What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***David Wilson Bandwagon*** (2 Viewers)

My biggest hesitation to start him is that the Broncos know he is a playmaker, and they know if they can strip the ball from him, he will be on the bench... so they are gonna be throwing the kitchen sink at him to get him to cough up the ball.
i think this is nuts

they are going to be throwing the kitchen sink at him to get him to cough up the ball, yes, but they are not doing it because they fear him and want him benched, they are doing it because turning the ball over to the broncos offense wins games for the broncos

if he gets benched, bonus
Where did I say they fear him? I said they know he is a playmaker, and they know if they can strip the ball, he will be on the bench. In other words, they can make the Giants one dimensional, or at least, severely handicapped in one dimension.
which, if true, is a side effect of the gact that they always try and create turnovers and likely see a weakness here

it's a small thing, but the assertion that the motivation for focusing on turnovers will be to get wilson on the bench is pretty odd

they want turnovers because it gives them the ball
Agree to disagree then. I just recall from Bountygate that there is mounds of evidence for coaching staffs to put extra emphasis on putting an opponent's playmaker on the bench since the result would help them win.

 
I have not gone through the entire thread, so if I am echoing previous sentiments, good for the poster that brought them up. Last year when Wilson fumbled and literally broke down crying, many people viewed that as weakness. I tried to look at it as a positive, that he cared that much about his team, and would be better for it. Well, now I am not really sure. In fact (as a guy who bought up Wilson this offseason), I think he is just not mentally strong. Fumbling is literally looked at as a disease/sickness (i.e. fumblitis) in NFL circles, and implies it can be fixed (see Tiki). It also is something that some players just can't recover from (remember Banks, the QB from STL and Balt). At a minimum, it is a quick way to find yourself on the bench, and for someone whose job it is to run the ball, out of the league in short order. Unless a player has an injured hand/arm, there is no reason for someone not to be able to hold onto the ball unless it is mental (either technique or carelessness). I worry that this is too much pressure for a guy like this, and instead of rising up to the challenge, he is going to go into a shell and the failures will compound.

 
My biggest hesitation to start him is that the Broncos know he is a playmaker, and they know if they can strip the ball from him, he will be on the bench... so they are gonna be throwing the kitchen sink at him to get him to cough up the ball.
i think this is nuts

they are going to be throwing the kitchen sink at him to get him to cough up the ball, yes, but they are not doing it because they fear him and want him benched, they are doing it because turning the ball over to the broncos offense wins games for the broncos

if he gets benched, bonus
Where did I say they fear him? I said they know he is a playmaker, and they know if they can strip the ball, he will be on the bench. In other words, they can make the Giants one dimensional, or at least, severely handicapped in one dimension.
which, if true, is a side effect of the gact that they always try and create turnovers and likely see a weakness here

it's a small thing, but the assertion that the motivation for focusing on turnovers will be to get wilson on the bench is pretty odd

they want turnovers because it gives them the ball
Agree to disagree then. I just recall from Bountygate that there is mounds of evidence for coaching staffs to put extra emphasis on putting an opponent's playmaker on the bench since the result would help them win.
He has a point B-Deep. bountygate was all bout getting players on the bench

 
My biggest hesitation to start him is that the Broncos know he is a playmaker, and they know if they can strip the ball from him, he will be on the bench... so they are gonna be throwing the kitchen sink at him to get him to cough up the ball.
i think this is nuts

they are going to be throwing the kitchen sink at him to get him to cough up the ball, yes, but they are not doing it because they fear him and want him benched, they are doing it because turning the ball over to the broncos offense wins games for the broncos

if he gets benched, bonus
Where did I say they fear him? I said they know he is a playmaker, and they know if they can strip the ball, he will be on the bench. In other words, they can make the Giants one dimensional, or at least, severely handicapped in one dimension.
which, if true, is a side effect of the gact that they always try and create turnovers and likely see a weakness here

it's a small thing, but the assertion that the motivation for focusing on turnovers will be to get wilson on the bench is pretty odd

they want turnovers because it gives them the ball
Agree to disagree then. I just recall from Bountygate that there is mounds of evidence for coaching staffs to put extra emphasis on putting an opponent's playmaker on the bench since the result would help them win.
I agree with bdeep here - defensive players around the league are taught and practice stripping the ball from anyone who has the ball.

Honestly, if you had a guy who was fumble prone, the defense would probably rather have him in the game than on the bench - he can't fumble if he is not in the game.

 
My biggest hesitation to start him is that the Broncos know he is a playmaker, and they know if they can strip the ball from him, he will be on the bench... so they are gonna be throwing the kitchen sink at him to get him to cough up the ball.
i think this is nuts

they are going to be throwing the kitchen sink at him to get him to cough up the ball, yes, but they are not doing it because they fear him and want him benched, they are doing it because turning the ball over to the broncos offense wins games for the broncos

if he gets benched, bonus
Where did I say they fear him? I said they know he is a playmaker, and they know if they can strip the ball, he will be on the bench. In other words, they can make the Giants one dimensional, or at least, severely handicapped in one dimension.
which, if true, is a side effect of the gact that they always try and create turnovers and likely see a weakness here

it's a small thing, but the assertion that the motivation for focusing on turnovers will be to get wilson on the bench is pretty odd

they want turnovers because it gives them the ball
Agree to disagree then. I just recall from Bountygate that there is mounds of evidence for coaching staffs to put extra emphasis on putting an opponent's playmaker on the bench since the result would help them win.
I agree with bdeep here - defensive players around the league are taught and practice stripping the ball from anyone who has the ball.

Honestly, if you had a guy who was fumble prone, the defense would probably rather have him in the game than on the bench - he can't fumble if he is not in the game.
Now that is a good point. Totally agree.

 
My biggest hesitation to start him is that the Broncos know he is a playmaker, and they know if they can strip the ball from him, he will be on the bench... so they are gonna be throwing the kitchen sink at him to get him to cough up the ball.
i think this is nuts

they are going to be throwing the kitchen sink at him to get him to cough up the ball, yes, but they are not doing it because they fear him and want him benched, they are doing it because turning the ball over to the broncos offense wins games for the broncos

if he gets benched, bonus
Where did I say they fear him? I said they know he is a playmaker, and they know if they can strip the ball, he will be on the bench. In other words, they can make the Giants one dimensional, or at least, severely handicapped in one dimension.
which, if true, is a side effect of the gact that they always try and create turnovers and likely see a weakness here

it's a small thing, but the assertion that the motivation for focusing on turnovers will be to get wilson on the bench is pretty odd

they want turnovers because it gives them the ball
Agree to disagree then. I just recall from Bountygate that there is mounds of evidence for coaching staffs to put extra emphasis on putting an opponent's playmaker on the bench since the result would help them win.
I agree with bdeep here - defensive players around the league are taught and practice stripping the ball from anyone who has the ball.

Honestly, if you had a guy who was fumble prone, the defense would probably rather have him in the game than on the bench - he can't fumble if he is not in the game.
the other team might rather have him in fumbling all game, but since they know he will be benched if he fumbles, the best they can hope to accomplish is get him on the bench and not making plays on the field.

 
EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. -- New York Giants coach Tom Coughlin said David Wilson needs to demonstrate proper ball-carrying technique in practice this week if he wants to retain his starting job, calling the running back "a marked man."

Wilson fumbled twice in Sunday's season-opening loss in Dallas and was benched in the third quarter in favor of Da'Rel Scott. The Giants signed veteran running back Brandon Jacobs on Tuesday, but Coughlin made it clear that his preference is for Wilson to correct his fumbling issues so he can play against the Denver Broncos in Week 2.

"As I've said many times, we need [Wilson]," Coughlin said Wednesday morning. "He's necessary. He's going to have to overcome this issue.

"And he's a marked man now, so he's really going to have to overcome it."

 
Ryan Mathews for Wilson rejected. Mainly because guy didn't like Mathews and noted he saw fewer snaps than Brown.

Sounds like, from Coughlin's latest, that Wilson really is on the verge of being a permanent fixture on the Giants bench if he can't prove he can play without fumbling. I'm sure the defense has been coached the strip and knock the ball out at every opportunity. I think if he fumbles we've seen the last of him as a fantasy prospect until he can get with a new team.

 
people need to improve their reading comprehension

why would your own player "be a marked man"?

he clearly means opponents have him as a marked man.

lol

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Except that he was specifically referring to practice. Or maybe not, hard to tell. Either way, he fumbles again, he's basically irrelevant for the rest of the season except as a flex play.

 
Except that he was specifically referring to practice. Or maybe not, hard to tell. Either way, he fumbles again, he's basically irrelevant for the rest of the season except as a flex play.
Im sure he can fumble again.

just not for another 70-80 carries at least

 
Right. Which is what makes this upcoming game such a nailbiter for owners. I think he's permabenched if he fumbles again.

 
yeah

the marked man means every other team ssmells blood, and they are gonna go for the strip

but yes, i also assume giant defenders have been told to go for the strip as wellm they need him to improve and practice is one wy to do it

nothing really new in that comment, i think we all assume if he coughs it up a bunch in practice coughlin is gonna kill him so the starter question will become irrelevant

 
Except that he was specifically referring to practice. Or maybe not, hard to tell. Either way, he fumbles again, he's basically irrelevant for the rest of the season except as a flex play.
That's weird my post got all sorts of messed up... what I tried to post was this.

These beat-writer translations are getting out of hand... they keep making these headlines that are just putting words in coaching staff's mouths and it's ridiculous.

Media Headlines: Tom Coughlin said David Wilson needs to demonstarate proper ball-carrying technique in practice this week if he wants to retain his starting job.

Tom Coughlin actually said: ""As I've said many times, we need [Wilson]," Coughlin said Wednesday morning. "He's necessary. He's going to have to overcome this issue. "And he's a marked man now, so he's really going to have to overcome it."

As some others pointed out... "marked man" doesn't mean he's marked for losing his job. It means he's marked for opposing tacklers.

 
so

what we are taking away is the writer totally made stuff up?

lol
Pretty much... Coughlin has yet to make a single statement about David Wilson's starter status. In fact he's literally told every reporter whose asked him about it to more or less shove off. This reporter heard "he's a marked man" and wrote "DAVID WILSON WILL NEED TO SHOW BALL SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TO RETAIN HIS ROLE". As if that's some how a direct translation.

 
Maybe it ends up helping Wilson. If defenders are looking for the ball as he approaches and worried more about trying to strip it than to tackle him, it just increases his chances to break a long one. If he gets past the second wave of defenders, he's gone. The opposition better make sure he's stopped first before getting too fancy with the strip drill.

 
Wilson is guilty of not seceding the yards to ball protection. He is a fighter. Coughlin needs to let him know that that HE knows that the yards will come without that- that getting both arms around the ball come first, and the yards will follow. Even if it means going down...

 
Coughlin will do everything he can to make Wilson succeed.

He's their only chance.

Just hold on to the ball, young one

 
Maybe it ends up helping Wilson. If defenders are looking for the ball as he approaches and worried more about trying to strip it than to tackle him, it just increases his chances to break a long one. If he gets past the second wave of defenders, he's gone. The opposition better make sure he's stopped first before getting too fancy with the strip drill.
This is actually a really really good point and could end up proving to be very true. If you have LBs coming up on him staring at the ball and not his eyes and his feet he is going to make them look stupid. He could break a couple really nice runs if opposing defenses are playing him like this... I'd hope they'd be smarter than that, but they're probably not.

Rofl at permabenched if e fumbles. Yeah, temp-benched, but perma?
Nope, if Wilson fumbles against Denver he's a drop in all formats including dynasty. He'll never play another game in the NFL clearly.

Per Ralph Vacchiano

RB Da'Rel Scott was injured in practice today. The details are unclear. Expecting an announcement from the Giants soon.
Holy crap. God REALLY wants David Wilson to succeed
Scott was really never a threat to Wilson anyway, the Giants have shown no trust in Scott as Wilson's backup. It's the main reason that the Giants had all these workouts scheduled long before the Dallas game anyway. They don't trust Scott or Cox in the backfield at all if Wilson were to go down or for some reason really doesn't work out.

 
I wonder if Wilson is being forced to carry a football around all week long like a fraternity pledge initiation rite. Maybe some teammates trying to sneak behind him while he's on line at Starbucks trying to punch the ball loose.

 
I wonder if Wilson is being forced to carry a football around all week long like a fraternity pledge initiation rite. Maybe some teammates trying to sneak behind him while he's on line at Starbucks trying to punch the ball loose.
Yeah, I'd imagine he's probably running more strip drills than you could ever think possible. Coughlin and Gilbride are probably giving some personal time with him as well. Again... they NEED him this isn't a case of them going "Come here kid, we like you we're gonna take you under out wing". Without David Wilson this teams playoff hopes are likely doomed this season. With him the Super Bowl is a realistic shot. This offense could be legitimately unstoppable if Wilson really does come on, with the way the passing game looked in the 2nd half vs Dallas. Adding an elite back to that offense would be brutal. Wilson is the key to this season and future seasons and Coughlin is well aware of the fact.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
so

what we are taking away is the writer totally made stuff up?

lol
Pretty much... Coughlin has yet to make a single statement about David Wilson's starter status. In fact he's literally told every reporter whose asked him about it to more or less shove off. This reporter heard "he's a marked man" and wrote "DAVID WILSON WILL NEED TO SHOW BALL SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TO RETAIN HIS ROLE". As if that's some how a direct translation.
that is not at all what i assume happened

i assume coughlin's comments in full were written about and that the reporter isd not a complete idiot or complete fiction writer

hell, if you think he made an assumption it would be off of this comment, not the marked man

"Yeah, in practice, he's going to have to have the ball in that position all the time, not just when he thinks he's running free and there's nobody around him," Coughlin said. "I want to see the ball in the right spot all the time.

"And frankly, there's nowhere else to go with this. I don't know what else to say about David Wilson. I realize it's a major issue for everybody, but there's a way to carry the ball and there's a way to protect the ball. Ball security is No. 1, and that's what he's going to have to demonstrate."

assuming the only things said were the quotes in the story, the question you should ask is when coughlin says he will "have to demonstrate" he will carry the ball the right way, what if he does not?

 
I wonder if Wilson is being forced to carry a football around all week long like a fraternity pledge initiation rite. Maybe some teammates trying to sneak behind him while he's on line at Starbucks trying to punch the ball loose.
Yeah, I'd imagine he's probably running more strip drills than you could ever think possible. Coughlin and Gilbride are probably giving some personal time with him as well. Again... they NEED him this isn't a case of them going "Come here kid, we like you we're gonna take you under out wing". Without David Wilson this teams playoff hopes are likely doomed this season. With him the Super Bowl is a realistic shot. This offense could be legitimately unstoppable if Wilson really does come on, with the way the passing game looked in the 2nd half vs Dallas. Adding an elite back to that offense would be brutal.
David Wilson is the difference between being a super bowl contender and not being able to make the playoffs?

 
Maybe it's just me - but the fact that this happened in Game #1 of the season,, I believe, gives him way more leeway.

I mean, Eli sucked. Lots of great players had bad fist weeks, fumbles, picks etc.

Shake the rust off and go...

If this were weelk 8, Id be way more worried

 
@RVacchianoNYDN
RB Da'Rel Scott was injured in practice today. The details are unclear. Expecting an announcement from the Giants soon.
 
Maybe it's just me - but the fact that this happened in Game #1 of the season,, I believe, gives him way more leeway.

I mean, Eli sucked. Lots of great players had bad fist weeks, fumbles, picks etc.

Shake the rust off and go...

If this were weelk 8, Id be way more worried
he'll have his chance, he has to correct the problem

if he does everything is fine, if not he won't get the carries.

it's pretty black and white and as coughlin kind of said- there's not much else to say. he HAS to fix this, all we can do is speculate as to if he will.

 
so

what we are taking away is the writer totally made stuff up?

lol
Pretty much... Coughlin has yet to make a single statement about David Wilson's starter status. In fact he's literally told every reporter whose asked him about it to more or less shove off. This reporter heard "he's a marked man" and wrote "DAVID WILSON WILL NEED TO SHOW BALL SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TO RETAIN HIS ROLE". As if that's some how a direct translation.
that is not at all what i assume happened

i assume coughlin's comments in full were written about and that the reporter isd not a complete idiot or complete fiction writer

hell, if you think he made an assumption it would be off of this comment, not the marked man

"Yeah, in practice, he's going to have to have the ball in that position all the time, not just when he thinks he's running free and there's nobody around him," Coughlin said. "I want to see the ball in the right spot all the time.

"And frankly, there's nowhere else to go with this. I don't know what else to say about David Wilson. I realize it's a major issue for everybody, but there's a way to carry the ball and there's a way to protect the ball. Ball security is No. 1, and that's what he's going to have to demonstrate."

assuming the only things said were the quotes in the story, the question you should ask is when coughlin says he will "have to demonstrate" he will carry the ball the right way, what if he does not?
I can't find this quote... I found these from this morning's presser.

“He’s following the technique that he’s been taught, and we’ll see under pressure if he can continue to do that,” Coughlin said. “The problems occur when you try to make a move and the ball leaves your side or the pocket that you’ve established for it. You have trouble and when there’s no place to go and other people are surrounding you, you have no choice but to cover it up with both hands and get in position where you’re taking care of the football. That’s not that difficult a thing for David Wilson, because of his body style and because of the height of his running position. He can do a good job of covering the ball up, and he was careless and it cost us dearly, but I’m confident he’s going to learn from it.”

Later, in response to another Wilson question, Coughlin said, “He fumbles the football, he fumbled the ball twice. He’s got to straighten that out. We’re not going to have a guy on the field who’s fumbling the ball. He wants to play, he wants to do it, he wants to improve, he wants to be a part of this team, he wants to help this team win. That is something that he must overcome. And the interesting thing is we didn’t see it in training camp, we didn’t see it in any of the preseason games, but it showed up then.”

Amid all the queries and analysis about Wilson, Coughlin would not say if the young back will start vs. the Broncos.

“We’ll see,” Coughlin said. “As I’ve said many times, we need him. He’s necessary. He’s going to have to overcome this issue. He’s a marked man. So he’s really going to have to overcome it.”
The bolded is a big thing for me personally... as I felt this was a big mental thing after the game anyway. And being that it's not an issue they had in practice, camp or in preseason full pad action that points to that. Again:

- First game of the season

- Finally named starter

- Brown goes down and he's told the team is on his shoulders... don't mess up kid

- Primetime game, 50 million people watching

- Against the Dallas Cowboys the same team who started his doghouse campaign last year

A lot of mental stuff going on in that game.

 
Giants should force feed him the ball Sunday, see what the kid can do.

And to keep P Manning off the field.

Test the kids cojones.

 
Maybe it's just me - but the fact that this happened in Game #1 of the season,, I believe, gives him way more leeway.

I mean, Eli sucked. Lots of great players had bad fist weeks, fumbles, picks etc.

Shake the rust off and go...

If this were weelk 8, Id be way more worried
Actually, it's probably worse that he did it right off the bat since it's not like he had a bunch of great, fumble-free games and then coughed it up a few times.

It was same time, last year when the team was on national TV, and it seems to have put doubt in Coughlin's mind that Wilson can handle the big time.

Agree that Eli sucked too, but it's night and day. Eli has as much leeway as anyone in the game considering what he's accompished.

 
Giants should force feed him the ball Sunday, see what the kid can do.

And to keep P Manning off the field.

Test the kids cojones.
I have a feeling this is what you're going to see... it's going to be a tough game to win anyway. His explosiveness up's their chances to win. Besides it keeping Peyton off the field he's just a big threat every time he touches the ball. Granted he's a big threat to succeed and fail but my gut tells me that's how they'll approach this is just put him out there and run on the first few plays of the game to see how he plays out. If he fumbles early it's recoverable. If he doesn't he starts to build some confidence and maybe has that breakout game they want him to have.

@RVacchianoNYDN
RB Da'Rel Scott was injured in practice today. The details are unclear. Expecting an announcement from the Giants soon.
YGTBFKM....
Why are people freaking about this as if it's even relevant news? Da'Rel Scott was already going to be fantasy irrelevant whether Wilson succeed's or not.

 
so

what we are taking away is the writer totally made stuff up?

lol
Pretty much... Coughlin has yet to make a single statement about David Wilson's starter status. In fact he's literally told every reporter whose asked him about it to more or less shove off. This reporter heard "he's a marked man" and wrote "DAVID WILSON WILL NEED TO SHOW BALL SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TO RETAIN HIS ROLE". As if that's some how a direct translation.
that is not at all what i assume happened

i assume coughlin's comments in full were written about and that the reporter isd not a complete idiot or complete fiction writer

hell, if you think he made an assumption it would be off of this comment, not the marked man

"Yeah, in practice, he's going to have to have the ball in that position all the time, not just when he thinks he's running free and there's nobody around him," Coughlin said. "I want to see the ball in the right spot all the time.

"And frankly, there's nowhere else to go with this. I don't know what else to say about David Wilson. I realize it's a major issue for everybody, but there's a way to carry the ball and there's a way to protect the ball. Ball security is No. 1, and that's what he's going to have to demonstrate."

assuming the only things said were the quotes in the story, the question you should ask is when coughlin says he will "have to demonstrate" he will carry the ball the right way, what if he does not?
I can't find this quote... I found these from this morning's presser.

“He’s following the technique that he’s been taught, and we’ll see under pressure if he can continue to do that,” Coughlin said. “The problems occur when you try to make a move and the ball leaves your side or the pocket that you’ve established for it. You have trouble and when there’s no place to go and other people are surrounding you, you have no choice but to cover it up with both hands and get in position where you’re taking care of the football. That’s not that difficult a thing for David Wilson, because of his body style and because of the height of his running position. He can do a good job of covering the ball up, and he was careless and it cost us dearly, but I’m confident he’s going to learn from it.”

Later, in response to another Wilson question, Coughlin said, “He fumbles the football, he fumbled the ball twice. He’s got to straighten that out. We’re not going to have a guy on the field who’s fumbling the ball. He wants to play, he wants to do it, he wants to improve, he wants to be a part of this team, he wants to help this team win. That is something that he must overcome. And the interesting thing is we didn’t see it in training camp, we didn’t see it in any of the preseason games, but it showed up then.”

Amid all the queries and analysis about Wilson, Coughlin would not say if the young back will start vs. the Broncos.

“We’ll see,” Coughlin said. “As I’ve said many times, we need him. He’s necessary. He’s going to have to overcome this issue. He’s a marked man. So he’s really going to have to overcome it.”
The bolded is a big thing for me personally... as I felt this was a big mental thing after the game anyway. And being that it's not an issue they had in practice, camp or in preseason full pad action that points to that. Again:

- First game of the season

- Finally named starter

- Brown goes down and he's told the team is on his shoulders... don't mess up kid

- Primetime game, 50 million people watching

- Against the Dallas Cowboys the same team who started his doghouse campaign last year

A lot of mental stuff going on in that game.
http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/9661705/david-wilson-new-york-giants-running-back-marked-man-tom-coughlin-says

 
Maybe it's just me - but the fact that this happened in Game #1 of the season,, I believe, gives him way more leeway.

I mean, Eli sucked. Lots of great players had bad fist weeks, fumbles, picks etc.

Shake the rust off and go...

If this were weelk 8, Id be way more worried
Actually, it's probably worse that he did it right off the bat since it's not like he had a bunch of great, fumble-free games and then coughed it up a few times.

It was same time, last year when the team was on national TV, and it seems to have put doubt in Coughlin's mind that Wilson can handle the big time.

Agree that Eli sucked too, but it's night and day. Eli has as much leeway as anyone in the game considering what he's accompished.
Im not saying Wilson has Eli;s leeway. at all.

the point is, game 1, even the best and mos experienced can suck. In that regard, youre early enough to correct the errors

 
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000242627/article/tom-coughlin-ny-giants-david-wilson-a-marked-man

David Wilson's play is trying Tom Coughlin's patience. But perhaps not as much as reporters who peppered the New York Giants coach with questions about the running back.

Wednesday, a visibly frustrated Coughlin wouldn't commit to Wilson as the starter.

"We'll see," Coughlin told reporters. "We need him. He has to overcome this issue. He's a marked man."

The Super Bowl-winning coach wasn't going to commit to anything, but it's clear that Wilson will get another shot at the job.

"I can't say any more about David Wilson, except if I watch him in practice, and his technique doesn't improve, I'll let you know. I'll let you know," Coughlin said.

again, this is not news. He'll get a shot and he needs to improve,HOWEVER if he fumbles a lot in practice there'd be a chance he may never get that shot. I don't expect that to happen.

that's kind of common sense, if the coach says focus on ball security and thenyou respond by fumbling in practice it is not going to end well. I doubt this happens, but the message is clearly out there.

 
@RVacchianoNYDN

RB Da'Rel Scott was injured in practice today. The details are unclear. Expecting an announcement from the Giants soon.
YGTBFKM....
Can't believe im typing this, but if its serious bump Jacobs?
Jacobs said he's weeks away from being in game shape, fwiw
With Andre Brown out. Da'Rel Scott possibly out or limited, Brandon Jacobs not anywhere near game-shape and the disaster that was his play this past week against Dallas....

We are going to learn a lot about David Wilson as a football player and person this coming Sunday against Denver.

Regardless of how it plays out, I'm looking forward to watching the drama to unfold....this is the stuff that makes being an NFL so fun!

 
yeah, i am curious about how he does too. i'd crumple under the pressure and end up urine soaked in the fetal position begging Coughlin not to make me take a handoff

"Tom i just don't think i can do it, please no more, PLEASE!"

but that and my complete lack of any athletic ability or drive to excel are probably the major reasons why I am not an NFL running back.

Well those and a bum knee.

 
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000242627/article/tom-coughlin-ny-giants-david-wilson-a-marked-man

David Wilson's play is trying Tom Coughlin's patience. But perhaps not as much as reporters who peppered the New York Giants coach with questions about the running back.

Wednesday, a visibly frustrated Coughlin wouldn't commit to Wilson as the starter.

"We'll see," Coughlin told reporters. "We need him. He has to overcome this issue. He's a marked man."

The Super Bowl-winning coach wasn't going to commit to anything, but it's clear that Wilson will get another shot at the job.

"I can't say any more about David Wilson, except if I watch him in practice, and his technique doesn't improve, I'll let you know. I'll let you know," Coughlin said.

again, this is not news. He'll get a shot and he needs to improve,HOWEVER if he fumbles a lot in practice there'd be a chance he may never get that shot. I don't expect that to happen.

that's kind of common sense, if the coach says focus on ball security and thenyou respond by fumbling in practice it is not going to end well. I doubt this happens, but the message is clearly out there.
i think the not committing is a lot of just coughlin being coughlin
It really is... Coughlin could have said to himself and the coaches and even Wilson 3 minutes after the game "David, you'll get the start again next week" and he still wouldn't tell the press on principal. Coughlin has been notorious for not telling the press things about team decisions and game plans, he's very much like Belichick in that regard. They're hard nosed old school coaches who don't believe the press has any right to any information about the team.

 
yeah

when that question was asked in the post game presser it pissed Coughlin off, and he is a stubborn old dude.He'll probably not answer it at all on principle because he is pissed at the timing of the first question

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top