Next Schefter update even better:Here's the pre-emptive link.
Link
More than a little surprised that Reeves would take a coord position. GM for FO, sure, but coord? Don't see him bring Vick back.
Are 49ers Angling for Vick?
San Francisco is being secretive about its offensive plans, but it is not hard to connect dots in this case.
The 49ers are interviewing former Falcons coach Dan Reeves today. Reeves was the head coach when the Falcons traded for quarterback Michael Vick. One day earlier, the 49ers interviewed former Falcons and current Ravens quarterback Hue Jackson, who used to coach Vick in Atlanta. And San Francisco also has expressed some interest in former Falcons wide receivers coach Mike Johnson, who coached quarterbacks in Baltimore and also knows Vick well.
So, some of the candidates that the 49ers have begun to focus in on all have connections to Vick, who could be back in the NFL as early as this summer. No team has a greater need for a quarterback than the 49ers. And it’s not to say that they will pursue him.
But the coaches they’re pursuing now all know and have worked with Vick. And if that’s not enough of a conspiracy theory, then consider this: On Thursday, the 49ers also signed former Falcons cornerback Jimmy Williams, Vick’s college teammate who lives in Hampton, Va., the next town over from where Vick lives.
Might all just be coincidence. But might not.
I don't know why any team would want Mike Vick!Obviously a lot has to happen first but it would be interesting. Vick was a real weapon in Reeves system before the West Coast Offense and Jim Mora Jr/Greg Knapp tried to make him a pocket passer with short throws and such
I think he served his time and should be allowed back if someone is dumb enough to sign him.greyone said:Do you see the NFL suspending Vick before reinstating him?
DPRugby said:Vick isn't going to play for the 49ers. Niner fans wouldn't put up with that kind of guy.
Because he's a play maker who wins games.I think that would be a great move for San Fran.Phurfur said:I don't know why any team would want Mike Vick!Loopdog said:Obviously a lot has to happen first but it would be interesting. Vick was a real weapon in Reeves system before the West Coast Offense and Jim Mora Jr/Greg Knapp tried to make him a pocket passer with short throws and such
Curious as to whether this is sarcasm? Vick broke his ankle against the Ravens in the preseason and came back a little early, even. Now, because he broke his ankle, the Falcons went 4-12 or something equally awful and Reeves was fired but Vick, for many other faults, played thru some injuries for both Reeves and Mora, including a seperated shoulder. I don't recall an instance where I thought Vick was exaggerating injury.My memory's probably screwy, but wasn't Vick nursing little injuries a major reason that Reeves is currently unemployed? I always assumed Vick hated that guy the way he would sit out for several weeks after some phantom sprain where he'd fall down without even being touched.
That was how I saw it. Although I do admit I may be misremembering things.Curious as to whether this is sarcasm?
Be interested in other input, especially from other homers. I never got that impression.That was how I saw it. Although I do admit I may be misremembering things.Curious as to whether this is sarcasm?
When Bill Walsh brought in Laurence Phillips, the backlash was muted a bit because of the faith in Walsh. The present Niner staff doesn't have close to the credibility to bring in someone like Vick, even with someone like Reeves to handhold him (not that I believe it's going to happen).As for Reeves as OC otherwise, I wouldn't have a problem with it. The knowledge an experienced HC could provide Singletary could be very beneficial for the rookie coach.DPRugby said:Vick isn't going to play for the 49ers. Niner fans wouldn't put up with that kind of guy.
Reeves would be the only guy there (outside of players, both Veteran and Current) that has any real experience in both coaching an personnel. The 49ers GM, Prez, and HC are green at their hired positions. The one thing Reeves isn't is a holdover Nolan that brought in, and failed with.When Bill Walsh brought in Laurence Phillips, the backlash was muted a bit because of the faith in Walsh. The present Niner staff doesn't have close to the credibility to bring in someone like Vick, even with someone like Reeves to handhold him (not that I believe it's going to happen).As for Reeves as OC otherwise, I wouldn't have a problem with it. The knowledge an experienced HC could provide Singletary could be very beneficial for the rookie coach.DPRugby said:Vick isn't going to play for the 49ers. Niner fans wouldn't put up with that kind of guy.
With Vick involved, I would say it kills his value.Does this kill Gore's value or boost it?
I kinda half agree half disagree with this.Michael Vick was a very valuable player, and defenses didn't figure him out at all. Yes he looks like he held back Roddy White's development, but let's not forget in Vick's final season he threw for about 2,500 yards and run for another 1,000. That's 3,500 yards and a lot of extended drives by running for 1st downs on 3rd and 9 and situations like that.I agree that he likely won't get back to that level right away, but its certainly worth the risk for any team that doesn't consider PR to be the most important thing in the world.As for Vince Young, I very much believe him being a running QB has next to nothing to do with why Kerry Collins passed him on the depth chart, its Young's lack of commitment to the game and possibly fragile pysche that got him put on the bench.I think some are getting ahead of themselves with the thoughts of Mike Vick coming back to the NFL and being anything like the player we remember him to be first of all. And let's remember, he wasn't exactly all that prolific to begin with once defenses figured him out and significantly narrowed his game. Many wanted to point fingers at his receivers, the very same receivers that rookie Matt Ryan stepped in and excelled with. Oh, and Roddy White is heading to his first Pro Bowl. Even "if" Vick is released in July "and" Goodell decides to reinstate him "and" somebody is willing to go out on a limb and sign him, one training camp and a handful of preseason games is not going to be enough time for a quarterback of limited skills to get his game back. Not going to happen. He'll have to redevelop his timing and accuracy, not to mention team chemistry. He never did conquer reading defenses either. No way he'll be starting caliber in 2009, with no real certainty he ever will be again. He'll be a project at best, and may even wind up being a player at a different position in the end if he does come back. I wouldn't be looking to open any future FF roster spots for him just yet. He's strickly a "wait and see." Vick is nothing to bank on by any means. He's got a long, long way to go before seeing an NFL field again. Much longer than some seem to think. The odds of him finding any kind of success in the NFL again are stacked against him.Let's also keep in mind that the "supposed" next coming of him is sitting on the bench in Tennessee behind an aged veteran who the team has all but assured he'll be brought back to start again next season. The NFL is no place for such quarterbacks.
1. People don't need to get past "the dog fighting thing" and, if possible, Clinton Portis should think before he opens his mouth. When he was making a fool out of himself on TV wondering aloud what the big deal was, one of his own teammates was looking at him like he couldn't believe what he was saying.2. Vick may have a right to go back to work but playing in the NFL is a priviledge, not a right. By the way, I never thought Vick was that good anyway.Loopdog said:I think people need to get past the dog fighting thing. I'm not saying I agree with it, but he has done his time and like any American, deserves the right to resume his profession when he is done serving. If you were a chef, and you got out of prison, you'd go back to cooking. Michael Vick will go back to playing football. I think that he will still be a useful player in the NFL no question. He's been off for 2 years, so his body is probably pretty well taken care of. I'm sure he's been lifting weights and staying in shape in there, hell, he is probably MORE dedicated to training in there then he was when he was a free man going all over the country being the league's most popular player. I'm sure he probably took some things for granted while he was at his apex of popularity. Time will tell.
But the idea that people are going to boycott NFL games because Vick is on their team is hysterically funny to me. Sure, there might be some of those annoying PETA idiots outside picketing, but NFL fans are rabid, there is NO CHANCE that any significant amount of people are going to boycott and not go to their favorite teams games because Vick is on their team. People will get over it. Vick will have to do some sort of apology or start a charity or something and really show that he's sorry, but if he does that, people will forgive him.
Just because Peta's helped some animals, doesn't make them any less annoying idiots. And all the people who will "quit watching the NFL", "stop buying tickets" and "quit playing fantasy football" because of what Vick did, yet continue to support a league that contains Leonard Little have little credibility with me.
Wrong. Both are idiots, but only one intentionally hurt another living thing. Intent is the key here.Just because Peta's helped some animals, doesn't make them any less annoying idiots. And all the people who will "quit watching the NFL", "stop buying tickets" and "quit playing fantasy football" because of what Vick did, yet continue to support a league that contains Leonard Little have little credibility with me.
...and the same one that did it intentionally did it over and over and over again without remorse.Wrong. Both are idiots, but only one intentionally hurt another living thing. Intent is the key here.Just because Peta's helped some animals, doesn't make them any less annoying idiots. And all the people who will "quit watching the NFL", "stop buying tickets" and "quit playing fantasy football" because of what Vick did, yet continue to support a league that contains Leonard Little have little credibility with me.
Vick rumors: all bark and no bite
The 49ers have high hopes for a quarterback who was picked first in the draft and whose career has been on ice for the last year and a half. But his last name is Smith, not Vick. A couple of reports yesterday looked at the some of the 49ers' recent moves - interviewing Hue Jackson and Dan Reeves, signing Jimmy Williams - and connected the dots to Michael Vick, the former Falcons cornerback currently behind bars for dog fighting. What the reports didn't look at was:
1. The 49ers' first choice for offensive coordinator was Scott Linehan, who has no ties to Vick.
2. Good character has been a top criterion for the 49ers in recent years. Guys who run dog-fighting operations from their homes don't exactly fit that description.
3. Mike Singletary doesn't suffer fools. "Cannot play with them, cannot win with them, cannot coach with them. Can't do it. I want winners!"
4. The 49ers don't think their quarterback situation is as dreary as everyone else does.
5. It would be asinine to hire an offensive coordinator based on the possibility that he could help you land a quarterback who hasn't thrown a pass since 2006, is currently incarcerated and who may or may not be suspended for the rest of his life.
6. And one more thing - the 49ers say they have no intention of pursuing Vick
Point 4 is probably the beat writ writers opinion here. If it's the 49ers opinion as well, they are indeed in trouble.49ers beat writer weighs in:
Vick rumors: all bark and no bite
The 49ers have high hopes for a quarterback who was picked first in the draft and whose career has been on ice for the last year and a half. But his last name is Smith, not Vick. A couple of reports yesterday looked at the some of the 49ers' recent moves - interviewing Hue Jackson and Dan Reeves, signing Jimmy Williams - and connected the dots to Michael Vick, the former Falcons cornerback currently behind bars for dog fighting. What the reports didn't look at was:
1. The 49ers' first choice for offensive coordinator was Scott Linehan, who has no ties to Vick.
2. Good character has been a top criterion for the 49ers in recent years. Guys who run dog-fighting operations from their homes don't exactly fit that description.
3. Mike Singletary doesn't suffer fools. "Cannot play with them, cannot win with them, cannot coach with them. Can't do it. I want winners!"
4. The 49ers don't think their quarterback situation is as dreary as everyone else does.
5. It would be asinine to hire an offensive coordinator based on the possibility that he could help you land a quarterback who hasn't thrown a pass since 2006, is currently incarcerated and who may or may not be suspended for the rest of his life.
6. And one more thing - the 49ers say they have no intention of pursuing Vick
I don't get it either. Quit watching the NFL because they employ a dogfighter? Does that mean they're okay with the league in its current situation where it employs a rapist and wife-beaters? These actions are okay with these people?Just because Peta's helped some animals, doesn't make them any less annoying idiots. And all the people who will "quit watching the NFL", "stop buying tickets" and "quit playing fantasy football" because of what Vick did, yet continue to support a league that contains Leonard Little have little credibility with me.
Well James Harrison intentionally hurt his wife and Jerramy Stevens intentionally raped someone. Marvin Harrison tried to shoot someone (the intent was there) and intentionally choked teenage fans. This is a product you can get behind, but when Vick is re-instated you're gonna have a problem?Wrong. Both are idiots, but only one intentionally hurt another living thing. Intent is the key here.Just because Peta's helped some animals, doesn't make them any less annoying idiots. And all the people who will "quit watching the NFL", "stop buying tickets" and "quit playing fantasy football" because of what Vick did, yet continue to support a league that contains Leonard Little have little credibility with me.
I really believe the 49ers think that. The FO is a delusional bunch.Point 4 is probably the beat writ writers opinion here. If it's the 49ers opinion as well, they are indeed in trouble.49ers beat writer weighs in:
Vick rumors: all bark and no bite
The 49ers have high hopes for a quarterback who was picked first in the draft and whose career has been on ice for the last year and a half. But his last name is Smith, not Vick. A couple of reports yesterday looked at the some of the 49ers' recent moves - interviewing Hue Jackson and Dan Reeves, signing Jimmy Williams - and connected the dots to Michael Vick, the former Falcons cornerback currently behind bars for dog fighting. What the reports didn't look at was:
1. The 49ers' first choice for offensive coordinator was Scott Linehan, who has no ties to Vick.
2. Good character has been a top criterion for the 49ers in recent years. Guys who run dog-fighting operations from their homes don't exactly fit that description.
3. Mike Singletary doesn't suffer fools. "Cannot play with them, cannot win with them, cannot coach with them. Can't do it. I want winners!"
4. The 49ers don't think their quarterback situation is as dreary as everyone else does.
5. It would be asinine to hire an offensive coordinator based on the possibility that he could help you land a quarterback who hasn't thrown a pass since 2006, is currently incarcerated and who may or may not be suspended for the rest of his life.
6. And one more thing - the 49ers say they have no intention of pursuing Vick
While it's not as long as your good self, I've been following the Niners for over 20 years from across the other side of the world. I've always viewed characters such as Joe Montana, Steve Young and Jerry Rice as the epitome of professional American sportsmen. Vick definitely does not fit this mold, and I'm with you in thinking it would be very hard to continue my support for the organisation were he to sign.I've been a 49ers fan since 1970. If for some reason they ever sign Vick I'll no longer support them in any fashion. Believe me, I've spent a lot of money on 49ers tickets, memorabilia and apparel over the years. If enough 49ers fans share my view the 49ers organization would definitely feel it in their wallets. Having said that, I don't think 49ers fans need to worry about Mr. Vick coming to San Francisco.
I think Shaun Hill gives them a solid enough option where they feel they don't need to do anything rash (like trade 5 1st rounders for Cassell or pursue a convicted felon like Vick). I don't think anyone believes that Shaun Hill is the QB of the future or anything. Singletary has said as much.Oh, and another article pointing out how ridiculous the Vick speculation is.I really believe the 49ers think that. The FO is a delusional bunch.Point 4 is probably the beat writ writers opinion here. If it's the 49ers opinion as well, they are indeed in trouble.49ers beat writer weighs in:
Vick rumors: all bark and no bite
The 49ers have high hopes for a quarterback who was picked first in the draft and whose career has been on ice for the last year and a half. But his last name is Smith, not Vick. A couple of reports yesterday looked at the some of the 49ers' recent moves - interviewing Hue Jackson and Dan Reeves, signing Jimmy Williams - and connected the dots to Michael Vick, the former Falcons cornerback currently behind bars for dog fighting. What the reports didn't look at was:
1. The 49ers' first choice for offensive coordinator was Scott Linehan, who has no ties to Vick.
2. Good character has been a top criterion for the 49ers in recent years. Guys who run dog-fighting operations from their homes don't exactly fit that description.
3. Mike Singletary doesn't suffer fools. "Cannot play with them, cannot win with them, cannot coach with them. Can't do it. I want winners!"
4. The 49ers don't think their quarterback situation is as dreary as everyone else does.
5. It would be asinine to hire an offensive coordinator based on the possibility that he could help you land a quarterback who hasn't thrown a pass since 2006, is currently incarcerated and who may or may not be suspended for the rest of his life.
6. And one more thing - the 49ers say they have no intention of pursuing Vick
Kind of applies to both. Little was charged with a DWI a couple years after killing a lady in a DWI crash. Little has never shown remorse. as has been said before... Human > Dog.Both are terrible people. Little only got a slap on the wrist, Vick did time. I'll forgive Vick before I'd forgive Little, but I guess some of you have your priorities....and the same one that did it intentionally did it over and over and over again without remorse.Wrong. Both are idiots, but only one intentionally hurt another living thing. Intent is the key here.Just because Peta's helped some animals, doesn't make them any less annoying idiots. And all the people who will "quit watching the NFL", "stop buying tickets" and "quit playing fantasy football" because of what Vick did, yet continue to support a league that contains Leonard Little have little credibility with me.
So the Lawrence Phillips signing didn't do it for you?While it's not as long as your good self, I've been following the Niners for over 20 years from across the other side of the world. I've always viewed characters such as Joe Montana, Steve Young and Jerry Rice as the epitome of professional American sportsmen. Vick definitely does not fit this mold, and I'm with you in thinking it would be very hard to continue my support for the organisation were he to sign.I've been a 49ers fan since 1970. If for some reason they ever sign Vick I'll no longer support them in any fashion. Believe me, I've spent a lot of money on 49ers tickets, memorabilia and apparel over the years. If enough 49ers fans share my view the 49ers organization would definitely feel it in their wallets. Having said that, I don't think 49ers fans need to worry about Mr. Vick coming to San Francisco.
I'm sure the animals they tossed in the dumpsters in North Carolina sure appreciated the help.ninerfan said:3. Those "annoying PETA idiots" do a lot of good for animals. You should take a look at their website to see the work that they do because you obviously have no idea.
Obviously not. These guys looked at the Phillips signing and decided that fit in with what they stood for as fans. Given that they both place such a strong emphasis on character we can only assume that they don't have a problem with beating women.Max Power said:So the Lawrence Phillips signing didn't do it for you?chook said:While it's not as long as your good self, I've been following the Niners for over 20 years from across the other side of the world. I've always viewed characters such as Joe Montana, Steve Young and Jerry Rice as the epitome of professional American sportsmen. Vick definitely does not fit this mold, and I'm with you in thinking it would be very hard to continue my support for the organisation were he to sign.ninerfan said:I've been a 49ers fan since 1970. If for some reason they ever sign Vick I'll no longer support them in any fashion. Believe me, I've spent a lot of money on 49ers tickets, memorabilia and apparel over the years. If enough 49ers fans share my view the 49ers organization would definitely feel it in their wallets. Having said that, I don't think 49ers fans need to worry about Mr. Vick coming to San Francisco.
Really. Maybe my memory is faulty but I thought he revived the Giants and the Falcons.Michael Fox said:The idea of Michael Vick in San Fran -- home of the wackiest lefties on earth -- is amusing. I'd love to see it happen just for drama value.Dan Reeves though? Seriously? I mean, Joe Gibbs was past his prime but the only reason Reeves ever HAD a prime was because of John Elway.