vertical burst, staying low in his pads while showing crisp hip snap with his lateral change of direction … Patient enough to allow blocks to setup, whether carrying or returning the ball … Smart football player with good football intelligence and is effective at picking up the blitz and stunt … Shows good peripheral vision to locate even the smallest of creases and is sudden running through the holes … Knows the offense well and is capable of playing either as a receiver or halfback … Has excellent work habits and is the type that approaches practices much like a game (all business on the field) … Is more of a leader by example type than a rah-rah one, but he is good at mentoring the younger players … Tough inside runner with the leg drive and power to get physical with defenders in attempts to break tackles, despite a lack of ideal size … Takes well to hard coaching … Very decisive in his moves and has a very good feel for the cutback lanes … Has that second gear and explosion needed to accelerate vertically off cuts … Runs behind his pads with good instincts, doing a nice job of driving and spinning to get extra yards after initial contact … Runs behind pads well and has more than enough speed and quickness to reach the corner … Has good vision with quick plant and drive agility when redirecting and sets up the defender well with his stop-and-go action … The thing you notice on film is his impressive athleticism and courage, as he will not hesitate to leap over the tackler, keeping his balance while moving forward, thanks to good body lean … Does a good job of securing the ball before heading upfield … Has natural hands and good extension to catch the ball outside his framework … Used mostly on shallow crossing routes, sideline take-offs and out routes, but could possibly shift to receiver at the next level due to his explosive acceleration and ability to separate after the catch … Demonstrates good running ability on kickoff returns, as he will follow his blocks well … Has the quickness and burst in and out of his cuts to take the ball long distances, whether running, returning or catching the ball … Prior to his senior year, Johnson was considered a marginal space blocker, as he sometimes over-extended or lunged at the defender with his head down, resulting in missed blocks. But as a senior, he showed much better hand placement and punch, doing a nice job of locating the blitz and using his hands to lock on and sustain … Has also become a proficient cut blocker, taking good angles to locate and neutralize second level defenders. Negatives: Durability might be a concern with his lack of ideal size, but he shows good power and leg drive to break tackles and is not a liability taking the ball up the middle … Showed inconsistent leg churn as a runner in 2006, but it was likely due to his turf toe injury, as he ran at a lower pad level and with crisper cuts during his senior year … Needs to work on his blocking technique, as he lacks good hand placement to lock on and sustain … Shows the ability to take the plays from the chalkboard to the playing field, but had some academic struggles … When he keeps his pad level down running with the ball, he can break tackles, but when he gets too tall in his pads, he loses some of his leg drive and can be contained running between the tackles … Has shown good ball security, but has smaller-than-ideal hands (7 1/4-inches). Compares To: DAVE MEGGETT-ex-New York Giants/New England … Some compare him to Philadelphia's Brian Westbrook, but even though the Eagles runner has fine speed, he lacks that explosive second gear Johnson possesses. With his injury woes behind them, Johnson finally came into his own as a senior, as he learned to vary his speed and showed much better patience waiting for blocks to develop. He is much stronger than his size indicates, but with his outstanding timed speed he is a versatile threat who is more than capable of handling kickoff duties. With his suddenness off the line of scrimmage and hand extension ability, he also can line wide in passing situations.-------------------------------sorry, this was cut and pasted from CBS Sportslines top 100.I'm always leary of speed RBs who are afraid to mix it up between the tackles. Am I wrong about Johnson?
I think you, and many FBG's overrate this in your rb analysis- which is why many go on and on about short shuttle and three cone drill for rb's. This is not the wr position, where cornebacks will know exactly where you are going id you have bad footwork. While you need pretty lateral agility, you don't need anything like a wr. The running game is not about going sideways. Johnson's lateral agility is plenty good enough. In the NFL, you have to see the hole, hit it hard, and have the strength/agility/agility to make one guy miss. Anything after that is gravy.I still want to see better lateral agility, but he is a stronger runner than I've given him credit for.
No one will draft him to be a feature back. Tiki wasn't taken to become one. Westbrook wasn't drafted to become on. . They earned it. (MJD still isn't one, but is a great NFL and FF player.) Johnson will have to earn it by outplaying the other backs on the roster.High risk pick as a feature back.
perhaps, but if I'm creating the perfect RB, I agree with SB - better lateral agility would be a plus. Not that it would be the first thing I'd want, but it's a bonus. There's a lot of benefit, especially as we're discussing a RB who might make his impact in the passing game, to better lateral agility. He isn't ever going to be one of the best downhill runners, but he could follow in the footsteps of Westbrook, Faulk, and Tiki if he works hard enough.I think you, and many FBG's overrate this in your rb analysis- which is why many go on and on about short shuttle and three cone drill for rb's. This is not the wr position, where cornebacks will know exactly where you are going id you have bad footwork. While you need pretty lateral agility, you don't need anything like a wr. The running game is not about going sideways. Johnson's lateral agility is plenty good enough. In the NFL, you have to see the hole, hit it hard, and have the strength/agility/agility to make one guy miss. Anything after that is gravy.I still want to see better lateral agility, but he is a stronger runner than I've given him credit for.
Yeah, you're right. After I posted that I started thinking along these lines and decided he's actually LOW risk in NFL terms, as long as you get him in the 2nd or 3rd round. At worst he'll be a useful return guy/3rd down back and justify his draft position. Anything else is gravy.High risk applies only to FF - where he could be a total bust.No one will draft him to be a feature back. Tiki wasn't taken to become one. Westbrook wasn't drafted to become on. . They earned it. (MJD still isn't one, but is a great NFL and FF player.) Johnson will have to earn it by outplaying the other backs on the roster.High risk pick as a feature back.
Certainly more is better. However, if Johnson fails, it won't be because he lacks enough lateral agility. He has more than enough of that to succeed. It will be because he lacks the ability to run inside when necessary or lacks the frame to to sustain NFL punishment on a weekly basis.perhaps, but if I'm creating the perfect RB, I agree with SB - better lateral agility would be a plus. Not that it would be the first thing I'd want, but it's a bonus. There's a lot of benefit, especially as we're discussing a RB who might make his impact in the passing game, to better lateral agility. He isn't ever going to be one of the best downhill runners, but he could follow in the footsteps of Westbrook, Faulk, and Tiki if he works hard enough.I think you, and many FBG's overrate this in your rb analysis- which is why many go on and on about short shuttle and three cone drill for rb's. This is not the wr position, where cornebacks will know exactly where you are going id you have bad footwork. While you need pretty lateral agility, you don't need anything like a wr. The running game is not about going sideways. Johnson's lateral agility is plenty good enough. In the NFL, you have to see the hole, hit it hard, and have the strength/agility/agility to make one guy miss. Anything after that is gravy.I still want to see better lateral agility, but he is a stronger runner than I've given him credit for.
You're probably right, but from what I've heard, he should play more of a WR/RB role than a "normal" RB. So lacking (or just not as good) a skill we look for in WRs in more of a concern than with other RBs.Certainly more is better. However, if Johnson fails, it won't be because he lacks enough lateral agility. He has more than enough of that to succeed. It will be because he lacks the ability to run inside when necessary or lacks the frame to to sustain NFL punishment on a weekly basis.perhaps, but if I'm creating the perfect RB, I agree with SB - better lateral agility would be a plus. Not that it would be the first thing I'd want, but it's a bonus. There's a lot of benefit, especially as we're discussing a RB who might make his impact in the passing game, to better lateral agility. He isn't ever going to be one of the best downhill runners, but he could follow in the footsteps of Westbrook, Faulk, and Tiki if he works hard enough.I think you, and many FBG's overrate this in your rb analysis- which is why many go on and on about short shuttle and three cone drill for rb's. This is not the wr position, where cornebacks will know exactly where you are going id you have bad footwork. While you need pretty lateral agility, you don't need anything like a wr. The running game is not about going sideways. Johnson's lateral agility is plenty good enough. In the NFL, you have to see the hole, hit it hard, and have the strength/agility/agility to make one guy miss. Anything after that is gravy.I still want to see better lateral agility, but he is a stronger runner than I've given him credit for.
I think this is overplayed. He is 5'10 and 195. He can carry a bit more weight but he looks like a rb. Look at his thighs and his build. There aren't many wr's built like him. However, he has been used extensively in the passing game and would sometimes be split out wide on wr screens. I think that you are looking at a 10-15 carry a game back with 2-4 receptions per game by year 2, unless he sucks.You're probably right, but from what I've heard, he should play more of a WR/RB role than a "normal" RB. So lacking (or just not as good) a skill we look for in WRs in more of a concern than with other RBs.
Reggie Bush Jr.?I think this is overplayed. He is 5'10 and 195. He can carry a bit more weight but he looks like a rb. Look at his thighs and his build. There aren't many wr's built like him. However, he has been used extensively in the passing game and would sometimes be split out wide on wr screens. I think that you are looking at a 10-15 carry a game back with 2-4 receptions per game by year 2, unless he sucks.You're probably right, but from what I've heard, he should play more of a WR/RB role than a "normal" RB. So lacking (or just not as good) a skill we look for in WRs in more of a concern than with other RBs.
Reggie Bush is a very useful NFL and FF player. He doesn't produce up to his hype or his contract, but he is a useful player that would be an asset to any team. If Chris Johnson can produce at a similar level at late round 1/early round 2 salary, that would be a great inexpensive addition to any nfl team. If you could draft Reggie Bush at 1.06-1.12 in a rookie draft, you would take him in a second.Reggie Bush Jr.?I think this is overplayed. He is 5'10 and 195. He can carry a bit more weight but he looks like a rb. Look at his thighs and his build. There aren't many wr's built like him. However, he has been used extensively in the passing game and would sometimes be split out wide on wr screens. I think that you are looking at a 10-15 carry a game back with 2-4 receptions per game by year 2, unless he sucks.You're probably right, but from what I've heard, he should play more of a WR/RB role than a "normal" RB. So lacking (or just not as good) a skill we look for in WRs in more of a concern than with other RBs.
How much of a difference between the following in your opinion:6-2, 205 (McFadden)or5-10, 197 (Johnson)Which player is more undersized?197 is pretty small these days. Gotta wonder if he can handle the traffic in the middle of the line at that size. IIRC the only elite RB in the last ten years who entered the league under 200 pounds was Tiki - and he put on 5-10 pounds after getting to the NFL. That's something not every player can do, and Tiki's work ethic turned out to be Payton-esque.High risk pick as a feature back.
Reggie Bush is a very useful NFL and FF player. He doesn't produce up to his hype or his contract, but he is a useful player that would be an asset to any team. If Chris Johnson can produce at a similar level at late round 1/early round 2 salary, that would be a great inexpensive addition to any nfl team. If you could draft Reggie Bush at 1.06-1.12 in a rookie draft, you would take him in a second.Reggie Bush Jr.?I think this is overplayed. He is 5'10 and 195. He can carry a bit more weight but he looks like a rb. Look at his thighs and his build. There aren't many wr's built like him. However, he has been used extensively in the passing game and would sometimes be split out wide on wr screens. I think that you are looking at a 10-15 carry a game back with 2-4 receptions per game by year 2, unless he sucks.You're probably right, but from what I've heard, he should play more of a WR/RB role than a "normal" RB. So lacking (or just not as good) a skill we look for in WRs in more of a concern than with other RBs.
We've discussed McFadden's size many times, so you're point is well-taken, and established.How much of a difference between the following in your opinion:6-2, 205 (McFadden)or5-10, 197 (Johnson)Which player is more undersized?197 is pretty small these days. Gotta wonder if he can handle the traffic in the middle of the line at that size. IIRC the only elite RB in the last ten years who entered the league under 200 pounds was Tiki - and he put on 5-10 pounds after getting to the NFL. That's something not every player can do, and Tiki's work ethic turned out to be Payton-esque.High risk pick as a feature back.
I'll take McFadden for 20 Alex. What did I win?How much of a difference between the following in your opinion:6-2, 205 (McFadden)or5-10, 197 (Johnson)Which player is more undersized?197 is pretty small these days. Gotta wonder if he can handle the traffic in the middle of the line at that size. IIRC the only elite RB in the last ten years who entered the league under 200 pounds was Tiki - and he put on 5-10 pounds after getting to the NFL. That's something not every player can do, and Tiki's work ethic turned out to be Payton-esque.High risk pick as a feature back.
a bust at a higher pick. Congrats.I'll take McFadden for 20 Alex. What did I win?How much of a difference between the following in your opinion:6-2, 205 (McFadden)197 is pretty small these days. Gotta wonder if he can handle the traffic in the middle of the line at that size. IIRC the only elite RB in the last ten years who entered the league under 200 pounds was Tiki - and he put on 5-10 pounds after getting to the NFL. That's something not every player can do, and Tiki's work ethic turned out to be Payton-esque.
High risk pick as a feature back.
or
5-10, 197 (Johnson)
Which player is more undersized?
you should probably watch an episode of Jeopardy before you make a reference to it.I'll take McFadden for 20 Alex. What did I win?How much of a difference between the following in your opinion:6-2, 205 (McFadden)or5-10, 197 (Johnson)Which player is more undersized?197 is pretty small these days. Gotta wonder if he can handle the traffic in the middle of the line at that size. IIRC the only elite RB in the last ten years who entered the league under 200 pounds was Tiki - and he put on 5-10 pounds after getting to the NFL. That's something not every player can do, and Tiki's work ethic turned out to be Payton-esque.High risk pick as a feature back.
Sorry, don't have the time. Busy watching tapes of rooks. So how should I have worded said answer?you should probably watch an episode of Jeopardy before you make a reference to it.I'll take McFadden for 20 Alex. What did I win?How much of a difference between the following in your opinion:6-2, 205 (McFadden)or5-10, 197 (Johnson)Which player is more undersized?197 is pretty small these days. Gotta wonder if he can handle the traffic in the middle of the line at that size. IIRC the only elite RB in the last ten years who entered the league under 200 pounds was Tiki - and he put on 5-10 pounds after getting to the NFL. That's something not every player can do, and Tiki's work ethic turned out to be Payton-esque.High risk pick as a feature back.
I'm with rabidfire. My gut has told me for a couple years that we make a pretty substantial error emphasizing lateral agility as an important feature in an NFL RB. Seriously. It's been bugging me since watching Reggie Bush struggle so much in the NFL after he laterally agilitized the NCAA to death. Vertical is better than horizontal. It's why I like McFadden so much more than Mendenhall and Stewart that I keep him in a higher tier. Like Johnson in those highlights, McFadden gets right on down the field with very little wasted movement. But don't shortchange either back because they don't slow down to fake someone out when they can blow right by with a little stutter step or less. In the NFL you're better off trying blow by than fake around.Certainly more is better. However, if Johnson fails, it won't be because he lacks enough lateral agility. He has more than enough of that to succeed. It will be because he lacks the ability to run inside when necessary or lacks the frame to to sustain NFL punishment on a weekly basis.perhaps, but if I'm creating the perfect RB, I agree with SB - better lateral agility would be a plus. Not that it would be the first thing I'd want, but it's a bonus. There's a lot of benefit, especially as we're discussing a RB who might make his impact in the passing game, to better lateral agility. He isn't ever going to be one of the best downhill runners, but he could follow in the footsteps of Westbrook, Faulk, and Tiki if he works hard enough.I think you, and many FBG's overrate this in your rb analysis- which is why many go on and on about short shuttle and three cone drill for rb's. This is not the wr position, where cornebacks will know exactly where you are going id you have bad footwork. While you need pretty lateral agility, you don't need anything like a wr. The running game is not about going sideways. Johnson's lateral agility is plenty good enough. In the NFL, you have to see the hole, hit it hard, and have the strength/agility/agility to make one guy miss. Anything after that is gravy.I still want to see better lateral agility, but he is a stronger runner than I've given him credit for.
It makes me happy too. If the story posted somewhere around here explaining his low production days, johnny-come-lately emergence and once pathetic ypc, is correct, then Chris Johnson is a big time NFL talent. I stayed up late reviewing these backs again and... from the above perspective.New rankings:He's not really underrated, that video just makes me happy.
Well, if you took Tatum Bell, made him a bit faster, a willing and able inside runner with fantastic hands and route running ability, and added a great work ethic on a stronger frame with better balance, you'd have Chris Johnson. As for pass protection, who knows, but it is typically an area of concern for most rookie backs. The dedicated seem to overcome it. I think Johnson can do that.CC, folks think Johnson's upside (with everything going right) is Westbrook, but how would you compare him to the likes of Tatum Bell? Both worked their way up the list because of speed, but Bell's shortcomings are nice and fresh in our minds. We won't know if Johnson can handle the rigors of the NFL until its happening, but can we determine in the now how coachable he is? Is he a detriment in pass protection?