What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Daniel Snyder wants reporter canned (1 Viewer)

Bri

Footballguy
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/early-lea...er_seeks_d.html

Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder is seeking the dismissal of Washington City Paper writer Dave McKenna because of a story he wrote in November, as Paul Farhi reported today.

*******Article Cindy is referring to:

There's no question Redskins owner Dan Snyder had a few problems with a cover story about him in Washington's City Paper in November.

At the moment, in fact, Snyder is fighting mad.

Snyder has objected to the article that detailed some of his controversial actions as team owner and other reports about him in the weekly publication, and has threatened legal action against the newspaper. He also is seeking the dismissal of the article's author, staff writer Dave McKenna.

Snyder took his complaints about the Nov. 19 article to Creative Loafing Inc., the Tampa-based company that owns City Paper and five other "alternative" papers around the country, and to CLI's parent, Atalaya Capital Management, a New York-based hedge fund. Atalaya bought CLI for $5 million in a bankruptcy proceeding in August 2009.

In a letter sent to City Paper's owners after the article's publication, Redskins chief operating officer David Donovan alleged that Snyder had been defamed by the publication and that legal action was an option. To date, however, no lawsuit has been filed.

The article, entitled "The Cranky Redskins Fan's Guide to Dan Snyder," detailed dozens of Snyder's actions as team owner and businessman. It recounted such episodes as the controversy surrounding the removal of trees on land adjacent to Snyder's home near the Potomac River and his raising of parking and ticket prices at FedEx Field, the Redskins' home.

The article was accompanied by a clearly doctored photo of Snyder with horns and facial hair. It drew hundreds of comments on City Paper's Web site, almost all of them praising McKenna and condemning Snyder.

McKenna has written critically about Snyder's ownership of the team for years, and has broken a number of stories that have painted Snyder in unflattering terms. McKenna has also freelanced music reviews and other stories to The Post's Style section for several years.

He had no comment when contacted Tuesday; he referred calls to Amy Austin, City Paper's publisher.

Austin, in an interview, stood by McKenna's work, calling his Nov. 19 story "very, very solid. . . . If there was something to correct, we would have corrected it." She added, "Dave is a stellar reporter. He provides original and well-reported content for us every week."

Austin said she couldn't comment on Snyder's objections because the team owner hasn't spoken with anyone at her publication. She referred questions to Marty Petty, chief executive of Creative Loafing. Petty did not return calls seeking comment.

Snyder has never sued a media organization for something aired or printed, according to Patty Glaser, one of his lawyers. But Glaser said Tuesday that a lawsuit is being prepared. Defending such a suit can be an expensive proposition for a media organization.

"We have been pushed in this direction, in our view," said Glaser, a well-known litigator based in Los Angeles who represented Conan O'Brien in his negotiations to leave NBC last year. "It's something we tried to avoid. We feel they have published untruths" about Snyder. She declined to describe Snyder's objections or to detail factual errors allegedly published by City Paper.

According to several people with direct knowledge of the situation, Snyder's attorneys contacted The Post last week and asked the newspaper to preserve e-mails between Post sports blogger Dan Steinberg and McKenna.

The attorneys said they intend to explore whether there was any agreement between McKenna and Steinberg to cross-promote McKenna's pieces on Snyder. Steinberg routinely links to sports content across the Web.

McKenna and Steinberg are former neighbors and longtime friends, a fact disclosed by Steinberg when he linked to McKenna's City Paper article on Steinberg's D.C. Sports Bog blog in November. At the time, Steinberg called McKenna's article "an encyclopedic takedown of Snyder's decade of Redskins ownership, with just about all the horror stories gathered in one place."

McKenna, in turn, occasionally mentions Steinberg's work in his City Paper columns and blog postings, referring to him as "the Great Dan Steinberg."

Steinberg declined to comment Tuesday, as did The Post.

 
Snyder used to own a media company (as someone commented at one of the links) and has zillions of dollars so he is not just some guy complaining here. This has to be taken as a very real threat to the reporter.

The PFWA meets near the Supe every year for the annual meeting. All the biggest NFL reporters are together right now with NFL execs not far away often meeting with them.

I imagine we'll hear something real quick on this- at least an initial viewpoint from all these powers that be.

 
I'll never understand how someone that made as much money as he has can fail so spectacularly at PR. If Dan feels he's been libelled then he should let people know what was untrue, sue the paper, and let a court decide. Trying to use his weight to get people fired that write negative stuff about him isn't exactly going to win him any public support.

 
why doesnt he just buy the company and move the guy to the Obituary section
Obituary writeups are lawsuits waiting to happen. Most papers use a madlibs like formula because of this. So I'm guessing you just mean a demotion he hates, so how about covering T-ball
 
I think the play here is for the publisher to call Snyder and say "give us something positive to write about" and be pushy if he's sorta reserved and unprepared for it. That's a keypoint Snyder needs to digest "on the spot."

Newspapers are for news not press releases. (although PRs can be used as filler some times) Snyder can't use the paper as his pr machine, he's gotta give them news. If he wants good news, then give em' good news. Without bothering to check, Brady and Peyton and Bradford and...likely donated time and/or money recently. Is there a Redskin that did? Give em' that info Snyder, give em that. Then the publisher should insist this very reporter goes and covers it.

The publisher may have to tell the reporter to tone it down, but I imagine that would be behind closed doors.

 
I think the play here is for the publisher to call Snyder and say "give us something positive to write about" and be pushy if he's sorta reserved and unprepared for it. That's a keypoint Snyder needs to digest "on the spot."

Newspapers are for news not press releases. (although PRs can be used as filler some times) Snyder can't use the paper as his pr machine, he's gotta give them news. If he wants good news, then give em' good news. Without bothering to check, Brady and Peyton and Bradford and...likely donated time and/or money recently. Is there a Redskin that did? Give em' that info Snyder, give em that. Then the publisher should insist this very reporter goes and covers it.

The publisher may have to tell the reporter to tone it down, but I imagine that would be behind closed doors.
Yes, one solution for the Emperor could be that he put on some clothes instead of trying to get fired the reporter who pointed out that he was buck naked.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
According to several people with direct knowledge of the situation, Snyder's attorneys contacted The Post last week and asked the newspaper to preserve e-mails between Post sports blogger Dan Steinberg and McKenna.The attorneys said they intend to explore whether there was any agreement between McKenna and Steinberg to cross-promote McKenna's pieces on Snyder. Steinberg routinely links to sports content across the Web.
The Washington Post isn't terribly impressed with Dan Snyder, and I don't see them doing anything to help him here. Snyder's just making himself look like a thin-skinned jackass again. It'll be interesting to hear how this is reported on ESPN980, which is effectively owned by Snyder.
 
I hope he sues them just so all the horrible stuff he's done resurfaces. I think Grandma and the season tickets is the worst. Snyder is a complete schmuck, has run a franchise into the ground and totally alienated nearly every Redskins fan. Is there really any more he could do to ruin things? Where is this guys shame?

 
Great piece. Loved reading it. Just like Snyder's management with everything else, he simply doesn't know how to navigate the media. News shouldn't be beholden to anyone when it comes to content as long as it is reported accurately and responsibly. It's a service to our democracy when done well and a necessity to sustain a democracy. When the press goes far enough south, so will the country. I wouldn't worry about that reporter. If the editor stands behind him publicly as strong as he has, then they're not warning him.

In fact, the PR for this suit might earn them more circulation. Sure it will be an expensive proposition for them, but I think the negative PR that will occur for Snyder will be too damaging for the suit to cost the paper too much money before Danny Boy drops it.

 
I hope he sues them just so all the horrible stuff he's done resurfaces. I think Grandma and the season tickets is the worst. Snyder is a complete schmuck, has run a franchise into the ground and totally alienated nearly every Redskins fan. Is there really any more he could do to ruin things? Where is this guys shame?
What's the old saying: "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." Applies here to Snyder fighting against "lies about him" in the paper...
 
According to several people with direct knowledge of the situation, Snyder's attorneys contacted The Post last week and asked the newspaper to preserve e-mails between Post sports blogger Dan Steinberg and McKenna.The attorneys said they intend to explore whether there was any agreement between McKenna and Steinberg to cross-promote McKenna's pieces on Snyder. Steinberg routinely links to sports content across the Web.
The Washington Post isn't terribly impressed with Dan Snyder, and I don't see them doing anything to help him here. Snyder's just making himself look like a thin-skinned jackass again. It'll be interesting to hear how this is reported on ESPN980, which is effectively owned by Snyder.
:thumbup: Pretty much read everything Fatness posts aout the Skins
 
the other article, the negative one, that this is all about is here

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/article...-to-dan-snyder/
My god that list is horrible :clap: Inside the Red Zone With Vinny Cerrato: WTEM radio show featuring top Snyder aide that debuted early in the 2008 season, shortly after Snyder had bought what was then D.C.’s only sports-radio station. Because of abuse from Skins fans, Cerrato quickly stopped taking calls. He later stopped showing up at all on Mondays after Skins’ losses. The show didn’t return for the 2009 season.

:pickle:

 
This is just another debacle for Snyder. He simply doesn't have anyone around him who can tell him no when he comes up with another terrible idea. Like suing bankrupt grandmothers for their season ticket money

I would be extremely surprised if this suit is ever filed. This is just Snyder trying to use the threat of a lawsuit to get the City Paper to fire McKenna. Clearly, and to their credit, City Paper has stood behind its reporter, and now this has turned into another embarrassment for the Redskins. This story had died and now it's bigger news than ever.

I remember another incident that the City Paper story doesn't even talk about - during a Steelers-Redskins game, Pittsburgh color analyst was calling the Redskins, the "Redfaces." Snyder sent a flunky over to tell Cope to stop and Cope responded "If that boy billionaire thinks he can shut me up, he can stick his head in a bucket of paint." The next day, the Redskins claimed they were worried about trademark rights with the distortion of the team name. Right.

When I was a reporter, an editor told me that it's not news when someone claims they're going to sue - it's only news when the lawsuit actually gets filed. In this case, I think that day will never come. What lawyer will sign his name to a complaint for libel, defamation or slander when they can't show something in the article was not true? Everything in that article is factual.

 
TheWheel said:
I hope he sues them just so all the horrible stuff he's done resurfaces. I think Grandma and the season tickets is the worst. Snyder is a complete schmuck, has run a franchise into the ground and totally alienated nearly every Redskins fan. Is there really any more he could do to ruin things? Where is this guys shame?
He could move the team to LA. :bag:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What lawyer will sign his name to a complaint for libel, defamation or slander when they can't show something in the article was not true? Everything in that article is factual.
There was plenty in that article that was not purely fact. That Snyder hired Sherm Lewis to embarrass Zorn into resigning, for instance. Whatever we may suspect, I doubt any of us know why Sherm Lewis was hired. McKenna routinely opines on Snyder's motivations at other times. Now, I'm sure McKenna is protected under Sullivan, and I'm not defending Snyder. But that article wasn't a great piece of reportage or anything. It was a compilation of lots of embarrassing things that have happened in the Snyder era with some conjecture about Snyder's motives. If Snyder were my client, I'd be sure he understood that his case wasn't particularly strong, but I'd have no worries about facing Rule 11 sanctions or even about failing to survive a motion to dismiss.

 
The story is now on Yahoo's home page. Great job, Dan! You've taken a story that appeared three months ago in a local weekly and not only brought it back to life but also made it national news.

 
According to several people with direct knowledge of the situation, Snyder's attorneys contacted The Post last week and asked the newspaper to preserve e-mails between Post sports blogger Dan Steinberg and McKenna.The attorneys said they intend to explore whether there was any agreement between McKenna and Steinberg to cross-promote McKenna's pieces on Snyder. Steinberg routinely links to sports content across the Web.
The Washington Post isn't terribly impressed with Dan Snyder, and I don't see them doing anything to help him here. Snyder's just making himself look like a thin-skinned jackass again. It'll be interesting to hear how this is reported on ESPN980, which is effectively owned by Snyder.
:blackdot: Pretty much read everything Fatness posts aout the Skins
:lmao: He resides in the "cradle of analysis."
 
the other article, the negative one, that this is all about is here

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/article...-to-dan-snyder/
My god that list is horrible :shrug: Inside the Red Zone With Vinny Cerrato: WTEM radio show featuring top Snyder aide that debuted early in the 2008 season, shortly after Snyder had bought what was then D.C.’s only sports-radio station. Because of abuse from Skins fans, Cerrato quickly stopped taking calls. He later stopped showing up at all on Mondays after Skins’ losses. The show didn’t return for the 2009 season.

:loco:
That article's just an incredible list of blunders. :lmao:
Redskins Unfiltered: Feature on Redskins.com designed to “offer fans an a la carte menu of information,” as Snyder told The New York Times in 2006. In practice, Unfiltered was mainly used to rebut everything written about the team by The Washington Post. Immediately after the Post ran a story that mentioned players eating “fast food” at Redskins Park, for example, Snyder staffer Larry Michael produced a long video in which team employees testified that Baja Fresh was NOT fast food. Unfiltered came back to haunt management when players used its video as evidence in a union grievance over “contact drills” during voluntary workouts. “You know how we caught them?” said NFLPA chief Gene Upshaw. “We saw it on their Web site.”
 
Gene Weingarten of The Washington Post responds to Snyder's lawsuit with an open letter:

To: Daniel Snyder, owner, Washington RedskinsFrom: Gene WeingartenRe: Your lawsuit against the Washington City Paper because of an unflattering article about you.I just want you to know you have my full support in this matter, as I support everything you have done during your stewardship of the Redskins. You rock. I wish you good health and long life and hope you run the franchise for many, many years to come. I say this with utmost sincerity as a lifelong fan of the New York Giants.I know you are taking some criticism today from carping media types. They seem to think that you are not only behaving like a petty, vindictive bully but also that you are being strategically stupid - by bringing a vast new audience to a three-month-old, otherwise-obscure alternative-media piece, which can be found here.I understand why you were upset by this article. By unkindly focusing only on the negative aspect of your ownership, the author, Dave McKenna, is suggesting that you are an avaricious, imperious, conscienceless plutocrat with callous contempt for the fans; a man whose Napoleonic, pouter-pigeon swagger conceals a doofus-like understanding of the game and whose pernicious, autocratic meddling has consigned the team to perpetual mediocrity and its players and coaches to a perennial state of harrowing anxiety, all of this starting virtually from the moment you arrived and continuing to this very minute.This could cause a casual reader to conclude you are the most malign and incompetent owner in the history of organized sports, which is completely unfair. Because of his agenda, McKenna fails to contextualize all of this - neglecting to mention, to use just one obvious example, that former Cincinnati Reds owner Marge Schott used to let her dog poop on the playing field.But I digress. The point I want to make - and I think I can speak not only for myself but for all Giants fans - is that you have been very, very good to us, and we appreciate it. It's not easy being an ardent supporter of a football team. In this sport, the cliche is mostly true: On any given Sunday, any team can defeat any other team. Such is the nature of this game, which is so often influenced by injuries and so often subject to the effects of intangibles like momentum. This keeps the devoted fan in a constant state of stress. You can't take any win for granted.But thanks to you, twice a season we can. Nothing is certain, of course, but when a Redskins game approaches, we at least know that we will be facing a team in spiritual disarray, whose players have been assembled largely by whim and impulse and ego, coached by a person as insecure as a teenage girl at a prom, with a nose zit.It helps. It helps a lot.After another losing season in which your recently acquired $78 million over-the-hill quarterback got benched and your corpulent $100 million defensive lineman simply refused to play, it is heartening to see you focusing your resources on trying to punish a newspaper.Yes, it may be a dreadfully arrogant and stupid thing to do. But the point is, you seem to want to do it. And believe me, what makes you happy makes me happy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Worst owner in sports. Some owners wont spend money and some suck all the money they can out of their fans.
I wasn't aware that Snyder was holding a gun to anyone's head. Fans give their money out of their own free will. In fact, as a Bills fan I have absolutely zero sympathy for any Skins fan that supports that team with any money at all. Because of Skins fans, Snyder has nickel and dimed everyone and turned the Redskins into one of the most valuable pro sports teams. And during the last CBA negotiations all we heard about was how great of an owner Snyder is and how he hustles after every dollar and is innovative in finding new revenue streams, blah blah blah. And how small market owners like Mike Brown and Ralph Wilson are just lazy and incompetent because they don't nickel and dime their fans to death in small markets with bad economies. And Wilson and Brown were ridiculed throughout that entire process even though it turns out that they were the only owners that were right and that were really looking out for the fans and the game of football. But that didn't stop the media and the fans in Dallas/Washington/NYC, etc. from beating their chests and telling us how great and smart their owners were.So thanks Skins fans, you keep feeding the beast and it's not only draining your wallets, but it's screwed everyone else as well.

TheWheel said:
I hope he sues them just so all the horrible stuff he's done resurfaces. I think Grandma and the season tickets is the worst. Snyder is a complete schmuck, has run a franchise into the ground and totally alienated nearly every Redskins fan. Is there really any more he could do to ruin things? Where is this guys shame?
Huh, because even with their putrid year, I'm pretty sure they sold out every game and had no problem raking in tons of dough. I bet they sold tons of McNabb jerseys before the season and in the early parts of the season too.
 
in that open letter he wrote of thanking him "on behalf of all Giants fans"- that's pretty funny. Guess Cowboys and Eagles need to thank him

 
Worst owner in sports. Some owners wont spend money and some suck all the money they can out of their fans.
I wasn't aware that Snyder was holding a gun to anyone's head. Fans give their money out of their own free will. In fact, as a Bills fan I have absolutely zero sympathy for any Skins fan that supports that team with any money at all. Because of Skins fans, Snyder has nickel and dimed everyone and turned the Redskins into one of the most valuable pro sports teams. And during the last CBA negotiations all we heard about was how great of an owner Snyder is and how he hustles after every dollar and is innovative in finding new revenue streams, blah blah blah. And how small market owners like Mike Brown and Ralph Wilson are just lazy and incompetent because they don't nickel and dime their fans to death in small markets with bad economies. And Wilson and Brown were ridiculed throughout that entire process even though it turns out that they were the only owners that were right and that were really looking out for the fans and the game of football. But that didn't stop the media and the fans in Dallas/Washington/NYC, etc. from beating their chests and telling us how great and smart their owners were.So thanks Skins fans, you keep feeding the beast and it's not only draining your wallets, but it's screwed everyone else as well.

TheWheel said:
I hope he sues them just so all the horrible stuff he's done resurfaces. I think Grandma and the season tickets is the worst. Snyder is a complete schmuck, has run a franchise into the ground and totally alienated nearly every Redskins fan. Is there really any more he could do to ruin things? Where is this guys shame?
Huh, because even with their putrid year, I'm pretty sure they sold out every game and had no problem raking in tons of dough. I bet they sold tons of McNabb jerseys before the season and in the early parts of the season too.
Your post comes off as nothing but bitter. Been a fan of the Skins for over 30 years, not going to switch teams. I'll give up on the whole NFL before I do that. I do agree about not spending any money on them and haven't in the last five years.p.s. I'ld have alittle more respect for Ralph Wilson. Wouldn't put his name and that clown Mike Brown's name in the same sentence.

 
in that open letter he wrote of thanking him "on behalf of all Giants fans"- that's pretty funny. Guess Cowboys and Eagles need to thank him
Nah, the NFC East is more fun when all 4 teams have a shot at things. I now look forward to Eagles and Giants games far more than Redskins games.
 
I'll never understand how someone that made as much money as he has can fail so spectacularly at PR. If Dan feels he's been libelled then he should let people know what was untrue, sue the paper, and let a court decide. Trying to use his weight to get people fired that write negative stuff about him isn't exactly going to win him any public support.
Well, you'd have to understand how he made his money. He made his money by using his Dad's money. It's not like he was poor to begin with. Then his company illegally stole customers from other companies by switching their accounts without the customer's knowledge. His penalty was a minor fine - purportedly only minor due to some insider activities. The guy certainly made money, but he's hardly a poster boy for how to create and build an empire in an honest and integrity based way.One of my friends worked in a very senior positions at his company (and I won't say in what job because it would give TMI). But she is adamant that he is the most selfish person she has ever met. The words she used to describe her 4-5 years there are unprintable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
in that open letter he wrote of thanking him "on behalf of all Giants fans"- that's pretty funny. Guess Cowboys and Eagles need to thank him
Nah, the NFC East is more fun when all 4 teams have a shot at things. I now look forward to Eagles and Giants games far more than Redskins games.
The Cowboys are only 6-4 in their last ten games vs. the Redskins. If you go back to the last 12 it's 6-6. Only three of the last ten games and one of the last six (a late December 2009 game with no meaning to the Skins) have been decided by more than six points. The teams split the two games last year.Why exactly do you look forward to Eagles and Giants games more than these games? You prefer it when your team plays against franchises that are clearly superior to the Cowboys?
 
in that open letter he wrote of thanking him "on behalf of all Giants fans"- that's pretty funny. Guess Cowboys and Eagles need to thank him
Nah, the NFC East is more fun when all 4 teams have a shot at things. I now look forward to Eagles and Giants games far more than Redskins games.
The Cowboys are only 6-4 in their last ten games vs. the Redskins. If you go back to the last 12 it's 6-6. Only three of the last ten games and one of the last six (a late December 2009 game with no meaning to the Skins) have been decided by more than six points. The teams split the two games last year.Why exactly do you look forward to Eagles and Giants games more than these games? You prefer it when your team plays against franchises that are clearly superior to the Cowboys?
:goodposting: I hold the trash talking till next year. I'd guess the Cowboys were the favored team in every one of those 12 games.
 
From the complaint:

In its cover art, the Washington City Paper depicted the Jewish Mr. Snyder in a blatantly anti-Semitic way, complete with horns, bushy eyebrows, and dollar signs. This is precisely the type of imagery used historically, including in Nazi Germany, to dehumanize and vilify the Jewish people and associate them with a litany of libels over the last 2,000 years.
:)
 
followup to story wdcrob posted http://voices.washingtonpost.com/early-lea..._letter_to.html asks readers to submit their own letters. BTW Cindy Boren is top-notch reporter and worth your time to bookmark her blog
Not sure what all the journalistic codes and ethics are, but it seems to be a little over-the-top to me for them to be soliciting such letters. I realize this is the blog portion of the WaPo and maybe that makes a difference.
 
in that open letter he wrote of thanking him "on behalf of all Giants fans"- that's pretty funny. Guess Cowboys and Eagles need to thank him
Nah, the NFC East is more fun when all 4 teams have a shot at things. I now look forward to Eagles and Giants games far more than Redskins games.
The Cowboys are only 6-4 in their last ten games vs. the Redskins. If you go back to the last 12 it's 6-6. Only three of the last ten games and one of the last six (a late December 2009 game with no meaning to the Skins) have been decided by more than six points. The teams split the two games last year.Why exactly do you look forward to Eagles and Giants games more than these games? You prefer it when your team plays against franchises that are clearly superior to the Cowboys?
:homer:Delusinal cowboys fans trying to trick themselves into thinking they have a better owner than Washington, when at best for Dallas it's a wash. :(
 
From the complaint:

In its cover art, the Washington City Paper depicted the Jewish Mr. Snyder in a blatantly anti-Semitic way, complete with horns, bushy eyebrows, and dollar signs. This is precisely the type of imagery used historically, including in Nazi Germany, to dehumanize and vilify the Jewish people and associate them with a litany of libels over the last 2,000 years.
:shrug:
As someone pointed out in the Redskins thread ... it's even more preposterous when you consider the name and logo of the team he owns.
 
From the complaint:

In its cover art, the Washington City Paper depicted the Jewish Mr. Snyder in a blatantly anti-Semitic way, complete with horns, bushy eyebrows, and dollar signs. This is precisely the type of imagery used historically, including in Nazi Germany, to dehumanize and vilify the Jewish people and associate them with a litany of libels over the last 2,000 years.
:jawdrop:
As someone pointed out in the Redskins thread ... it's even more preposterous when you consider the name and logo of the team he owns.
I did not think about that, but that does add to the absurdity of it. I did not even know Snyder was Jewish until I read the complaint. The Indy Star similarly drew devil horns on Coach K last year. I guess in Snyder's mind, the Indy Star is anti-polish.
 
If you haven't been alienated by Dan Snyder no matter who you root for you need to respect yourself a little more. This guy acts in blatant disregard for the people who support him. The fact that Redskin fans still show up to a below average product, for which he has perpetrated. A fan to him is money. He doesn't give a #### about you. All he wants is your money. It would be one thing if the Redskins were winning and doing all this and that so the games were meaningful but it ain't. He is taking advantage of your loyalty. His hiring moves are debatable as all are but it is at least nice to see that he actually got a coach instead of wasting time with Jim Zorn. All I can do is hope things work out and you get something for your money.

 
in that open letter he wrote of thanking him "on behalf of all Giants fans"- that's pretty funny. Guess Cowboys and Eagles need to thank him
Nah, the NFC East is more fun when all 4 teams have a shot at things. I now look forward to Eagles and Giants games far more than Redskins games.
The Cowboys are only 6-4 in their last ten games vs. the Redskins. If you go back to the last 12 it's 6-6. Only three of the last ten games and one of the last six (a late December 2009 game with no meaning to the Skins) have been decided by more than six points. The teams split the two games last year.Why exactly do you look forward to Eagles and Giants games more than these games? You prefer it when your team plays against franchises that are clearly superior to the Cowboys?
:sadbanana:Delusinal cowboys fans trying to trick themselves into thinking they have a better owner than Washington, when at best for Dallas it's a wash. :unsure:
Not that either is great reading but from 1999 - 2010 (Snyder's tenure):Cowboys 96 - 96, 2 Division Championships, 4 Playoff App.Redskins 86 -106, 1 Division Championship, 2 Playoff App.And Jerry had a bit of success before then. Most owners > Jerry > Snyder
 
in that open letter he wrote of thanking him "on behalf of all Giants fans"- that's pretty funny. Guess Cowboys and Eagles need to thank him
Nah, the NFC East is more fun when all 4 teams have a shot at things. I now look forward to Eagles and Giants games far more than Redskins games.
The Cowboys are only 6-4 in their last ten games vs. the Redskins. If you go back to the last 12 it's 6-6. Only three of the last ten games and one of the last six (a late December 2009 game with no meaning to the Skins) have been decided by more than six points. The teams split the two games last year.Why exactly do you look forward to Eagles and Giants games more than these games? You prefer it when your team plays against franchises that are clearly superior to the Cowboys?
:unsure:Delusinal cowboys fans trying to trick themselves into thinking they have a better owner than Washington, when at best for Dallas it's a wash. :lmao:
Not that either is great reading but from 1999 - 2010 (Snyder's tenure):Cowboys 96 - 96, 2 Division Championships, 4 Playoff App.Redskins 86 -106, 1 Division Championship, 2 Playoff App.And Jerry had a bit of success before then. Most owners > Jerry > Snyder
:lmao: Keep telling yourself that. If Snyder had owned the Jimmy Johnson led Cowboys, Dallas would probably have at least 2 more Lombardi trophies right now.
 
Snyder had the Redskins' lawyer (the one responsible for having fans thrown out of the stadium in 2009 for carrying signs saying "Fire Cerrato" and "Fire the Owner") on radio today. I didn't hear it but someone in the comments on this article heard it.

Donovan could only come up with 2 factual inaccuracies on Lavar show today:

1) Dan Snyder was not 'tossed out' as director of 6 flags:

Nine people, including Snyder's handpicked Six Flags chief executive, Mark Shapiro, were named directors as part of a bankruptcy reorganization plan submitted by the company's junior bondholders, according to a filing submitted Friday in U.S. bankruptcy court in Delaware.

Under the reorganization plan, Snyder could not be reappointed to the board without the consent of those junior bondholders. A spokesman for Snyder released a statement Friday that said he would not seek reappointment.

VERDICT: No chance of them winning this in a court of law. They resigned because they had been de facto fired. As a bankruptcy lawyer, I can tell you that enumerating who cannot be on the board is quite unusual.

2) Snyder forged telemarketers' signatures

http://www.myfloridalegal.com/newsrel.nsf/...5256A390047D9C9

Verdict: Snyder Communications definitely participated in slamming (by the way, so did everyone else in the industry, they were just more aggressive). Only possible claim is that the specific slamming claims in question were post-sale, although Snyder did not leave active mgmt until later I believe.

SO: Snyder lawsuit has zero percent chance. But I think we knew that already.

Posted by: zornskins2 | February 2, 2011 7:22 PM | Report abuse
 
From the complaint:

In its cover art, the Washington City Paper depicted the Jewish Mr. Snyder in a blatantly anti-Semitic way, complete with horns, bushy eyebrows, and dollar signs. This is precisely the type of imagery used historically, including in Nazi Germany, to dehumanize and vilify the Jewish people and associate them with a litany of libels over the last 2,000 years.
:tfp:
If this is the photo they are talking about:http://cpmedia.s3.amazonaws.com/mirror/old..._cover_illo.jpg

I'm failing to see the dollar signs. Could it be that this libel lawsuit is itself libelous?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top