I'm confident that Branch will be on the field in week 1. Why? Because to my recollection, Branch did not play in preseason last year (caution against injuries). Because he was held out of preseason last year, the Pats have set a precedent of sorts that tell Branch and his agent, you don't have to play in preseason. That means that the Pats don't have leverage against him to claim that not playing in the preseason jeopardizes the team, or his roster spot. So, Branch is trying to get the most leverage he can right now. If he doesn't get what he wants, I believe he'll suit up for the regular season.
I'm not really clear on what you're saying here. The Patriots don't need "leverage" based on last season's pre-season - they have all the leverage, he really has none. He's making less than a million in salary this season, and a huge chunk of that is rapidly being taken away in 14k a day fines. He's not made so much money that he can just bat an eye at these fines (which, of course, is the reason for the holdout in the first place).If he sits out until week 10, I could easily seeing the Patriots tagging him in the off-season, and letting him lose that salary as well by holding out if he so chooses. By choosing this course, he could easily kill his market value as a receiver if he hardly plays for two seasons.He'll come back, and he'll come back because he has no other option.