Rick James
Footballguy
Jeez now it's Wilson's fault Eli threw an interception? Give the guy a break.
We have reason to believe that David Wilson is behind the use of chemical weapons in Syria.Jeez now it's Wilson's fault Eli threw an interception? Give the guy a break.
Eh, I'm a DW fanboy, and the fumble is on DW. He has to protect that ball.One of the two fumbles (the first one I believe) was partially Hynoski's fault who wiffed on the blocking assignment on the guy that was pushed into Wilson causing the fumble
I think that's ridiculous too. In Carl Banks said in his review of the play that the INT on the first screen is on LT Beatty and Eli. Beatty allowed Ware to get inside when Beatty was supposed to push his man outside or cut him. Eli should have thrown the ball in the dirt when he saw Ware blowing up the play.Jeez now it's Wilson's fault Eli threw an interception? Give the guy a break.
This is a really really good article. But invalid to 95% of the people posting in this thread because David Wilson clearly doesn't have elite talent to them and cannot be in the same discussion at: Adrian Peterson, LT2, Barry Sanders, Walter Payton, Emmitt Smith, Eric Dickerson etc.Other RBs with early fumbling issues:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1770069-history-says-its-way-too-early-to-give-up-on-david-wilson
Was David wilson behind the 9-11 attacks,okc bombing, and sandy hook to>>>>We have reason to believe that David Wilson is behind the use of chemical weapons in Syria.Jeez now it's Wilson's fault Eli threw an interception? Give the guy a break.
Good point I saw that to. Wilson was behind a huge d.ware who was jumping in the air and Eli just threw it right to him, not on Dwilson... Just like first fumble almost seemed like guy was pushed into him... either way as long as he doesn't play Dallas he won't fumble. He has 3 fumbles in 2 games against cowboys which coincidentally was the first game in the first place of the season.. Weird.I think that's ridiculous too. In Carl Banks said in his review of the play that the INT on the first screen is on LT Beatty and Eli. Beatty allowed Ware to get inside when Beatty was supposed to push his man outside or cut him. Eli should have thrown the ball in the dirt when he saw Ware blowing up the play.Jeez now it's Wilson's fault Eli threw an interception? Give the guy a break.
Wow Khy you are a really smart shark and I couldn't agree with you more my friend. Well put couldn't have said it better myself. Great info,reviews and analysis where most of this talk by haters is useless babble as they try to justify michael cox or andre brown(after week 10) or even brandon jacobs who is far from being anything better then a blocker at times. It will play out soon enough and I still have faith that Dwilson is a stud in the making. Keep the faith guys.This is a really really good article. But invalid to 95% of the people posting in this thread because David Wilson clearly doesn't have elite talent to them and cannot be in the same discussion at: Adrian Peterson, LT2, Barry Sanders, Walter Payton, Emmitt Smith, Eric Dickerson etc.Other RBs with early fumbling issues:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1770069-history-says-its-way-too-early-to-give-up-on-david-wilson
Which I think is the biggest issue with this little discussion we have going here... some people (ShaBucks for example) do not believe in Wilson's talent outside of his fumbling and pass blocking woes. If you don't believe in that talent then you look at him as a mediocre RB who can't hold onto the ball and is clearly not worth having on the field.
Then you have the realistic camp who can see he has elite talent as a runner and if you can get him past his fumbling and pass blocking woes will more than likely be a top back in this league. Because so many of the all time greats had early career fumbling issues.
That's the real difference here and there's no real way to fix that.
This is still one of my favorite videos of him... I remember watching this last year after the Giants drafted him and I could barely pick my jaw off the floor. I had known of him prior to the draft and thought he had some talent but after watching that video I was amazed at the fact that: David Wilson DOESN'T go down after first contact... and is almost never brought down by a single player. Then last season I felt like we saw that same thing in his NFL play. If you make a small hole and give this kid one man to beat... he will beat him 9/10 and gain more yards. The only time he loses yardage is when the offensive line blows their blocking assignments and he's whacked behind the line. But there's a reason he was the NCAA leader in yards after contact.
That's kind of the whole point of this article that was linked above... it just goes and lists pretty much every HoF running back you can think of who had early career fumbling issues in many cases much worse than what we've seen of Wilson so far. And they fought through it and managed to get past it. Wilson will too, Coughlin has taught 3 different RBs how to hold the ball properly and fixed their fumbling issues. He'll get Wilson to that point as well.This really comes down to whether or not Wilson solves his fumbling issues. If he does, he has RB1 potential. But he's gotta hold on to the ball as if he's holding onto the job, because one really is a metaphor for the other.
lol at comparing Wilson to HOFers. He has some talent, but HOF caliber he ain't. Not even close.That's kind of the whole point of this article that was linked above... it just goes and lists pretty much every HoF running back you can think of who had early career fumbling issues in many cases much worse than what we've seen of Wilson so far. And they fought through it and managed to get past it. Wilson will too, Coughlin has taught 3 different RBs how to hold the ball properly and fixed their fumbling issues. He'll get Wilson to that point as well.This really comes down to whether or not Wilson solves his fumbling issues. If he does, he has RB1 potential. But he's gotta hold on to the ball as if he's holding onto the job, because one really is a metaphor for the other.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1770069-history-says-its-way-too-early-to-give-up-on-david-wilson
... and it would have been ridiculous to compare those guys to existing HOFers in their first couple of years of play.ROYALWITCHEESE said:lol at comparing Wilson to HOFers. He has some talent, but HOF caliber he ain't. Not even close.Khy said:That's kind of the whole point of this article that was linked above... it just goes and lists pretty much every HoF running back you can think of who had early career fumbling issues in many cases much worse than what we've seen of Wilson so far. And they fought through it and managed to get past it. Wilson will too, Coughlin has taught 3 different RBs how to hold the ball properly and fixed their fumbling issues. He'll get Wilson to that point as well.LawFitz said:This really comes down to whether or not Wilson solves his fumbling issues. If he does, he has RB1 potential. But he's gotta hold on to the ball as if he's holding onto the job, because one really is a metaphor for the other.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1770069-history-says-its-way-too-early-to-give-up-on-david-wilson
You can say that about, well, almost every HOF RB in their rookie season.ROYALWITCHEESE said:lol at comparing Wilson to HOFers. He has some talent, but HOF caliber he ain't. Not even close.Khy said:That's kind of the whole point of this article that was linked above... it just goes and lists pretty much every HoF running back you can think of who had early career fumbling issues in many cases much worse than what we've seen of Wilson so far. And they fought through it and managed to get past it. Wilson will too, Coughlin has taught 3 different RBs how to hold the ball properly and fixed their fumbling issues. He'll get Wilson to that point as well.LawFitz said:This really comes down to whether or not Wilson solves his fumbling issues. If he does, he has RB1 potential. But he's gotta hold on to the ball as if he's holding onto the job, because one really is a metaphor for the other.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1770069-history-says-its-way-too-early-to-give-up-on-david-wilson
Scott isn't a rookie, he's a 3rd year player.T with T said:I think it's interesting that FBG on its news section is saying Dwilson could return kicks this next game. I wonder if that is a smokescreen or invicative on Wilson losing lots of work on the offensive side.. Here again I don't believe the Giants have a choice. Cox/scott are both rookies and that is one reason coughlin benched Dwilson for so long because he was a rookie and Coughlin doesn't like rolling with rookies, that's a fact.
Additionally, it's fallacy that Coughlin doesn't like playing rookies.Scott isn't a rookie, he's a 3rd year player.T with T said:I think it's interesting that FBG on its news section is saying Dwilson could return kicks this next game. I wonder if that is a smokescreen or invicative on Wilson losing lots of work on the offensive side.. Here again I don't believe the Giants have a choice. Cox/scott are both rookies and that is one reason coughlin benched Dwilson for so long because he was a rookie and Coughlin doesn't like rolling with rookies, that's a fact.
)... i have mentioned names like cleveland gary and tim worley having issues with fumbling which may have impacted career negatively, but, not sure how talented they were in relation to wilson, or what if any the impact was... did they really have shortened carers? some RBs we just will never know... if they fumbled too much early and never got another chance, they fell into abyss of history, never had the chance to make a name for themselves (how many otherwise could have been priest holmes or arian foster?)...
)... as somebody who is pro-wilson, i'd be much more comfortable assigning him a positive arc and trajectory to the remainder of his career if he can just hang on to the ball better... almost everybody fumbles once in a while, and his style of never-say-die, tackle breaking prowess is admirable... but if he is going to continue that, he needs to be EXTRA cognizant to hold the ball "high and tight" with proper technique...Scott isn't a rookie, he's a 3rd year player.T with T said:I think it's interesting that FBG on its news section is saying Dwilson could return kicks this next game. I wonder if that is a smokescreen or invicative on Wilson losing lots of work on the offensive side.. Here again I don't believe the Giants have a choice. Cox/scott are both rookies and that is one reason coughlin benched Dwilson for so long because he was a rookie and Coughlin doesn't like rolling with rookies, that's a fact.
Ok your right he is going into third year but has 11 career carries. He has no skillset and is just a below avg plodder with no physical ability like wilson so he is irrelevant either way bud.
Disagree. Anyone who saw Peterson play in his rookie year knew the guy was special.You can say that about, well, almost every HOF RB in their rookie season.Hindsight makes geniuses of everyone, it seems.ROYALWITCHEESE said:lol at comparing Wilson to HOFers. He has some talent, but HOF caliber he ain't. Not even close.Khy said:That's kind of the whole point of this article that was linked above... it just goes and lists pretty much every HoF running back you can think of who had early career fumbling issues in many cases much worse than what we've seen of Wilson so far. And they fought through it and managed to get past it. Wilson will too, Coughlin has taught 3 different RBs how to hold the ball properly and fixed their fumbling issues. He'll get Wilson to that point as well.LawFitz said:This really comes down to whether or not Wilson solves his fumbling issues. If he does, he has RB1 potential. But he's gotta hold on to the ball as if he's holding onto the job, because one really is a metaphor for the other.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1770069-history-says-its-way-too-early-to-give-up-on-david-wilson
I doubt that N, even if it is case Wilson should see Lion's share of the carries. Only reason I could see Scott start or take first snap would be for TC to send message to Dwilson and mess with him psychologically, which at this point is pointless and could do more harm then good. I think Dwilson knows he played like ##### and has to step up, he doesn't need any more messages sent, I think he understands.I expect Da'Rel Scott to start.
I don't own him, but a good buddy in my league who has him is sweating bullets, considering lowball offers, and generally needs to be talked off the ledge. Small sample size, but yes I think that there a lot of DW owners crossing their fingers he doesn't get benched again over his fumbling issues.Are people considering David Wilson a pretty risky flex this week?
I am starting him with confidence. We all get duds or low scoring outputs from time to time from any given player in our lineup.Are people considering David Wilson a pretty risky flex this week?
Struggling between Wilson and Bradshaw at my flex.Are people considering David Wilson a pretty risky flex this week?
I hope you're right but this is crazy. No evidence whatsoever to start him with confidence. I've got him in 2 of 4 leagues, including the one that counts.I am starting him with confidence. We all get duds or low scoring outputs from time to time from any given player in our lineup.Are people considering David Wilson a pretty risky flex this week?
way to go out on a limb.if wilson gets a chance again tomorrow, looks good doing it, hangs on to the ball, scores a TD or two, and looks like he is back in the team's good graces again...
we are going to see some seriously whipsaw action on his value in the next week...
you could say that about anybody...way to go out on a limb.If he tears his acl, his value will plummet in redrafts.if wilson gets a chance again tomorrow, looks good doing it, hangs on to the ball, scores a TD or two, and looks like he is back in the team's good graces again...
we are going to see some seriously whipsaw action on his value in the next week...
I'm starting him with zero confidence. Seems more likely to get < 5 touches than he does to get 100 total yards + 1 TD.I am starting him with confidence. We all get duds or low scoring outputs from time to time from any given player in our lineup.Are people considering David Wilson a pretty risky flex this week?
No.Playing the what if game, what if Wilson fumbles on the first series? Wouldn't Scott have another crack at it? Is Wilson on double secret probation? Shouldn't Scott at least be rostered if the space is available?
The first part is correctNo.Playing the what if game, what if Wilson fumbles on the first series? Wouldn't Scott have another crack at it? Is Wilson on double secret probation? Shouldn't Scott at least be rostered if the space is available?
The Giants are not going to give up on Wilson ...they have made that clear as day.
Scott was an injury away from being cut and never heard from again.
If necessary Jacobs and/or Cox would start over Scott in time or they would sign another RB.
I guess? If you have no clue and dont follow the Giants.The first part is correctNo.Playing the what if game, what if Wilson fumbles on the first series? Wouldn't Scott have another crack at it? Is Wilson on double secret probation? Shouldn't Scott at least be rostered if the space is available?
The Giants are not going to give up on Wilson ...they have made that clear as day.
Scott was an injury away from being cut and never heard from again.
If necessary Jacobs and/or Cox would start over Scott in time or they would sign another RB.
the second and third parts are just crazy talk
I tried to explain several times in this thread that Scott was a nobody that was going to be cut and was completely unrosterable for fantasy purposes. Don't bother, some people just don't want to listen.I guess? If you have no clue and dont follow the Giants.The first part is correctNo.Playing the what if game, what if Wilson fumbles on the first series? Wouldn't Scott have another crack at it? Is Wilson on double secret probation? Shouldn't Scott at least be rostered if the space is available?
The Giants are not going to give up on Wilson ...they have made that clear as day.
Scott was an injury away from being cut and never heard from again.
If necessary Jacobs and/or Cox would start over Scott in time or they would sign another RB.
the second and third parts are just crazy talk
Scott was absolutely going to be cut before Andre Brown was injured - If that's crazy talk you should bring it up with the Giants and Giant beat writers
There is about 0% chance that Scott will be the featured back on this or any team. He's fast but that's it. Cox has been much more impressive. And Scott is injured.
If you think it's crazy talk ... go get Scott on your roster
you make a good point about Andre Brown (who was cut once befpore by the Giants in 2010)., but there's no way Cox is even close to being ready to play significant time and Jacobs is old and may be good for spot duty (3d doen, pass pro, a few carries), but ask him to carry a significant portion of the load and he'll end up on the injury report where he spent most of last season.I guess? If you have no clue and dont follow the Giants.The first part is correctNo.Playing the what if game, what if Wilson fumbles on the first series? Wouldn't Scott have another crack at it? Is Wilson on double secret probation? Shouldn't Scott at least be rostered if the space is available?
The Giants are not going to give up on Wilson ...they have made that clear as day.
Scott was an injury away from being cut and never heard from again.
If necessary Jacobs and/or Cox would start over Scott in time or they would sign another RB.
the second and third parts are just crazy talk
Scott was absolutely going to be cut before Andre Brown was injured - If that's crazy talk you should bring it up with the Giants and Giant beat writers
There is about 0% chance that Scott will be the featured back on this or any team. He's fast but that's it. Cox has been much more impressive. And Scott is injured.
If you think it's crazy talk ... go get Scott on your roster
I had no idea he was the Gatorade player of the year. That changes everything.This is hilarious that this David Wilson thread is at 55 pages and counting because it is obvious there are some big time David Wilson Hater's and people that try to discredit the young man. First of all Dwilson is 22 years old and was always a mvp type caliber player even before he was 19... Here is something you probably didn't know.
He was first-team all-district and all-region selection and the Gatorade Player of the Year for Virginia. In 2009, he played for USA Football's U.S. Under-19 National Team that won the 2009 IFAF Under-19 World Championship in Canton, Ohio and was named the tournament's MVP, rushing for 427 yards and eight touchdowns in three games.[2]
Here is some highlights on the above mentioned player from 2011 where he had over 1700 yards rushing, was by far the team's best player and leader. He had most yards after contact in the NCAA that year. He is 5-9 206 lbs with a BMI of 30.4..... Here are some clips
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-m-Ev5amfM
The speech he puts on truly shows the heart,determination and will power he has and I love watching this vid as it gets me PUMPED, hyped and ready to rip someones head off as you could tell the rest of the locker room was ready to go kick some ###.... All this hate because the guy had a bad first game and had first game jitters needs to stop. Dwilson is a Superb runner and can be one of the best Backs in the league within a few years. Yes he has to improve with ball security and stand up and take on blockers but the guy is young and you can't ignore his talent. He is fast, has great vision, stronger then he looks and people give him credit for.... Do I need to say anymore guys.... For all the other Dwilson supporters out there I appreciate your awesome knowledge and positive vibes... All you Dwilson haters can go get in another thread and start talking stupid... Im all in on Dwilson and will be starting him vs Den as I think he has a huge game and will be running angry.