Idk that one pick was pretty badAll seriousness, I think Tannehill is arguably playing better than Burrow.
Being a contrarian with hot takes makes one just that: a contrarian with hot takes.All seriousness, I think Tannehill is arguably playing better than Burrow.
lol noAll seriousness, I think Tannehill is arguably playing better than Burrow.
70 yards of sacks is every bit as bad as 2 INT's.
100% disagree. I'd say at least 75% on solely on Burrow.Depends on how much of the sack you put in the quarterback's hands. There's work being done on that, but it's largely a function of his line today, not Burrow.
Simmons it is.What happens here. Chase puts on a clinic or Simmons?
Only 1-2 were on Burrow I think60 yards of sacks is every bit as bad as 2 INT's.
Agreed, but Burrow needs to be aware of that and throw it away.Green is right. Part of the sack problem is play design.
That's what I was thinking. Slow-developing plays. Burrow bears some responsibility. But he's not having as bad a game as Tannehill. All Tannehill had to do was not turn the ball over and they'd likely have won.Green is right. Part of the sack problem is play design.
Only 1-2 were on Burrow I think
The Tight End seems to be open every playIs Cinci really calling nothing underneath? Talk about tone deaf.
Dude, we get it. You thought Tannehill was better than Dak and are going to spend the rest of the thread defending him. But they've both stunk on a national stage today. Roll with it. Your boy is average at best.Agreed, but Burrow needs to be aware of that and throw it away.
You can't throw it away if you are right in the middle of the pocket.Agreed, but Burrow needs to be aware of that and throw it away.
You can't throw it away if you are right in the middle of the pocket.