During the reception at Trinity, I attempted to engage some of the admissions staff to see what I could gleam from them in terms of the admission process.
* All remained very guarded when talking about admissions, staying a 500 foot level almost as if they were protecting state secrets
* One lady did back up, almost exactly, what 
@IvanKaramazovsaid earlier in that "you would not believe how poorly written some of the essays are.  Bad grammar, boring topics, topics that do nothing to tell us anything about the individual" etc etc
* I spoke in length to the lead of the admissions team about the test optional philosophy.
- He said this is the 3rd college he has worked at where they have transitioned to test optional
- he is very passionate about the subject
- he said all 3 schools, the transition was identical.  All the math/engineering based faculty and staff did not want to go test optional, the science based groups were ambivalent, and the humanities group loved the idea
- he said he spent most of his time at the 3 schools convincing the math/engineering group.  He found the best way to do this was to simply interview a ton of teachers and ask them to describe their ideal freshman student.   When each did (and the general description was always similar teacher to teacher) he then would ask them how does one 3 hour test on a Saturday help us in admissions determine any of those traits?   When he was met with shrugs, he was able to get them to sign on.
- they are keeping track of how all test optional kids are doing but he said it is likely to have little meaning as Trinity as a whole is de-emphasizing test scores even for the kids who choose to send them in.  Trinity does not even request what the scores are after kids accept like other test optional schools do
- I found out later talking to another dad this his daughter who also received the presidential scholarship, also went test optional, which really hit home that they are truly practicing what they are preaching.