The Z Machine
Footballguy
Thankfully someone understands me here.Hi, I speak Z Machine.Dammit I am dumb.... I am all.... who they heck is beisbol? I don't even know that screen name let alone seen a post.good stuff beisbol kids
![]()
yer a moron.
Thankfully someone understands me here.Hi, I speak Z Machine.Dammit I am dumb.... I am all.... who they heck is beisbol? I don't even know that screen name let alone seen a post.good stuff beisbol kids
![]()
yer a moron.
He is crushing it!So Gally Jr had his first "Fall World Series" intrasquad game yesterday. He started at 2B and hit 8th for his team. Here were his AB's:
He also came in to close the game out. He entered with one out in the second to last inning with a 2 run lead. Got the first guy to strike out on an 0-2 fast ball above his hands. Got a swing and a miss. Next batter hit a routine fly ball to center that the CF had trouble with due to the sun and dropped it for an error. That put a runner on 2B. Battled with one of the better hitters on the team last year. After a couple of full count foul balls ended up missing down for a walk. Guy stole 2B to put runners on 2nd and 3rd. Got the batter to pop out on the infield.
- 1st AB: Swung at first pitch on a running fast ball that got in on him and he flew out to CF. He said if he started a bit earlier and got around it he could have barrelled it up to LF and with the wind blowing out might of had a chance at a HR.
- 2nd AB: Bottom 3rd. Down 4-3. Bases Loaded. Crushed a hanging breaking ball to left center for a 2 RBI double to take the lead.
- 3rd AB: Runner on 2B. Ground ball in the 3-4 hole for another base hit and went to second on the throw to draw a throw and allow runner to score. Was safe at 2B.
His team then put up 9 runs to put the game out of reach. He finished off the top of the last inning. Gave up a weak ground ball hit but got another strikeout and a couple routine fly balls.
His team now plays in a best of three finals against the third team. One game today and two tomorrow (if necessary). They are playing 5 inning games.
He is now 7 for 16 with a couple doubles for the fall. Has played a flawless 2B and only given up runs in one of his six outings on the mound. So far so good.
Take it to the non-athletic accomplishments thread............hahahahaha3 A's and a B this semester. Keep it up son.
Take it to the non-athletic accomplishments thread............hahahahaha3 A's and a B this semester. Keep it up son.
Oh excuse me….he also got an A in Intro to Sports Management but that ended last week. Lol. So 5 classes.Only 4 classes?
My kid has like 7 hahahaha![]()
I guess we will allow that here since it has "sports" in the name.Oh excuse me….he also got an A in Intro to Sports Management but that ended last week. Lol. So 5 classes.Only 4 classes?
My kid has like 7 hahahaha![]()
Take it to the non-athletic accomplishments thread..."Dad...she is freaking hot" lol)....
I love these updates. Congrats to Gally Jr. Sounds like life is good right now.Game 2 of the three game "Fall World Series" intrasquad. I didn't get the play by play as usual but I did get that he went 1 for 3 with a single and on base by error in his other two AB's. He is pulling everything which is not normal as his natural swing is to drive the ball the right center. But he says the "book" on him is to pound him inside because of how well he goes to the right side. He has adjusted and since he is hitting .500 (10 for 20) with a bit of pop (2 doubles and a HR - all to the left side) it's a good sign he is adjusting.
One of his on base by error was a 2 run error on a fly ball to left field (not sure how tough a play or if the wind/sun played a part) but at the time they were down two runs so that tied it up. His roommate then came up and knocked in the go ahead run to put them up 10-9.
Gally Jr then got called on to close the game out for the last inning and set them down in order with a pop out, strike out and ground out to SS. The team captains are the ones that set the lineups and made pitching decisions so it's interesting that they called on a freshman for the two save chances they had this week and since Gally Jr succeeded in both outings I would say that is a good start and impression for his teammates and hopefully the coaches are taking notice as well.
That's awesome..congrats on his first TD!Playoff win tonight.
My son had another very good game....
6 Tackles, 1 Tackle for a Loss, 2 Assists, 1 Punt Block
17 yards on 6 carries, 1 TD (also 1 fumble that he recovered)
The punt block was really the game winning play in the 4th after us trailing the whole game. He then got the carry to break it in for his first ever TD. We defeated our very much disliked rival and sent them home 8-6 final score. ( The difference was they missed their extra point kick, and we made ours, which is 2 points at this level)
That is awesome. Congrats to your son on his hard work and fantastic attitude paying off.Gally Jr had one on one meetings with the coaching staff over the weekend. Well, it was one on coaching staff meeting but they are doing that will each player to give them a status on where they stand and how they evaluated the fall thus far (they have mid terms this week so it's seems like a mid term report so to speak).
He said the coach asked him how he thought it went and of course he said "It went alright" and the coach came back with well "it went a lot better than just alright". He was extremely impressed with his approach and purpose in everything he did. Whether it was his approach during BP or any individual drill there was always a purpose to what he was doing that he rarely sees with freshmen. He told him he was also impressed with his presence on the mound and that he could tell he knows "how to pitch" rather than just throw and that he doesn't see that much from 18 yr olds.
Gally Jr was recruited by the pitching coach and the head coach didn't really know a lot about him. He saw the videos we sent but you can't tell a ton from those and the coach admitted as much. When I talked to the head coach at the time my son committed he mentioned that he didn't know a lot about my son and was trusting his pitching coach. It even went so far that on move in day when the coach had players there to help with the move he didn't even know my kid's name. It was quite comical and worrisome all at the same time.
All that to say, the coach decided to give my son some scholarship money after seeing him play over the last two months. Pretty awesome. What a first impression. He went on to say that he wasn't in the bottom third of players and is likely nearing the top third (they have 45 players so I think the coach looks at it in groups of 15). Not bad for a freshman that the head coach didn't even know who he was when he got there.
So proud of this kid for coming in from day 1 and making a great first impression and earning his place. So excited to see how things shake out as the season gets closer.
So a 19U team was able to hang with a D3 team? WowCool experience for my daughter’s 19U hockey team on Saturday. They got to play an exhibition game against a D3 women’s hockey team, with the full game-day experience in that team’s barn (which is nicer than a lot of D1 team’s arenas/rinks). We knew it would be tough sledding with mostly 17 year old girls playing some 23/24 year olds, but it was pretty cool.
We went down early 4-0 in the first period, but once they got their feet under them the girls played better in periods 2 & 3 (2-1 for the college team), to lose 6-1. We scored our only goal on the power play, with my daughter making a good play to help keep the puck in at the blue line, making a pass to her center and then hustling to get to her spot in front of the net to put enough of a screen on the goalie to help the shot from the point to get past. Her coach pulled her aside in the lobby after the game, and told her that even though they didn’t credit her with an assist (gave it to another girl), that the goal wouldn’t have happened without the work she put in. She was happy with that. Was a good dress rehearsal for her for the type of work she’ll need to put in playing D3 next year.
Also played two games against “normal” competition on Sunday, and while her team utterly dominated shots and time of possession (57-9 shots for/against in game 1, and 40-2 for/against in game 2), they went into the 3rd period of game 1 tied 0-0. My daughter had one goal waved off in the first after the ref said she lost sight of the puck, but blew the whistle after my daughter put it in the net. It had been sliding along the front of the goalie’s pad in the crease, and the ref was standing back near the corner, so she couldn’t see it. The other ref had a perfect view from the blue line and tried to get the first ref to change her mind, but she said there was nothing she could do about it.
My daughter then went on to score two goals in the 3rd period, tipping a shot in from the blueline to make it 1-0, and battling in front for a rebound to push us to a 3-0 lead, and the team went on to win 4-0. When I told her after the game she really had a hat trick, she told me she actually scored 4 goals. She had tipped our 4th goal in too, but she didn’t want to take it away from her teammate who had shot it from the blue line, so she didn’t say anything. She’s probably cost herself a dozen or so goals over the last few seasons when she does that because she doesn’t want to take them away from her teammates. While it would have been cool for her to have the hatty, I love that she thinks that way.
Game 2 we mixed the lines up a bit, and she was digging playing with some new lineys. Ended up with an assist in that game, also won 4-0. All in all, a good but tiring weekend.
Not for nothing. My daughters 18u softball team would have obliterated her D3 softball team.So a 19U team was able to hang with a D3 team? WowCool experience for my daughter’s 19U hockey team on Saturday. They got to play an exhibition game against a D3 women’s hockey team, with the full game-day experience in that team’s barn (which is nicer than a lot of D1 team’s arenas/rinks). We knew it would be tough sledding with mostly 17 year old girls playing some 23/24 year olds, but it was pretty cool.
We went down early 4-0 in the first period, but once they got their feet under them the girls played better in periods 2 & 3 (2-1 for the college team), to lose 6-1. We scored our only goal on the power play, with my daughter making a good play to help keep the puck in at the blue line, making a pass to her center and then hustling to get to her spot in front of the net to put enough of a screen on the goalie to help the shot from the point to get past. Her coach pulled her aside in the lobby after the game, and told her that even though they didn’t credit her with an assist (gave it to another girl), that the goal wouldn’t have happened without the work she put in. She was happy with that. Was a good dress rehearsal for her for the type of work she’ll need to put in playing D3 next year.
Also played two games against “normal” competition on Sunday, and while her team utterly dominated shots and time of possession (57-9 shots for/against in game 1, and 40-2 for/against in game 2), they went into the 3rd period of game 1 tied 0-0. My daughter had one goal waved off in the first after the ref said she lost sight of the puck, but blew the whistle after my daughter put it in the net. It had been sliding along the front of the goalie’s pad in the crease, and the ref was standing back near the corner, so she couldn’t see it. The other ref had a perfect view from the blue line and tried to get the first ref to change her mind, but she said there was nothing she could do about it.
My daughter then went on to score two goals in the 3rd period, tipping a shot in from the blueline to make it 1-0, and battling in front for a rebound to push us to a 3-0 lead, and the team went on to win 4-0. When I told her after the game she really had a hat trick, she told me she actually scored 4 goals. She had tipped our 4th goal in too, but she didn’t want to take it away from her teammate who had shot it from the blue line, so she didn’t say anything. She’s probably cost herself a dozen or so goals over the last few seasons when she does that because she doesn’t want to take them away from her teammates. While it would have been cool for her to have the hatty, I love that she thinks that way.
Game 2 we mixed the lines up a bit, and she was digging playing with some new lineys. Ended up with an assist in that game, also won 4-0. All in all, a good but tiring weekend.
I'm not sure you'd call it hanging with them, I call it more surviving. They outshot us pretty good, and the end result was never in question. I think this week was their first official week on the ice, and it was their first exhibition game of the year. That D3 team will be fine when it counts.So a 19U team was able to hang with a D3 team? WowCool experience for my daughter’s 19U hockey team on Saturday. They got to play an exhibition game against a D3 women’s hockey team, with the full game-day experience in that team’s barn (which is nicer than a lot of D1 team’s arenas/rinks). We knew it would be tough sledding with mostly 17 year old girls playing some 23/24 year olds, but it was pretty cool.
We went down early 4-0 in the first period, but once they got their feet under them the girls played better in periods 2 & 3 (2-1 for the college team), to lose 6-1. We scored our only goal on the power play, with my daughter making a good play to help keep the puck in at the blue line, making a pass to her center and then hustling to get to her spot in front of the net to put enough of a screen on the goalie to help the shot from the point to get past. Her coach pulled her aside in the lobby after the game, and told her that even though they didn’t credit her with an assist (gave it to another girl), that the goal wouldn’t have happened without the work she put in. She was happy with that. Was a good dress rehearsal for her for the type of work she’ll need to put in playing D3 next year.
Also played two games against “normal” competition on Sunday, and while her team utterly dominated shots and time of possession (57-9 shots for/against in game 1, and 40-2 for/against in game 2), they went into the 3rd period of game 1 tied 0-0. My daughter had one goal waved off in the first after the ref said she lost sight of the puck, but blew the whistle after my daughter put it in the net. It had been sliding along the front of the goalie’s pad in the crease, and the ref was standing back near the corner, so she couldn’t see it. The other ref had a perfect view from the blue line and tried to get the first ref to change her mind, but she said there was nothing she could do about it.
My daughter then went on to score two goals in the 3rd period, tipping a shot in from the blueline to make it 1-0, and battling in front for a rebound to push us to a 3-0 lead, and the team went on to win 4-0. When I told her after the game she really had a hat trick, she told me she actually scored 4 goals. She had tipped our 4th goal in too, but she didn’t want to take it away from her teammate who had shot it from the blue line, so she didn’t say anything. She’s probably cost herself a dozen or so goals over the last few seasons when she does that because she doesn’t want to take them away from her teammates. While it would have been cool for her to have the hatty, I love that she thinks that way.
Game 2 we mixed the lines up a bit, and she was digging playing with some new lineys. Ended up with an assist in that game, also won 4-0. All in all, a good but tiring weekend.
Explain this to me like I have no clue about what you are talking about.... you know, for others who don't and stuff.A bit of a shakeup is taking place in the soccer-playing community. Looks like US Soccer will shift to grade-based classifications next year instead of year-based.
That seems strange. What would be the reason for that?A bit of a shakeup is taking place in the soccer-playing community. Looks like US Soccer will shift to grade-based classifications next year instead of year-based.
It means instead of using ages (U12, U14 U16 etc) to determine the levels of play they will go by grades in school. So you could have a discrepancy of ages in a particular division because it is the 5th and 6th grade division.Explain this to me like I have no clue about what you are talking about.... you know, for others who don't and stuff.A bit of a shakeup is taking place in the soccer-playing community. Looks like US Soccer will shift to grade-based classifications next year instead of year-based.
Ha! I was thinking it was like some sort of grading system which is what was really confusing me. I couldn't figure out how that would make sense.It means instead of using ages (U12, U14 U16 etc) to determine the levels of play they will go by grades in school. So you could have a discrepancy of ages in a particular division because it is the 5th and 6th grade division.Explain this to me like I have no clue about what you are talking about.... you know, for others who don't and stuff.A bit of a shakeup is taking place in the soccer-playing community. Looks like US Soccer will shift to grade-based classifications next year instead of year-based.
I never thought about it going that way but now that you say that I may be completely off base. I guess I could see some leagues/teams etc doing an evaluation and creating teams based on talent level. Seems really difficult to do consistently as the evaluators will vary by so much. Seems like that would be terrible for younger ages as you could have a 5 year old playing with 12 year olds.Ha! I was thinking it was like some sort of grading system which is what was really confusing me. I couldn't figure out how that would make sense.
There are many rumors, including the upcoming World Cup. US Soccer wants to seize on the national-level interest/mania to emphasize youth soccer enrollment (maybe parents were putting kids in rec instead of comp?). I do think soccer wants to take advantage of vulnerabilities it sees in enrollment in our other sports, particularly baseball and football. Smart thing to do actually.That seems strange. What would be the reason for that?A bit of a shakeup is taking place in the soccer-playing community. Looks like US Soccer will shift to grade-based classifications next year instead of year-based.
How does changing how they divide up divisions increase enrollment? I have never based my kids enrollment in a sport on whether or not the divisions were based on age or grade. Maybe I am missing the point of your statements?I do think soccer wants to take advantage of vulnerabilities it sees in enrollment in our other sports, particularly baseball and football. Smart thing to do actually.
Yeah parents are often unhappy when their kids cannot play together in comp soccer because one was born at the end of the year and the friend was born at the beginning of the next. Does this really affect enrollment? Perhaps if parents are turning to rec soccer instead. Still feels like a bit of a red herring.How does changing how they divide up divisions increase enrollment? I have never based my kids enrollment in a sport on whether or not the divisions were based on age or grade. Maybe I am missing the point of your statements?I do think soccer wants to take advantage of vulnerabilities it sees in enrollment in our other sports, particularly baseball and football. Smart thing to do actually.
ETA: I just saw your previous post. Maybe I am different than other parents as how an organization arranged their divisions really had no impact for me.
If that's what the parents are worried about, they should probably be playing rec soccer anyway.Yeah parents are often unhappy when their kids cannot play together in comp soccer because one was born at the end of the year and the friend was born at the beginning of the next. Does this really affect enrollment? Perhaps if parents are turning to rec soccer instead. Still feels like a bit of a red herring.How does changing how they divide up divisions increase enrollment? I have never based my kids enrollment in a sport on whether or not the divisions were based on age or grade. Maybe I am missing the point of your statements?I do think soccer wants to take advantage of vulnerabilities it sees in enrollment in our other sports, particularly baseball and football. Smart thing to do actually.
ETA: I just saw your previous post. Maybe I am different than other parents as how an organization arranged their divisions really had no impact for me.
I can't imagine that that reason drives any real difference in numbers. I mean pretty much every other 'club' sport is by age.... I don't know of any that are not. If the rest of the world does it that way then it has to be the US trying to align itself with that.Yeah parents are often unhappy when their kids cannot play together in comp soccer because one was born at the end of the year and the friend was born at the beginning of the next. Does this really affect enrollment? Perhaps if parents are turning to rec soccer instead. Still feels like a bit of a red herring.How does changing how they divide up divisions increase enrollment? I have never based my kids enrollment in a sport on whether or not the divisions were based on age or grade. Maybe I am missing the point of your statements?I do think soccer wants to take advantage of vulnerabilities it sees in enrollment in our other sports, particularly baseball and football. Smart thing to do actually.
ETA: I just saw your previous post. Maybe I am different than other parents as how an organization arranged their divisions really had no impact for me.
A theory that seems to make more sense is that ECNL wants to be a better path for kids to play D1 soccer (and this suggests that US Soccer is giving up on Club soccer being organized in a way that supports the national team's development, though I'm not sure they ever said that overtly).I can't imagine that that reason drives any real difference in numbers. I mean pretty much every other 'club' sport is by age.... I don't know of any that are not. If the rest of the world does it that way then it has to be the US trying to align itself with that.Yeah parents are often unhappy when their kids cannot play together in comp soccer because one was born at the end of the year and the friend was born at the beginning of the next. Does this really affect enrollment? Perhaps if parents are turning to rec soccer instead. Still feels like a bit of a red herring.How does changing how they divide up divisions increase enrollment? I have never based my kids enrollment in a sport on whether or not the divisions were based on age or grade. Maybe I am missing the point of your statements?I do think soccer wants to take advantage of vulnerabilities it sees in enrollment in our other sports, particularly baseball and football. Smart thing to do actually.
ETA: I just saw your previous post. Maybe I am different than other parents as how an organization arranged their divisions really had no impact for me.
I am very doubtful that other countries have as many parents holding their kids back in grade in order to perform better in sport. That seems very much like an American thing to do that would baffle other countries.
Seems like a very odd decision to me.
This sucks and has been an issue for years. Around my area it is the high school that suffers as any kid that has talent plays for their club and it really dilutes the competition for the high schools. I think softball is nearing this type of thing too but not quite to the same level.Club soccer doesn't align with high school soccer, and one or the other suffers for it.
Spot on.HS sports are only important to top talent in as much as that is how they get recruited. If HS isn't the primary way recruitment happens like in the past and recruitment if focused on club organizations, the top talent will go there. Some will play both but I have heard more and more where club teams discourage or flat out ban playing for their organization AND HS. Football has a great advantage over other sports because there really isn't anything to compete with HS football for the talent and that is how you get recruited. Other sports, to varying degrees, seems to have moved away from HS sport.
From my own observance while learning swim.... it seems like swimmers do both club and HS but then actually don't really do club. I think it has something to do with practice time. Our club only sees the HS swimmers at the conference championship meet and that is it. I see some HS swimmers from other clubs here and there but for the most part, HS swimmers aren't at the ISI meets.
Softball is a mess. However here 16u and up (even some 14u) don't start summer season until HS season is over. So they will start late May and go 8 weeks to end of July. All while having tryouts in July for the upcoming fallThis sucks and has been an issue for years. Around my area it is the high school that suffers as any kid that has talent plays for their club and it really dilutes the competition for the high schools. I think softball is nearing this type of thing too but not quite to the same level.Club soccer doesn't align with high school soccer, and one or the other suffers for it.
All of these travel, club, etc type teams really eventually becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy as talent is pulled from rec/town/local/high school because you "gotta play travel" if you want to get better/scene. So rather than it being for the elite of the elite (which is what it used to be) it becomes so diluted that it can lose it's purpose. If kids just stayed with their local leagues the competition would be higher and it would elevate everyone at much less cost and travel. But as "talent" leaves the local it leads to the next step down of talent leaving to be challenged and then it trickles down and you end up with nothing at the local level. This is now becoming more prevalent with high schools and you are seeing it with soccer/softball/volleyball where the high school season isn't being recruited for college so the better players are playing other league instead of high school. It's sad as it really loses community involvement and pride in your school. Kind of sucks.
For many sports, the recruitment doesn't necessarily come from the high school sport. Football is one exception, but even with football the recruitment is largely coming from the various camps players attend to get noticed, then the coaches may see their film (twitter is huge for this process), and then the coaches may attend a game if they can make it part of a sweep of seeing several prospects in one trip.HS sports are only important to top talent in as much as that is how they get recruited. If HS isn't the primary way recruitment happens like in the past and recruitment if focused on club organizations, the top talent will go there. Some will play both but I have heard more and more where club teams discourage or flat out ban playing for their organization AND HS. Football has a great advantage over other sports because there really isn't anything to compete with HS football for the talent and that is how you get recruited. Other sports, to varying degrees, seems to have moved away from HS sport.
From my own observance while learning swim.... it seems like swimmers do both club and HS but then actually don't really do club. I think it has something to do with practice time. Our club only sees the HS swimmers at the conference championship meet and that is it. I see some HS swimmers from other clubs here and there but for the most part, HS swimmers aren't at the ISI meets.
FWIW when I was coaching at a P5 basketball program our recruiting stuff was like 95%+ from EYBL, UA, camp/leagues and then AAU. Some services did HS film for us you can subscribe to, especially for places like the fancy private schools with powerhouse sports teams that compete with each other. Montverde for example.For many sports, the recruitment doesn't necessarily come from the high school sport. Football is one exception, but even with football the recruitment is largely coming from the various camps players attend to get noticed, then the coaches may see their film (twitter is huge for this process), and then the coaches may attend a game if they can make it part of a sweep of seeing several prospects in one trip.HS sports are only important to top talent in as much as that is how they get recruited. If HS isn't the primary way recruitment happens like in the past and recruitment if focused on club organizations, the top talent will go there. Some will play both but I have heard more and more where club teams discourage or flat out ban playing for their organization AND HS. Football has a great advantage over other sports because there really isn't anything to compete with HS football for the talent and that is how you get recruited. Other sports, to varying degrees, seems to have moved away from HS sport.
From my own observance while learning swim.... it seems like swimmers do both club and HS but then actually don't really do club. I think it has something to do with practice time. Our club only sees the HS swimmers at the conference championship meet and that is it. I see some HS swimmers from other clubs here and there but for the most part, HS swimmers aren't at the ISI meets.
For other sports like soccer, baseball, softball, volleyball, etc., it is much easier for coaches to watch at the major club tournaments as you have a ton of prospects in one place at the same time.
Basketball is a bit of a hybrid still, with major viewing tournaments for both AAU and high school. I'd venture a guess based on my experience with these that unless you are a top prospect, the major high school viewing tournaments are actually a better place to be seen, especially for the majority of kids that are lower level D1 or D2/D3 level prospects.
The only sport where I've seen first hand the club discouraging/disallowing players from playing high school is soccer at the true highest level of club, outside of that, almost all of the club organizations essentially shut down their high school programs during the high school season of sport (mentioned in a previous post if is a CIF violation for a student to participate in an organized activity of the same sport, during their high school season of sport).
Seems like for swimming it would be very straightforward for recruiting. What's your time? What are your dimensions? Rack and stack. There isn't much subjectivity there. I am sure there are some technique improvement situations but it seems like times would be the most important thing.One thing I noticed in swim with the higher level meets, like just below Olympic level.... you have some swimmers swimming for schools and then you have some swimmers swimming for clubs. I don't know how that all works out.