How did Coleman lose his job? We have no idea how things will be once he returns.I'd much rather have him than Coleman, who is injured and lost his job. CJ is banged up but has his job.
I'm not sure how Freeman can be a 3 down RB but Hillman can't. If it's because of size Forsett was a 3 down RB for Kubiak last year and he weighs the same as Hillman. All that matters to Kubiak is who's getting the job done.I don't get the Coleman comparison at all. Very different situations.
Coleman is a rookie who has not had a clear path to being a workhorse at any point yet and FWIW is current #2 on the teams depth chart. CJA's is a top of the depth chart and his coach has stated publically that he wants him to stay in the game more.
Their competition is different as well. Freeman is a more viable 3 down RB than Hillman and is a much bigger threat to Coleman's touches than Hillman is to CJA's at this point in time.
Could have swore I clicked on the CJ Anderson thread.I'm not sure how Freeman can be a 3 down RB but Hillman can't. If it's because of size Forsett was a 3 down RB for Kubiak last year and he weighs the same as Hillman. All that matters to Kubiak is who's getting the job done.Coleman was very much going to be the workhorse before he got hurt. He was announced the starter before week 1 and got 58% of snaps to Freeman's 36%. In week 2 he was out touching Freeman 9:3 before he got hurt.I don't get the Coleman comparison at all. Very different situations.
Coleman is a rookie who has not had a clear path to being a workhorse at any point yet and FWIW is current #2 on the teams depth chart. CJA's is a top of the depth chart and his coach has stated publically that he wants him to stay in the game more.
Their competition is different as well. Freeman is a more viable 3 down RB than Hillman and is a much bigger threat to Coleman's touches than Hillman is to CJA's at this point in time.
I took hillman just as protection for CJ. I never thought he could be a full time RB. But I am changing my mind a little after seeing the two of them play. And you make a good point with Forsett. Of course last year I never thought he could be the guy.I'm not sure how Freeman can be a 3 down RB but Hillman can't. If it's because of size Forsett was a 3 down RB for Kubiak last year and he weighs the same as Hillman. All that matters to Kubiak is who's getting the job done.Coleman was very much going to be the workhorse before he got hurt. He was announced the starter before week 1 and got 58% of snaps to Freeman's 36%. In week 2 he was out touching Freeman 9:3 before he got hurt.I don't get the Coleman comparison at all. Very different situations.
Coleman is a rookie who has not had a clear path to being a workhorse at any point yet and FWIW is current #2 on the teams depth chart. CJA's is a top of the depth chart and his coach has stated publically that he wants him to stay in the game more.
Their competition is different as well. Freeman is a more viable 3 down RB than Hillman and is a much bigger threat to Coleman's touches than Hillman is to CJA's at this point in time.
they have a guy who was a healthy scratch pretty much all year last year, was a healthy scratch last week, and iirc was consistently worked by AZ's depth players in the 2nd half of the 4th preseason game this year starting at RT tomorrow. And a guy who isn't a LT playing LT tomorrow. And the OL has already been bad without these changes.Call it a gut feeling but I think he has a decent game this week. Minnesota has been better against the run since they get gashed week one but they can't score. I can see manning getting them ahead and with that defense, Minnesota having a hard time scoring. I'm tempted to roll him out over Randle this week...
I wonder why Denver hasn't been searching FA's for some experienced O-line guys. It's obvious to everyone that they need help upfront. Must just be content to ride this wave til midseason expecting improvement.they have a guy who was a healthy scratch pretty much all year last year, was a healthy scratch last week, and iirc was consistently worked by AZ's depth players in the 2nd half of the 4th preseason game this year starting at RT tomorrow. And a guy who isn't a LT playing LT tomorrow. And the OL has already been bad without these changes.I'm going to guess tomorrow is not going to be the day anyone in Denver's running game breaks out.Call it a gut feeling but I think he has a decent game this week. Minnesota has been better against the run since they get gashed week one but they can't score. I can see manning getting them ahead and with that defense, Minnesota having a hard time scoring. I'm tempted to roll him out over Randle this week...
Other then the fact Hillman is a terrible blocker.addicted2ff said:I'm not sure how Freeman can be a 3 down RB but Hillman can't. If it's because of size Forsett was a 3 down RB for Kubiak last year and he weighs the same as Hillman. All that matters to Kubiak is who's getting the job done.VaTerp said:I don't get the Coleman comparison at all. Very different situations.
Coleman is a rookie who has not had a clear path to being a workhorse at any point yet and FWIW is current #2 on the teams depth chart. CJA's is a top of the depth chart and his coach has stated publically that he wants him to stay in the game more.
Their competition is different as well. Freeman is a more viable 3 down RB than Hillman and is a much bigger threat to Coleman's touches than Hillman is to CJA's at this point in time.
Coleman was very much going to be the workhorse before he got hurt. He was announced the starter before week 1 and got 58% of snaps to Freeman's 36%. In week 2 he was out touching Freeman 9:3 before he got hurt.
The line has been awful, but I don't think that's why CJ is banged up. Anderson does not have a great deal of raw talent, imo. What he does have is a lot of heart, and that drives him to play over his head, and frankly, beyond his talent level - Being a stud does not come easily or naturally to Anderson.His 110% effort causes him to suffer a lot of lower body injuries. He had problems with his ankles during his impressive run last season as well. Even if CJ starts playing well, and holds off Hillman or Juwan, he will likely spend a lot of time on the injury report throughout the season.ATB said:I just don't see CJ being fully healthy until after bye week. He's been nicked up in every game, as his coach says. And that isn't going to change behind such an awful O-line.
Quality linemen don't grow on trees. Almost anyone of use is already rostered. They could try to swing a trade, but good luck getting another team to part with a competent lineman. Even if they could plug a stud tackle or guard into the line he would need time to gel with the others. A quality O-Line needs to function as a single cohesive unit.ATB said:I wonder why Denver hasn't been searching FA's for some experienced O-line guys. It's obvious to everyone that they need help upfront. Must just be content to ride this wave til midseason expecting improvement.Buffaloes said:they have a guy who was a healthy scratch pretty much all year last year, was a healthy scratch last week, and iirc was consistently worked by AZ's depth players in the 2nd half of the 4th preseason game this year starting at RT tomorrow. And a guy who isn't a LT playing LT tomorrow. And the OL has already been bad without these changes.I'm going to guess tomorrow is not going to be the day anyone in Denver's running game breaks out.Kwai Chang Caine said:Call it a gut feeling but I think he has a decent game this week. Minnesota has been better against the run since they get gashed week one but they can't score. I can see manning getting them ahead and with that defense, Minnesota having a hard time scoring. I'm tempted to roll him out over Randle this week...
they added Evan Mathis toward the end of TC and just added Tyler Polumbus. What doesn't make sense is them trading backup swing OT Chris Clark for a 7th at the end of preseason.ATB said:I wonder why Denver hasn't been searching FA's for some experienced O-line guys. It's obvious to everyone that they need help upfront. Must just be content to ride this wave til midseason expecting improvement.Buffaloes said:they have a guy who was a healthy scratch pretty much all year last year, was a healthy scratch last week, and iirc was consistently worked by AZ's depth players in the 2nd half of the 4th preseason game this year starting at RT tomorrow. And a guy who isn't a LT playing LT tomorrow. And the OL has already been bad without these changes.I'm going to guess tomorrow is not going to be the day anyone in Denver's running game breaks out.Kwai Chang Caine said:Call it a gut feeling but I think he has a decent game this week. Minnesota has been better against the run since they get gashed week one but they can't score. I can see manning getting them ahead and with that defense, Minnesota having a hard time scoring. I'm tempted to roll him out over Randle this week...
Not sure I agree. If/when the O-Line starts to gel one of these guys is likely to emerge. If Bronco history is any guide that guy will probably be Juwan Thompson.None are worth anything. They will all struggle all year and be replaced in the Offseason via free agency or draft.
Someone will have a good game hear or there but that's the upside of this backfield. Guessing the week they play well.
the problems with the Denver running game have almost nothing to do with the talent at RB. that's not the issueNone are worth anything. They will all struggle all year and be replaced in the Offseason via free agency or draft.
Someone will have a good game hear or there but that's the upside of this backfield. Guessing the week they play well.
I keep seeing this dredged up as an excuse for Anderson. If those stats are accurate, it means he averaged less than 2 ypc after contact after getting to the second level untouched last year.Kubs wants CJA to "stay on the field consistently".
Jim McCormick @_JimmyMcCormick 3h3 hours ago
C.J. Anderson is averaging 0.75 yards before contact per rush after averaging 2.79 yards before contact per rush in 2014.
Do you happen to have stats for other lead backs? I'd like to compare how Anderson did after contact.I keep seeing this dredged up as an excuse for Anderson. If those stats are accurate, it means he averaged less than 2 ypc after contact after getting to the second level untouched last year.Kubs wants CJA to "stay on the field consistently".
Jim McCormick @_JimmyMcCormick 3h3 hours ago
C.J. Anderson is averaging 0.75 yards before contact per rush after averaging 2.79 yards before contact per rush in 2014.
That is hardly the mark of a special RB. Anderson is JAG - and not even a very impressive one - whose line is now not blowing wide open holes for him. Not sure why anyone would think this situation is suddenly going to get any better.
Pretty clear that Kubiak does not have the right guys on the O-line to make his running O go right now.
No, I don't. You're welcome to look them up. All I know that if a guy gets to the second level untouched and therefore has a lot of momentum, he ought to be able to fall forward from that point and get another two yards.Do you happen to have stats for other lead backs? I'd like to compare how Anderson did after contact.I keep seeing this dredged up as an excuse for Anderson. If those stats are accurate, it means he averaged less than 2 ypc after contact after getting to the second level untouched last year.That is hardly the mark of a special RB. Anderson is JAG - and not even a very impressive one - whose line is now not blowing wide open holes for him. Not sure why anyone would think this situation is suddenly going to get any better.Kubs wants CJA to "stay on the field consistently".
Jim McCormick @_JimmyMcCormick 3h3 hours ago
C.J. Anderson is averaging 0.75 yards before contact per rush after averaging 2.79 yards before contact per rush in 2014.
Pretty clear that Kubiak does not have the right guys on the O-line to make his running O go right now.
Thanks, I'll be sure to look them up if I'm ever making a statement about what's good or bad.No, I don't. You're welcome to look them up. All I know that if a guy gets to the second level untouched and therefore has a lot of momentum, he ought to be able to fall forward from that point and get another two yards.Do you happen to have stats for other lead backs? I'd like to compare how Anderson did after contact.I keep seeing this dredged up as an excuse for Anderson. If those stats are accurate, it means he averaged less than 2 ypc after contact after getting to the second level untouched last year.That is hardly the mark of a special RB. Anderson is JAG - and not even a very impressive one - whose line is now not blowing wide open holes for him. Not sure why anyone would think this situation is suddenly going to get any better.Kubs wants CJA to "stay on the field consistently".
Jim McCormick @_JimmyMcCormick 3h3 hours ago
C.J. Anderson is averaging 0.75 yards before contact per rush after averaging 2.79 yards before contact per rush in 2014.
Pretty clear that Kubiak does not have the right guys on the O-line to make his running O go right now.
Lmao. I got Bloomed... Again.It's official now, CJ will be a stud the rest of the season. Starting him again week 4, with confidence.@SigmundBloom: on WW show today @CecilLammey said drop Anderson. So you know what that means https://t.co/BzIMdssLFl
You do that. Apparently you can't see it by watching.wdcrob said:Thanks, I'll be sure to look them up if I'm ever making a statement about what's good or bad.Bronco Billy said:No, I don't. You're welcome to look them up. All I know that if a guy gets to the second level untouched and therefore has a lot of momentum, he ought to be able to fall forward from that point and get another two yards.wdcrob said:Do you happen to have stats for other lead backs? I'd like to compare how Anderson did after contact.Bronco Billy said:I keep seeing this dredged up as an excuse for Anderson. If those stats are accurate, it means he averaged less than 2 ypc after contact after getting to the second level untouched last year.That is hardly the mark of a special RB. Anderson is JAG - and not even a very impressive one - whose line is now not blowing wide open holes for him. Not sure why anyone would think this situation is suddenly going to get any better.Kubs wants CJA to "stay on the field consistently".
Jim McCormick @_JimmyMcCormick 3h3 hours ago
C.J. Anderson is averaging 0.75 yards before contact per rush after averaging 2.79 yards before contact per rush in 2014.
Pretty clear that Kubiak does not have the right guys on the O-line to make his running O go right now.
which week was it C.J ? I must have missed itI feel like this is going to happen all year. I can't trust either CJ or Hillman enough to start them. Then each week one will score big points on my bench. This week it is Hillman.
Looked to me like a great wrap up. I just don't see anything separating CJ and Hillman beyond Hillman getting good blocking and CJ not.CJ not being able to hit that gaping hole says everything.
Looked to me like a great wrap up. I just don't see anything separating CJ and Hillman beyond Hillman getting good blocking and CJ not.CJ not being able to hit that gaping hole says everything.
Hillman's probably paying them off.Looked to me like a great wrap up. I just don't see anything separating CJ and Hillman beyond Hillman getting good blocking and CJ not.CJ not being able to hit that gaping hole says everything.This might be the greatest post I've ever read on here. Two RBs on the same team and the line only blocks for one of them.
Sums up the last month of this thread nicely.Looked to me like a great wrap up. I just don't see anything separating CJ and Hillman beyond Hillman getting good blocking and CJ not.CJ not being able to hit that gaping hole says everything.This might be the greatest post I've ever read on here. Two RBs on the same team and the line only blocks for one of them.
So you are a guy who prescribes to the "take his one good run away" analysis. I may not agree with it but you are allowed to analyze people however you want. Unfortunately for you if you do that for both players Hillman still has the highest ypc. Of course there is still a quarter to go. Maybe CJ can string some together. Although I hope for your argument that it isn't just one long run.When all your yards come on one run, coaches don't put a lot of weight in that. It's not what you do with one touch. It's what you do over the course of the game with all your touches.
He's not wrong.John Lynch ripping into CJ again, saying he has to be able to break arm tackles. Oof.
I don't think he's saying that. I believe he's talking about real football and coaches' perception of value to the team. A coach would rather play the guy who gets you 60 yds on 20 3-Yd runs than the guy who gets you the same 60 yds on 20 carries, but one of those 20 is a 40 yder and he only accumulated 20 yds on the other 19 carries. It's about ball control and down/distance.So you are a guy who prescribes to the "take his one good run away" analysis. I may not agree with it but you are allowed to analyze people however you want. Unfortunately for you if you do that for both players Hillman still has the highest ypc. Of course there is still a quarter to go. Maybe CJ can string some together. Although I hope for your argument that it isn't just one long run.When all your yards come on one run, coaches don't put a lot of weight in that. It's not what you do with one touch. It's what you do over the course of the game with all your touches.
judged on that last drive hillman is the guyThis last drive could be telling. The score is tied. So far Hillman has the longest run and the higher ypc (once remove their longest run). Whoever can help them the most here would be looked at as more valuable I would think.
The little Rudy tried to warn us. We have only ourselves to blame.Cj Anderson @cjandersonb22 Sep 13
So glad we got the win its all about the W so 4 fantasy ppl plz sit me 4 17 weeks
Is this real?The little Rudy tried to warn us. We have only ourselves to blame.Cj Anderson @cjandersonb22 Sep 13
So glad we got the win its all about the W so 4 fantasy ppl plz sit me 4 17 weeks![]()
He's done poisoning my lineup.