What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Collapse of the World: Deutsche Bank (1 Viewer)

And I said yield is available on highly rated corporate debt and REITS. :shrug:
It's available, but it is greatly compressed. Which means investors have to take more units of risk to get the same yield as they used to or, more likely, less than they used to.

Pension plans that used to target an annual return in the upper single digits (7.5-9%) are mostly now realizing somewhere between half and two thirds of that. And that is a direct result of yield compression.

 
Under the rescue plan, Die Zeit said, if the bank really could not pay the fine by itself, then it would be able to sell parts of its business to other financial institutions at prices set at such a level that the burden on Deutsche was eased and it would not make any significant losses.

That could happen, said the newspaper, if the businesses were going to have to be sold at clearly less than their value. In an emergency, those transactions could be supported by state guarantees, it added.
The colloquial term for this is "smoke and mirrors". Or, if not explicitly sanctioned by the government, fraud.

 
That thing is interest rates.  Unfortunately, negative interest rates really wreck the business models of most banks.
And this is why there is a huge push all of a sudden by banks and the Fed to move to a cashless system. In a cashless system, a lot of people would be forced into keeping their money in the bank even with negative interest rates. 

 
Negative rates are a joke.

Kuroda basically admitted BoJ's policies are not working (without actually saying it) at their last meeting by taking a new stance and trying to steepen the long end of the curve.

 
There are people flooding into negative interest rate bonds because they can't think of anywhere else to put their money. It's craziness.

Corporations are sitting on billions in cash and can't even think of anywhere to put it, that's how bad it is.

The government could fund billions in worthwhile public works and infrastructure repairs easily, just by collecting on the rush to negative-rate bonds, and they're not doing it. Madness.
Seems like this condition is one of the cheaper lunches you can imagine, but didn't expect you to be the one agree with.

Good summation of the bind:

 So what are the solutions to safe asset shortage problem? One solution is for the government to issue more safe assets. That the 10-year U.S. treasury is now 1.73% seven years after the crisis suggest there is still strong appetite for treasury securities. This is the solution proposed by folks like Stephen Williamson and Paul Krugman. Another solution is for policymakers to 'shock and awe' the public into believing a robust recovery is coming and thereby decrease their demand for safe assets. QE was supposed to do this but was not that effective. Scott Sumner andMichael Woodford's call for NGDP level targeting would also fall under this option. The final option is that policy makers could try to work past the ZLB via negative interest rates. Under this option policymakers would help the safe asset market clear by pushing interest rates and prices to their market-clearing levels.

As  noted by Narayana Kocherlakota, the difficulty of doing the first two options seems to be making negative interest rates the default option.  I am not convinced it will be very effective given how it is being implemented (very different than Miles Kimball's suggested approach). But it is a response--a groping in the dark by central bankers--to the deeper safe asset shortage problem. And that is something we all need to better understand. 

http://macromarketmusings.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-safe-asset-problem-is-back-negative.html

 
Very little of this money even goes to the people screwed by Deutsche Bank.

The whole thing is rather pointless.  It's a pittance that's going to glide from government coffer to government coffer that will be paid back in another fashion at a later date.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top