What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

DJ HACKETT = BUST (1 Viewer)

DenverBroncos

Footballguy
Per Rotoworld

Seahawks WR Nate Burleson is competing for the starting split end job.

Burleson, who played with torn ligaments in his thumb last season, is battling D.J. Hackett. Hackett has failed to impress coaches in camp thus far, and Mike Holmgren has gone from saying the job was his to saying it will be "interesting" to see who wins the job.

 
Per Rotoworld Seahawks WR Nate Burleson is competing for the starting split end job.Burleson, who played with torn ligaments in his thumb last season, is battling D.J. Hackett. Hackett has failed to impress coaches in camp thus far, and Mike Holmgren has gone from saying the job was his to saying it will be "interesting" to see who wins the job.
I agree. I like Nate to win the job.
 
Seattle homer here - this is bunk. DJ will get the job. He's made some great catches so far in camp. Nate will/can be a great weapon once he gets the ball in his hands, but DJ's been in this offence 2 years longer and has a leg-up. Holmie's comments are to encourage other WR's, not send a message that DJ isn't performing.
 
Seattle homer here - this is bunk. DJ will get the job. He's made some great catches so far in camp. Nate will/can be a great weapon once he gets the ball in his hands, but DJ's been in this offence 2 years longer and has a leg-up. Holmie's comments are to encourage other WR's, not send a message that DJ isn't performing.
:lmao: .. nay, great post. write this down ... Hackett will win the starting job and perform better than expected as he'll be working against each team's 2nd best CB.
 
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-s...p&type=lgns

Seattle receivers Hackett, Burleson competing for a starting role

By TIM BOOTH, AP Sports Writer

July 31, 2007

KIRKLAND, Wash. (AP) -- Nate Burleson curled himself around the body of linebacker Lofa Tatupu just enough to stick out his left paw and grab the dart from quarterback Matt Hasselbeck. The one-handed catch drew 'oohs' from teammates.

Before Seahawks' coaches could fully process the play, D.J. Hackett crawled over rookie defensive back Josh Wilson to make an equally dazzling diving grab in the end zone.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was just Day 2 of training camp, but one of the few decisions the Seahawks face -- who starts opposite Deion Branch at wide receiver -- could be quite entertaining.

"The receiver thing is going to be interesting, let me just leave it at that," coach Mike Holmgren said. "Branch will start, (Bobby) Engram will play and we will see what goes with the rest."

The competition at receiver between Hackett and Burleson is one in a handful of offensive changes for the Seahawks. There is a new tight end (Marcus Pollard) and possible spots available on the offensive line.

Experience and depth at receiver gave general manager Tim Ruskell the flexibility to move wideout Darrell Jackson right before the draft in April. He was traded to San Francisco for a fourth-round pick.

To accommodate the trade, Branch moved from the split end position he played in his first season with the Seahawks to Jackson's former flanker role. The void is expected to be filled by Burleson or Hackett.

"I don't really come out on the field every day competing against D.J. Hackett. I go out and compete with myself and push myself to be the best receiver on the field," Burleson said. "If I can do that then I know at the least on game day I'm going to get the ball thrown my way because I've been doing it in practice."

Burleson was Seattle's splashy signing in the offseason following its NFC championship and Super Bowl loss to Pittsburgh. He was snatched away from Minnesota as the Seahawks' rebuttal to the Vikings signing of offensive guard Steve Hutchinson, a deal almost equal in numbers to Hutchinson and one that brought Burleson back to his hometown.

Seattle hoped Burleson would be a speedy a downfield target they previously lacked. Instead, Burleson's first season had a disappointing start. A thumb injury, the arrival of Branch and Holmgren using fewer four-wide receiver formations left Burleson languishing. He finally found a niche as a kick returner that eventually led to more chances in the passing game.

"The hardest thing for me was dealing with confidence issues about my thumb," Burleson said. "That basically followed me for the whole season."

Hackett also started slowly in his third season with the Seahawks, but by the middle of the year was getting consistent playing time and developed into one of Hasselbeck's favorite options.

Seattle's coaches have always liked Hackett's raw skills and his 6-foot-2, 208-pound frame. But Holmgren admits they thought Hackett was a little too "casual" when he arrived in Seattle.

"He has learned to do things our way and has done a great job that way," Holmgren said.

Hackett hopes to continue impressing Holmgren.

"I just take it as a compliment of what I'm doing on the field," he said. "They see my hard work and the plays I'm making."

 
Seattle homer here - this is bunk. DJ will get the job. He's made some great catches so far in camp. Nate will/can be a great weapon once he gets the ball in his hands, but DJ's been in this offence 2 years longer and has a leg-up. Holmie's comments are to encourage other WR's, not send a message that DJ isn't performing.
:rolleyes: .. nay, great post. write this down ... Hackett will win the starting job and perform better than expected as he'll be working against each team's 2nd best CB.
I don't think Holmgren would mess with the kid's headif he was performing well enough to lock down the WR2 spot.The Burleson/Hackett battle may be one to keep an eye on.
 
Burleson played pretty well in MInny and then got a big contract and had a bad year. I don't see that it would be that shocking if Burleson won a starting job.

 
Burleson played pretty well in MInny and then got a big contract and had a bad year. I don't see that it would be that shocking if Burleson won a starting job.
:lmao: I'm not sure it's a suprise that a receiver who is getting paid TWICE as much money is "battling" for a WR2 with the SeaHawks. Burleson would probably be the WR2 automatically had it not be for his kick returning skills. This is a situation to monitor closely although I feel that any WR in Seattle not named Branch will be inconsisent at best. With Engram getting his share and Burleson and Hackett in the rotation there will be inconsistency every week.
 
OVERREACT MUCH?

The New Tribune reports: "After the first day of training camp, Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren labeled D.J. Hackett the favorite [to start at split end]. 'Hackett has the inside track now,'Holmgren said. On the second day of camp, Holmgren bristled at a question about Hackett assuming the starting duties. 'That was yesterday,' he said bluntly." Apparently Hackett is in the doghouse because he left Tuesday morning's practice to be with his wife, who was giving birth to their first child. Holmgren reportedly expected him to return for the afternoon practice but Hackett didn't. Jeez, Mike, lighten up!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This wouldnt be a game of strategy if everyone knew the future. I tried to trade for Hackett in June wiht a medium hot offer and couldnt get him. I would still trade for him today with that same offer.There are a couple of camp battles, that are juicy. A) Hacket /Burleson in SeattleB) Mike Walker Charles Sharon and D.Northcutt to unseat either or both of M.Jones//R.Williams in JAXC) B.Brazel, Tab Perry in CINAmong many others

Are there any good seahawk forums out there? I can't seem to find even a decent one
Tacoma News Tribune - Seahawks Blog. Best info you will get about what's going on."][Hawks camp]
 
Wonder if there is pressure from up top to start Burleson so that they don't look like such baffoons for giving him the big contract.

 
Per Rotoworld Seahawks WR Nate Burleson is competing for the starting split end job.Burleson, who played with torn ligaments in his thumb last season, is battling D.J. Hackett. Hackett has failed to impress coaches in camp thus far, and Mike Holmgren has gone from saying the job was his to saying it will be "interesting" to see who wins the job.
:hot:This thread is bunk, forget about #2, Hackett will be in the #1 spot by week 8 period. :hot:
 
Wonder if there is pressure from up top to start Burleson so that they don't look like such baffoons for giving him the big contract.
4 years, $14 mil with $4 mil guaranteed is "big"?
No but 7 years and $49 Mil sure is.
that's not the real contract #'s. In case you haven't followed Seattle - at all - those were artifically inflated to snub the Vikes after the Hutchinson poison pill contract.
 
OVERREACT MUCH?

The New Tribune reports: "After the first day of training camp, Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren labeled D.J. Hackett the favorite [to start at split end]. 'Hackett has the inside track now,'Holmgren said. On the second day of camp, Holmgren bristled at a question about Hackett assuming the starting duties. 'That was yesterday,' he said bluntly." Apparently Hackett is in the doghouse because he left Tuesday morning's practice to be with his wife, who was giving birth to their first child. Holmgren reportedly expected him to return for the afternoon practice but Hackett didn't. Jeez, Mike, lighten up!
People are apparently ignoring your post, but thank you for it. It clears things up.
 
Hackett Starter

Update: Hackett is penciled in as the No. 2 wideout, but his starting job is not totally secure, the Tacoma News Tribune reports.

Recommendation: "(Deion) Branch will start, (Bobby) Engram will play and we will see what goes with the rest," coach Mike Holmgren said. This sounds like coach-speak to let Hackett know nothing is being handed to him. Nate Burleson will get a look in training camp, but the upside remains with Hackett.
Burleson probably wouldn't even be the WR4 if he didn't emerge as the punt returner that he is. In Sando's Audible interview he said that they call it a competition for #2 but unless Hackett completely falls on his face the job is his. The big money that Nate got was simply an exagerated figure to match the Huth deal, they reworked the deal to what it really was, a 4/14mil or so. There is almost no way that Burleson beats out Hackett. None. Everything I have read, except for some posters here, point to the fact that Hackett has the job locked down. Apparently DJ was a little "lazy" in his first years on the team, putting him a little in the doghouse but that the last 2 years he's practiced as hard as anyone and has come through in game situations better than anyone. For every good catch in practice Burleson makes, Hackett makes a great one. Hackett will be the starter and he will lead the Hawks in TDs.
 
This sounds like typical training camp coach-speak to me. Not wanting Hackett to think the job is his. If he doesn't start, I'll be surprised.

 
Wonder if there is pressure from up top to start Burleson so that they don't look like such baffoons for giving him the big contract.
4 years, $14 mil with $4 mil guaranteed is "big"?
No but 7 years and $49 Mil sure is.
Are you somehow under the impression hes going to be around for the last 3 years of that contract which totals $35 mil?You realize only signing and very few other bonuses are "guaranteed", right?

 
Wonder if there is pressure from up top to start Burleson so that they don't look like such baffoons for giving him the big contract.
4 years, $14 mil with $4 mil guaranteed is "big"?
No but 7 years and $49 Mil sure is.
Are you somehow under the impression hes going to be around for the last 3 years of that contract which totals $35 mil?You realize only signing and very few other bonuses are "guaranteed", right?
I still don't believe people actually think that was what the contract was for. It was only backloaded that way to exactly match the Hutch deal and was noever, ever going to be honored as such. It's like wizened Japanese soldiers found deserted on Pacific Islands that still think WWII is still on. It was a 4 year deal worth about 14mil, with extra lnaguage on it to flip off the Vikings and the NFL for the poison pill loodhole. And I believe they renegotiated it this off season to match what it really is. Please, please, please stop using the "$49mil" argument for why the Seahawks have to start Nate because of his salary!
 
Looks like Holmgren is going to be more angry because I hear Hackett missed camp again today to stay with his wife and baby.

 
Burleson got extra reps in practice because Hackett went to be with his wife and new baby. Holmgren might be a little miffed because of miscommunication about whether Hackett would miss practice for that reason.

Seems like people are making a big deal out of nothing. Holmgren isn't going to let this one thing prevent Hackett from winning the job.

Move along.

 
Burleson got extra reps in practice because Hackett went to be with his wife and new baby. Holmgren might be a little miffed because of miscommunication about whether Hackett would miss practice for that reason.Seems like people are making a big deal out of nothing. Holmgren isn't going to let this one thing prevent Hackett from winning the job.Move along.
Guess again.When Holmgren says it will be "interesting" to see whowins the #2 WR slot, expect a battle. Nothing is settled at this moment..... nothing.
 
mad sweeney said:
It's like wizened Japanese soldiers found deserted on Pacific Islands that still think WWII is still on.
Winner - most bizarre analogy of the day award, FBGs Shark Pool, August 1, 2007.
 
mad sweeney said:
vandyt said:
Wonder if there is pressure from up top to start Burleson so that they don't look like such baffoons for giving him the big contract.
4 years, $14 mil with $4 mil guaranteed is "big"?
No but 7 years and $49 Mil sure is.
Are you somehow under the impression hes going to be around for the last 3 years of that contract which totals $35 mil?You realize only signing and very few other bonuses are "guaranteed", right?
I still don't believe people actually think that was what the contract was for. It was only backloaded that way to exactly match the Hutch deal and was noever, ever going to be honored as such. It's like wizened Japanese soldiers found deserted on Pacific Islands that still think WWII is still on. It was a 4 year deal worth about 14mil, with extra lnaguage on it to flip off the Vikings and the NFL for the poison pill loodhole. And I believe they renegotiated it this off season to match what it really is. Please, please, please stop using the "$49mil" argument for why the Seahawks have to start Nate because of his salary!
He renegotiated that contract in the offseason anyway, so the original one he signed is no longer valid anyway.
 
Anthony Borbely said:
This sounds like typical training camp coach-speak to me. Not wanting Hackett to think the job is his. If he doesn't start, I'll be surprised.
Now that we know what coach-speak sounds like, what would it sound like if Hackett's job really was in jeopardy?
 
QUESTION: Do you honestly think that Holmgren is going to come out and say that Hackett will start and Burleson is #3 WR at after 3 days of T.C? Give your heads a shake.

Come on people. If Holmgren would have said that, it would have taking any motivation away from Hackett and Burleson. Players play better in the adversity of competition, so why would Holmgren say something to dissipate that competition?

It's not as if Hackett is some returning starter to the job from last year and it's known to everybody that he is the #2 without a doubt. This motivates Hackett into playing better because he doesn't have the position locked up, but also motivated Burleson into believing that he has a chance to start and hopefully he can step up.

Please people....stop overreacting to a piece of coach speak which will only make the Seattle WR corps better overall.

 
QUESTION: Do you honestly think that Holmgren is going to come out and say that Hackett will start and Burleson is #3 WR at after 3 days of T.C? Give your heads a shake. Come on people. If Holmgren would have said that, it would have taking any motivation away from Hackett and Burleson. Players play better in the adversity of competition, so why would Holmgren say something to dissipate that competition? It's not as if Hackett is some returning starter to the job from last year and it's known to everybody that he is the #2 without a doubt. This motivates Hackett into playing better because he doesn't have the position locked up, but also motivated Burleson into believing that he has a chance to start and hopefully he can step up.Please people....stop overreacting to a piece of coach speak which will only make the Seattle WR corps better overall.
I agree with most of this.Hackett does NOT have the #2 slot locked up by any means.It's an open slot and will be earned by whomever outproduces the other.
 
I agree that it is an open slot. But if someone gave me the chance to wager on Hackett beating out Burleson (absent injury), I'd bet my house on it. Probably won't get that chance, but I will make sure Hackett is on my team this season.

 
Hackett's chances of being a "bust" this year are slim to none IMO, barring an unforeseen injury or something of course.

 
I agree that it is an open slot. But if someone gave me the chance to wager on Hackett beating out Burleson (absent injury), I'd bet my house on it. Probably won't get that chance, but I will make sure Hackett is on my team this season.
I see it as an open slot until someone plays themselves into it.But then again, I may be looking at this from a more unbiased point of view.I don't own either of these players on any of my dynasty teams.
 
I agree that it is an open slot. But if someone gave me the chance to wager on Hackett beating out Burleson (absent injury), I'd bet my house on it. Probably won't get that chance, but I will make sure Hackett is on my team this season.
I see it as an open slot until someone plays themselves into it.But then again, I may be looking at this from a more unbiased point of view.I don't own either of these players on any of my dynasty teams.
Hackett played into the spot during the season last year. The job is his to lose, no matter what coach speak or blurb comes out on the internet.
 
From the tacoma News Tribune

With the Blue Angels flying overhead, the Hawks went through a 2 1/2 –hour morning practice. D.J. Hackett was back at practice after being with his wife for the birth of their son, Andre James, who will be called A.J. to his father’s D.J. Hackett was back working with the starters while Nate Burleson worked with the second unit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From the tacoma News Tribune

With the Blue Angels flying overhead, the Hawks went through a 2 1/2 –hour morning practice. D.J. Hackett was back at practice after being with his wife for the birth of their son, Andre James, who will be called A.J. to his father’s D.J. Hackett was back working with the starters while Nate Burleson worked with the second unit.
:thumbup:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top