One thought on driverless vehicles only on highways relates to the way that we deal with multiple trailers on interstate highways. States like OH allow for three shorter or two full size trailer on roads like the OH Turnpike. At exists, there are parking areas for drivers to drop off the extra vehicles if they are leaving the highway, and cannot take the extra trailers. This would work on highways for driverless vehicles as well, requiring the vehicles to stop at a certain point leaving their cargo to be transfered to a 'local' truck, which could handle the deliveries from there.1) Driverless on highways only... a person behind the wheel can operate their Uber-car, sure, but how does Uber get the car to them at the start without their network of human drivers? What's really different in this world? Not much. It's a driverless car but you have to carry an extra driver? Seems impractical.
I think all of the major car companies will be in. I belive the government has allocation 4 billion to promoting this tech, which tells me that when it comes to liability issues, the govt may throw some weight to limiting that side of the risk.Google has invested massively in driverless cars, and Tesla isn't far behind.
continue to transition to higher paying, white collar jobs...efficiencies gained from outsourcing manufacturing to third world countries has been a boon for those with skilled degrees...robots would have a similar effect, though the overall impact is debatable.http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-18/rise-of-the-robots-will-eliminate-more-than-5-million-jobs
Robots to eliminate 5 million jobs by 2020
How do we prepare, economically, for that kind of transition?
The overall liability with driverless car environments is less than what it is now with human error, self driven cars. Liability is a non issue in the long run...which is one of the drivers...reduce risk/liability.I think all of the major car companies will be in. I belive the government has allocation 4 billion to promoting this tech, which tells me that when it comes to liability issues, the govt may throw some weight to limiting that side of the risk.Google has invested massively in driverless cars, and Tesla isn't far behind.
Therein lies the challenge. As a population you want to decrease the number of unskilled workers in your workforce and increase the percentage of skilled workers. The other aspect is that those 5 million unskilled jobs will be replaced by a number significantly less than 5 m skilled jobs in a static state; so growth is important.continue to transition to higher paying, white collar jobs...efficiencies gained from outsourcing manufacturing to third world countries has been a boon for those with skilled degrees...robots would have a similar effect, though the overall impact is debatable.http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-18/rise-of-the-robots-will-eliminate-more-than-5-million-jobs
Robots to eliminate 5 million jobs by 2020
How do we prepare, economically, for that kind of transition?
The impact on the trucking industry will be immense. Truckers will become a thing of the past, as will many supporting jobs such at truck stops, motels, etc.The overall liability with driverless car environments is less than what it is now with human error, self driven cars. Liability is a non issue in the long run...which is one of the drivers...reduce risk/liability.I think all of the major car companies will be in. I belive the government has allocation 4 billion to promoting this tech, which tells me that when it comes to liability issues, the govt may throw some weight to limiting that side of the risk.Google has invested massively in driverless cars, and Tesla isn't far behind.
As I've stated previously in this thread...it's just a matter of time.
This is easily the biggest impact of any technology mentioned in this thread.
I'm amazed at how quickly it is happening and that the move to fully autonomous cars (passenger has no control of the vehicle) is the direction we're heading right from the beginning.The overall liability with driverless car environments is less than what it is now with human error, self driven cars. Liability is a non issue in the long run...which is one of the drivers...reduce risk/liability.I think all of the major car companies will be in. I belive the government has allocation 4 billion to promoting this tech, which tells me that when it comes to liability issues, the govt may throw some weight to limiting that side of the risk.Google has invested massively in driverless cars, and Tesla isn't far behind.
As I've stated previously in this thread...it's just a matter of time.
This is easily the biggest impact of any technology mentioned in this thread.
Why would you go to a store at all. Get measured/scanned, submit your data to the online shop and see yourself in the clothes item chosen, in the size that best fits you in 3D/holographic/VR. one click and get it sent to your house. Or, once manufacturing moves from large scale batch jobs to small scale individual runs, one will be created that fits you like a glove - without the need for human intervention at all.However, unskilled jobs that take little training will be replaced. I could retail workers on many levels being replaced by robots. Why do I need someone to help me check out at Old Navy? I can scan tags, or an automated robot can process those purchases just as easily
I was just thinking today, after hearing a home elderly care commercial, how robots could be really useful in a similar situation. They could be better than life alert, and allow relatives to see/communicate easier. If they could do household task it would be really useful."End of Manual Labor" in our lifetime?
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/02/24/google-robot-is-the-end-of-manual-labor-vc.html
I think the AI is going to have to come a lot farther along before robots will be ready to take over anything but rote tasks. And I don't think AI is going to get there as fast as a lot of people seem to think it will.Quez said:I was just thinking today, after hearing a home elderly care commercial, how robots could be really useful in a similar situation. They could be better than life alert, and allow relatives to see/communicate easier. If they could do household task it would be really useful.
Robots carry out tasks automatically. Unless we get close to a general AI, robots won't be good for general manual labor. You'd have to specifically program one with instructions for a specific job that you want it to perform. And then hope that it can do that job without running into too many variables that might cause it problems.If we ever develop a general AI, it will end mental labor. Almost immediately.
Manual labor is done when we have graceful robots with general useful capabilities. They'll be expensive for the first batch, but that batch will make the second batch and prices will fall off a cliff.
If only other parts of the plant were useful so we'd have a(nother) reason to mass produce them.Cheaper and more conductive than graphene
http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/scientist-says-hemp-fibers-are-better-than-graphene/
Forget smart glasses: Samsung patents contact lenses with built-in camera that projects images directly into the eye
Samsung has been granted a patent for contact lenses that project images directly into the eye.
- Contact lenses will include a display, camera, antenna and sensors
- The antenna will link up to a smartphone, which processes images
- Google also has two patents for similar smart contact lens designs
The patent, awarded in South Korea, includes a contact lens equipped with a display, a camera, an antenna, and several sensors that detect movement.
The contact lens will use the antenna to link up to a smartphone, which processes the image sent into the eyes.
Meanwhile, the sensors will be used to control the images using movements such as blinks.
The lens can then send images onto the wearer's eye and record their surroundings.
If Samsung can make it a reality, the 'smart' contact lenses could prove tough competition for products such as Google Glasses.
SamMobile, who first spotted the patent, claims the 'lenses can provide a more natural way to provide augmented reality than smart glasses.'
Google also has two patents for smart contact lenses, which may be closer to reality.
In 2014, it signed a deal with health giant Novartis to produce its ground-breaking smart contact lenses.
The two said they would produce the first glucose monitoring lens for diabetics and one to treat farsightedness, it was announced.
However, the firm hinted at 'other uses' for the technology with patent of a lens that includes a built in camera.
According to PatentBolt, the system could even be used to help the blind see.
'For example, a blind person wearing Google's contact lens with a built-in camera may be walking on a sidewalk and approaching an intersection,' it says.
'The analysis component of the contact lens can process the raw image data of the camera to determine processed image data indicating that the blind person is approaching intersection with a crosswalk and establish that there is a car approaching the intersection.'
Like Samsung, the lens also has wireless capabilities allowing it to link to a smartphone, which can be used to process data and give the user audio commands.
Alphabet also filed a patent for a contact lens that could potentially gather data about the wearer’s environment.
According to the patent, the device could sense allergens such as grass or tree pollen while 'photo detector sensors and solar cells' that would act like solar panels to power the device.
Samsung applied for its smart contacts patent in two year ago, at the same time that Google received patents for its smart contact lenses.
The company has yet to respond to DailyMail.com on if and when a consumer product will be released.
If someone has a heart attack and their body stops functioning, maybe they could just pull the living brain out of your body and stick it in a jar. Then they can clone a new body for that person and signals are sent back and forth from the original brain to the new body. They also couldn't die because if somehow that body was killed, the brain would be safe in the jar. They'd just make a new body. In theory you could stay young and healthy you're entire life that way. You could clone yourself an 18 year old body and use that until it starts losing its hair or getting fat, then throw it away and get a fresh copy. Never have to diet. Could do as much drugs as you wanted.http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/paralyzed-man-moves-fingers-plays-guitar-hero-with-brain-implant-milestone/
the ways we are discovering to interface directly with the brain are amazing
Not fast enough. My sexbot is on backorder.I've reaching the point where I believe nearly everything we can imagine can be accomplished. The pace of technology is accelerating at and astounding rate.
Saw this guy give talk about just this subject at a conference recently. Scared the #### out of everyone.Moore's law.
Get ready to welcome the singularity.
A German startup is developing a potential replacement for spark plugs: microwave pulse ignition.
The tech is under development by MWI Micro Wave Ignition AG of Empfingen, Germany, which claims that its ignition system can be used in both gasoline and diesel engines, reducing fuel consumption by as much as 30 percent. Additionally, lower combustion temperatures are said to reduce nitrous oxide emissions—normally caused by high combustion temperatures—by as much as 80 percent. MWI even says that engines don't need to be redesigned to accommodate the technology, which can be retrofitted to existing production engines.
Backers of the company include a group of stakeholders led by former Porsche CEO Wendelin Wiedeking, credited with saving the automaker in the 1990s.
"I am convinced that MWI is a disruptive innovation with a huge market potential," says Wiedeking of the technology.
MWI has begun to discuss the use of its ignition system in mass-produced vehicles with Chinese and Korean automakers, according to Bloomberg. One of these companies could be Hyundai, which is pursuing a lofty 50 percent thermal efficiency target from its internal combustion engines under a program called SmartStream. The Drive contacted Hyundai and MWI to inquire as to whether the two are in touch, and we will update when we receive comment.
I’m ready.http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-18/rise-of-the-robots-will-eliminate-more-than-5-million-jobs
Robots to eliminate 5 million jobs by 2020
How do we prepare, economically, for that kind of transition?
It's kinda just the tip of the iceberg.http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-18/rise-of-the-robots-will-eliminate-more-than-5-million-jobs
Robots to eliminate 5 million jobs by 2020
How do we prepare, economically, for that kind of transition?
...more profits.the corporate windfall will translate into (edit)