What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Chris Wesseling Dynasty Rank: Tight Ends (1 Viewer)

JohnnyU

Footballguy
There is already an open DataReader associated with this Connection which must be closed first. PRINTER FRIENDLY Dynasty Rankings Archives The Top-35 Tight Ends conclude of our season-ending Dynasty rankings series. For earlier installments, see the following:Top-50 QuarterbacksTop-65 Running BacksTop-90 Wide ReceiversTight EndsTier One1. Antonio Gates, Chargers | Age: 30.3 – After an injured-filled disappointing 2008, Gates returned to the elite same elite player he was from 2004 through 2007. Though 2009 wasn't his best fantasy season thanks to a mediocre touchdown total, it was Gates' best NFL season. He's earned the No. 1 spot going into 2010.2. Jermichael Finley, Packers | Age: 23.6 – A physical mismatch for linebackers and safeties, the fast-rising Finley is drawing comparisons to a young Tony Gonzalez as the Packers' biggest matchup problem. His catch rate was behind only Jason Witten among tight ends, and he was flat-out uncoverable at times late in the season. An incredible athlete, the 23-year-old has the advantage of playing with the brightest young quarterback in the league.3. Jason Witten, Cowboys | Age: 28.4 – You could make the argument that Witten is due for a healthy bounce-back in touchdowns next season, but he's now had four TDs or less in three of the past four seasons. While he's still a lock for 85 catches and 900+ yards, the Cowboys just have too many other quality options at the goal-line.4. Dallas Clark, Colts | Age: 31.3 – The good news is that Clark's 100 receptions were the second-most in history for a tight end, behind only Tony Gonzalez's 102 in 2004. The bad news is that Clark will be 31-years-old entering the 2010 season. 5. Vernon Davis, 49ers | Age: 26.8 – Finally making good on his freakish talent, Davis was a playmaking monster all over the field once Alex Smith took over as quarterback. The two have obvious chemistry, which is a slight problem as Smith hardly inspires confidence as the solution to the Niners' QB problems.Tier Two6. Brent Celek, Eagles | Age: 25.8 – Celek is steadily improving as a blocker, but it's his speed and after-the-catch ability that sets him apart. The six-year, $33 million extension guarantees the he remains a top option in the Philly passing game for years to come. 7. Kellen Winslow, Buccaneers | Age: 27.2 – Rookie Josh Freeman was surprisingly good for Winslow's value. The tight end is now the focal point of the Bucs passing offense, though that could change if the Bucs reel in a legit No. 1 receiver this offseason.8. Owen Daniels, Texans | Age: 27.10 – Daniels was basically used as the Texans' No. 2 receiver behind Andre Johnson before he suffered the third ACL injury of his career last season. The injury ruins his chances of signing a monster contract with the Texans this offseason, but at least he'll return to a Gary Kubiak offense in 2010. 9. Zach Miller, Raiders | Age: 24.9 – Did you buy low late in the season? Miller continues to impress as the one member of the Raiders offense who can produce despite shoddy quarterback play. He should knock on the door to the Top-5 if the Raiders finally unearth a legit NFL passer.10. Chris Cooley, Redskins | Age: 28.2 – A trade chip for Mike Shanahan? Fred Davis played well down the stretch, and the new regime in D.C. would welcome the opportunity to land more draft picks. 11. Greg Olsen, Bears | Age: 25.6 – Couldn't make the leap in 2009 despite even while playing alongside an underwhelming group of wide receivers. As Vernon Davis can attest, Olsen would be screwed if Mike Martz somehow lands the offensive coordinator job. Tier Three12. Dustin Keller, Jets | Age: 26.0 – Keller's nice playoff run illustrated his solid hands, good route running, red-zone presence, and impressive after-the-catch ability. Keller has one thing keeping him from every-week stud status: he can't run block on a team that prides itself on a "ground and pound" attack.13. Tony Gonzalez, Falcons | Age: 34.7 – Still elite but the best tight end of all time is another year closer to the end, turning 34 in February. Shannon Sharpe is the only tight end in history to record a 500-yard season at Gonzalez's age.14. Heath Miller, Steelers | Age: 27.11 – Was 2009 the start of a trend or simply a career year? I'd lean toward the former with the Steelers' owner and head coach making it clear that re-establishing the running game is the No. 1 offensive priority in 2010.15. John Carlson, Seahawks | Age: 26.4 – According to then-coach Jim Mora, Carlson had trouble clearing linebackers at the second level. That, and staying in to block, killed his fantasy value in 2009.16. Tony Scheffler, Broncos | Age: 27.7 - Still among the most effective pass-catching tight ends in the league, Scheffler wass simply under-utilized in Josh McDaniels' offense. The Vernon Davis lesson should teach Dynasty leaguers not to sleep on a talented tight end coming out of a bad situation. Scheffler is fully expected to be dealt this offseason, and that's all he needs to regain weekly fantasy relevance.Tier Four17. Visanthe Shiancoe, Vikings | Age: 30.3 – Similar to Sidney Rice, Shiancoe's value is highly dependent on the return of Brett Favre. Due to reach the age-30 mark this summer, he's not much of an asset outside the red zone.18. Jared Cook, Titans | Age: 23.5 – Freakishly talented receiver/tight end hybrid should see a dramatic increase in playing time with Bo Scaife's Titans future in question. Part of an interesting collection of emerging young talent in Tennessee with Chris Johnson, Vince Young, and Kenny Britt.19. Brandon Pettigrew, Lions | Age: 25.7 – Just when he was starting to show serious promise, the No. 20 overall pick tore his ACL. Reports out of Detroit indicate he could begin the 2010 season on the PUP list.20. Fred Davis, Redskins | Age: 24.8 – Not on Chris Cooley's level yet as an all-around player, but he's proven to be a more effective red-zone weapon. Davis has earned an increase in snaps for 2010, but his fantasy value is entirely dependant on a Cooley trade.21. Martellus Bennett, Cowboys | Age: 23.6 – The ultra-talented second fiddle took a step back in 2009, losing snaps to John Philips down the stretch in a penalty-filled season. Bennett has the ability to be a fantasy stud, but he's nothing more than a roster decoration for the next couple of seasons.Tier Five22. Kevin Boss, Giants | Age: 26.8 – Dynasty owners couldn't give him away at mid-season, but Boss finished as a rock-solid TE2 with a career season.23. Marcedes Lewis, Jaguars | Age: 26.4 – Lewis is a frustrating player to own because he has the athleticism, size, and now the elite blocking ability. On the flip side, his hands are inconsistent and speedy Zach Miller threatens to steal passing-down snaps going forward.24. Jeremy Shockey, Saints | Age: 30.1 – Constantly battling through nagging injuries, Shockey is no longer a weekly starting option. Wait for him to open the season strong, and then deal him before the injuries start to kick in.25. Todd Heap, Ravens | Age: 30.6 – See Shockey's comments.26. Ben Watson, Patriots | Age: 29.9 – Watson finished No. 1 in footballoutsiders.com's DVOA rankings, but the Patriots are fully expected to let him walk. He's in dire need of a fresh start elsewhere.Tier Six27. Evan Moore, Browns | Age: 25.8 – A 6'6, 247-pound former basketball player and wide receiver at Stanford, Moore flashed soft hands and impressive athleticism down the stretch. He's an ideal roster stash/flier.28. Gary Barnidge, Panthers | Age: 25.0 – My favorite deep sleeper at tight end, Barnidge has 4.6 speed and soft hands. Behind Steve Smith, he's the best pass-catching option on the team.29. Zach Miller, Jaguars | Age: 25.11 – Another fine roster stash, Miller is a former quarterback who flashed impressive speed and solid hands in a 15-catch December.30. David Thomas, Saints | Age: 27.2 – Thomas filled in beautifully in the Billy Miller down the stretch, but his fantasy value revolves around Shockey's health.31. Bo Scaife, Titans | Age: 29.8 – Scaife's yardage numbers aren't bad, but he's one of the least effective per-play tight ends in the league. Unlikely to be brought back in Tennessee at a $5.91 million tender offer, he'll struggle to find a starting job on the open market. 32. Shawn Nelson, Bills | Age: 24.11 – One of the league's least effective tight ends in footballoutsiders' metrics, Nelson deserves a mulligan in the Bills' lifeless offense. 33. James Casey, Texans | Age: 26.0 – Had an opportunity in the second half with Daniels' ACL injury, but he ended up riding the pine behind Joel Dreessen.34. Anthony Fasano, Dolphins | Age: 26.5 – Coming off an awful season in 2009. Where's the upside?35. Tie: Chase Coffman, Bengals | Age: 23.10 / Cornelius Ingram, Eagles | Age: 25.3 – Both players are young, athletic pass-catchers with loads of potential and checkered injury histories.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When I spent my entire $1000.00 BB waiver on Finley at the beginning of last season, everyone thought I was crazy (I did too), but it looks like it could really payoff.

:patsselfonback:

;)

 
Love Finley's upside but i couldnt take him above Witten or Vernon right now. Would need to see more.
:rolleyes: Those were my initial thoughts as well.
Ummm.....U wouldnt need to see more out of Vernon? considering he only had one good year....If you need to see more out of Finley, I suggest you take a football 101 class on talent!Or just watch the Playoff game between the Pack and Cards this year!I would take Finley as the #1 TE in a Dynasty base on pure Size and Upside....oh and the fact no one could cover him!
 
Love Finley's upside but i couldnt take him above Witten or Vernon right now. Would need to see more.
:rolleyes: Those were my initial thoughts as well.
Ummm.....U wouldnt need to see more out of Vernon? considering he only had one good year....If you need to see more out of Finley, I suggest you take a football 101 class on talent!Or just watch the Playoff game between the Pack and Cards this year!I would take Finley as the #1 TE in a Dynasty base on pure Size and Upside....oh and the fact no one could cover him!
His one good year was 1000 yards and 13 TDs. Considering he was also a top 10 draft pick, ive seen enough. Finley not yet to put him that high. Im sure you'll give me a smartass comment back though.
 
Love Finley's upside but i couldnt take him above Witten or Vernon right now. Would need to see more.
:rolleyes: Those were my initial thoughts as well.
Ummm.....U wouldnt need to see more out of Vernon? considering he only had one good year....If you need to see more out of Finley, I suggest you take a football 101 class on talent!Or just watch the Playoff game between the Pack and Cards this year!I would take Finley as the #1 TE in a Dynasty base on pure Size and Upside....oh and the fact no one could cover him!
His one good year was 1000 yards and 13 TDs. Considering he was also a top 10 draft pick, ive seen enough. Finley not yet to put him that high. Im sure you'll give me a smartass comment back though.
At least you know what to expect?What did Vernon do the few years prior? I could post but i'm sure you can figure it out!P.S. --- Finleys situation is better? No? I mean this is dynasty and Finley is younger with a stud QB, not a bum Smith.Full disclosure I have both Finley and Davis on my squad in my big dynasty league!
 
Love Finley's upside but i couldnt take him above Witten or Vernon right now. Would need to see more.
:popcorn: Those were my initial thoughts as well.
Ummm.....U wouldnt need to see more out of Vernon? considering he only had one good year....If you need to see more out of Finley, I suggest you take a football 101 class on talent!Or just watch the Playoff game between the Pack and Cards this year!I would take Finley as the #1 TE in a Dynasty base on pure Size and Upside....oh and the fact no one could cover him!
His one good year was 1000 yards and 13 TDs. Considering he was also a top 10 draft pick, ive seen enough. Finley not yet to put him that high. Im sure you'll give me a smartass comment back though.
At least you know what to expect?What did Vernon do the few years prior? I could post but i'm sure you can figure it out!P.S. --- Finleys situation is better? No? I mean this is dynasty and Finley is younger with a stud QB, not a bum Smith.Full disclosure I have both Finley and Davis on my squad in my big dynasty league!
Put Martz with Finley and we'll see how he does. Not sure if Finley's situation is better or not. You don't always need a top QB to put up top numbers as a TE. Look at Gonzo in KC. You just need a system that favors throwing to the TE. Age doesnt really matter in this situation imo, Vernon is 26, Finley is 23. Unless you're looking 8 years out who cares. I'll take the guy who has already proven he can put up big numbers over the course of an entire season.
 
Vernon's problems went well beyond Martz. Martz mattered as well, but Vernon was not the player then that he seems to be now. Mr. Singletary looks to be exactly what he needed.

Finley is a risk due to the limited time we have seen him succeed, but the guy looks VERY good. I wouldn't blame anybody for taking any of the other top TEs before Finley, but Finley has the elite athleticism and situation to be a major force for a long time. I got him off of the waiver wire before last season in both my dynasty leagues, and i frankly wouldn't trade him for any other TE, I like what I have seen that much... but I have a higher risk tolerance than many people.

 
Didn't we have this thread already? Or was it a different ranking that had Finley high? Either way there's no way I draft him ahead of Witten just yet. He might be awesome or he might be just another overpriced guy with potential. I go after these guys before they're big, or I won't go after them at all.

FWIW, I'm going after Cook. Pair him with Gonzo or another older stud and you'll be set.

 
Didn't we have this thread already? Or was it a different ranking that had Finley high? Either way there's no way I draft him ahead of Witten just yet. He might be awesome or he might be just another overpriced guy with potential. I go after these guys before they're big, or I won't go after them at all.

FWIW, I'm going after Cook. Pair him with Gonzo or another older stud and you'll be set.
No, we haven't had this thread until today. There are other threads with a lot of Finley, but this one is Chris Wesseling's dynasty te rankings.
 
fruity pebbles said:
JuSt CuZ said:
mikel2014 said:
fruity pebbles said:
Love Finley's upside but i couldnt take him above Witten or Vernon right now. Would need to see more.
:X Those were my initial thoughts as well.
Ummm.....U wouldnt need to see more out of Vernon? considering he only had one good year....If you need to see more out of Finley, I suggest you take a football 101 class on talent!Or just watch the Playoff game between the Pack and Cards this year!I would take Finley as the #1 TE in a Dynasty base on pure Size and Upside....oh and the fact no one could cover him!
His one good year was 1000 yards and 13 TDs. Considering he was also a top 10 draft pick, ive seen enough. Finley not yet to put him that high. Im sure you'll give me a smartass comment back though.
I have to agree with Fruity Pebbles. That's no knock on Finley either, but he hasn't shown as much. One or two great playoff games should not be overweighted, but it happens every year.
 
LHUCKS said:
Gates is much too high from a dynasty perspective...age is catching up with him.
I don't see any evidence of "age catching up with him." I don't see any reason to think that he can't continue to produce as he has for at least three or four more years, much like Gonzo.
 
LHUCKS said:
Gates is much too high from a dynasty perspective...age is catching up with him.
I don't see any evidence of "age catching up with him." I don't see any reason to think that he can't continue to produce as he has for at least three or four more years, much like Gonzo.
for starters, he'll be 30 years old soon. Secondly, his 2008 was injury plagued.No way I would trade Vernon Davis for him straight up...not even close.this list is terrible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really, it is about how much risk/reward chance you want to take. Finley has a less proven track record but is also much younger than the rest and this is dynasty rankings.

I have seen enough Packer games for me to be willing to take a risk on Finley as my TE#1 in dynasty.

 
JohnnyU said:
FUBAR said:
Didn't we have this thread already? Or was it a different ranking that had Finley high? Either way there's no way I draft him ahead of Witten just yet. He might be awesome or he might be just another overpriced guy with potential. I go after these guys before they're big, or I won't go after them at all.

FWIW, I'm going after Cook. Pair him with Gonzo or another older stud and you'll be set.
No, we haven't had this thread until today. There are other threads with a lot of Finley, but this one is Chris Wesseling's dynasty te rankings.
I was joking, but we're seeing the same discussion points from Jeter's
 
Really, it is about how much risk/reward chance you want to take. Finley has a less proven track record but is also much younger than the rest and this is dynasty rankings.I have seen enough Packer games for me to be willing to take a risk on Finley as my TE#1 in dynasty.
I'd have no problem with him being my #1 but the only TE I'm taking in the first handful of rounds is Witten.
 
LHUCKS said:
Gates is much too high from a dynasty perspective...age is catching up with him.
I don't see any evidence of "age catching up with him." I don't see any reason to think that he can't continue to produce as he has for at least three or four more years, much like Gonzo.
for starters, he'll be 30 years old soon. Secondly, his 2008 was injury plagued.No way I would trade Vernon Davis for him straight up...not even close.this list is terrible.
FYI, 30 isn't old for TEs. Quit applying the 30 yr old RB theory on TEs.
 
LHUCKS said:
Gates is much too high from a dynasty perspective...age is catching up with him.
I don't see any evidence of "age catching up with him." I don't see any reason to think that he can't continue to produce as he has for at least three or four more years, much like Gonzo.
for starters, he'll be 30 years old soon. Secondly, his 2008 was injury plagued.No way I would trade Vernon Davis for him straight up...not even close.this list is terrible.
FYI, 30 isn't old for TEs. Quit applying the 30 yr old RB theory on TEs.
:goodposting: he's 4 years younger than a highly productive Gonzo. you have 4-5 years with him.
 
I have to agree with Fruity Pebbles. That's no knock on Finley either, but he hasn't shown as much. One or two great playoff games should not be overweighted, but it happens every year.
Finley was injured in the Week 7 game and missed the next 3 games. In Weeks 11 through 17 he had 50 targets, 38 receptions, 425 yards, and 4 touchdowns.Its not a full season of great production, never mind a couple seasons worth, but the hype surrounding Finley didnt start with the playoff game against Arizona.
 
LHUCKS said:
Gates is much too high from a dynasty perspective...age is catching up with him.
I don't see any evidence of "age catching up with him." I don't see any reason to think that he can't continue to produce as he has for at least three or four more years, much like Gonzo.
for starters, he'll be 30 years old soon. Secondly, his 2008 was injury plagued.No way I would trade Vernon Davis for him straight up...not even close.this list is terrible.
Even in 2008 when you say he was "injury plagued," he was the fourth best fantasy TE and didn't miss a game. What makes me feel confident is his consistency and his ability to play and be productive even when he has suffered nagging injuries. Six of his seven years he has been a top four TE. In seven years he has missed only three games, one game a year in each of his FIRST three. He could suffer a broken leg or ACL like any player but I just don't see evidence of him slowing down with age yet.
 
:goodposting: he's 4 years younger than a highly productive Gonzo. you have 4-5 years with him.
Gonzo is the norm now?oh boy
No, but neither is being 30 the graveyard for TEs. You should know this.
It's damn near close. Todd Heap is closer to the norm than Gonzo for Pro Bowl TE career progression.
Heap is a good player but he isn't in the same class as Gates and Gonzo. He has had three years that are CLOSE to Gates type production, but they would have been considered bad years for Gates. His year to year production over his whole career has been much less consistent; you can't compare Heap's career trajectory to Gates.Moreover, he has had two years where he suffered serious injuries and missed significant time.
 
Heap is a good player but he isn't in the same class as Gates and Gonzo. He has had three years that are CLOSE to Gates type production, but they would have been considered bad years for Gates. His year to year production over his whole career has been much less consistent; you can't compare Heap's career trajectory to Gates.
Comparing production is really a faulty approach. I think you really just need to look at a typical perennial Pro Bowler career progression. They peak in the second half of their 20s and fall off a cliff in the their early 30s.Gates is much riskier than perceived.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:shrug: he's 4 years younger than a highly productive Gonzo. you have 4-5 years with him.
Gonzo is the norm now?oh boy
No, but neither is being 30 the graveyard for TEs. You should know this.
It's damn near close. Todd Heap is closer to the norm than Gonzo for Pro Bowl TE career progression.
Gates is not the normal TE. Sharpe was also highly productive to age 35. Those two are Gates peers, not Heap.
 
:goodposting: he's 4 years younger than a highly productive Gonzo. you have 4-5 years with him.
Gonzo is the norm now?oh boy
No, but neither is being 30 the graveyard for TEs. You should know this.
It's damn near close. Todd Heap is closer to the norm than Gonzo for Pro Bowl TE career progression.
There's been plenty of productive TEs well into their 30s. Your statement has no merit.
 
As far as age is concerned, i think we are getting into uncharted waters. We all know the TE positions has changed with many large WR/TE guys at TE pulling in great numbers. Sharpe was the first of the breed and is often used as the standard, yet Gonzo only needs a measly 500 yards to be the second guy to accomplish what Shapre did at his age?? I would take the over on that any day...What I am getting at is that these guys are not built like Ben Coates anymore (big, burly guys with decent hands). They are just big WRs and need to be treated as such. Sure, some will break down early like Shockey, but God knows he does not take care of himself (I believe 10 months ago he was rushed to a hospital because he passed out at a Vegas pool). Gates should be where he is because we do not know anything different (as far as age is concerned). What we do know is that he was TE #1 and should be treated as such. This is different from when Curtis Martin led the league in yards...you could just tell the wheels were gonna come off on that one.

 
As far as age is concerned, i think we are getting into uncharted waters. We all know the TE positions has changed with many large WR/TE guys at TE pulling in great numbers. Sharpe was the first of the breed and is often used as the standard, yet Gonzo only needs a measly 500 yards to be the second guy to accomplish what Shapre did at his age?? I would take the over on that any day...What I am getting at is that these guys are not built like Ben Coates anymore (big, burly guys with decent hands). They are just big WRs and need to be treated as such. Sure, some will break down early like Shockey, but God knows he does not take care of himself (I believe 10 months ago he was rushed to a hospital because he passed out at a Vegas pool). Gates should be where he is because we do not know anything different (as far as age is concerned). What we do know is that he was TE #1 and should be treated as such. This is different from when Curtis Martin led the league in yards...you could just tell the wheels were gonna come off on that one.
Here's a hint...the wheels are going to fall off in at least five years...probably a lot sooner than that in terms of tier one TE production.Ridiculous responses in this thread.
 
As far as age is concerned, i think we are getting into uncharted waters. We all know the TE positions has changed with many large WR/TE guys at TE pulling in great numbers. Sharpe was the first of the breed and is often used as the standard, yet Gonzo only needs a measly 500 yards to be the second guy to accomplish what Shapre did at his age?? I would take the over on that any day...What I am getting at is that these guys are not built like Ben Coates anymore (big, burly guys with decent hands). They are just big WRs and need to be treated as such. Sure, some will break down early like Shockey, but God knows he does not take care of himself (I believe 10 months ago he was rushed to a hospital because he passed out at a Vegas pool). Gates should be where he is because we do not know anything different (as far as age is concerned). What we do know is that he was TE #1 and should be treated as such. This is different from when Curtis Martin led the league in yards...you could just tell the wheels were gonna come off on that one.
Here's a hint...the wheels are going to fall off in at least five years...probably a lot sooner than that in terms of tier one TE production.Ridiculous responses in this thread.
I guess that depends on how you view value in terms of dynasty. Personally, in keepers and dynasty, I don't look more than a few years down the road. Sure there are exceptions, but last year many thought Fitz would be a WR 1-3 overall for years to come. The inevitable hit and now Warner has retired and although you are the "Matt Leinert fan boy" on the board, you have to admit that his numbers will take a hit. Whether that drops him from #1 overall, who knows?!?...but to say it is silly to just go with Gates is ridiculous unless you have a rule in your league that you can't trade. Going into 2009, my guess is that consensus (what really is consensus) most likely had ADP, Fitz and Brady as tops in Dynasty. Going into 2010, most likely all will be removed from the #1 overall spot.
 
Here's a hint...the wheels are going to fall off in at least five years...probably a lot sooner than that in terms of tier one TE production.Ridiculous responses in this thread.
indeed. How far out do you look? I'm pretty sure I can find a replacement in 5 years. At least as sure as I am that I'll still be playing this game.
 
The main thing that concerns me when ranking 30+ year olds this high is their trade value. If you plan on keeping him until the wheels fall off i can see it but just know that their trade value can only go down from here

 
LHUCKS said:
Gates is much too high from a dynasty perspective...age is catching up with him.
I don't see any evidence of "age catching up with him." I don't see any reason to think that he can't continue to produce as he has for at least three or four more years, much like Gonzo.
for starters, he'll be 30 years old soon. Secondly, his 2008 was injury plagued.No way I would trade Vernon Davis for him straight up...not even close.this list is terrible.
FYI, 30 isn't old for TEs. Quit applying the 30 yr old RB theory on TEs.
Actually gianmarco did a study that showed there's a serious dropoff for TE production once they reach 31 years of age. Of course the elite talents like Gonzo and Sharpe were able to still produce well past that age, and most would put Gates in the elite category so he should be an exception as well, but its something to consider.
 
Actually gianmarco did a study that showed there's a serious dropoff for TE production once they reach 31 years of age. Of course the elite talents like Gonzo and Sharpe were able to still produce well past that age, and most would put Gates in the elite category so he should be an exception as well, but its something to consider.
I don't know how much credence I'd give to historical aging patterns of TEs. This new crop of TEs is unlike the TEs of the past. I'd expect Gates/Gonzo/Sharpe/Keller/Witten/Scheffler/etc to age more like WRs than like TEs from the '80s.
 
Actually gianmarco did a study that showed there's a serious dropoff for TE production once they reach 31 years of age. Of course the elite talents like Gonzo and Sharpe were able to still produce well past that age, and most would put Gates in the elite category so he should be an exception as well, but its something to consider.
I don't know how much credence I'd give to historical aging patterns of TEs. This new crop of TEs is unlike the TEs of the past. I'd expect Gates/Gonzo/Sharpe/Keller/Witten/Scheffler/etc to age more like WRs than like TEs from the '80s.
I think that previously TEs were kind of like catchers in baseball in that they wore down because of the constant grind of physical play over and over again. Some of these guys and I include Gates in this category are more slot receivers who chip block if at all on most plays and don't have the physical abuse that TEs have had in the past. That and advances in medicine lead me to believe that this group of TEs will likely not only play longer but be productive longer.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top