He's not asking "who should I start"If you dont like these then GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You have posted in every one of these, STOP IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GO TO THE ACF!!!
This is an ACF question, take it where it belongs.He's not asking "who should I start"If you dont like these then GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You have posted in every one of these, STOP IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GO TO THE ACF!!!
There have been tons of these type post ALL YEAR, evidently it's ok. Again, if you don't want to read these type of posts, DON'TThis is an ACF question, take it where it belongs.He's not asking "who should I start"If you dont like these then GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You have posted in every one of these, STOP IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GO TO THE ACF!!!
I usually dont read them, but with FF playoffs upon us, there have been alot more of them. I just get sick of seeing them all over the front page. Also, dont kid yourself, these are definately WDIS questions, just without actually asking WDIS.There have been tons of these type post ALL YEAR, evidently it's ok. Again, if you don't want to read these type of posts, DON'TThis is an ACF question, take it where it belongs.He's not asking "who should I start"If you dont like these then GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You have posted in every one of these, STOP IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GO TO THE ACF!!!
If it makes you feel better, I'll ask "what do you expect from Cooley this week"How is this different from "Chicago run D - will it shut down the JAX Running game" or "Steelers/Cowboys post your predictions", "Schaub, first week back - a negative for AJ/Daniels"... IOW, most of the threads we see on page 1 can be construed as WDIS if you have that perception.Burning Sensation said:I usually dont read them, but with FF playoffs upon us, there have been alot more of them. I just get sick of seeing them all over the front page. Also, dont kid yourself, these are definately WDIS questions, just without actually asking WDIS.big_donkey said:There have been tons of these type post ALL YEAR, evidently it's ok. Again, if you don't want to read these type of posts, DON'TBurning Sensation said:This is an ACF question, take it where it belongs.big_donkey said:He's not asking "who should I start"If you dont like these then GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You have posted in every one of these, STOP IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!robin1970 said:GO TO THE ACF!!!
That is better, that doesnt make it an ACF question. For the record, i dont like Cooley this week against the Ravens. The Ravens have only allowed a TE to catch more than 2 passes twice this year. Winslow got them for 5 catches in week 9 and Brent Celek had 3 in week 12. The Ravens also havnt given up more than 64 yards or a TD pass to a TE all year.If it makes you feel better, I'll ask "what do you expect from Cooley this week"How is this different from "Chicago run D - will it shut down the JAX Running game" or "Steelers/Cowboys post your predictions", "Schaub, first week back - a negative for AJ/Daniels"... IOW, most of the threads we see on page 1 can be construed as WDIS if you have that perception.Burning Sensation said:I usually dont read them, but with FF playoffs upon us, there have been alot more of them. I just get sick of seeing them all over the front page. Also, dont kid yourself, these are definately WDIS questions, just without actually asking WDIS.big_donkey said:There have been tons of these type post ALL YEAR, evidently it's ok. Again, if you don't want to read these type of posts, DON'TBurning Sensation said:This is an ACF question, take it where it belongs.big_donkey said:He's not asking "who should I start"If you dont like these then GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!robin1970 said:GO TO THE ACF!!!
You have posted in every one of these, STOP IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would be suprised if Campbell completes much more than 7 passes, no way Cooleys catches that many today.I think Cooley is the only player to do anything today. I think he'll get a lot of check downs and 3rd options dumps to him. I think in a ppR he should be an ok play.I'll say something like 7-50.I have other options at TE also but I'm rolling with Cooley
it wasn't a question, I was stating what I was planning to do. FWIW, I opted to start Cooley afterall. Just to make SNF more interesting.That is better, that doesnt make it an ACF question. For the record, i dont like Cooley this week against the Ravens. The Ravens have only allowed a TE to catch more than 2 passes twice this year. Winslow got them for 5 catches in week 9 and Brent Celek had 3 in week 12. The Ravens also havnt given up more than 64 yards or a TD pass to a TE all year.If it makes you feel better, I'll ask "what do you expect from Cooley this week"
How is this different from "Chicago run D - will it shut down the JAX Running game" or "Steelers/Cowboys post your predictions", "Schaub, first week back - a negative for AJ/Daniels"... IOW, most of the threads we see on page 1 can be construed as WDIS if you have that perception.
You were just letting people know who you were starting at TE? Let me ask you this, why would someone care who you are starting at TE?it wasn't a question, I was stating what I was planning to do. FWIW, I opted to start Cooley afterall. Just to make SNF more interesting.That is better, that doesnt make it an ACF question. For the record, i dont like Cooley this week against the Ravens. The Ravens have only allowed a TE to catch more than 2 passes twice this year. Winslow got them for 5 catches in week 9 and Brent Celek had 3 in week 12. The Ravens also havnt given up more than 64 yards or a TD pass to a TE all year.If it makes you feel better, I'll ask "what do you expect from Cooley this week"
How is this different from "Chicago run D - will it shut down the JAX Running game" or "Steelers/Cowboys post your predictions", "Schaub, first week back - a negative for AJ/Daniels"... IOW, most of the threads we see on page 1 can be construed as WDIS if you have that perception.
God forbid he discuss the alternatives to starting a fantasy football player on a fantasy football messeage board. If you don't like these types of threads just stay out of them.You were just letting people know who you were starting at TE? Let me ask you this, why would someone care who you are starting at TE?it wasn't a question, I was stating what I was planning to do. FWIW, I opted to start Cooley afterall. Just to make SNF more interesting.That is better, that doesnt make it an ACF question. For the record, i dont like Cooley this week against the Ravens. The Ravens have only allowed a TE to catch more than 2 passes twice this year. Winslow got them for 5 catches in week 9 and Brent Celek had 3 in week 12. The Ravens also havnt given up more than 64 yards or a TD pass to a TE all year.If it makes you feel better, I'll ask "what do you expect from Cooley this week"
How is this different from "Chicago run D - will it shut down the JAX Running game" or "Steelers/Cowboys post your predictions", "Schaub, first week back - a negative for AJ/Daniels"... IOW, most of the threads we see on page 1 can be construed as WDIS if you have that perception.
Put them where they belong, and i will stay out of them.God forbid he discuss the alternatives to starting a fantasy football player on a fantasy football messeage board. If you don't like these types of threads just stay out of them.You were just letting people know who you were starting at TE? Let me ask you this, why would someone care who you are starting at TE?it wasn't a question, I was stating what I was planning to do. FWIW, I opted to start Cooley afterall. Just to make SNF more interesting.That is better, that doesnt make it an ACF question. For the record, i dont like Cooley this week against the Ravens. The Ravens have only allowed a TE to catch more than 2 passes twice this year. Winslow got them for 5 catches in week 9 and Brent Celek had 3 in week 12. The Ravens also havnt given up more than 64 yards or a TD pass to a TE all year.If it makes you feel better, I'll ask "what do you expect from Cooley this week"
How is this different from "Chicago run D - will it shut down the JAX Running game" or "Steelers/Cowboys post your predictions", "Schaub, first week back - a negative for AJ/Daniels"... IOW, most of the threads we see on page 1 can be construed as WDIS if you have that perception.
I personally don't find anything wrong with these. But then again I'm not on my message board high horse all day.Put them where they belong, and i will stay out of them.God forbid he discuss the alternatives to starting a fantasy football player on a fantasy football messeage board. If you don't like these types of threads just stay out of them.You were just letting people know who you were starting at TE? Let me ask you this, why would someone care who you are starting at TE?it wasn't a question, I was stating what I was planning to do. FWIW, I opted to start Cooley afterall. Just to make SNF more interesting.That is better, that doesnt make it an ACF question. For the record, i dont like Cooley this week against the Ravens. The Ravens have only allowed a TE to catch more than 2 passes twice this year. Winslow got them for 5 catches in week 9 and Brent Celek had 3 in week 12. The Ravens also havnt given up more than 64 yards or a TD pass to a TE all year.If it makes you feel better, I'll ask "what do you expect from Cooley this week"
How is this different from "Chicago run D - will it shut down the JAX Running game" or "Steelers/Cowboys post your predictions", "Schaub, first week back - a negative for AJ/Daniels"... IOW, most of the threads we see on page 1 can be construed as WDIS if you have that perception.