PinkydaPimp
Footballguy
Im still not following your argument. You are comparing people using a slur or banning a word to a corporation NAMED a slur? These two things aren't the same. I think you know this.New Orleans. Do you live in Iceland?
Im still not following your argument. You are comparing people using a slur or banning a word to a corporation NAMED a slur? These two things aren't the same. I think you know this.New Orleans. Do you live in Iceland?
WI. The Iceland of the US maybe?New Orleans. Do you live in Iceland?
Red Wolves is terrible.sounds like we will have a name by Monday. red wolves or warriors. Red Wolves likely.![]()
Two words is a killer for me. I guess redskins was sorta two words.I kind of like it.![]()
I think they wanted to ensure they can keep the fight song. And httr and burgundy and gold. That accomplishes all of the above. Also rolls off the tongue the same. Maybe that’s why i like it.Two words is a killer for me. I guess redskins was sorta two words.
I went to a D II school and they changed the mascot while I was there from Raiders to Skyhawks. A skyhawk is a fictional bird.Red Wolves sounds like a D III college team.
A skyhawk is also an airplane.I went to a D II school and they changed the mascot while I was there from Raiders to Skyhawks. A skyhawk is a fictional bird.
Hail to the Redtails just sounds cool though.I think they wanted to ensure they can keep the fight song. And httr and burgundy and gold. That accomplishes all of the above. Also rolls off the tongue the same. Maybe that’s why i like it.
I like red tails but i don’t see Snyder choosing it. It doesn’t fit with the people he aligns with.Don’t like the Red Tails at all, horrible nickname for a sports team. Much rather honor the Tuskegee airmen with something on the national level, not a sports team. The Red Wolves are the top choice in recent polls locally, even Dwayne Haskins has come out as a fan of the Red Wolves, while earlier he was in favor of Red Tails.
Haskins Red Wolves
If they did choose Red Tails, I just would hate hearing “Washington leaves town with their tails their between legs”. I just don’t think “Tails” would turn out to be a good choice. I want the Tuskegee airmen to be honored, just don’t think this is the best way. But, of all the names that are mentioned now, if Red Wolves are not chosen, even though I think it’s a bad choice personally, the Red Tails does seem like a good choice of what’s being mentioned. It was nice in 2007 for President Bush to award the Tuskegee Airmen’s members, who were still living, the Congressional Gold Medal.I like red tails but i don’t see Snyder choosing it. It doesn’t fit with the people he aligns with.
the more i hear red wolves though the more i like it as the choice.
Sportswriters would never use something this corny.If they did choose Red Tails, I just would hate hearing “Washington leaves town with their tails their between legs”.
It’s been used before and “Tails“ had nothing to do with the player involved.Sportswriters would never use something this corny.
Arkansas State is D1 guyRed Wolves sounds like a D III college team.
Rick 'em, rack 'emIt will be interesting to see what the lyrics to the new fight song will be. Here is a link to what they are presently and what they were originally. Can’t believe they had “scalp’em” in the original fight song.
HTTR Lyrics
YepThe new name should honor how the name change finally happened...The Washington Corporate Sponsors
Truly amazing that after having 100 corporate suits proof-read that release no one felt it might look just a tad better to not lead off with the sponsors...then again it is the truth.
Maybe the NFL should change all of the teams name to some professional grievance group instead?The new name should honor how the name change finally happened...The Washington Corporate Sponsors
You don’t think African Americans, gays or transsexuals watch football?Maybe the NFL should change all of the teams name to some professional grievance group instead?
How about, the Washington Transsexuals? Maybe the Seattle BLMs? The Los Angeles Code Pinks? The New York Antifas? The Las Vegas Bronies? Do we have enough professional grievance groups to cover all 32 teams? If not, then maybe just anyone who has ever been offended at some point or another in their life can have a team named after them. Of course, none of these people probably watch football anyways and certainly won't pay anything towards the club, but that's okay as long as we're all made aware of whatever it is they want us to be aware of.
Just throwing out suggestions here. Trying to help, that's all.
Maybe you should FULLY read the post.You don’t think African Americans, gays or transsexuals watch football?
No thanks.maybe Snyder will change the first name as well since the team plays in Maryland
Isn't that kind of like ordering Confederate flags before they are banned?The 2 Redskins hats I ordered arrived Saturday. Got an old school one and a Military one. 20% off and selling out fast. So anyone looking for Redskin gear better order it soon as once it is gone it is gone for good. Some Redskin collectables on NFL.COM as well.
A buddy of mine that is a huge fan of that team said he asked yesterday if wearing his existing Redskins gear was going to be okay and the liberal dude in the group took about a New York second to compare it to the confederate flag and start shaming the guy.Isn't that kind of like ordering Confederate flags before they are banned?
NFL/TEAM - "We are moving forward from this image that has been deemed racist and hurtful."
American Consumers - "I need to get more of that before its too late!"
Anyone that bought Redskins merchandise for the last 20 years had to be aware this was going to happen eventually.A buddy of mine that is a huge fan of that team said he asked yesterday if wearing his existing Redskins gear was going to be okay and the liberal dude in the group took about a New York second to compare it to the confederate flag and start shaming the guy.
Is Nike, FedEx, Daniel Snyder, Goodell, or anyone else exchanging that gear for the new gear free of charge? Going to guess that's where these corporations that love doing the right thing draw the line and tell these fans they are SOL.
I've been to a flea market that still sells old stuff like that. My favorite was a help wanted sign from the early 20th century that said "Irish need not apply".Isn't that kind of like ordering Confederate flags before they are banned?
NFL/TEAM - "We are moving forward from this image that has been deemed racist and hurtful."
American Consumers - "I need to get more of that before its too late!"
Same goes for Texas Rangers, Cleveland Indians, New Orleans Saints and other fans?Anyone that bought Redskins merchandise for the last 20 years had to be aware this was going to happen eventually.
Maybe the Indians, probably not the other two. People have been talking about changing the Redskins name for being racist for as long as I can remember. Until a few weeks ago I hadn't heard anything similar about the Rangers and Saints.Same goes for Texas Rangers, Cleveland Indians, New Orleans Saints and other fans?
The Saints logo is worse than any of them, IMOMaybe the Indians, probably not the other two. People have been talking about changing the Redskins name for being racist for as long as I can remember. Until a few weeks ago I hadn't heard anything similar about the Rangers and Saints.
Extra point for the French spelling.There is absolutely nothing wrong with the Saints logo. It's just faux outrage intended to deflect attention from the Redskins controversy.
Guess you haven’t researched the history of that logo. It’s more gross than any other liberal sports outrage. And I don’t give a #### about the redskins to be honestThere is absolutely nothing wrong with the Saints logo. It's just faux outrage intended to deflect attention from the Redskins controversy.
Hey - you don't get to pick and choose who gets to be offended. The liberal mantra is if it's offensive to anyone, no matter how slight, it has to go.There's nothing wrong with the Saints logo itself.
No one is seriously offended by a flower.
The fact that a small group of people misappropriated the flower symbol hundreds of years ago, does not mean that all current iterations of that flower are offensive.
This shouldn't need explaining.
There's nothing wrong with the Saints logo itself.
No one is seriously offended by a flower.
The fact that a small group of people misappropriated the flower symbol hundreds of years ago, does not mean that all current iterations of that flower are offensive.
This shouldn't need explaining.
Sweet - your posts are offensive to me.Hey - you don't get to pick and choose who gets to be offended. The liberal mantra is if it's offensive to anyone, no matter how slight, it has to go.
Oh, yeah, and you have to call that person/company racist.
Are there people asking to change the logo of the Saints? I've seen you post about this at least a dozen times now. Have you an example of people clamoring to alter this one?at we used to brand this symbol onto slaves but this other iteration means something different. That apply to everything else? Confederate Flag? Gator Bait chant?