What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dion Lewis (2 Viewers)

4.57 40 yard dash. He's not taking many to the house like Barry.
I agree but I will also say some guys play at very different speeds in the game than that timed 40. Emmitt Smith was said to be slow. But he was effective. David Johnson this year was supposed to be slow but he looks like a young Michael Turned streaking down the sidelines. Call it what you will. Maybe they get scared. I don't know. But they play differently than the stopwatch indicates.

 
@FieldYates: Filed to ESPN: the Patriots have signed RB Dion Lewis to a 2-year contract extension through the 2017 season, per a league source.

@FieldYates: Lewis' deal: $600k signing bonus, base salaries of $800k in '16, $1.2M in '17. Can earn up to $1.8M in incentives from 2016-2017.

Just sayin
What a steal. The Pats are such a smart organization that the Colts could learn a thing or two about.

 
Anyone traded for him. Still think market is low. Trying to gauge his trade value.
I was offered Karlos Williams for him the other day.

Haven't seen him actually traded at all. Probably several reasons on both sides of that one.

 
@FieldYates: Filed to ESPN: the Patriots have signed RB Dion Lewis to a 2-year contract extension through the 2017 season, per a league source.

@FieldYates: Lewis' deal: $600k signing bonus, base salaries of $800k in '16, $1.2M in '17. Can earn up to $1.8M in incentives from 2016-2017.

Just sayin
What a steal. The Pats are such a smart organization that the Colts could learn a thing or two about.
Giants too. How much did they pay Vereen?

 
@FieldYates: Filed to ESPN: the Patriots have signed RB Dion Lewis to a 2-year contract extension through the 2017 season, per a league source.

@FieldYates: Lewis' deal: $600k signing bonus, base salaries of $800k in '16, $1.2M in '17. Can earn up to $1.8M in incentives from 2016-2017.

Just sayin
What a steal. The Pats are such a smart organization that the Colts could learn a thing or two about.
It looks like everyone in here is pro Lewis.

I'm neutral. I sold in a few leagues where I got good offers.

I'm lukewarm on this news. On one hand, it's a good thing they signed him. On the other, that's clearly not great money. It's definitely not "this guy is going to be a RB1 for the next 3 years" money.

 
@FieldYates: Filed to ESPN: the Patriots have signed RB Dion Lewis to a 2-year contract extension through the 2017 season, per a league source.

@FieldYates: Lewis' deal: $600k signing bonus, base salaries of $800k in '16, $1.2M in '17. Can earn up to $1.8M in incentives from 2016-2017.

Just sayin
What a steal. The Pats are such a smart organization that the Colts could learn a thing or two about.
It looks like everyone in here is pro Lewis.

I'm neutral. I sold in a few leagues where I got good offers.

I'm lukewarm on this news. On one hand, it's a good thing they signed him. On the other, that's clearly not great money. It's definitely not "this guy is going to be a RB1 for the next 3 years" money.
Is it "this guy is going to be an RB1 for the current season" money? 'Cause that's all I care about...I'm desperate at RB so I'll hold on to any hope, slim as it may be

 
For what it's worth, DLF did another round of dynasty mocks last week, and Dion Lewis had an ADP in the mid-70s. So somewhere around the early 7th round in startups.

I still think that's too low, but it's a huge rise from where he was a month ago. (Undrafted.)

 
@FieldYates: Filed to ESPN: the Patriots have signed RB Dion Lewis to a 2-year contract extension through the 2017 season, per a league source.

@FieldYates: Lewis' deal: $600k signing bonus, base salaries of $800k in '16, $1.2M in '17. Can earn up to $1.8M in incentives from 2016-2017.

Just sayin
What a steal. The Pats are such a smart organization that the Colts could learn a thing or two about.
It looks like everyone in here is pro Lewis.

I'm neutral. I sold in a few leagues where I got good offers.

I'm lukewarm on this news. On one hand, it's a good thing they signed him. On the other, that's clearly not great money. It's definitely not "this guy is going to be a RB1 for the next 3 years" money.
Wouldn't that be he and his agent's doing though? Maybe he wants to stay in the Patriots' organization and is willing to take that deal now instead of negotiating and thinking someone else will give him more?

 
@FieldYates: Filed to ESPN: the Patriots have signed RB Dion Lewis to a 2-year contract extension through the 2017 season, per a league source.

@FieldYates: Lewis' deal: $600k signing bonus, base salaries of $800k in '16, $1.2M in '17. Can earn up to $1.8M in incentives from 2016-2017.

Just sayin
What a steal. The Pats are such a smart organization that the Colts could learn a thing or two about.
It looks like everyone in here is pro Lewis.

I'm neutral. I sold in a few leagues where I got good offers.

I'm lukewarm on this news. On one hand, it's a good thing they signed him. On the other, that's clearly not great money. It's definitely not "this guy is going to be a RB1 for the next 3 years" money.
Wouldn't that be he and his agent's doing though? Maybe he wants to stay in the Patriots' organization and is willing to take that deal now instead of negotiating and thinking someone else will give him more?
It's possible his agent was taken to the cleaners. If nothing else, it's an indicator of what him, his agent, and the Pats think of him.

I'm seeing different numbers now from Rotoworld vs this tweet. Rotoworld is reporting numbers closer to a $2 million base. That would put him on the low spectrum of starters and the top backups. It puts him in the Deangelo Williams/Roy Helu/Rashad Jennings/Bilal Powell/Chris Ivory/Pierre Thomas tier of contracts. That would actually bode well for him. If the $2 million base numbers are correct, I'm more optimistic than I originally was about this extension.

Again - this contract doesn't mean anything by itself, it's just an indicator. Like all stats, you just need to take it with a grain of salt and not read too much into it. With that being said, $2 million base is a much, much better indicator than the initial $600K base reported.

 
Anyone traded for him. Still think market is low. Trying to gauge his trade value.
I'm trying to get him. Dude that owns him in my work PPR league also has Arian Foster, Forte, and Gurley so he's not even starting Lewis at the moment. He has a good team but is 2-2 at the moment. Has absolutely nada at TE and I have Gronk and Eifert, so I'm trying to trade him Eifert and Lamar Miller for Lewis. Trade's been out there for a day now, he told me he's still considering it but that he put out a couple of offers involving Lewis of his own that he's waiting for answers on before he decides on my offer. I'll let you know if he ultimately accepts (or what deal goes through if not mine), but hopefully this gives you SOME idea of what he might be worth on the open market.

 
Anyone traded for him. Still think market is low. Trying to gauge his trade value.
I'm trying to get him. Dude that owns him in my work PPR league also has Arian Foster, Forte, and Gurley so he's not even starting Lewis at the moment. He has a good team but is 2-2 at the moment. Has absolutely nada at TE and I have Gronk and Eifert, so I'm trying to trade him Eifert and Lamar Miller for Lewis. Trade's been out there for a day now, he told me he's still considering it but that he put out a couple of offers involving Lewis of his own that he's waiting for answers on before he decides on my offer. I'll let you know if he ultimately accepts (or what deal goes through if not mine), but hopefully this gives you SOME idea of what he might be worth on the open market.
As a Lewis owner I'd shoot that down immediately although I am very high on Lewis and don't care for Miller much at all.

 
Anyone traded for him. Still think market is low. Trying to gauge his trade value.
I'm trying to get him. Dude that owns him in my work PPR league also has Arian Foster, Forte, and Gurley so he's not even starting Lewis at the moment. He has a good team but is 2-2 at the moment. Has absolutely nada at TE and I have Gronk and Eifert, so I'm trying to trade him Eifert and Lamar Miller for Lewis. Trade's been out there for a day now, he told me he's still considering it but that he put out a couple of offers involving Lewis of his own that he's waiting for answers on before he decides on my offer. I'll let you know if he ultimately accepts (or what deal goes through if not mine), but hopefully this gives you SOME idea of what he might be worth on the open market.
As a Lewis owner I'd shoot that down immediately although I am very high on Lewis and don't care for Miller much at all.
That's funny. Was just talking to a guy in a league (dynasty) and he has Lewis and NEEDS a TE and said he offered Lewis for Eifert and got shot down. Lots of different opinions out there, apparently.

 
Anyone traded for him. Still think market is low. Trying to gauge his trade value.
I'm trying to get him. Dude that owns him in my work PPR league also has Arian Foster, Forte, and Gurley so he's not even starting Lewis at the moment. He has a good team but is 2-2 at the moment. Has absolutely nada at TE and I have Gronk and Eifert, so I'm trying to trade him Eifert and Lamar Miller for Lewis. Trade's been out there for a day now, he told me he's still considering it but that he put out a couple of offers involving Lewis of his own that he's waiting for answers on before he decides on my offer. I'll let you know if he ultimately accepts (or what deal goes through if not mine), but hopefully this gives you SOME idea of what he might be worth on the open market.
As a Lewis owner I'd shoot that down immediately although I am very high on Lewis and don't care for Miller much at all.
That's funny. Was just talking to a guy in a league (dynasty) and he has Lewis and NEEDS a TE and said he offered Lewis for Eifert and got shot down. Lots of different opinions out there, apparently.
That doesn't really surprise me. I said earlier I don't have a good feel for Lewis' Dynasty value yet. I could see someone valuing Eifert more since his role seems to be far more secure long-term barring injury.

In re-draft leagues, though, I'd rank Lewis much higher than Eifert and Miller combined. I'd want no worse than a high-end WR2 or Top 5 TE if I were trading him or a clear upgrade at RB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyone traded for him. Still think market is low. Trying to gauge his trade value.
I'm trying to get him. Dude that owns him in my work PPR league also has Arian Foster, Forte, and Gurley so he's not even starting Lewis at the moment. He has a good team but is 2-2 at the moment. Has absolutely nada at TE and I have Gronk and Eifert, so I'm trying to trade him Eifert and Lamar Miller for Lewis. Trade's been out there for a day now, he told me he's still considering it but that he put out a couple of offers involving Lewis of his own that he's waiting for answers on before he decides on my offer. I'll let you know if he ultimately accepts (or what deal goes through if not mine), but hopefully this gives you SOME idea of what he might be worth on the open market.
As a Lewis owner I'd shoot that down immediately although I am very high on Lewis and don't care for Miller much at all.
That's funny. Was just talking to a guy in a league (dynasty) and he has Lewis and NEEDS a TE and said he offered Lewis for Eifert and got shot down. Lots of different opinions out there, apparently.
That doesn't really surprise me. I said earlier I don't have a good feel for Lewis' Dynasty value yet. I could see someone valuing Eifert more since his role seems to be far more secure long-term barring injury.

In re-draft leagues, though, I'd rank Lewis much higher than Eifert and Miller combined. I'd want no worse than a high-end WR2 or Top 5 TE if I were trading him or a clear upgrade at RB.
I agree that might be the thought. I get it to.

Just to play devil's advocate for a minute, though, in the vast majority of ppr dynasty leagues, you don't see top 10 young RBs on a top-flight NFL offense offers for a TE not named Gronk (Graham/Kelce, maybe).

Unless they are dominant TEs and Gronk is really the only true dominant TE right now, those are deals that favor the RB owner. When you turn down the next Foster, Morris, Hill, etc, you pay for that a lot more than when you lose a TE.

 
That's funny. Was just talking to a guy in a league (dynasty) and he has Lewis and NEEDS a TE and said he offered Lewis for Eifert and got shot down. Lots of different opinions out there, apparently.
I'm pretty sure I'm still the top ranker on Dion Lewis by a very substantial margin. I know Tefertiller and Hammond, (aka Couch Potato), put Lewis at RB19 and RB17 in their last rankings update. I don't see anyone at DLF that has him higher than RB20. Matt Williamson just updated at ESPN, and he had Lewis at RB17. For comparison, I've got Lewis somewhere in the 7th-10th range depending on window and scoring system. But I'd still take Eifert over him in dynasty. (He ranks that high for me partly because I'm high on Lewis, but mostly because I'm just low on every other RB; he may be my 7th-ranked RB, but he's behind a couple dozen WRs and a fistful of TEs, sitting more in the high-4th-round range in terms of startup picks.)

 
I agree that might be the thought. I get it to.


Just to play devil's advocate for a minute, though, in the vast majority of ppr dynasty leagues, you don't see top 10 young RBs on a top-flight NFL offense offers for a TE not named Gronk (Graham/Kelce, maybe).

Unless they are dominant TEs and Gronk is really the only true dominant TE right now, those are deals that favor the RB owner. When you turn down the next Foster, Morris, Hill, etc, you pay for that a lot more than when you lose a TE.
Also for what it's worth, I've got Eifert above Graham and on par with Kelce in dynasty.

 
That's funny. Was just talking to a guy in a league (dynasty) and he has Lewis and NEEDS a TE and said he offered Lewis for Eifert and got shot down. Lots of different opinions out there, apparently.
I'm pretty sure I'm still the top ranker on Dion Lewis by a very substantial margin. I know Tefertiller and Hammond, (aka Couch Potato), put Lewis at RB19 and RB17 in their last rankings update. I don't see anyone at DLF that has him higher than RB20. Matt Williamson just updated at ESPN, and he had Lewis at RB17. For comparison, I've got Lewis somewhere in the 7th-10th range depending on window and scoring system. But I'd still take Eifert over him in dynasty. (He ranks that high for me partly because I'm high on Lewis, but mostly because I'm just low on every other RB; he may be my 7th-ranked RB, but he's behind a couple dozen WRs and a fistful of TEs, sitting more in the high-4th-round range in terms of startup picks.)
I get the reasoning. It's preference and I won't say there is a right or wrong but for me I think unless his name is Gronk, I can find another "pretty good but not named Gronk" TE. Young, top 10 RBs don't come along often. There is risk. There sure is. But at the end of the day, he's young, he's top 10, he plays on a top NFL offense that is known for not taking their foot off the gas. I take the chance and I might just have the next Foster.

I lose Eifert and big deal. There's another emerging TE coming along every half hour. Last year it was Kelce. This year looks like Ebron is in play. TEs aren't hard. You just have to have patience. You draft the talent and set it on bake for 2 years. Rbs are much more difficult to find the ones doing what Lewis is.

 
@FieldYates: Filed to ESPN: the Patriots have signed RB Dion Lewis to a 2-year contract extension through the 2017 season, per a league source.

@FieldYates: Lewis' deal: $600k signing bonus, base salaries of $800k in '16, $1.2M in '17. Can earn up to $1.8M in incentives from 2016-2017.

Just sayin
What a steal. The Pats are such a smart organization that the Colts could learn a thing or two about.
It looks like everyone in here is pro Lewis.

I'm neutral. I sold in a few leagues where I got good offers.

I'm lukewarm on this news. On one hand, it's a good thing they signed him. On the other, that's clearly not great money. It's definitely not "this guy is going to be a RB1 for the next 3 years" money.
Wouldn't that be he and his agent's doing though? Maybe he wants to stay in the Patriots' organization and is willing to take that deal now instead of negotiating and thinking someone else will give him more?
It's possible his agent was taken to the cleaners. If nothing else, it's an indicator of what him, his agent, and the Pats think of him.

I'm seeing different numbers now from Rotoworld vs this tweet. Rotoworld is reporting numbers closer to a $2 million base. That would put him on the low spectrum of starters and the top backups. It puts him in the Deangelo Williams/Roy Helu/Rashad Jennings/Bilal Powell/Chris Ivory/Pierre Thomas tier of contracts. That would actually bode well for him. If the $2 million base numbers are correct, I'm more optimistic than I originally was about this extension.

Again - this contract doesn't mean anything by itself, it's just an indicator. Like all stats, you just need to take it with a grain of salt and not read too much into it. With that being said, $2 million base is a much, much better indicator than the initial $600K base reported.
$600k was the reported signing bonus.

 
got him in one of my two leagues and the other I tried to pick him up off waivers and my buddy got him just before me at the 7th spot after week 1. I grabbed Woodhead so all is not lost but I tried for the next few days trying to deal for Lewis upping the offer each time. I've been very successful in that league and I think my persistence in trying to acquire him caused the other owner to dig in his heals thinking he may have something good. I keep kicking myself over how I handled those offers and as in hindsight I should have made a really strong pitch right off the bat as I think I could've got him before he knew what he had...In the grand scheme of things that "strong offer" at that time would have been pennies on the dollar now that he's a top 10 back probably for years to come.

 
got him in one of my two leagues and the other I tried to pick him up off waivers and my buddy got him just before me at the 7th spot after week 1. I grabbed Woodhead so all is not lost but I tried for the next few days trying to deal for Lewis upping the offer each time. I've been very successful in that league and I think my persistence in trying to acquire him caused the other owner to dig in his heals thinking he may have something good. I keep kicking myself over how I handled those offers and as in hindsight I should have made a really strong pitch right off the bat as I think I could've got him before he knew what he had...In the grand scheme of things that "strong offer" at that time would have been pennies on the dollar now that he's a top 10 back probably for years to come.
Woo for years to come is bold. Im very high on him THIS YEAR ONLY. I can easily see brady winning another super bowl and him and belichick retiring together as it would be there 5th ring. Long term i wouldn't know where to put Lewis but for this year barring injury he should be a top 15 back for the year.

 
solorca said:
Shutout said:
Not sure how many of my fellow Eagle fans will agree but this pre-season he has given me a Westbrook feeling when he was a rookie. The way he's looked this pre-season makes you wonder why he fell so far in the draft.
I got that feeling as well. Have to temper it a little because it was 2nd and 3rd string last night but he looked good. He wasn't just trying to burn people. He was patient behind the line and waited forthe hole to open. He angled off the blockers well and turned losses into gains for the times he was caught behind the line. Reminds me a lot of Warrick Dunn. I think he makes the team. Bye bye Eldra Buckley.
Good comparison. Kind of limited in FF though. If he were on the Colts or Some team like that, he would be my 2nd most favorite dynasty rookie RB stash.
In reply to the post above. This is from 2011, bumped to illustrate that I think there WERE people that knew all along what was there. It just took him getting to a team that could use him properly to bear fruit. Go back to page one of this thread an you will see a good handful of people saying this is the player they saw.
I loved Leonard Hankerson in 2011, I guess that means I am awesome now that he's playing well in 2015.
Actually, yea. Situation is hard to predict but if a guy has talent, it will shine through. It's no surprise that if you had faith in a guy like Hank that going from dreadful Washington to pass happy Atlanta was just what he needed.

 
Hoss Style said:
RealReactions said:
mnmplayer said:
3. Lewis is arguably more talented than any RB on that list other than Dillon.
This is a pretty ambitious statement for someone who most people didn't know existed until he had a good week one. Why can't we just say "he's doing really well, and if he keeps doing well there's no reason to think belichick will go away from him"? Or "he's playing as well as any back since Dillon"?Fwiw, Blount is pretty talented too. Not elite. Not nearly as shifty. Different kind of player. He plays a role the Patriots like to use and plays it well. Sometimes they'll use one more than the other. Sometimes they won't use the backs as much, sometimes they'll use them both a lot. It looks like Lewis has earned playing time even in pass heavy schemes. That's enough for me.
A guy people compared to Barry Sanders in 2009 you mean? I think you need to give Dion a little more credit, even if YOU had no idea who he was, plenty of other people did. I will paraphrase BB in saying, "Dion Lewis was no secret."
:goodposting: I don't know what boston guy is talking about. i knew about him in preseason even though he didn't play a lot and even drafted him in every league :shrug:
How many were yelling at the top of their lungs before the preseason? Not many. Just be glad you got him.
I watch all the condensed games each week when I work out. This guy was sticking out like a sore thumb. Wont profess to be an expert but I did profess his potential before the season started.

mnmplayer, on 05 Sept 2015 - 10:57 AM, said:

He could make an impact. He has rare, elite balance/ankle breaking skill and adequate power/speed and good hands/catch. Very compact. Deceptive power, adequate for nickel/dime sets where he will be facing mostly. Also Pats tied him up in 2014 after the injury thinking they would tie him up for 2015. Didn't play in final pre-season game. He's in the plan.

Gushinghistory/story/narrative while watching his 40+ carry game. Pretty much every play went to him.

I agree, but those that listened got a freebie RB1 in PPR, at least a RB2 in non. Its not like the last pick of any redraft round was a huge investment (where you could grab him) as he wasn't on anyone's radar of any site that would bump his ADP even past 25th round, heck even after the 1st week of waivers he could have been had for cheap and I think anyone that looked at the film on his pre-season that I posted would have seen the same thing, ankle breaking skills and good catching ability ... so drafting him with their last pick no matter how it turns out now is way ahead of the game.

P.S. The comparison to Barry Sanders was an ex-linebacker/ analysts' opinion from the video's I posted. I just mentioned it and also mentioned that he can catch better than Barry could. That was my only comparison to Barry, so if you believed the "other guy" that he ran like Barry and believed he could catch better than Barry (which isn't really saying that much since Barry was not known for great pass catching skills), well then do the math and realize the potential for this kid is great.

Note that I wrote, "I have seen this guy compared to Barry Sanders. I didn't want to mention that myself" also "runs like Barry" is in quotes which indicates its not my thought but borrowed from somebody else. I cant take credit for that comparison, but I dare say I can't think of a better comparison to his body type/ running style/ tackle breaking ability. If someone has a better comparison let me know. That's what I thought. Nobody compares to Barry, but it says a lot when a linebacker who played during the Barry era makes the comparison ... a lot more qualified to make the comparison than you or me. He also said this about Barry so he is not disrespecting Barry:

"The best football player I've ever watched was Lawrence Taylor, and the best running back I've seen in 25 years is Barry Sanders. It's not even close. It's going to be a long, long time before we see another like him, if we do".

 
That's funny. Was just talking to a guy in a league (dynasty) and he has Lewis and NEEDS a TE and said he offered Lewis for Eifert and got shot down. Lots of different opinions out there, apparently.
I'm pretty sure I'm still the top ranker on Dion Lewis by a very substantial margin. I know Tefertiller and Hammond, (aka Couch Potato), put Lewis at RB19 and RB17 in their last rankings update. I don't see anyone at DLF that has him higher than RB20. Matt Williamson just updated at ESPN, and he had Lewis at RB17. For comparison, I've got Lewis somewhere in the 7th-10th range depending on window and scoring system. But I'd still take Eifert over him in dynasty. (He ranks that high for me partly because I'm high on Lewis, but mostly because I'm just low on every other RB; he may be my 7th-ranked RB, but he's behind a couple dozen WRs and a fistful of TEs, sitting more in the high-4th-round range in terms of startup picks.)
I get the reasoning. It's preference and I won't say there is a right or wrong but for me I think unless his name is Gronk, I can find another "pretty good but not named Gronk" TE. Young, top 10 RBs don't come along often. There is risk. There sure is. But at the end of the day, he's young, he's top 10, he plays on a top NFL offense that is known for not taking their foot off the gas. I take the chance and I might just have the next Foster.

I lose Eifert and big deal. There's another emerging TE coming along every half hour. Last year it was Kelce. This year looks like Ebron is in play. TEs aren't hard. You just have to have patience. You draft the talent and set it on bake for 2 years. Rbs are much more difficult to find the ones doing what Lewis is.
I disagree that RBs are more difficult to find. Every year a half-dozen or so come out of the woodwork, even in dynasty. They may not be multi-year (or even multi-game) studs, but they can definitely fill in bye weeks and come out with a blow up performance here and there. The two most recent examples I can think of are Lewis and Latavius Murray as legit every-week guys.

Long-term TE finds are very difficult, but they do have the advantage that it takes so long for young TEs to mature. This allows the savvy owner to trade for under-performing rookies and 2nd year players.

 
That's funny. Was just talking to a guy in a league (dynasty) and he has Lewis and NEEDS a TE and said he offered Lewis for Eifert and got shot down. Lots of different opinions out there, apparently.
I'm pretty sure I'm still the top ranker on Dion Lewis by a very substantial margin. I know Tefertiller and Hammond, (aka Couch Potato), put Lewis at RB19 and RB17 in their last rankings update. I don't see anyone at DLF that has him higher than RB20. Matt Williamson just updated at ESPN, and he had Lewis at RB17. For comparison, I've got Lewis somewhere in the 7th-10th range depending on window and scoring system. But I'd still take Eifert over him in dynasty. (He ranks that high for me partly because I'm high on Lewis, but mostly because I'm just low on every other RB; he may be my 7th-ranked RB, but he's behind a couple dozen WRs and a fistful of TEs, sitting more in the high-4th-round range in terms of startup picks.)
I get the reasoning. It's preference and I won't say there is a right or wrong but for me I think unless his name is Gronk, I can find another "pretty good but not named Gronk" TE. Young, top 10 RBs don't come along often. There is risk. There sure is. But at the end of the day, he's young, he's top 10, he plays on a top NFL offense that is known for not taking their foot off the gas. I take the chance and I might just have the next Foster.

I lose Eifert and big deal. There's another emerging TE coming along every half hour. Last year it was Kelce. This year looks like Ebron is in play. TEs aren't hard. You just have to have patience. You draft the talent and set it on bake for 2 years. Rbs are much more difficult to find the ones doing what Lewis is.
I disagree that RBs are more difficult to find. Every year a half-dozen or so come out of the woodwork, even in dynasty. They may not be multi-year (or even multi-game) studs, but they can definitely fill in bye weeks and come out with a blow up performance here and there. The two most recent examples I can think of are Lewis and Latavius Murray as legit every-week guys.

Long-term TE finds are very difficult, but they do have the advantage that it takes so long for young TEs to mature. This allows the savvy owner to trade for under-performing rookies and 2nd year players.
We see it exactly the opposite and that's okay. We all know multiple viewpoints work.

In dynasty, I don't want to be streaming FOTM RBs in bye weeks and here and there performances, seeing which ones are Arian Foster and which ones are Andre Williams because the cost is so much greater for a young dynasty RB.

The second that Andre Williams flashed that one big game, his price was 5 times what Charles Clay was, despite him having a couple of good games. Fast forward a year later and the guy you pay peanuts on is the one worth the price.

RBs come and go in a blink. Just my opinion but when you feel pretty confident you got one, that's the more valuable guy. Much harder to find and pay for than a TE. Again, just my opinion and may be unique unto me but has worked in my case.

 
D Lewis's Base salary 2015-$585K, 2016-800K, 2017-1.2 MILL

600K signing bonus. This makes him the 34th highest paid RB

of 142 RB contracts. That's according to overthecap.com.

That is a steal.

ETA $200k roster bonus for 2016 and 2017

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have this offer on the table. Thoughts?

Dorsett, Phillip IND WR

Year 2016 Round 2 Draft Pick

for

Lewis, Dion NEP RB
Lewis side for me.

Above someone said he can be had for RB2 or WR2. I think it is very subjective across leagues. I've seen cases where he can't be GIVEN for Rb2 and WR2s. Ver polarizing scenario. People are either believers or they are banging the "But it's a Pats RB" drum. It might just be impossible to fairly trade him for even value.

 
D Lewis's Base salary 2015-$585K, 2016-800K, 2017-1.2 MILL

600K signing bonus. This makes him the 34th highest paid RB

of 142 RB contracts. That's according to overthecap.com.

That is a steal.
Love pats' favor of incentive laden contracts... great way to keep guys motivated and reward them nicely for performance. Win Win really.

But even with the incentives... this is likely a fantastic value if the kid can continue to perform (and there's not much reason why he shouldn't as he just turned 25.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If he outperforms his contract this year, especially if the Pats find a way to win another superbowl, I could see BB giving him a raise. I doubt they resign him in 2018, nature of the position and prior history.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We see it exactly the opposite and that's okay. We all know multiple viewpoints work.

In dynasty, I don't want to be streaming FOTM RBs in bye weeks and here and there performances, seeing which ones are Arian Foster and which ones are Andre Williams because the cost is so much greater for a young dynasty RB.

The second that Andre Williams flashed that one big game, his price was 5 times what Charles Clay was, despite him having a couple of good games. Fast forward a year later and the guy you pay peanuts on is the one worth the price.

RBs come and go in a blink. Just my opinion but when you feel pretty confident you got one, that's the more valuable guy. Much harder to find and pay for than a TE. Again, just my opinion and may be unique unto me but has worked in my case.
I do think that the market tends to undervalue TEs, which means they can often be acquired more cheaply than RBs. But it also means that people underrated just how much of an advantage a good TE really provides. This offseason, I did a big project calculating actual career fantasy value from 1985-2014, and one of the things that I found was, in PPR, a consistently-good TE like Greg Olsen or Alge Crumpler actually provides as much of a career advantage on the scoreboard as an RB the caliber of Rudi Johnson, Willis McGahee, Domanick Williams, or DeMarco Murray. (Obviously with 2015+ still pending for Olsen and Murray.)

According to PFR, Crumpler had five top-12 seasons (8th, 5th, 4th, 4th, and 2nd). Olsen has five and counting (9th, 10th, 6th, 8th, 4th). Tyler Eifert easily has the look of a guy who could match or exceed that. He's young, he's talented, he's productive, he's highly pedigreed, he looks like a star, he's getting fed. Even if he's "just" a consistent TE5 kind of guy, that is still pretty valuable, and also pretty rare.

And there's upside beyond that. If he's more of a Wesley Walls (8th, 6th, 7th, 4th, 2nd, 1st), Ben Coates (3rd, 1st, 1st, 3rd, 2nd, 3rd), or Keith Jackson (1st, 2nd, 2nd, 5th, 2nd, 5th, 4th, 4th) type, he could have value more on par with a Corey Dillon, Eddie George, Ricky Williams, or Frank Gore. And if Eifert winds up being a Jason Witten or Antonio Gates type, (unlikely, but not impossible), he could have career value on par with Tiki Barber, Thurman Thomas, Priest Holmes, or Ricky Watters. There is potentially a *LOT* of value to a guy who performs as a top 3-5 TE for eight years.

Now, this isn't to say that Eifert is that guy. But he's one of very few players in the league with that kind of potential. Gronk is obviously on a completely different level right now, but after him, who? Graham is already 29. Jordan Cameron and Julius Thomas looked like they had a shot, but obviously things look grimmer now. Jordan Reed can't stay healthy. Charles Clay, maybe? In my mind, it's really just Kelce and Eifert who have a shot at being long-term mainstays towards the top of the charts. Those long-term mainstays are rare enough and valuable enough that I'll take some gambles to acquire one.

Obviously I'm a huge Dion Lewis fan, but to me it's a question of whether I think the chances are better that Dion Lewis is the next Domanick Williams or that Tyler Eifert is the next Greg Olsen. And I'd put my money on Eifert. But, like you said, if you miss out on a good tight end, it's perfectly possible to get by with Delanie Walker and Owen Daniels and Gary Barnidge and a steady stream of free options, which you can't really do at running back.

 
Just curious what methodology was used to determine value in the above scenario. Rankings themselves are pretty meaningless. For example, the #1 player at a position might have a 50 point scoring advantage over the #2 player . . . and there might not be a 50 point differential in the next 10 players. Also, did you use points scored on the season or a ppg metric? I personally like ppg way better, as your fantasy team won't have to eat a zero if your player is sidelined.

Similarly, to make up numbers as an example, having a RB get 100 career value points in say a three year period (and then maybe fade into obscurity) is worth more IMO than a TE that might have 100 career value points over a ten year career (with each year being say in the 10 point range).

 
Forgot to add that in redraft leagues, WHERE the player gets drafted also plays a key part of how valuable he is comparably speaking. For example, Rodgers and Brady might be scoring similarly this year, but Brady at the moment looks like a way more valuable pick as he went many rounds later in redraft leagues.

 
Not talented enough to stick on the Browns roster.

Run It Up said:
If he outperforms his contract this year, especially if the Pats find a way to win another superbowl, I could see BB giving him a raise. I doubt they resign him in 2018, nature of the position and prior history.
The Browns will sign him to a big time contract in 2018.

 
Not talented enough to stick on the Browns roster.

Run It Up said:
If he outperforms his contract this year, especially if the Pats find a way to win another superbowl, I could see BB giving him a raise. I doubt they resign him in 2018, nature of the position and prior history.
The Browns will sign him to a big time contract in 2018.
Then trade him to the Colts after one year where the Colts will continue to not have a run game.

 
Anarchy99 said:
Just curious what methodology was used to determine value in the above scenario. Rankings themselves are pretty meaningless. For example, the #1 player at a position might have a 50 point scoring advantage over the #2 player . . . and there might not be a 50 point differential in the next 10 players. Also, did you use points scored on the season or a ppg metric? I personally like ppg way better, as your fantasy team won't have to eat a zero if your player is sidelined.

Similarly, to make up numbers as an example, having a RB get 100 career value points in say a three year period (and then maybe fade into obscurity) is worth more IMO than a TE that might have 100 career value points over a ten year career (with each year being say in the 10 point range).
I wrote a couple of articles about it this offseason. The two big ones are here and here.

In a nutshell, I combed through hundreds of the actively-managed MFL10s, MFL25s, MFL50s, and MFL100s from last season looking for leagues where all teams set a lineup every week over the first 13 weeks. Once I'd found enough leagues, I wrote down the actual "worst starter" and "average starter" baselines, (i.e. what was the absolute fewest points any team scored at the QB position? What was the average points scored in each QB start across the entire league?). Baselines, note, are thus calculated on a per-game basis. E.G. "The absolute worst any team did at the QB position was, say, 13 points per game, while the average QB start netted 18 points per game". Or whatever the actual values were.

I then calculated two values. EVoB, or Estimated Value over Baseline, is (PPG - the observed worst-starter baseline) * (games played). EVoS, (Estimated Value over Starters), is (PPG - the observed average starter baseline) * (games played).

Career EVoB / EVoS was just a sum of all the yearly totals. I agree that, in theory, a single 100-EVoB season should be worth more than two 50-EVoB seasons, but... the non-linearity of marginal EVoB would be a difficult thing to model, and a project for another offseason, and people I know who have attempted to model this in the past have told me that the marginal differences are small enough that ignoring them won't have a huge practical impact.

This does ignore the carrying cost of tying up a roster spot, too. There are other flaws. I wasn't going for something perfect, I was just going for something pretty good and usable. If Greg Olsen has 403 career EVoB and DeMarco Murray has 402, I'm not going to take it as the gospel truth that Olsen has been a point more valuable. But I do feel pretty confident that they've at least been in the same ballpark.

The other thing missing from EVoB, as I noted, is some sort of market-value adjustment. If a 200 EVoB TE is much cheaper than a 200 EVoB RB, then a 400 EVoB TE is naturally less valuable than a 400 EVoB RB, because of opportunity cost. That's one I just handwave away, because there's no real universal solution to that problem. Markets vary too much from league to league. Just an additional piece of context to consider when comparing the numbers.

 
I think something people are glazing over is that Dion's last contract was a 4 year 2.2 mil rookie deal in 2011. He has not been well paid in his time in the league. As much as we might see him as a great talent emerging and worth the money, he is human and he probably wants to cash out on his performance just in case, god forbid, he gets hurt. He played it safe for the money and it's shaping up to be a great thing for the pats

 
I think something people are glazing over is that Dion's last contract was a 4 year 2.2 mil rookie deal in 2011. He has not been well paid in his time in the league. As much as we might see him as a great talent emerging and worth the money, he is human and he probably wants to cash out on his performance just in case, god forbid, he gets hurt. He played it safe for the money and it's shaping up to be a great thing for the pats
And he is faced with the possibility of being labled a systems back or the Patriots not playing him. Those are two very real scenarios that could have tanked him going into FA in the off season.

I see his side for taking the bird in the hand. Only thing, I wish the Patriots would have paid him somewhere in the top 25 backs or something. 34 suggests he isn't a starter in the league, by the numbers. He deserved more.

 
I think something people are glazing over is that Dion's last contract was a 4 year 2.2 mil rookie deal in 2011. He has not been well paid in his time in the league. As much as we might see him as a great talent emerging and worth the money, he is human and he probably wants to cash out on his performance just in case, god forbid, he gets hurt. He played it safe for the money and it's shaping up to be a great thing for the pats
And he is faced with the possibility of being labled a systems back or the Patriots not playing him. Those are two very real scenarios that could have tanked him going into FA in the off season.I see his side for taking the bird in the hand. Only thing, I wish the Patriots would have paid him somewhere in the top 25 backs or something. 34 suggests he isn't a starter in the league, by the numbers. He deserved more.
He deserved more? After producing in three games following a journeymans path his first few years? If he deserved more, he wouldn't have put pen to paper.

 
I think something people are glazing over is that Dion's last contract was a 4 year 2.2 mil rookie deal in 2011. He has not been well paid in his time in the league. As much as we might see him as a great talent emerging and worth the money, he is human and he probably wants to cash out on his performance just in case, god forbid, he gets hurt. He played it safe for the money and it's shaping up to be a great thing for the pats
And he is faced with the possibility of being labled a systems back or the Patriots not playing him. Those are two very real scenarios that could have tanked him going into FA in the off season.I see his side for taking the bird in the hand. Only thing, I wish the Patriots would have paid him somewhere in the top 25 backs or something. 34 suggests he isn't a starter in the league, by the numbers. He deserved more.
He isn't a top 25 RB. That's why he didn't get "top-25" money from NE, & that's why he took a deal that didn't get him "top-25" money. We, as FF'ers see a couple good FF weeks, in a system that seems perfect for his skill set, and we start saying he's Barry Sanders, better than Marshawn Lynch, etc. The fact is he's had a few good weeks; that doesn't make him a top 25 RB. That being said, the Pats extending him suggests that he could be, and they want to have him locked up in case that happens.
 
To me, this early mid season extention means 2 things.

1) Belichick feels like he's a value to the team for the price they are paying him and he won't find anyone else in the near future that will bring better value

2) Dion either feels like other teams won't see as much value in him in free agency as much as Belichick does or he wants to lock up some guaranteed money in case he gets hurt again, since there's a real possibility he might not be a starter again if he had another serious injury

 
To me, this early mid season extention means 2 things.

1) Belichick feels like he's a value to the team for the price they are paying him and he won't find anyone else in the near future that will bring better value

2) Dion either feels like other teams won't see as much value in him in free agency as much as Belichick does or he wants to lock up some guaranteed money in case he gets hurt again, since there's a real possibility he might not be a starter again if he had another serious injury
It cost the Patriots $600k to get to decide if he's worth keeping for $800k next season.

Looks like a combination of 1 and 2.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top