I disagree. Obviously, it would have improved their WP% if the play had ended at 2:01 rather than 2:00. But you know what would have had far more impact? If they had converted the 4th down. That has to be the priority in that situation. If it takes an extra few seconds of scrambling to improve their chances of converting, I would choose that option every time. As it happened, they ended up with the worst of all possible worlds: no conversion, no extra clock stoppage. But I mostly just view that as bad luck that the play didn't finish a second earlier.My objection to going for it on 4th and 25 was that in the time it took them to run that play, the clock ran down to 2:00. So lets say KC punts and proceeds to force a three-and-out (their only realistic path to victory at that point). They had three TOs. So they could get the ball back with something like 90 seconds left on the clock an no TOs. That's doable, especially for Mahomes. He scored twice against the Bills in that playoff game in less time than that.Can we talk about the Chiefs going for it on 4th and 25?
My knee jerk reaction was that it was moronic. You’re backed up, got 3 timeouts and 2 minute warning still and it seemed desperate and distrusting of their defense.
Thinking more though, so what? The most important thing in that scenario is having the ball so you can score points.
If you punt, you do not have the ball and need a stop. A first down ends the game. If you go for it and don’t get it, you do not have the ball and need a stop. A first down ends the game.
So, same situation except you sacrifice 40 some yards of field position. But you have Mahomes. This is not the same calculation other teams have the luxury of making. I don’t think Reid much cared whether he would need 3 or 7 to win because he has full confidence in Mahomes. Either way you need a stop and have 2 minutes or so left to work with.
I’m not saying it was the RIGHT decision, but it’s way closer than I’m hearing about today. And I think Reid has long decided that since he has an all timer back there, he would rather lose with the ball in his hands than without.
Obviously, it didn’t work, but it also turned out to be their last chance at scoring points. More I think about it, more I agree with it. It’s not distrust of the defense, it’s massive amounts of trust in Mahomes. Ride or die with your guy. I get it.
But they would have been much better off to give the ball back to DET before the two minute warning. Then they can get the ball back and still have a TO, and they might survive a situation where Detroit gains a first down. I think having that TO in their back pocket is worth more than the very low chance of converting 4th and 25.
Would love to see a 4th down bot analysis of this one.
If your argument is that they should have punted because it would have allowed them to ensure the clock would stop before 2:00, that's far more reasonable. Like I said, I probably would have favored punting in that situation regardless, and the clock situation nudges it even further in that direction. But once they decided to go for it, they needed to do whatever it took to convert.
Also, if it had been 4th and 3 and they had run a slow-developing play instead of a quick out, that might have been grounds for criticism. But I doubt many NFL teams have a lot of quick-hit plays that can pick up 25 yards in obvious passing situations.
Even though it is a low percent play to complete, what scared me was a PI or Def. Hold. They cut away to commercial so fast, I was still worried through the whole commercial break that the refs might have thrown a late flag.