Maybe if we're pitting the 135-lb woman against completely untrained, unathletic guys. But give the big guys even basic HS-athlete level athleticism ... they should be able to make things a lot tougher on the MMA woman. Not saying she couldn't still win, but it wouldn't be (for her) like fighting a small child or something.
It would be. Weight is a big advantage on the ground, but not having any clue what you are doing doesn't allow you to make use of that advantage.
Check my post carefully. What I said, specifically, was this:
A big guy with basic HS-athlete level athleticism would challenge the MMA female quite a bit more than a small child would challenge her.
Admittedly, I'm picking nits. My greater point, though, is that you don't have to be in-prime Chuck Liddell to give her a match. You don't even have to be 75% prime Chuck, even. How to define that "75% of Chuck L." is another discussion.
And Dan Severn was 2 time all American D1 wrestler who fought at the Olympic trails with a 75 lb advantage over Royce. BJJ has also advantaged a lot since 1994.
My point here was only that Severn's weight advantage made things much harder on Gracie, despite Royce's BBJ techniques. And despite Severn's own wrestling accomplishments, I think the Severn/Gracie 1994 match is still instructive of how a 135-lb MMA female fighter would fare against a bigger male opponent with
a legitimate degree of athleticism.About the 1994 match: yes, Royce Gracie won. But
it was long and drawn out (16 minutes) and was certainly no walk for Gracie. The lore of that match in the intervening years is that Gracie had that match in the bag all along, when in fact Severn was probably "winnning" for 15 minutes and change.