joffer
Footballguy
Well bless their little hearts.They hopped. The continents weren't separated 6,000 years ago.Do they say how the two kangaroos got from Ararat to Australia? Cause that one's always bugged me.
Well bless their little hearts.They hopped. The continents weren't separated 6,000 years ago.Do they say how the two kangaroos got from Ararat to Australia? Cause that one's always bugged me.
Why do you think there are people out there pushing to have this stuff discussed in public schools?B-Deep said:We also have people who think we never landed on the moon, time travel has occurred, the sitting president is part of some grand Illuminati scheme to create a new world order (that one persists through presidents amazingly), and most obsurd of all, if i name any Hollywood hottie there will be a subset of people who think she is somehow below their level.NCCommish said:Of course it does Larry. Or else you end up with people who think dragons existed.larry_boy_44 said:Yes, because how the world got here changes how we should act right now today so much...NCCommish said:Not at all. I also come down on people who do junk science and try to pass it off as good work. This is no different than junk science. It hurts more than it helps and it causes ignorance of real world science which is necessary to make real world decisions on policy.Rayderr said:Because people like putting down others that are different in order to feel better about themselves.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyone
you are never gonna convince everyone, IF they want a place to gather and discuss their beliefs so be it.
Outrage over public schools teaching this stuff, that is well placed. This museum is simply not worth the time to disparage
That's a different matterWhy do you think there are people out there pushing to have this stuff discussed in public schools?B-Deep said:We also have people who think we never landed on the moon, time travel has occurred, the sitting president is part of some grand Illuminati scheme to create a new world order (that one persists through presidents amazingly), and most obsurd of all, if i name any Hollywood hottie there will be a subset of people who think she is somehow below their level.NCCommish said:Of course it does Larry. Or else you end up with people who think dragons existed.larry_boy_44 said:Yes, because how the world got here changes how we should act right now today so much...NCCommish said:Not at all. I also come down on people who do junk science and try to pass it off as good work. This is no different than junk science. It hurts more than it helps and it causes ignorance of real world science which is necessary to make real world decisions on policy.Rayderr said:Because people like putting down others that are different in order to feel better about themselves.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyone
you are never gonna convince everyone, IF they want a place to gather and discuss their beliefs so be it.
Outrage over public schools teaching this stuff, that is well placed. This museum is simply not worth the time to disparage
This cave aquarium features live blind cavefish, showing how natural selection allows organisms to possess characteristics most favorable for a given environment—but it is not an example of evolution in the molecules-to-man sense.
One of the new exhibits will fill the large portico of the Creation Museum—filled with dragons!![]()
With all-original, spectacular artwork, intriguing portrayals of many dragon legends, hundreds of Chinese lanterns, two large colorful dragons from China and intriguing artifacts, this dragon display will be unique and awe-inspiring. The question will be posed to our guests, “Were dinosaurs dragons?”
My point is that the reason why you have yahoos trying to inject this crap into public schools/text books is because of organizations/churches like this.That's a different matter
People can believe what they want to believe, that's pretty fundamental to freedom. If they want to open a museum for there beliefs who cares.
that's a far cry from demanding those beliefs be taught in public schools, then it crosses a line where i believe it matters.
if they have their own place and they are spending their money to support their beliefs i don't feel a need to be upset
be prepared for a micro v macro lectureThis cave aquarium features live blind cavefish, showing how natural selection allows organisms to possess characteristics most favorable for a given environment—but it is not an example of evolution in the molecules-to-man sense.![]()
ok, so what of it?My point is that the reason why you have yahoos trying to inject this crap into public schools/text books is because of organizations/churches like this.That's a different matter
People can believe what they want to believe, that's pretty fundamental to freedom. If they want to open a museum for there beliefs who cares.
that's a far cry from demanding those beliefs be taught in public schools, then it crosses a line where i believe it matters.
if they have their own place and they are spending their money to support their beliefs i don't feel a need to be upset
Not to mention how they're contributing to the dumbing-down of our general populice.
No, but that doesn't mean we should all laugh at them. I'm an atheist, and even I found NCC's calling Christian beliefs "magic thinking" insulting.You can't possible support or defend any organization that teaches completeRayderr said:If you say so.NCCommish said:Not at all. I also come down on people who do junk science and try to pass it off as good work. This is no different than junk science. It hurts more than it helps and it causes ignorance of real world science which is necessary to make real world decisions on policy.Rayderr said:Because people like putting down others that are different in order to feel better about themselves.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyoneunder the name of science can you?
it's science..Well bless their little hearts.They hopped. The continents weren't separated 6,000 years ago.Do they say how the two kangaroos got from Ararat to Australia? Cause that one's always bugged me.
It's like The Louvre: you can't take it all in in just one day.
- All passes good for 2 days.
![]()
How else would you describe it?No, but that doesn't mean we should all laugh at them. I'm an atheist, and even I found NCC's calling Christian beliefs "magic thinking" insulting.You can't possible support or defend any organization that teaches completeRayderr said:If you say so.NCCommish said:Not at all. I also come down on people who do junk science and try to pass it off as good work. This is no different than junk science. It hurts more than it helps and it causes ignorance of real world science which is necessary to make real world decisions on policy.Rayderr said:Because people like putting down others that are different in order to feel better about themselves.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyoneunder the name of science can you?
You're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree withBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyone
some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do.
freedom, it is america
if you don't like it, don't go
Exactly. It's contributing to the fear and distrust of science.My point is that the reason why you have yahoos trying to inject this crap into public schools/text books is because of organizations/churches like this.That's a different matter
People can believe what they want to believe, that's pretty fundamental to freedom. If they want to open a museum for there beliefs who cares.
that's a far cry from demanding those beliefs be taught in public schools, then it crosses a line where i believe it matters.
if they have their own place and they are spending their money to support their beliefs i don't feel a need to be upset
Not to mention how they're contributing to the dumbing-down of our general populice.
you sure doYou're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree withBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyone
some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do.
freedom, it is america
if you don't like it, don't go
We also have the right to mock this place.
I don't see why ridiculous, unsubstantiated beliefs should be tolerated. Should we tolerate the beliefs of people who think the earth is flat? That 1+1=3? That underpants gnomes exist? That Don and Dawn rhyme?you sure doYou're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree withBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyone
some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do.
freedom, it is america
if you don't like it, don't go
We also have the right to mock this place.
i also do not believe in reincarnation, but i respect the Dali Lama
there are different paths for different people, but tolerance should be on everyone's path. Many people inside the museum could use this lesson, as could many outside
if someone is trying to force their views on me, or debate them with me, or force them on others then there is an issue, i see nothing to be gained by mocking them for discussing their views among like minded folk
Sure it is. And I wouldn't want to be paying for it if I lived there. Which I don't...Thank god.B-Deep said:This museum is simply not worth the time to disparageNCCommish said:Of course it does Larry. Or else you end up with people who think dragons existed.larry_boy_44 said:Yes, because how the world got here changes how we should act right now today so much...NCCommish said:Not at all. I also come down on people who do junk science and try to pass it off as good work. This is no different than junk science. It hurts more than it helps and it causes ignorance of real world science which is necessary to make real world decisions on policy.Rayderr said:Because people like putting down others that are different in order to feel better about themselves.eh not too sure why this should bother anyone
I would call it their beliefs. All religions have events in their history that defy science. Jews have a days worth of oil buring for 8 days, Islam has splitting the moon into 2, Buddhists have flowers raining from the sky and decapitated bodies spewing milk instead of blood. Yet for whatever reason, people (mainly my fellow atheists) seem to like to point and laugh at christians. And really, the only reason to laugh and make fun of someone else is to make yourself feel better.How else would you describe it?No, but that doesn't mean we should all laugh at them. I'm an atheist, and even I found NCC's calling Christian beliefs "magic thinking" insulting.You can't possible support or defend any organization that teaches completeRayderr said:If you say so.NCCommish said:Not at all. I also come down on people who do junk science and try to pass it off as good work. This is no different than junk science. It hurts more than it helps and it causes ignorance of real world science which is necessary to make real world decisions on policy.Rayderr said:Because people like putting down others that are different in order to feel better about themselves.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyoneunder the name of science can you?
I don't see why ridiculous, unsubstantiated beliefs should be tolerated. Should we tolerate the beliefs of people who think the earth is flat? That 1+1=3? That underpants gnomes exist? That Don and Dawn rhyme?you sure doYou're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree withBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyone
some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do.
freedom, it is america
if you don't like it, don't go
We also have the right to mock this place.
i also do not believe in reincarnation, but i respect the Dali Lama
there are different paths for different people, but tolerance should be on everyone's path. Many people inside the museum could use this lesson, as could many outside
if someone is trying to force their views on me, or debate them with me, or force them on others then there is an issue, i see nothing to be gained by mocking them for discussing their views among like minded folk
I believe it's that God has made them appear older is their explanation.Interesting they have dinosaur bones. I'm wondering how they explain away the bible's time discrepancies with science? Carbon dating is a tool of Satan?
if you are open to the idea of an all powerful god willing to mess with us almost anything is explainableI believe it's that God has made them appear older is their explanation.Interesting they have dinosaur bones. I'm wondering how they explain away the bible's time discrepancies with science? Carbon dating is a tool of Satan?
1. All of those beliefs are stupid.I would call it their beliefs. All religions have events in their history that defy science. Jews have a days worth of oil buring for 8 days, Islam has splitting the moon into 2, Buddhists have flowers raining from the sky and decapitated bodies spewing milk instead of blood. Yet for whatever reason, people (mainly my fellow atheists) seem to like to point and laugh at christians. And really, the only reason to laugh and make fun of someone else is to make yourself feel better.How else would you describe it?No, but that doesn't mean we should all laugh at them. I'm an atheist, and even I found NCC's calling Christian beliefs "magic thinking" insulting.You can't possible support or defend any organization that teaches completeRayderr said:If you say so.NCCommish said:Not at all. I also come down on people who do junk science and try to pass it off as good work. This is no different than junk science. It hurts more than it helps and it causes ignorance of real world science which is necessary to make real world decisions on policy.Rayderr said:Because people like putting down others that are different in order to feel better about themselves.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyoneunder the name of science can you?
Indeed.My point is that the reason why you have yahoos trying to inject this crap into public schools/text books is because of organizations/churches like this.That's a different matter
People can believe what they want to believe, that's pretty fundamental to freedom. If they want to open a museum for there beliefs who cares.
that's a far cry from demanding those beliefs be taught in public schools, then it crosses a line where i believe it matters.
if they have their own place and they are spending their money to support their beliefs i don't feel a need to be upset
Not to mention how they're contributing to the dumbing-down of our general populice.
Indeed.My point is that the reason why you have yahoos trying to inject this crap into public schools/text books is because of organizations/churches like this.That's a different matter
People can believe what they want to believe, that's pretty fundamental to freedom. If they want to open a museum for there beliefs who cares.
that's a far cry from demanding those beliefs be taught in public schools, then it crosses a line where i believe it matters.
if they have their own place and they are spending their money to support their beliefs i don't feel a need to be upset
Not to mention how they're contributing to the dumbing-down of our general populice.
Yep.You're still missing the point.I don't see why ridiculous, unsubstantiated beliefs should be tolerated. Should we tolerate the beliefs of people who think the earth is flat? That 1+1=3? That underpants gnomes exist? That Don and Dawn rhyme?you sure doYou're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree withBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyone
some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do.
freedom, it is america
if you don't like it, don't go
We also have the right to mock this place.
i also do not believe in reincarnation, but i respect the Dali Lama
there are different paths for different people, but tolerance should be on everyone's path. Many people inside the museum could use this lesson, as could many outside
if someone is trying to force their views on me, or debate them with me, or force them on others then there is an issue, i see nothing to be gained by mocking them for discussing their views among like minded folk![]()
why tolerate people that think global warming is real, or fake?
why tolerate people who vote different from you?
why tolerate people who chose to live in another counrty?
why tolerate people who play the lotto?
why tolerate people who liked the movie eyes wide shut?
there's likely something that you do/say/believe/like that someone else deems ridiculous
you are under no obligation to be tolerant, but it is something i would ask christians to be so it is something i would also ask non-christians to be
now if we are talking about racism, abuse, things of that nature that is a different story
but if my neighbor, lets call him Larry, is a kind and normal person who also believes god created the world in 6 days and then took a snoozer on day 7, I am doing myself and the world disservice by rejecting him completely over that one belief
that's just my 2 cents though
About the underpants gnomes -- go on...I don't see why ridiculous, unsubstantiated beliefs should be tolerated. Should we tolerate the beliefs of people who think the earth is flat? That 1+1=3? That underpants gnomes exist? That Don and Dawn rhyme?you sure doYou're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree withBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyone
some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do.
freedom, it is america
if you don't like it, don't go
We also have the right to mock this place.
i also do not believe in reincarnation, but i respect the Dali Lama
there are different paths for different people, but tolerance should be on everyone's path. Many people inside the museum could use this lesson, as could many outside
if someone is trying to force their views on me, or debate them with me, or force them on others then there is an issue, i see nothing to be gained by mocking them for discussing their views among like minded folk
You're confusing tolerating the belief vs tolerating the person. Of course you tolerate the person (unless they are a terrible person). Of all your examples, only global warming fits. The rest are opinions based on personal preference. Global warming is based on facts. Playing the lotto is not a belief. It may be a poor decision which can be proven mathematically but it is not a belief. Believing you have a better chance of winning because you have "lucky numbers" is a belief which is completely unfounded, worthy of ridicule and is not something I'd "tolerate".I don't see why ridiculous, unsubstantiated beliefs should be tolerated. Should we tolerate the beliefs of people who think the earth is flat? That 1+1=3? That underpants gnomes exist? That Don and Dawn rhyme?you sure do i also do not believe in reincarnation, but i respect the Dali Lama there are different paths for different people, but tolerance should be on everyone's path. Many people inside the museum could use this lesson, as could many outside if someone is trying to force their views on me, or debate them with me, or force them on others then there is an issue, i see nothing to be gained by mocking them for discussing their views among like minded folkYou're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance. We also have the right to mock this place.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree with some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do. freedom, it is america if you don't like it, don't goBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh not too sure why this should bother anyonewhy tolerate people that think global warming is real, or fake?why tolerate people who vote different from you?why tolerate people who chose to live in another counrty?why tolerate people who play the lotto?why tolerate people who liked the movie eyes wide shut? there's likely something that you do/say/believe/like that someone else deems ridiculous you are under no obligation to be tolerant, but it is something i would ask christians to be so it is something i would also ask non-christians to be now if we are talking about racism, abuse, things of that nature that is a different story but if my neighbor, lets call him Larry, is a kind and normal person who also believes god created the world in 6 days and then took a snoozer on day 7, I am doing myself and the world disservice by rejecting him completely over that one belief that's just my 2 cents though
these people are bat#### crazy.. I'm just glad they aren't bat#### crazy enough to blow stuff up in the name of creationism..
True, though to be fair, there's some dead abortion doctors who weren't killed by muslims...these people are bat#### crazy.. I'm just glad they aren't bat#### crazy enough to blow stuff up in the name of creationism..
"Oh! No TRUE Christian would ever do that!"True, though to be fair, there's some dead abortion doctors who weren't killed by muslims...these people are bat#### crazy.. I'm just glad they aren't bat#### crazy enough to blow stuff up in the name of creationism..
Seriously?I believe it's that God has made them appear older is their explanation.Interesting they have dinosaur bones. I'm wondering how they explain away the bible's time discrepancies with science? Carbon dating is a tool of Satan?
you say global warming is based on factsYou're confusing tolerating the belief vs tolerating the person. Of course you tolerate the person (unless they are a terrible person). Of all your examples, only global warming fits. The rest are opinions based on personal preference. Global warming is based on facts. Playing the lotto is not a belief. It may be a poor decision which can be proven mathematically but it is not a belief. Believing you have a better chance of winning because you have "lucky numbers" is a belief which is completely unfounded, worthy of ridicule and is not something I'd "tolerate".I don't see why ridiculous, unsubstantiated beliefs should be tolerated. Should we tolerate the beliefs of people who think the earth is flat? That 1+1=3? That underpants gnomes exist? That Don and Dawn rhyme?you sure do i also do not believe in reincarnation, but i respect the Dali Lama there are different paths for different people, but tolerance should be on everyone's path. Many people inside the museum could use this lesson, as could many outside if someone is trying to force their views on me, or debate them with me, or force them on others then there is an issue, i see nothing to be gained by mocking them for discussing their views among like minded folkYou're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance. We also have the right to mock this place.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree with some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do. freedom, it is america if you don't like it, don't goBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh not too sure why this should bother anyonewhy tolerate people that think global warming is real, or fake?why tolerate people who vote different from you?why tolerate people who chose to live in another counrty?why tolerate people who play the lotto?why tolerate people who liked the movie eyes wide shut? there's likely something that you do/say/believe/like that someone else deems ridiculous you are under no obligation to be tolerant, but it is something i would ask christians to be so it is something i would also ask non-christians to be now if we are talking about racism, abuse, things of that nature that is a different story but if my neighbor, lets call him Larry, is a kind and normal person who also believes god created the world in 6 days and then took a snoozer on day 7, I am doing myself and the world disservice by rejecting him completely over that one belief that's just my 2 cents though
Did you see Mr. Wilhelm cleaning the carpets?I went to this thing about 2 years ago. Had seen it I think in the maher doc "Relgiulous". Made a wrong turn leaving a casino and ran right into it. It's probably 20 minutes outside of Cincy.I went to gawk and mock but that is NOT the vibe. It's kind of creepy and stepford wives-y. I thought it might not be wise to poke fun but then again I was solo. Everyone was polite so I respected their belief. Lots of mennonite families as I recall.Have to say, for ideas this wacky, it was Fairly well done. They definitely didn't scrimp, lots of animatronics, a decent planetarium setup, but at the end I the day it's just BIZARRE. LIttle kids and let dinosaurs.They had a cross section of the ark though which was actually kind of coolTo see how this could have possibly been conceived. Last I heard they were fundraising to build an actual replica of the ark based on biblical dimensions.I can't recommend a trip but if you're ever in Cincy or eastern Indy with time to kill, it's an experience all right.
Way to completely miss the point.you say global warming is based on factsYou're confusing tolerating the belief vs tolerating the person. Of course you tolerate the person (unless they are a terrible person). Of all your examples, only global warming fits. The rest are opinions based on personal preference. Global warming is based on facts. Playing the lotto is not a belief. It may be a poor decision which can be proven mathematically but it is not a belief. Believing you have a better chance of winning because you have "lucky numbers" is a belief which is completely unfounded, worthy of ridicule and is not something I'd "tolerate".I don't see why ridiculous, unsubstantiated beliefs should be tolerated. Should we tolerate the beliefs of people who think the earth is flat? That 1+1=3? That underpants gnomes exist? That Don and Dawn rhyme?you sure do i also do not believe in reincarnation, but i respect the Dali Lama there are different paths for different people, but tolerance should be on everyone's path. Many people inside the museum could use this lesson, as could many outside if someone is trying to force their views on me, or debate them with me, or force them on others then there is an issue, i see nothing to be gained by mocking them for discussing their views among like minded folkYou're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance. We also have the right to mock this place.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree with some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do. freedom, it is america if you don't like it, don't goBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh not too sure why this should bother anyonewhy tolerate people that think global warming is real, or fake?why tolerate people who vote different from you?why tolerate people who chose to live in another counrty?why tolerate people who play the lotto?why tolerate people who liked the movie eyes wide shut? there's likely something that you do/say/believe/like that someone else deems ridiculous you are under no obligation to be tolerant, but it is something i would ask christians to be so it is something i would also ask non-christians to be now if we are talking about racism, abuse, things of that nature that is a different story but if my neighbor, lets call him Larry, is a kind and normal person who also believes god created the world in 6 days and then took a snoozer on day 7, I am doing myself and the world disservice by rejecting him completely over that one belief that's just my 2 cents though
others argue it is not
i am unsure as to which side i should be intolerant of
millions of people play the lotto believeing they will win
i also tolerate people who believe there are aliens, and people who believe there are not, even people who believe we have been visited
hell, i'll tolerate people who believe in bigfoot
right up until they try and tell me I must believe in bigfoot
of course if I tell them they must not, I am doing what i won't tolerate them doing.
I did not deny it, but there are plenty who doWay to completely miss the point.you say global warming is based on factsYou're confusing tolerating the belief vs tolerating the person. Of course you tolerate the person (unless they are a terrible person). Of all your examples, only global warming fits. The rest are opinions based on personal preference. Global warming is based on facts. Playing the lotto is not a belief. It may be a poor decision which can be proven mathematically but it is not a belief. Believing you have a better chance of winning because you have "lucky numbers" is a belief which is completely unfounded, worthy of ridicule and is not something I'd "tolerate".I don't see why ridiculous, unsubstantiated beliefs should be tolerated. Should we tolerate the beliefs of people who think the earth is flat? That 1+1=3? That underpants gnomes exist? That Don and Dawn rhyme?you sure do i also do not believe in reincarnation, but i respect the Dali Lama there are different paths for different people, but tolerance should be on everyone's path. Many people inside the museum could use this lesson, as could many outside if someone is trying to force their views on me, or debate them with me, or force them on others then there is an issue, i see nothing to be gained by mocking them for discussing their views among like minded folkYou're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance. We also have the right to mock this place.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree with some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do. freedom, it is america if you don't like it, don't goBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh not too sure why this should bother anyonewhy tolerate people that think global warming is real, or fake?why tolerate people who vote different from you?why tolerate people who chose to live in another counrty?why tolerate people who play the lotto?why tolerate people who liked the movie eyes wide shut? there's likely something that you do/say/believe/like that someone else deems ridiculous you are under no obligation to be tolerant, but it is something i would ask christians to be so it is something i would also ask non-christians to be now if we are talking about racism, abuse, things of that nature that is a different story but if my neighbor, lets call him Larry, is a kind and normal person who also believes god created the world in 6 days and then took a snoozer on day 7, I am doing myself and the world disservice by rejecting him completely over that one belief that's just my 2 cents though
others argue it is not
i am unsure as to which side i should be intolerant of
millions of people play the lotto believeing they will win
i also tolerate people who believe there are aliens, and people who believe there are not, even people who believe we have been visited
hell, i'll tolerate people who believe in bigfoot
right up until they try and tell me I must believe in bigfoot
of course if I tell them they must not, I am doing what i won't tolerate them doing.
Yes, the person should be tolerated. But their completely unfounded beliefs should not. If you believe you have a better than 1 in X (x being whatever the actual odds are for that lotto) chance at winning the lottery, that belief is wrong and should be called out.
And if you're denying the overwhelming evidence of global warming, I don't know what to tell you other than your belief is ridiculous on the subject is ridiculous and wrong. See what I did there? I called your belief ridiculous, not you.
This is a reasonable, well-written response.you sure doYou're right. We have the freedom to construct artifices that are living tributes to fake science and ignorance.freedom lets people make choices you or I disagree withBecause when we replace science with magic thinking we end up in trouble. When we indoctrinate future citizens with woefully inadequate scientific knowledge or mislead them to think science is evil we suffer as an economy and as a country.eh
not too sure why this should bother anyone
some would argue when we indoctrinate children with liberal ideals the same happens, others would argue conservative ideals do.
freedom, it is america
if you don't like it, don't go
We also have the right to mock this place.
i also do not believe in reincarnation, but i respect the Dali Lama
there are different paths for different people, but tolerance should be on everyone's path. Many people inside the museum could use this lesson, as could many outside
if someone is trying to force their views on me, or debate them with me, or force them on others then there is an issue, i see nothing to be gained by mocking them for discussing their views among like minded folk
These "others" you speak of are not scientists. There isn't two sides to every argument.you say global warming is based on facts
others argue it is not
Ironic that people drive to this museum using fossil fuels composed of organisms that are 650 million years old.
No - usually the response is that carbon dating is not foolproof, and sometimes gives inaccurate readings. The claim is that false assumptions are made about the starting nature of the the atoms involved.Seriously?I believe it's that God has made them appear older is their explanation.Interesting they have dinosaur bones. I'm wondering how they explain away the bible's time discrepancies with science? Carbon dating is a tool of Satan?