What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cowboys Fan Sues NFL For $89Billion For Reversing Dez Bryant Catc (1 Viewer)

Righetti

Footballguy
http://deadspin.com/imprisoned-cowboys-fan-sues-nfl-for-89b-for-reversing-1681357642

Terry Hendrix, currently incarcerated in Colorado and a serial filer of frivolous lawsuits, has finally struck upon a real injustice. He's suing the NFL for nearly $89 billion for the officiating decision to overturn Dez Bryant's reception in the Cowboys' playoff loss to the Packers.

Hendrix's handwritten filing is "on behalf of Dez Bryant #88, all Dallas Cowboys fans, and all people in or from the Sovereign Republic of Texas." It names as defendants the NFL, Roger Goodell, referee Gene Steratore, and head of officiating Dean Blandino, and accuses them of "fraud, theft and gross stupidity in the face of an undeniable catch."

The suit goes on to predict what would have happened had Bryant's reception stood:

"The Cowboys' offensive line would have perfectly created an 'Autobahn' for DeMarco Murray to drive into the endzone for the score and victory."
He's seeking a very specific $88,987,654,321.88.
 
It names as defendants the NFL, Roger Goodell, referee Gene Steratore, and head of officiating Dean Blandino, and accuses them of "fraud, theft and gross stupidity in the face of an undeniable catch."
This is a distinction that a lot of legal cases turn on: the refs didn't rule that it wasn't a catch; they ruled that it wasn't a completion. (It is possible for a catch to nonetheless result in an incompletion, as when the receiver's feet are out of bounds, or when the receiver fails to control the ball through his fall when going to the ground during the act of a catch.)

The plaintiff was oh so close to recovering $89 billion, but he just missed out on a technicality.

 
It names as defendants the NFL, Roger Goodell, referee Gene Steratore, and head of officiating Dean Blandino, and accuses them of "fraud, theft and gross stupidity in the face of an undeniable catch."
This is a distinction that a lot of legal cases turn on: the refs didn't rule that it wasn't a catch; they ruled that it wasn't a completion. (It is possible for a catch to nonetheless result in an incompletion, as when the receiver's feet are out of bounds, or when the receiver fails to control the ball through his fall when going to the ground during the act of a catch.)

The plaintiff was oh so close to recovering $89 billion, but he just missed out on a technicality.
Still time to amend!

 


It names as defendants the NFL, Roger Goodell, referee Gene Steratore, and head of officiating Dean Blandino, and accuses them of "fraud, theft and gross stupidity in the face of an undeniable catch."
This is a distinction that a lot of legal cases turn on: the refs didn't rule that it wasn't a catch; they ruled that it wasn't a completion. (It is possible for a catch to nonetheless result in an incompletion, as when the receiver's feet are out of bounds, or when the receiver fails to control the ball through his fall when going to the ground during the act of a catch.)

The plaintiff was oh so close to recovering $89 billion, but he just missed out on a technicality.
Still time to amend!
Better yet, still time to beat him to the loot and file our own case!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top