BigJim®
Footballguy
ThisMe either but it was necessary and i think that was the point. They had to turn the audience against him.
ThisMe either but it was necessary and i think that was the point. They had to turn the audience against him.
Well, killing Kurt's kid early in the season didn't totally stick with his code either. He never had the real proof, and it was a more emotional kill than he usually does.I get turning the audience against Dexter. But doing that with 15 minutes left of the 9th season felt like a copout (no pun intended). He stuck by his code this whole time and I understand having his son there changed things but to blatantly kill a good person like that felt cheap and not the Dexter we watched for 8 seasons. Bottom line, he got a lot of innocent people killed as collateral damage. They could've had him killed without killing Logan. Would've made the ending more debatable IMO and not so clear cut. Dexter's killings were always debatable IMO.
Just like a drug addict or an alcoholic keeps control the whole time or only has 3 drinks..... Until they dont.He stuck by his code this whole time
Not really. He was going to kill the podcast girl for no reason at all. Just because she maybe said something he couldn't prove.He stuck by his code this whole time
Not a big fan of Dexter killing Logan
The show aired yesterday. Maybe dont come in the thread until you watch it?please used the hide button next time ...you ruined that part for me
I saw an article with an interview of the writer (who also wrote S1-4), who indicated New Blood was a one off and there has been no talk of doing anything further. He said he would be interested down the road if something were to be considered. But as of now, all quiet on that front.
Laguerta, though not his kill, I believe would have become a deviation from the code if Deb had not shot the gun herself.Well, killing Kurt's kid early in the season didn't totally stick with his code either. He never had the real proof, and it was a more emotional kill than he usually does.
Yep. Plus, didn’t he rage kill someone early in S5 when he was reeling from Rita’s death. Cannot remember exactly since I rarely rewatch that season.Laguerta, though not his kill, I believe would have become a deviation from the code if Deb had not shot the gun herself.
Well, he stuck a pen in the neck of the guy who killed Deb in the interrogation room. But to your point this was not a guy who evaded justice yet.Yep. Plus, didn’t he rage kill someone early in S5 when he was reeling from Rita’s death. Cannot remember exactly since I rarely rewatch that season.
jobarules said:The show aired yesterday. Maybe dont come in the thread until you watch it?
From another site. Some of these are pretty sketchy, but he's definitely killed outside the code before, even if you give him a lot of leeway on the "Don't get caught" part of the code.Ghost Rider said:Yep. Plus, didn’t he rage kill someone early in S5 when he was reeling from Rita’s death. Cannot remember exactly since I rarely rewatch that season.
Yes that's my premise. There is no spoiler boxyeah, I guess I "asked for it"
so your premise is that everyone needs to be completely caught up (within a day ...) before entering a thread?
that's the entire reason the spoiler box was invented
Yes that's my premise. There is no spoiler box
I don't enjoy anything. Talking about a show IN THE THREAD dedicated to said show A DAY AFTER is commonplace. It's on you to avoid entering the thread.so you enjoy playing the spoiler ...and then telling the crybaby's that #### is on them.
got it.
Well, he stuck a pen in the neck of the guy who killed Deb in the interrogation room. But to your point this was not a guy who evaded justice yet.
It was a lot better when the spoiler box worked now you have to avoid everythingyeah, I guess I "asked for it"
so your premise is that everyone needs to be completely caught up (within a day ...) before entering a thread?
that's the entire reason the spoiler box was invented
Either way, it should be a given to not wander into a thread about a show the day after its finale, as you know people will be talking about it. Go check out the threads when Breaking Bad and Sopranos ended. No one was using spoilers then either. Hell, I watched the finale Sunday morning On Demand when eating breakfast and avoided even looking at Twitter for fear there'd be a trending topic like "DEXTER DIED" or something like that, and I wanted to avoid all spoilers if possible.Yeah, gotta side with joba on this one. I spent 20 minutes trying to figure out how to Spoiler that kill list, and couldn't get it to work.
Terrible theory. Just awful.
Until he’s notTerrible theory. Just awful.
He's dead. We saw him die. Clyde Phillips said he is dead.
He's dead.
I’m starting Dexter from the very beginning and now 6 episodes in. I just finished the episode where the ice box murderer allegedly dove 100 feet down in the sea to retrieve a body that Dexter dumped in order to set him up.
Please tell me this show gets better.
I’m starting Dexter from the very beginning and now 6 episodes in. I just finished the episode where the ice box murderer allegedly dove 100 feet down in the sea to retrieve a body that Dexter dumped in order to set him up.
Please tell me this show gets better.
Are you saying this is an issue because it is unbelievable? If so, then yeah you should probably stop now. I mean up until that point it was totally believable that there was a blood spatter expert working for the police department that was moonlighting as a serial killer taking care of killers that the law let go. I mean that is totally believable.I’m starting Dexter from the very beginning and now 6 episodes in. I just finished the episode where the ice box murderer allegedly dove 100 feet down in the sea to retrieve a body that Dexter dumped in order to set him up.
Please tell me this show gets better.
I’m starting Dexter from the very beginning and now 6 episodes in. I just finished the episode where the ice box murderer allegedly dove 100 feet down in the sea to retrieve a body that Dexter dumped in order to set him up.
Please tell me this show gets better.
It gets so, so much worse
Are you saying this is an issue because it is unbelievable? If so, then yeah you should probably stop now. I mean up until that point it was totally believable that there was a blood spatter expert working for the police department that was moonlighting as a serial killer taking care of killers that the law let go. I mean that is totally believable.I’m starting Dexter from the very beginning and now 6 episodes in. I just finished the episode where the ice box murderer allegedly dove 100 feet down in the sea to retrieve a body that Dexter dumped in order to set him up.
Please tell me this show gets better.
I'm actually doing the same thing and stopped right about where you are. So far, it just seems like a crappy show from the USA network.
It gets so, so much worse
More about the manner in which he takes care of what he does. There isn't enough time in the day to do what he does and still function on zero sleep.Are you saying this is an issue because it is unbelievable? If so, then yeah you should probably stop now. I mean up until that point it was totally believable that there was a blood spatter expert working for the police department that was moonlighting as a serial killer taking care of killers that the law let go. I mean that is totally believable.I’m starting Dexter from the very beginning and now 6 episodes in. I just finished the episode where the ice box murderer allegedly dove 100 feet down in the sea to retrieve a body that Dexter dumped in order to set him up.
Please tell me this show gets better.
Why wouldn't it be? A number of nurses have been convicted for killing their patients. Why couldn't someone affiliated with the police department?
I'm actually doing the same thing and stopped right about where you are. So far, it just seems like a crappy show from the USA network.It gets so, so much worse
Man, you guys have no imagination. It's very entertaining and gets good through the trinity killer and Jimmie Smits. But the last couple seasons are kind of sub par and the finale was terrible.
I would definitely suggest at least finishing the first season. I will say that I really never liked or was interested in the supporting characters for the most part, though I watched the whole series and liked it for the most part because of Dexter and some of the inherent moral questions.I'm actually doing the same thing and stopped right about where you are. So far, it just seems like a crappy show from the USA network.It gets so, so much worse
Man, you guys have no imagination. It's very entertaining and gets good through the trinity killer and Jimmie Smits. But the last couple seasons are kind of sub par and the finale was terrible.
I dunno. It's not a believability thing for me. It just seems kind of dull. I don't care about any of the characters. His sister trying to make homicide, whatever. His drab co-workers, blah. I can think of a dozen amazing storylines that could use the setup of a cop really being a serial killer, and none of them involve another serial killer leaving barbie dolls in the guy's freezer.
I get that it might get better. But I'm just tired of shows where you have to wait for this to happen when so many other great shows can be amazing from the first episode.
I could see thinking the character was annoying, but I don't think Jennifer Carpenter was terrible by any means in her performance. Not saying she is Meryl Streep, and I haven't seen her in anything else to make a comparison, but I think she did a good job on Dexter. I would say to not let the flaws of the character taint your view of the actor's performance.The sister was just an unbelievably terrible actor. She single handedly ruined it for me.
I found her very annoying and cheesy, but I assumed that was the point so as to drive home how naive she is to her brother and why he remains close to her.I could see thinking the character was annoying, but I don't think Jennifer Carpenter was terrible by any means in her performance. Not saying she is Meryl Streep, and I haven't seen her in anything else to make a comparison, but I think she did a good job on Dexter. I would say to not let the flaws of the character taint your view of the actor's performance.The sister was just an unbelievably terrible actor. She single handedly ruined it for me.
This should tell you something.Not saying she is Meryl Streep, and I haven't seen her in anything else to make a comparison,
This should tell you something.Not saying she is Meryl Streep, and I haven't seen her in anything else to make a comparison,

I found her very annoying and cheesy, but I assumed that was the point so as to drive home how naive she is to her brother and why he remains close to her.I could see thinking the character was annoying, but I don't think Jennifer Carpenter was terrible by any means in her performance. Not saying she is Meryl Streep, and I haven't seen her in anything else to make a comparison, but I think she did a good job on Dexter. I would say to not let the flaws of the character taint your view of the actor's performance.The sister was just an unbelievably terrible actor. She single handedly ruined it for me.
In other words, I didn't blame the actress because I assume she was playing the character as written.
Not really, because I don't watch a lot of stuff in general. (but the stuff I do, I tend to re-watch and know really well)This should tell you something.Not saying she is Meryl Streep, and I haven't seen her in anything else to make a comparison,
Yeah, Seasons 1,2 and 4 are all all-timers, with 3 being very good as well. There are plenty of good moments and episodes in the later seasons, but the consistency was long gone. I did find it still watchable till the end, though, largely because MCA's performance as Dexter was always so phenomenal, even when the writing wasn't great.I found her very annoying and cheesy, but I assumed that was the point so as to drive home how naive she is to her brother and why he remains close to her.I could see thinking the character was annoying, but I don't think Jennifer Carpenter was terrible by any means in her performance. Not saying she is Meryl Streep, and I haven't seen her in anything else to make a comparison, but I think she did a good job on Dexter. I would say to not let the flaws of the character taint your view of the actor's performance.The sister was just an unbelievably terrible actor. She single handedly ruined it for me.
In other words, I didn't blame the actress because I assume she was playing the character as written.
I recall a lot of acting criticisms of her early on in season 1 but I agree, i think the character is supposed to be annoying and insecure and stuttering starting out. She’s much more confident and consistent in the later seasons when her character gets more confident after the things she goes thru. I never had any problem with the acting on this show, now the writing on the other hand after season 4, holy moly…
It is, yes. I am not saying it is as great as the early Dexter seasons, but it's a much better ending to the Dexter story than we got in the original series. I won't say anything else, but I think much of the criticism is for a very specific reason (I cannot say, as it would be a spoiler).I watched like the first two episodes of the "new" (or 9th?) season on Showtime. Didn't hate it, but we pared down our streaming services. Is it worth continuing to watch? I'm assuming no because I haven't heard anything good about it.
Yeah, which is a shame because I thought young Hanks did a really nice job with his character and at some point Dexter had to be caught. But, likely you said, holy moly on the direction the writing went. So dumb.I found her very annoying and cheesy, but I assumed that was the point so as to drive home how naive she is to her brother and why he remains close to her.I could see thinking the character was annoying, but I don't think Jennifer Carpenter was terrible by any means in her performance. Not saying she is Meryl Streep, and I haven't seen her in anything else to make a comparison, but I think she did a good job on Dexter. I would say to not let the flaws of the character taint your view of the actor's performance.The sister was just an unbelievably terrible actor. She single handedly ruined it for me.
In other words, I didn't blame the actress because I assume she was playing the character as written.
I recall a lot of acting criticisms of her early on in season 1 but I agree, i think the character is supposed to be annoying and insecure and stuttering starting out. She’s much more confident and consistent in the later seasons when her character gets more confident after the things she goes thru. I never had any problem with the acting on this show, now the writing on the other hand after season 4, holy moly…
Oh, so it's just one season?It is, yes. I am not saying it is as great as the early Dexter seasons, but it's a much better ending to the Dexter story than we got in the original series. I won't say anything else, but I think much of the criticism is for a very specific reason (I cannot say, as it would be a spoiler).I watched like the first two episodes of the "new" (or 9th?) season on Showtime. Didn't hate it, but we pared down our streaming services. Is it worth continuing to watch? I'm assuming no because I haven't heard anything good about it.
Oh, so it's just one season?It is, yes. I am not saying it is as great as the early Dexter seasons, but it's a much better ending to the Dexter story than we got in the original series. I won't say anything else, but I think much of the criticism is for a very specific reason (I cannot say, as it would be a spoiler).I watched like the first two episodes of the "new" (or 9th?) season on Showtime. Didn't hate it, but we pared down our streaming services. Is it worth continuing to watch? I'm assuming no because I haven't heard anything good about it.