What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Daughter's math homework (1 Viewer)

Clearly the "-" symbol is defined as "the opposite of" in mathematics. Does anyone argue against this?
Yes. If that were true, then 3 - 2 would mean "3 opposite of 2" and the answer would be "no" instead of "1".So clearly "-" has other meanings.
3 - 2 means "add the opposite of two to three"
That would be 3 + (2 * -1).
Don't put two operators in a row.
I didn't.
 
In class, I would always describe "integers" as the counting numbers (1, 2, 3, etc) and their opposites (-1, -2, -3, etc) and zero.

I hope that no one here will argue that -1 is not the opposite of 1.

We say "negative 1" because it is the opposite of "positive 1".  We write -1 because it is far easier than continuously writing "negative 1".

Clearly the "-" symbol is defined as "the opposite of" in mathematics.  Does anyone argue against this?

----------------------------------------------------------

The word "of" in mathematics means "multiply".

If the problem reads "What is 1/2 of 6?", you multiply 1/2 times 6 and get an answer of 3.

If the problem reads, "30 is 50% of what number?", we set up the following equation:

30 is 50% of what number30 =  0.5  *  XWe divide 30 by 0.5 and get 60.Clearly, the word "of" is defined as "multiplication" in mathematics.  Does anyone argue against this?

----------------------------------------------------------

The order of operations tells us that exponents are performed before any multiplication.

If the problem reads 2*5^2, we square 5 before multiplying because multiplying  clearly means multiplication.

2*5^2

2*25

50

If the problem reads -5^2, we square before taking the opposite of because the word of clearly means multiplication.

-5^2

-25

These two problems are performed consistent with one another.  Does anyone argue against this?
I disagree. Which one of your garages do you want to arm wrestle in?
Neither. It is cold and neither are heated.
Math teacher right? How cold can it get down there? #####.
 
Clearly the "-" symbol is defined as "the opposite of" in mathematics.  Does anyone argue against this?
Yes. If that were true, then 3 - 2 would mean "3 opposite of 2" and the answer would be "no" instead of "1".So clearly "-" has other meanings.
The "-" I am referring to is the stand alone "-" that is often found at the beginning of numerals and expressions such as "-5", "-5x", "-5^2", etc.The "-" you are referring to in your reply is commonly called a "subtraction" sign. By definition, subtracting is merely "adding the opposite". In your "3 - 2" example, we can rewrite it as "3 + (-2)" which can be read as "three plus negative two" or "three plus the opposite of two".

 
Clearly the "-" symbol is defined as "the opposite of" in mathematics.  Does anyone argue against this?
Then what's the opposite of -1? --1?
You could write it like that or "-(-1)" or "+1" or simply use the conventional notation of "1".
 
I just consulted my buddy the successful mechanical engineer.

-----

Solve for x:

x = -5^2

-----

Hello Smoo,

Assuming that you mean x equals negative 5 squared, I would say that x = 25.

I'm sure you'll let met know if I'm I missing something...

-----
Well let him know. :thumbup:
 
Clearly the "-" symbol is defined as "the opposite of" in mathematics.  Does anyone argue against this?
Yes. If that were true, then 3 - 2 would mean "3 opposite of 2" and the answer would be "no" instead of "1".So clearly "-" has other meanings.
3 - 2 means "add the opposite of two to three"
That would be 3 + (2 * -1).
That's a longer way to write it, but sure.
 
You guys still haven't convinced me that -5 should not be considered a self-contained number. You've come close, but not there yet.

 
I just consulted my buddy the successful mechanical engineer.

-----

Solve for x:

x = -5^2

-----

Hello Smoo,

Assuming that you mean x equals negative 5 squared, I would say that x = 25.

I'm sure you'll let met know if I'm I missing something...

-----
Well let him know. :thumbup:
I'm not sure what to let him know.I told him that math has passed us by.

 
In class, I would always describe "integers" as the counting numbers (1, 2, 3, etc) and their opposites (-1, -2, -3, etc) and zero.

I hope that no one here will argue that -1 is not the opposite of 1.

We say "negative 1" because it is the opposite of "positive 1".  We write -1 because it is far easier than continuously writing "negative 1".

Clearly the "-" symbol is defined as "the opposite of" in mathematics.  Does anyone argue against this?

----------------------------------------------------------

The word "of" in mathematics means "multiply".

If the problem reads "What is 1/2 of 6?", you multiply 1/2 times 6 and get an answer of 3.

If the problem reads, "30 is 50% of what number?", we set up the following equation:

30 is 50% of what number30 =  0.5  *  XWe divide 30 by 0.5 and get 60.Clearly, the word "of" is defined as "multiplication" in mathematics.  Does anyone argue against this?

----------------------------------------------------------

The order of operations tells us that exponents are performed before any multiplication.

If the problem reads 2*5^2, we square 5 before multiplying because multiplying  clearly means multiplication.

2*5^2

2*25

50

If the problem reads -5^2, we square before taking the opposite of because the word of clearly means multiplication.

-5^2

-25

These two problems are performed consistent with one another.  Does anyone argue against this?
I disagree. Which one of your garages do you want to arm wrestle in?
Neither. It is cold and neither are heated.
Math teacher right? How cold can it get down there? #####.
Yes I is a math teacher. Below 50 is cold to me.
 
I just consulted my buddy the successful mechanical engineer.

-----

Solve for x:

x = -5^2

-----

Hello Smoo,

Assuming that you mean x equals negative 5 squared, I would say that x = 25.

I'm sure you'll let met know if I'm I missing something...

-----
Well let him know. :thumbup:
He made an assumption and then answered it correctly pursuant to his assumption. He just doesn't know the convention. He must have been advanced in Junior High too :)
 
You guys still haven't convinced me that -5 should not be considered a self-contained number. You've come close, but not there yet.
By itself, -5 is a self-contained number. Your problem is in thinking that the "-5" part of "-5^2" is a self-contained number.Now, as I said before ... that is how it is, now #### ;)

 
I'd explain it this way:Pretty much all math, from basic 2+2=4 up to differential calculus, is based on the addition of numbers. To understand addition, you have to understand what is actually being done to the two values in question.Take 2 and 2. Both of these are magnitudes of an arbitrary unit. They could represent houses, planes, or internet geeks who post too much on silly topics. The best way to conceptualize what is happening when you add two and two, is to draw a number line. On the number line, you start with your pencil tip at zero, and draw a line from zero to two. Your new origin is 2 now and you go two more to the right (default direction). The total displacement is the answer, and you have traveled across 4 units.When you want to move to subtraction, the concept of direction comes in and it can be taught a number of different ways. You can introduce negative numbers and positive numbers, and show that negative is the left direction and positive is the right direction.So if you want to subtract 1 from 2, (2-1), you start at 0, draw a line from 0 to 2, and then draw a line ONE unit in the negative direction from 2, or left from 2. Your total displacement from 0 is 1 unit. This is absolutely the same as saying (2+(-1)), as the sign only indicates the direction you travel on the number line. The important thing is the value, and the total displacement. On the number line, you cannot have a negative distance traveled (as you can't have a negative length of your line from 0 to your end point), but you can have a distance traveled in the negative or positive direction.So when someone says -5, and you look at it with respect to the number line, it is simply saying that you travel five units in the negative direction. The negative sign tells direction, and the 5 tells distance. The two are clearly separate entities.This becomes an issue in multiplication (which is really fancy addition). So, you have 2*5. Start on the line at 0, and go five in the positive direction, twice. Total displacement is 10 units.Now try -2*5. You can do this another way, by going 2 in the negative direction 5 times, or 5 in the negative direction twice. Clearly, the direction is detached from the values.So now you have (-5)^2. You factor it out to (-5)(-5) and it looks confusing because you have two direction components. But just like double negatives, they cancel each other out because they are SEPARATE from the numerical values themselves. Two neg's make a positive, and you have (5)(5) and you go 5 units in the positive direction five times.So, basically, it should be obvious that the sign and the value are separate entities UNLESS they are explicitly grouped together.-5^2 is basically the negative direction of the result of 5^2, or (5)(5).

 
You guys still haven't convinced me that -5 should not be considered a self-contained number. You've come close, but not there yet.
Your problem is in thinking that the "-5" part of "-5^2" is a self-contained number.
I don't see that as being a problem, I see that as being an observation.
 
I just consulted my buddy the successful mechanical engineer.

-----

Solve for x:

x = -5^2

-----

Hello Smoo,

Assuming that you mean x equals negative 5 squared, I would say that x = 25.

I'm sure you'll let met know if I'm I missing something...

-----
Well let him know. :thumbup:
He made an assumption and then answered it correctly pursuant to his assumption. He just doesn't know the convention. He must have been advanced in Junior High too :)
That's possible. Or his teacher was wrong. Or his teacher didn't teach him well. Or he didn't pay attention. Or he forgot.
 
:taps fingers:

Still waiting for a smoo reply.
To what?
Here's the most concise logical explanation I can muster:

The answer is that it doesn't matter that -5 is an integer or not, the negative sign is a direction that modifies the value of 5. Five exists, negative five does not. Negative five is only Five in a specific direction. The negative sign is an operator on the value of five. As it's an operator, it's subject to the order of operations, and comes UNDER the priority of exponents, unless parentheses say otherwise.
roly has provided the only argument so far which has any chance of swaying me.
DON'T DO IT!!
He won't be able to resolve the -1 issue.
I don't see the issue with -1. It's just 1 step in the negative direction. It's a unit vector, used to scale other magnitudes in the same direction.
It's being used as an inherently negative number. All other negative numbers seem to require factoring. This is inconsistent. Math isn't inconsistent.
If you like the vector stuff, -1 is a scaler that keeps the vector being scaled's original magnitude, but changes the direction. It's called a unit vector. The same is being done with numbers. -1 multiplied by another number retains the numbers magnitude, but changes the direction. You have two -1's. -1 as a "number" is one unit in the direction to the left of 0 on the number line. And then you have the -1 as a scaler, which is used to reverse the direction of another number/vector due to the property that 1 times any number is that number, and 1 times and number in the opposite direction is that same number in the opposite direction.

It seems confusing when you break it down to the basics, but it's totally consistant. Negative numbers, even -1, only differ from positive numbers by their signs...and that just denotes direction. If you have no problem with (1)*(5) you should have no problem with (-1)*(5) because it's just saying "The answer is five times one in the negative direction"
 
I took the same math classes as everybody else, so that theory of Clayton's is bogus.
:confused: I have created no new Clayton Theory in this thread.
Your theory was that some people went to some advanced math class and missed the dummy math class where they covered this stuff.
 
I'd explain it this way:

Pretty much all math, from basic 2+2=4 up to differential calculus, is based on the addition of numbers. To understand addition, you have to understand what is actually being done to the two values in question.

Take 2 and 2. Both of these are magnitudes of an arbitrary unit. They could represent houses, planes, or internet geeks who post too much on silly topics. The best way to conceptualize what is happening when you add two and two, is to draw a number line. On the number line, you start with your pencil tip at zero, and draw a line from zero to two. Your new origin is 2 now and you go two more to the right (default direction). The total displacement is the answer, and you have traveled across 4 units.

When you want to move to subtraction, the concept of direction comes in and it can be taught a number of different ways. You can introduce negative numbers and positive numbers, and show that negative is the left direction and positive is the right direction.

So if you want to subtract 1 from 2, (2-1), you start at 0, draw a line from 0 to 2, and then draw a line ONE unit in the negative direction from 2, or left from 2. Your total displacement from 0 is 1 unit.

This is absolutely the same as saying (2+(-1)), as the sign only indicates the direction you travel on the number line. The important thing is the value, and the total displacement. On the number line, you cannot have a negative distance traveled (as you can't have a negative length of your line from 0 to your end point), but you can have a distance traveled in the negative or positive direction.

So when someone says -5, and you look at it with respect to the number line, it is simply saying that you travel five units in the negative direction. The negative sign tells direction, and the 5 tells distance. The two are clearly separate entities.

This becomes an issue in multiplication (which is really fancy addition). So, you have 2*5. Start on the line at 0, and go five in the positive direction, twice. Total displacement is 10 units.

Now try -2*5. You can do this another way, by going 2 in the negative direction 5 times, or 5 in the negative direction twice. Clearly, the direction is detached from the values.

So now you have (-5)^2. You factor it out to (-5)(-5) and it looks confusing because you have two direction components. But just like double negatives, they cancel each other out because they are SEPARATE from the numerical values themselves. Two neg's make a positive, and you have (5)(5) and you go 5 units in the positive direction five times.

So, basically, it should be obvious that the sign and the value are separate entities UNLESS they are explicitly grouped together.

-5^2 is basically the negative direction of the result of 5^2, or (5)(5).
Using this, how do you explain (-5)*(-2)=10?
 
:taps fingers:

Still waiting for a smoo reply.
To what?
Here's the most concise logical explanation I can muster:

The answer is that it doesn't matter that -5 is an integer or not, the negative sign is a direction that modifies the value of 5. Five exists, negative five does not. Negative five is only Five in a specific direction. The negative sign is an operator on the value of five. As it's an operator, it's subject to the order of operations, and comes UNDER the priority of exponents, unless parentheses say otherwise.
roly has provided the only argument so far which has any chance of swaying me.
DON'T DO IT!!
He won't be able to resolve the -1 issue.
I don't see the issue with -1. It's just 1 step in the negative direction. It's a unit vector, used to scale other magnitudes in the same direction.
It's being used as an inherently negative number. All other negative numbers seem to require factoring. This is inconsistent. Math isn't inconsistent.
If you like the vector stuff, -1 is a scaler that keeps the vector being scaled's original magnitude, but changes the direction. It's called a unit vector. The same is being done with numbers. -1 multiplied by another number retains the numbers magnitude, but changes the direction. You have two -1's. -1 as a "number" is one unit in the direction to the left of 0 on the number line. And then you have the -1 as a scaler, which is used to reverse the direction of another number/vector due to the property that 1 times any number is that number, and 1 times and number in the opposite direction is that same number in the opposite direction.

It seems confusing when you break it down to the basics, but it's totally consistant. Negative numbers, even -1, only differ from positive numbers by their signs...and that just denotes direction. If you have no problem with (1)*(5) you should have no problem with (-1)*(5) because it's just saying "The answer is five times one in the negative direction"
I think that's a clever explanation, but am not convinced.
 
Simple. By definition, a negative number is formed by multiplying that number by -1. Since multiplication is involved, you would first perform the exponential part first, therefore arriving at -25. If -5 had been in parenthesis, then the answer would be 25. -1x5^2 + 4x2^3 = 7. I cant believe there has been this many posts about this.

 
I'd explain it this way:

Pretty much all math, from basic 2+2=4 up to differential calculus, is based on the addition of numbers. To understand addition, you have to understand what is actually being done to the two values in question.

Take 2 and 2. Both of these are magnitudes of an arbitrary unit. They could represent houses, planes, or internet geeks who post too much on silly topics. The best way to conceptualize what is happening when you add two and two, is to draw a number line. On the number line, you start with your pencil tip at zero, and draw a line from zero to two. Your new origin is 2 now and you go two more to the right (default direction). The total displacement is the answer, and you have traveled across 4 units.

When you want to move to subtraction, the concept of direction comes in and it can be taught a number of different ways. You can introduce negative numbers and positive numbers, and show that negative is the left direction and positive is the right direction.

So if you want to subtract 1 from 2, (2-1), you start at 0, draw a line from 0 to 2, and then draw a line ONE unit in the negative direction from 2, or left from 2. Your total displacement from 0 is 1 unit.

This is absolutely the same as saying (2+(-1)), as the sign only indicates the direction you travel on the number line. The important thing is the value, and the total displacement. On the number line, you cannot have a negative distance traveled (as you can't have a negative length of your line from 0 to your end point), but you can have a distance traveled in the negative or positive direction.

So when someone says -5, and you look at it with respect to the number line, it is simply saying that you travel five units in the negative direction. The negative sign tells direction, and the 5 tells distance. The two are clearly separate entities.

This becomes an issue in multiplication (which is really fancy addition). So, you have 2*5. Start on the line at 0, and go five in the positive direction, twice. Total displacement is 10 units.

Now try -2*5. You can do this another way, by going 2 in the negative direction 5 times, or 5 in the negative direction twice. Clearly, the direction is detached from the values.

So now you have (-5)^2. You factor it out to (-5)(-5) and it looks confusing because you have two direction components. But just like double negatives, they cancel each other out because they are SEPARATE from the numerical values themselves. Two neg's make a positive, and you have (5)(5) and you go 5 units in the positive direction five times.

So, basically, it should be obvious that the sign and the value are separate entities UNLESS they are explicitly grouped together.

-5^2 is basically the negative direction of the result of 5^2, or (5)(5).
Using this, how do you explain (-5)*(-2)=10?
He invoked some mysterious corolloray that says two negatives cancel each other out, but he pulled it out of his ### rather than applying it to the elaborate world he's constructed.
 
That's possible. Or his teacher was wrong. Or his teacher didn't teach him well. Or he didn't pay attention. Or he forgot.
Let's just blame Smoo's teacher. And mine. And most everyone's teacher.
 
WOW! I'm glad work kept me busy today... I can't believe this has grown all the way to 27 pages!I wrote down the equations and gave them to a guy here at work that is the ultimate math geek, so much so that he has actually written a couple of math books for educational use. He quickly, without thinking twice, rattled off the answers as -7 and 18. I gave him a brief synopsis of this thread and he just kind of chuckled. The only way you answer this any other way is to make up your own rules for calculating the value of expressions or making assumptions that aren't in the equation.

 
WOW! I'm glad work kept me busy today... I can't believe this has grown all the way to 27 pages!

I wrote down the equations and gave them to a guy here at work that is the ultimate math geek, so much so that he has actually written a couple of math books for educational use. He quickly, without thinking twice, rattled off the answers as -7 and 18. I gave him a brief synopsis of this thread and he just kind of chuckled. The only way you answer this any other way is to make up your own rules for calculating the value of expressions or making assumptions that aren't in the equation.
No one is disputing that this is the current convention. Smoo doesn't like the convention.
 
Okay, I'm going to ask what might be a stupid question: Why does multiplying two negative numbers equal a positive number? I know it does, I'm just not sure why.

 
WOW! I'm glad work kept me busy today... I can't believe this has grown all the way to 27 pages!

I wrote down the equations and gave them to a guy here at work that is the ultimate math geek, so much so that he has actually written a couple of math books for educational use. He quickly, without thinking twice, rattled off the answers as -7 and 18. I gave him a brief synopsis of this thread and he just kind of chuckled. The only way you answer this any other way is to make up your own rules for calculating the value of expressions or making assumptions that aren't in the equation.
:bs: He probably wrote the textbook that this trick question appeared in.

 
WOW! I'm glad work kept me busy today... I can't believe this has grown all the way to 27 pages!
Still havent discovered the board settings in the control panel? This is a whole new debate - but why would you choose not to have 50 posts per page?
 
Okay, I'm going to ask what might be a stupid question: Why does multiplying two negative numbers equal a positive number? I know it does, I'm just not sure why.
Using roly's number line world, it's because going the opposite direction of "left one" one time means you went right one.
 
By itself, -5 is a self-contained number. Your problem is in thinking that the "-5" part of "-5^2" is a self-contained number.
More specifically, negative five is a self-contained number, and you can represent negative just fine by writing "-5" since -5 = (-5) = -(5) = (-1)(5) = "negative five".The problem comes when you write "-5" as part of a larger expression, combining it with other characters. When you do that, you have to apply rules about what the other characters mean and what happens when you combine them.

In the same way, twenty-three can be represented just fine by writing "23". But when you combine that with other characters so as to write, for example, "1,236" now the "23" no longer means twenty-three.

Similarly, when you write "-5^2," now the "-5" no longer means negative five.

 
I took the same math classes as everybody else, so that theory of Clayton's is bogus.
:confused: I have created no new Clayton Theory in this thread.
Your theory was that some people went to some advanced math class and missed the dummy math class where they covered this stuff.
My experience is that some very advanced math students are deficient in some basic math operations.
 
WOW! I'm glad work kept me busy today... I can't believe this has grown all the way to 27 pages!
Still havent discovered the board settings in the control panel? This is a whole new debate - but why would you choose not to have 50 posts per page?
It's easier to find a specific post on a page if there are less posts per page.
 
WOW! I'm glad work kept me busy today... I can't believe this has grown all the way to 27 pages!

I wrote down the equations and gave them to a guy here at work that is the ultimate math geek, so much so that he has actually written a couple of math books for educational use. He quickly, without thinking twice, rattled off the answers as -7 and 18. I gave him a brief synopsis of this thread and he just kind of chuckled. The only way you answer this any other way is to make up your own rules for calculating the value of expressions or making assumptions that aren't in the equation.
:bs: He probably wrote the textbook that this trick question appeared in.
I've been torn if I think that this is a stupid math question or not to give a kid. On one hand, it's not even testing the order of operation, it's testing math convention in the absense of clear instruction. On the other hand, I apparently needed to be taught this and was not.I presently think it's a great math question and the teacher should win some sort of teacher award, provided she explains it clearly.

 
He invoked some mysterious corolloray that says two negatives cancel each other out, but he pulled it out of his ### rather than applying it to the elaborate world he's constructed.
How is that mysterious? Negative means opposite and the opposite of a negative is a positive, so a negative negative is a positive.
 
Well unless I'm still operating on old math here, we should be able to do the same thing to each side of the equation and still have them be equal. So what the hell, here goes.-5^2 = -25(-5^2)^.5 = (-25)^.5gllll with that.

 
WOW! I'm glad work kept me busy today... I can't believe this has grown all the way to 27 pages!
Still havent discovered the board settings in the control panel? This is a whole new debate - but why would you choose not to have 50 posts per page?
It's easier to find a specific post on a page if there are less posts per page.
It's easier to find a specific post in a thread if there are more posts per page. :loco:
 
WOW! I'm glad work kept me busy today... I can't believe this has grown all the way to 27 pages!
Still havent discovered the board settings in the control panel? This is a whole new debate - but why would you choose not to have 50 posts per page?
Go ahead defy convention, use your base 50 system.
 
Using this, how do you explain (-5)*(-2)=10?
It's a pure logic problem. -5 times -2 consists of four important parts. 2 directions and 2 values. Since direction and values are independent, you can separate them logically into (--) direction and (5*2) value. (--) direction is the same thing as "Not Not" something, and as we all know, double negatives cancel each other out, as does reversing a direction twice.So a negative basically reverses the default direction, which is positive. Two negatives reverse the direction twice, which basically results in you going the default direction. Then you are left with simply going the correct distance in the proper direction.

 
He invoked some mysterious corolloray that says two negatives cancel each other out, but he pulled it out of his ### rather than applying it to the elaborate world he's constructed.
How is that mysterious? Negative means opposite and the opposite of a negative is a positive, so a negative negative is a positive.
It was mysterious in the context of the framework world he constructed. He was carefully explaining how everything was represented on his number line model, but then just pulled "oh, and two negatives cancel each other out" from nowhere, without explaining it within the context of his framework.
 
WOW! I'm glad work kept me busy today... I can't believe this has grown all the way to 27 pages!

I wrote down the equations and gave them to a guy here at work that is the ultimate math geek, so much so that he has actually written a couple of math books for educational use. He quickly, without thinking twice, rattled off the answers as -7 and 18. I gave him a brief synopsis of this thread and he just kind of chuckled. The only way you answer this any other way is to make up your own rules for calculating the value of expressions or making assumptions that aren't in the equation.
No one is disputing that this is the current convention.
A lot of people were disputing it until Shick! and Clayton got here. Some people were ridiculing anybody who went along with the (apparently) standard convention.
 
Well unless I'm still operating on old math here, we should be able to do the same thing to each side of the equation and still have them be equal. So what the hell, here goes.

-5^2 = -25

(-5^2)^.5 = (-25)^.5

gllll with that.
:goodposting:
 
Okay, I'm going to ask what might be a stupid question: Why does multiplying two negative numbers equal a positive number? I know it does, I'm just not sure why.
Using roly's number line world, it's because going the opposite direction of "left one" one time means you went right one.
Left was a poor choice of words maybe. Reversing the direction is better in some cases. So negative negative negative means you reversed the direction 3 times, which is the same as only having reversed directions once.
 
Well unless I'm still operating on old math here, we should be able to do the same thing to each side of the equation and still have them be equal. So what the hell, here goes.

-5^2 = -25

(-5^2)^.5 = (-25)^.5

gllll with that.
Following the convention, I don't see the problem.(-25)^.5 = (-25)^.5

:confused:

If you wrote ((-5)^2)^.5 = (-25)^.5 you would have changed the problem, no?

 
Smoo, you tried to hack at this, but tell me what else is wrong here:

In class, I would always describe "integers" as the counting numbers (1, 2, 3, etc) and their opposites (-1, -2, -3, etc) and zero.

I hope that no one here will argue that -1 is not the opposite of 1.

We say "negative 1" because it is the opposite of "positive 1". We write -1 because it is far easier than continuously writing "negative 1".

Clearly the "-" symbol is defined as "the opposite of" in mathematics. Does anyone argue against this?

----------------------------------------------------------

The word "of" in mathematics means "multiply".

If the problem reads "What is 1/2 of 6?", you multiply 1/2 times 6 and get an answer of 3.

If the problem reads, "30 is 50% of what number?", we set up the following equation:

30 is 50% of what number30 = 0.5 * XWe divide 30 by 0.5 and get 60.Clearly, the word "of" is defined as "multiplication" in mathematics. Does anyone argue against this?

----------------------------------------------------------

The order of operations tells us that exponents are performed before any multiplication.

If the problem reads 2*5^2, we square 5 before multiplying because multiplying clearly means multiplication.

2*5^2

2*25

50

If the problem reads -5^2, we square before taking the opposite of because the word of clearly means multiplication.

-5^2

-25

These two problems are performed consistent with one another. Does anyone argue against this?
 
He invoked some mysterious corolloray that says two negatives cancel each other out, but he pulled it out of his ### rather than applying it to the elaborate world he's constructed.
How is that mysterious? Negative means opposite and the opposite of a negative is a positive, so a negative negative is a positive.
It was mysterious in the context of the framework world he constructed. He was carefully explaining how everything was represented on his number line model, but then just pulled "oh, and two negatives cancel each other out" from nowhere, without explaining it within the context of his framework.
:lmao: Geez, didn't think the concept was that difficult to require explanation. Negatives reverse the direction on a number line. That should answer the problems.Think in Grammar. This is not not an easy problem.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top