Bull Dozier
Footballguy
Those of you citing how Culpepper looked good in the preseason, and basing any kid of expectation on that: Culpepper's QB rating last year w/Miami in the preseason was 93.5.
And Mort said Eli Manning was going to miss a month.I'm not saying McCown won't be out a month but if it doesn't come directly from Kiffin don't take it as gospel.ESPN (Clayton) is (or was) saying McCown is out 3 to 4 weeks.
I trust the professor!And Mort said Eli Manning was going to miss a month.I'm not saying McCown won't be out a month but if it doesn't come directly from Kiffin don't take it as gospel.ESPN (Clayton) is (or was) saying McCown is out 3 to 4 weeks.
Those of you citing how Culpepper looked good in the preseason, and basing any kid of expectation on that: Culpepper's QB rating last year w/Miami in the preseason was 93.5.
I am basing my opinions on my witness of pre-season and last weeks second half playing time. -The knee/leg looks good. Cpep is very nimble and mobile without a limp. No favoring of the leg. He bootlegged hard to the right and threw a laser for a key 1st down late in the game. -The ball is coming out of his hand sooo fast. Too fast actually, reminds me of Vick. Everything is a spiral. He did show some touch and timing. He also threw another TD that was called out of bounds(play was on the 2 yard line...pass was slightly overthrown and Ron Curry couldn't get his feet in) FYI, Curry was targeted by CPep in the redzone. -My main question was can he throw the ball with touch. First game, first play BMW lined up leftside close to the TE. He runs 5 yards up and breaks left to the sideline. Cpep throws the ball with more arc than usual to my witness. And the ball lands square in BMWs hands over the shoulder and bobbles it OB. Too bad Mike Williams fat hands couldn't handle. Every football thrown to mike williams should have glaze on it. BMW might actually hold on to it. Enough with the eating jokes.-Timing with his wideouts has been off. Only by a slight margin. An extra week of work can improve that relationship. thats all for now. There are many reasons to doubt Cpep. But there is are also many reasons to believe in him. The Raiders are resurrecting a franchise that was bottom of the barrel last season. Left for dead by everybody. Including current players Mccown, Cpep, Mike Williams, Jerry Porter, Ron Curry all underdog stories on a COMPETITIVE TEAM.Those of you citing how Culpepper looked good in the preseason, and basing any kid of expectation on that: Culpepper's QB rating last year w/Miami in the preseason was 93.5.I'm still going to stash him on my bench as my #3.
Honestly, I hope you're right about Culpepper, because he was in a bad situation, although I dislike how he handled it.I don't think you are.I am basing my opinions on my witness of pre-season and last weeks second half playing time. -The knee/leg looks good. Cpep is very nimble and mobile without a limp. No favoring of the leg. He bootlegged hard to the right and threw a laser for a key 1st down late in the game. -The ball is coming out of his hand sooo fast. Too fast actually, reminds me of Vick. Everything is a spiral. He did show some touch and timing. He also threw another TD that was called out of bounds(play was on the 2 yard line...pass was slightly overthrown and Ron Curry couldn't get his feet in) FYI, Curry was targeted by CPep in the redzone. -My main question was can he throw the ball with touch. First game, first play BMW lined up leftside close to the TE. He runs 5 yards up and breaks left to the sideline. Cpep throws the ball with more arc than usual to my witness. And the ball lands square in BMWs hands over the shoulder and bobbles it OB. Too bad Mike Williams fat hands couldn't handle. Every football thrown to mike williams should have glaze on it. BMW might actually hold on to it. Enough with the eating jokes.-Timing with his wideouts has been off. Only by a slight margin. An extra week of work can improve that relationship. thats all for now. There are many reasons to doubt Cpep. But there is are also many reasons to believe in him. The Raiders are resurrecting a franchise that was bottom of the barrel last season. Left for dead by everybody. Including current players Mccown, Cpep, Mike Williams, Jerry Porter, Ron Curry all underdog stories on a COMPETITIVE TEAM.Those of you citing how Culpepper looked good in the preseason, and basing any kid of expectation on that: Culpepper's QB rating last year w/Miami in the preseason was 93.5.I'm still going to stash him on my bench as my #3.
The benefit of knowing this offense 3 months more thoroughly outweighs starting a decidedly mediocre QB with a broken finger.... come on. This team was never going anywhere this year and Culpepper would have started if he showed anything in practice. McCown is barely worthy of being a placeholder- they are trying to keep the embarassment to a minimum until their rookie savior is ready. Culpepper wasnt showing he was up to that. We'll find out this week it appears.Feels like deja vu all over again.mbuehner said:Culpepper is certainly worth a flyer, but if you are starting him for some reason you must be in bad trouble to begin with. They didnt pay him to back up Josh McCown- the fact that Culp couldnt beat him out is not a good. The fact that they wouldnt go to Culpepper when McCown broke his finger is a stunning indictment. Something bad is happening in practice, and that doesnt bode well for this game.
That being said i have him stashed on a roster or two- late round flyer with potentially awesome upside. But i'm not kidding myself that he's a massive longshot to ever crack a starting lineup for me again.Culpepper did not lose out on the starting job, he showed up 3 months after McCown, 1 month before the season started, and did not get the benefit of the minicamps that McCown did. McCown simply knows the offense better.
Of course. Yes. Absolutely. With one guy you get to use the whole playbook, with the other you have to reduce it significantly. Which do you think is more important to a coach?And your scouting of both McCown and Daunte is merely your opinion and Kiffin, perhaps, has a different one. No offense but I would trust any of the 32 NFL head coaches opinions on player scouting over yours...except Herm Edwards of course.The benefit of knowing this offense 3 months more thoroughly outweighs starting a decidedly mediocre QB with a broken finger.... come on. This team was never going anywhere this year and Culpepper would have started if he showed anything in practice. McCown is barely worthy of being a placeholder- they are trying to keep the embarassment to a minimum until their rookie savior is ready. Culpepper wasnt showing he was up to that. We'll find out this week it appears.Feels like deja vu all over again.Culpepper is certainly worth a flyer, but if you are starting him for some reason you must be in bad trouble to begin with. They didnt pay him to back up Josh McCown- the fact that Culp couldnt beat him out is not a good. The fact that they wouldnt go to Culpepper when McCown broke his finger is a stunning indictment. Something bad is happening in practice, and that doesnt bode well for this game.
That being said i have him stashed on a roster or two- late round flyer with potentially awesome upside. But i'm not kidding myself that he's a massive longshot to ever crack a starting lineup for me again.Culpepper did not lose out on the starting job, he showed up 3 months after McCown, 1 month before the season started, and did not get the benefit of the minicamps that McCown did. McCown simply knows the offense better.
Fine. I'll take the guy that can throw the ball. You stick with the Jonathan Quinn school of what makes a good quarterback.Of course. Yes. Absolutely. With one guy you get to use the whole playbook, with the other you have to reduce it significantly. Which do you think is more important to a coach?
No offense but i'm not really concerned with how much you value my opinion either way. Moreover, if anything im respecting the Oakland coaching staff. They have played McCown over Culpepper at every possible opportunity and McCown has delivered the average performance we all expected out of him. I'll take that at face value. The size of the playbook has not been Oaklands problem the last few years. Its always execution when youre THAT bad.And your scouting of both McCown and Daunte is merely your opinion and Kiffin, perhaps, has a different one. No offense but I would trust any of the 32 NFL head coaches opinions on player scouting over yours...except Herm Edwards of course.
If you are crediting the Oakland staff then why not extend that to include wanting to make sure the most prepared QB is playing in the games? I don't see why Daunte being empirically the better QB but the least prepared at the moment in this offense need be mutually exclusive.And...Jonathan Quinn??? I am happy to see that you choose measured and reasonable subjects for your comparisons. Remind me again when Quinn was targeted by any NFL head coach as a starting QB? McCown was brought in by three teams who thought, right or wrong, he could compete for the starting job, he is light years ahead of Quinn athletically and experientially but let's not let that get in the way of a hyperbolic argument.btw are you saying that you are better at scouting players than 31 of 32 NFL coaches? Yes or no?Fine. I'll take the guy that can throw the ball. You stick with the Jonathan Quinn school of what makes a good quarterback.Of course. Yes. Absolutely. With one guy you get to use the whole playbook, with the other you have to reduce it significantly. Which do you think is more important to a coach?No offense but i'm not really concerned with how much you value my opinion either way. Moreover, if anything im respecting the Oakland coaching staff. They have played McCown over Culpepper at every possible opportunity and McCown has delivered the average performance we all expected out of him. I'll take that at face value. The size of the playbook has not been Oaklands problem the last few years. Its always execution when youre THAT bad.And your scouting of both McCown and Daunte is merely your opinion and Kiffin, perhaps, has a different one. No offense but I would trust any of the 32 NFL head coaches opinions on player scouting over yours...except Herm Edwards of course.
INTS 2 (18th)TDs 4 (14th)SACKS 4 (25th)QB RAT. 87.3 (15th)Is this the $$$ Miami Defense you are talking about?Per NFL.comDefensive Allowed averages with NFL rank. Vs Redkins, Cowboys, & Jets.PTS 28.0 (26th) YDS 336.0 (20th) PASS YDS 170.0 (7th) RUSH YDS 166.0 (29th)
Because it smacks of coach speak. Half the time your most prepared QB is your backup. They have nothing better to do than prepare. Preparation is great, but talent wills out. We arent talking about a hundred million dollar rookie that needs to be protected from the speed of the NFL- Culpepper has played for a long time. Lets put it this way- if Peyton Manning somehow appeared in Oakland when Culp did, would he be sitting on the bench?If you are crediting the Oakland staff then why not extend that to include wanting to make sure the most prepared QB is playing in the games? I don't see why Daunte being empirically the better QB but the least prepared at the moment in this offense need be mutually exclusive.
I do believe **** Jauron and Terry Shea brought him over to the Bears under the exact premise that he 'understood the offense' so well. Not as a starter but they stuck with him long enough to ruin a promising season. Then again McCown and Culp were only brought in as placeholders and backups as well...This Raiders team's strength is defense and running game. McCown was pegged not to turn the ball over and embarass the team. Thats why Culps sat on the bench this long. The guy is an 8 year veteran, if it takes him 2 months, 4 preseason and 3 regular season games to 'figure out' the offense- that itself is an indictment. Rookies get thrown in faster than that sometimes.And...Jonathan Quinn??? I am happy to see that you choose measured and reasonable subjects for your comparisons. Remind me again when Quinn was targeted by any NFL head coach as a starting QB?
You are making some good points but I think we are talking past each other. Are you saying that McCown is more talented than Daunte? You should also look at Kiffin's career at USC and how they handled competition for a starting spot, wide open in the off season but once the games count they go with their guy and give him every chance to succeed. McCown is Kiffin's guy and he will give McCown every chance to put a hammer lock on the job (i.e. he won't pull him based on one game), and the Raiders have been competitive in every game this year. I think Kiffin is being patient and seeing if the team gels under McCown, it has very little to do with overall talent between the two guys, which I think is closer than most believe, but the fact that he is going to give his guy (McCown) every chance to succeed before going with Plan B. A good test of this theory will happen this weekend if Daunte lights up Miami I still would not be shocked if McCown is still the starter when he is healthy.eta:Because it smacks of coach speak. Half the time your most prepared QB is your backup. They have nothing better to do than prepare. Preparation is great, but talent wills out. We arent talking about a hundred million dollar rookie that needs to be protected from the speed of the NFL- Culpepper has played for a long time. Lets put it this way- if Peyton Manning somehow appeared in Oakland when Culp did, would he be sitting on the bench?If you are crediting the Oakland staff then why not extend that to include wanting to make sure the most prepared QB is playing in the games? I don't see why Daunte being empirically the better QB but the least prepared at the moment in this offense need be mutually exclusive.I do believe **** Jauron and Terry Shea brought him over to the Bears under the exact premise that he 'understood the offense' so well. Not as a starter but they stuck with him long enough to ruin a promising season. Then again McCown and Culp were only brought in as placeholders and backups as well...This Raiders team's strength is defense and running game. McCown was pegged not to turn the ball over and embarass the team. Thats why Culps sat on the bench this long. The guy is an 8 year veteran, if it takes him 2 months, 4 preseason and 3 regular season games to 'figure out' the offense- that itself is an indictment. Rookies get thrown in faster than that sometimes.And...Jonathan Quinn??? I am happy to see that you choose measured and reasonable subjects for your comparisons. Remind me again when Quinn was targeted by any NFL head coach as a starting QB?
The flaw in your analogy is that USC never had a former all-star QB who transferred to the school a few weeks before the season started.Chaka said:You should also look at Kiffin's career at USC and how they handled competition for a starting spot, wide open in the off season but once the games count they go with their guy and give him every chance to succeed. McCown is Kiffin's guy and he will give McCown every chance to put a hammer lock on the job (i.e. he won't pull him based on one game),
You and I are not far off then. I read a great article a few years back breaking down Daunte and it really emphasized that he was a one-read QB. I also agree that most have overrated him expecting future returns to be similar to past performances but seldom do they take into account the WRs that he was throwing to for most of his career (a nice six game run without Randy in '04 notwithstanding). On the plus side he has always been tremendously accurate in both the short and long passing game.(64% career completions, never below 60%) and has also been good at avoiding INTs, the awful start in '05 notwithstanding, and he has been worlds better than McCown in that dept if nothing else.mbuehner said:I think Culp is a guy that relied on a monsterously talented WR and his legs. Now teams have figured out he only looks at half the field...
Cpep has 1 passing(porter) and 1 rushing td end of 1st.^^^^Lets make sure everybody see this^^^^Also I believe Cpep is an Al Davis signing. Mike Williams and McClown were Kiffins calls. So what you say?Kiffin as not named a starter and don't be shocked if he goes with McCown on Sunday.
Culpepper did not lose out on the starting job, he showed up 3 months after McCown, 1 month before the season started, and did not get the benefit of the minicamps that McCown did. McCown simply knows the offense better.
Whichever Raiders QB plays this week should be a decent fantasy prospect.
Big Al extended Kiffins leash not forcing Cpep into the lineup. Kiffin made his own decisions also about offseason personnel and preseason qb competition. And here we are. It is what it is.
Somebody broke down Josh's turnovers 7fumbles 5ints earlier. Along with some interesting info about fumble tendencies of Cpep and McCown. Thanks. Didn't know that.
As bad as it looks the Raiders have been competitive in each game and even had the lead. They were never competitve last season. From an improvement standpoint. The Raiders are trending positively with Josh in the game.
Moving on...I agree with the OP. Culpepper will look better than avg. 228+ yards 2TDs(possibly 1 rushing) and either a fumble or int(not both). Jordan is also gonna ball.
Culpepper was also sacked alot becuase he held onto the ball. My reasoning:
1) He didn't want to throw anymore ints. Ints mentioned above.
2) He was padding his stats. Incompletions make qbs look bad on paper. Considering how many times he was sacked. Those throw-away passes really would have dropped his rating. Throw-away passe is an important tool for a qb and momentum maintainer compared to a sack. Cpep needs to learn this...
3) He did hold to the ball a few times in the last game, taking a sack one time.
4)He didn't fumble it though.
***Sleeper Offense of the Year - Oakland Raiders***
Moving on...
Pass Distribution
Curry and Porter will be pretty equal. Ronald getting a few more targets overall, but especially in the redzone/endzone(more importantly).
I am concerned about Lamonts rec yards. I don't remember Cpep dumping to his RBs. Also another possible reason he was sacked often.
Im not sure why people are insexplicably downgrading curry.
Oh, yeah, we'll be definitely be talking about him.how come nobody is talking about daunte? top 4 qb taken in the past 5 drafts, sitting there for anybody who wants him on the waiver wire. gonna be named starter and absolutely drill his former team on sunday who turned their back on him. 300 yds, 2 passing, one rushing.anybody?
Wait till Monday. Eveybody will be all over it. Minny fans, Miami fans, CPep-haters, Cpep Supporters, Raider fans, raider-haters, Moss-fans...the pot is simmering.Oh, yeah, we'll be definitely be talking about him.how come nobody is talking about daunte? top 4 qb taken in the past 5 drafts, sitting there for anybody who wants him on the waiver wire. gonna be named starter and absolutely drill his former team on sunday who turned their back on him. 300 yds, 2 passing, one rushing.anybody?
GREAT call. Would you happen to know the winning lotto numbers for tomorrow? TIAhow come nobody is talking about daunte? top 4 qb taken in the past 5 drafts, sitting there for anybody who wants him on the waiver wire. gonna be named starter and absolutely drill his former team on sunday who turned their back on him. 300 yds, 2 passing, one rushing.anybody?
they ran the ball 42 timesfargas had 22 car for 179I've never seen a QB have a moredominant performance with so few completions.5
5/12 with 5 TD's.. Has to be some kind of recordI've never seen a QB have a moredominant performance with so few completions.5
I believe 3/4 quarters of the world knows that, but nice to inform the other 1/4.cpep didn't pass for more yards because he didn't need to Oak was running like nothing all day 300+ yards. And when Daunte needed to pass he connected and lead his teams to TDs on EVERY red zone posession
HAAAAAAAA-TER.lucky week
5 TDs was lucky. Lamont injury lead to Cpeps last 2 rushing TDs.The 2passing TDs and 1st rushing TD is typical Cpep.HAAAAAAAA-TER.lucky week
Everything is luck in this game pal.Thats why it's called Fantasy Football.5 TDs was lucky. Lamont injury lead to Cpeps last 2 rushing TDs.The 2passing TDs and 1st rushing TD is typical Cpep.HAAAAAAAA-TER.lucky week![]()
Those of you citing how Culpepper looked good in the preseason, and basing any kid of expectation on that: Culpepper's QB rating last year w/Miami in the preseason was 93.5.
I agree, thats why I picked him up only for week4, dropping him now..like to share good QB's with rest of league putting him back on waiver wire. Week 4 was his season high.Those of you citing how Culpepper looked good in the preseason, and basing any kid of expectation on that: Culpepper's QB rating last year w/Miami in the preseason was 93.5.![]()