Terminalxylem
Footballguy
Two - ID and one ccJuxtatarot said:For you cashless gents, please tell me you carry more than just one piece of plastic.
Two - ID and one ccJuxtatarot said:For you cashless gents, please tell me you carry more than just one piece of plastic.
NopeJuxtatarot said:For you cashless gents, please tell me you carry more than just one piece of plastic.
Do you know CPR?jvdesigns2002 said:Not at all. The question is about people that literally routinely walk around with no money on them. I carry cash with me all of the time--but the vast majority of my purchases are done with credit cards to track my spending. The context of how the thread started was that I made a comment that I personally find the action of people routinely leaving their home with zero cash (like nothing for an emergency or an unexpected occurence) to be an immature and irresponsible action. The question is not if you use the cash on a day to day basis--its whether you carry any on you at all on a regular basis.
I don't know cpr but I have watched youtube videos on how to do it. I absolutely would love to try it out on a dummy and learn it from a professional but will have to wait until after covid. I do have a lot of waterproof matches that i keep in an emergency kit at home as well as in my van, and no--I've never been hunting. None of those things are as easy and simple as carrying cash with you--so there is literally no parallel. Not everybody can have every skill--but everybody who has money is easily capable of carrying a single bill with them. Once again--I say something in a context--and the context is that is something that is ridiculously easy to do--and people are asking me if I can kill an ox with a knife. That's rich.Do you know CPR?
Can you start a fire without a lighter?
Ever kill a musk ox with a knife?
It was a debit/ATM card. I only use a Capitol One credit card, which I believe can be used at an ATM in an emergency.Your debit card doesn't work at ATM's? Or do you not have that, either?
I’m just giving you hell...but I’d argue CPR is far more valuable in an actual emergency. Carrying cash may make life easier, but it will probably never save it.I don't know cpr but I have watched youtube videos on how to do it. I absolutely would love to try it out on a dummy and learn it from a professional but will have to wait until after covid. I do have a lot of waterproof matches that i keep in an emergency kit at home as well as in my van, and no--I've never been hunting. None of those things are as easy and simple as carrying cash with you--so there is literally no parallel. Not everybody can have every skill--but everybody who has money is easily capable of carrying a single bill with them. Once again--I say something in a context--and the context is that is something that is ridiculously easy to do--and people are asking me if I can kill an ox with a knife. That's rich.
I don't disagree with you at all--but I also don't see how both my point and your point can't both be valid. In a perfect world everybody would carry emergency cash with them and everybody would know cpr. I'm certainly not hating on that one bit and I agree with your assessment about CPR.I’m just giving you hell...but I’d argue CPR is far more valuable in an actual emergency. Carrying cash may make life easier, but it will probably never save it.
I’m willing to be inconvenienced (or inconvenience my wife/friends) if a rare cash-only situation arises. Simple or not, I’d hate to stand by helpless during a cardiac arrest.
I should start teaching a cash-only CPR class.I don't disagree with you at all--but I also don't see how both my point and your point can't both be valid. In a perfect world everybody would carry emergency cash with them and everybody would know cpr. I'm certainly not hating on that one bit and I agree with your assessment about CPR.
I agree that there are numerous foreseeable events where a person can't use a CC and that having cash would be nice. But I haven't seen any reasons why it is so egregious to not have cash that you would call such a decision to be irresponsible. It's not hard to carry cash, you are right. Having a spare $20 would be nice at times. But not having cash has never put me in a situation of potential harm or other scenario that would lead me to saying that the decision to not have cash rose to the level of irresponsible. What you see as irresponsible, I see as mere inconvenience.And I can think of dozens of times in the last 10-12 years where having cash on hand with me benefited me greatly. My guess is that many people would probably say the same. Maybe you haven't had many or any of those experiences yet--but "yet" is the key word---and if you never have one of those experiences--how hard was it for you to slide a $20 bill in your cell phone case just in case? Like i said--it's no risk with very high reward.
Have you seen Frozen? There is a song in the movie that is great advice for you in this thread.I don't know cpr but I have watched youtube videos on how to do it. I absolutely would love to try it out on a dummy and learn it from a professional but will have to wait until after covid. I do have a lot of waterproof matches that i keep in an emergency kit at home as well as in my van, and no--I've never been hunting. None of those things are as easy and simple as carrying cash with you--so there is literally no parallel. Not everybody can have every skill--but everybody who has money is easily capable of carrying a single bill with them. Once again--I say something in a context--and the context is that is something that is ridiculously easy to do--and people are asking me if I can kill an ox with a knife. That's rich.
Why not just drop the schtick? If you don't want to carry cash around--don't do it. You are acting like your opinion is the only one that matters. Look at the poll ----nearly 3/4 of people in this forum consider it a good idea and do it. I've made many points clear on how it's a good idea and you have not yet mentioned one valid point on how it's not. All you've done is clown something just because you don't do it. You have not contributed anything to the conversation besides that.If I ever started carrying around an emergency $20 bill, there is a 100% chance I’d use it for something nonessential long before it would ever possibly prove useful in an actual emergency.
Basically the idea is we need some event that occurs with no forewarning, that knocks out all ability to conduct electronic transactions, and also I’m not home at the time and also I have no way of getting home and I need cash for something really important, but only $20 or less, and I have no other way of obtaining it.... You know, there are lots of risks that are so tiny that it’s not irresponsible to act as if they don’t exist at all. We all do that all the time. This is one of them.
How ticked would you be if that amount of money was stolen, or accidentally blew out of your hand into the ocean or whatever.We just need to pair up the cash-free with the $100+ crowd, as they’re about equally distributed.
But for anyone who carries money, how do you determine how much is necessary? What’s the expectation for a responsible adult?
You are acting like your opinion is the only one that matters.
Lots of factors. I fall into the $100 plus crowd because I take care of 80 year old diabetic mother and I pretty much support our very close family friends that live in our same neighborhood so my emergency money could possibly need to be used to temporarily support 4 people (including myself) in the case of an interruption. Unfortunately--the cost of goods in Southern California in general tend to be high--so thats why I carry a hundred or more. I don't want to speak for the others--but the number of people you might need to support and a general assessment of cost of goods in your location are most likely the biggest factors. The cost of goods in Maui is not going to be the same as the cost of goods in Phoenix--so that's something to factor in.We just need to pair up the cash-free with the $100+ crowd, as they’re about equally distributed.
But for anyone who carries money, how do you determine how much is necessary? What’s the expectation for a responsible adult?
The quoted comment was directed at someone else, but I did previously mention not wanting to lose cash (have wallet lost or stolen) and forcing myself to be unable to use most vending machines. I believe those are valid reasons for not wanting to carry cash.you have not yet mentioned one valid point on how it's not.
It doesn't even matter, there's no onus on anyone here to demonstrate why it's not a good idea. It's a fine idea, it just doesn't make someone "immature," "irresponsible" or "unprofessional" if they choose not to. Such an absurd take.The quoted comment was directed at someone else, but I did previously mention not wanting to lose cash and forcing myself to be unable to use most vending machines. I believe those are valid reasons for not wanting to carry cash.
The problem is that you’ve now been forced to keep digging your hole deeper and deeper to justify your condescending stance.And I've many times clearly said that I'm not judging the person--I'm judging the action. I agree with your premise of why I'm getting kickback--but I'm also calling things as I see them. We all judge actions. That's just a fact. Maybe I'm the only one here thats comfortable admitting it openly--but we all do it.
The comment was absolutely not directed at you because you actually contributed to the discussion and made some great points. I respect that and I enjoy people that have counterpoints that can have a different point of view but manage to discuss things in a civil and polite manner. That’s what good discussion is all about. I very much appreciated our exchanges in this thread. The comment I said was directed at somebody whose only contribution to the thread is trolling, snarky jokes and nothing substantive.The quoted comment was directed at someone else, but I did previously mention not wanting to lose cash (have wallet lost or stolen) and forcing myself to be unable to use most vending machines. I believe those are valid reasons for not wanting to carry cash.
That’s fair and perhaps that’s how some people think I come across but frankly it doesn’t bother me. We all judge actions. We judge people’s choices in fashion, their choices in fantasy football, we judge their stance on topics in threads- just as you are judging the way i look at things. You literally just judged how i presented my stance but also admitted that I seem like a decent person otherwise in regards to character. You literally just judged my action and was able to to refrain from casting that action judgement on me as a whole. You proved my point without even being aware of it. Regardless of whether or not we agree- you are entitled to your opinion, you’ve been polite and civil in elaborating your thoughts and I respect that.The problem is that you’ve now been forced to keep digging your hole deeper and deeper to justify your condescending stance.
Of course it’s easy to carry cash and it’s a good idea to do so, generally speaking, but if people choose not to it’s not “irresponsible” or “immature”. In this day and age it’s largely unnecessary. Your’s a ridiculously extreme stance and you’ve been forced to come up with extreme scenarios to justify it.
And for some reason you can’t grasp the fact that when you judge some ones actions you are surely judging the person - yet you insist otherwise. You scream it on top of a mountain instead of stepping back and letting it sink in. it’s like me saying “you sound like a total ########” and then claiming I’m not really calling you a ########.
Instead of doubling down you should have stepped back a little. You seem like a decent guy otherwise but you’re coming across as some one that doesn’t want to admit that they could have been wrong in any way.
5 cards in my wallet. One hidden in the car. Haven’t carried cash in god knows how long. It’s disgusting and doesn’t give me points.Juxtatarot said:For you cashless gents, please tell me you carry more than just one piece of plastic.
You pulled up with one of the worst takes of all time. What kind of substantive response do you want? There's nothing at all "immature," "irresponsible" or "unprofessional" about not carrying cash on your person at all times. It's not our job to refute your opinion, it's absurd on its face. You feel better walking around with cash in your pocket? That's cool, no one ever said it isn't. But let's not pretend there's anything substantive in your judgment of others, it's a bonkers opinion that even your fellow cash-carriers wouldn't try to defend.only contribution to the thread is trolling, snarky jokes and nothing substantive.
My claim was that grown adults that actually have net worth actively choosing to not carry around at least some cash on them at all times in the case of an emergency or unforeseen circumstance is an immature and irresponsible decision because of it being a high reward and no risk thing to do---that is literally effortless. You literally hold a bill in your wallet or slide one between your cell phone and cell phone case. I backed it up with examples, i articulated my point many times--and you literally have provided nothing to counterpoint it--while many others have. Read through the thread--I've discussed and counterpointed non cash holders (some of whom brought up solid points) and at the end we still had a civil and positive conversation. You on the other hand have contributed nothing. All you have done is twist my take on calling the decision to not carry cash irrepsonsible and immature to somehow claiming that I'm calling the people that make that decision irresponsible and immature as a whole. Those are two completely different things. You are changing the context of what I said to cater to your point of view. That is not a positive discussion--that's you moving the goal posts.You pulled up with one of the worst takes of all time. What kind of substantive response do you want? There's nothing at all "immature," "irresponsible" or "unprofessional" about not carrying cash on your person at all times. It's not our job to refute your opinion, it's absurd on its face. You feel better walking around with cash in your pocket? That's cool, no one ever said it isn't. But let's not pretend there's anything substantive in your judgment of others, it's a bonkers opinion that even your fellow cash-carriers wouldn't try to defend.
On the contrary, against my better judgment I gave a reason why I wouldn't carry cash and explained why the risk-reward scenario you've presented isn't compelling. You've actually provided nothing but your bonkers opinion over and over. And when it was pointed out how dumb it was, you tried to make some distinction between "someone who is immature and irresponsible" and "someone who continuously makes the same immature and irresponsible decision every moment of their life." It's a distinction without a difference. There are three types of people in this thread: those who don't carry cash; those who do; and you, out on an island, not just carrying cash but pretending that those who don't aren't adulting as well as you are when you carry cash in your grownup wallet on your way down to the business office to do a business.You on the other hand have contributed nothing.
Please copy and paste for me where you politely elaborated and articulated on the risks of carrying some cash on you in the case of an emergency. I'd like to see your compelling reason about how the risk is not worth it that I somehow missed.On the contrary, against my better judgment I gave a reason why I wouldn't carry cash and explained why the risk-reward scenario you've presented isn't compelling. You've actually provided nothing but your bonkers opinion over and over. And when it was pointed out how dumb it was, you tried to make some distinction between "someone who is immature and irresponsible" and "someone who continuously makes the same immature and irresponsible decision every moment of their life." It's a distinction without a difference. There are three types of people in this thread: those who don't carry cash; those who do; and you, out on an island, not just carrying cash but pretending that those who don't aren't adulting as well as you are when you carry cash in your grownup wallet on your way down to the business office to do a business.
Forget about calling someone immature and irresponsible as a whole, the part you don't seem to be getting is that no one agrees with you that not carrying cash is "an immature and irresponsible decision". Most agree that it's a pretty good idea to carry some "just in case" (I do myself), but that's very different from saying it's an immature and irresponsible decision not to.My claim was that grown adults that actually have net worth actively choosing to not carry around at least some cash on them at all times in the case of an emergency or unforeseen circumstance is an immature and irresponsible decision because of it being a high reward and no risk thing to do---that is literally effortless. You literally hold a bill in your wallet or slide one between your cell phone and cell phone case. I backed it up with examples, i articulated my point many times--and you literally have provided nothing to counterpoint it--while many others have. Read through the thread--I've discussed and counterpointed non cash holders (some of whom brought up solid points) and at the end we still had a civil and positive conversation. You on the other hand have contributed nothing. All you have done is twist my take on calling the decision to not carry cash irrepsonsible and immature to somehow claiming that I'm calling the people that make that decision irresponsible and immature as a whole. Those are two completely different things. You are changing the context of what I said to cater to your point of view. That is not a positive discussion--that's you moving the goal posts.
And I do not understand the push back at that at all. If something literally takes zero effort and it is something that literally has no downside but can provide moderate to substantial upside---how can that not be labelled immature or irresponsible? Is it fair to call the decision of a grown adult choosing not to ever wear a seatbelt irresponsible/immature even though 99.9% of the time they won't get in an accident? I personally think that's a fair way to characterize that decision--do you?Forget about calling someone immature and irresponsible as a whole, the part you don't seem to be getting is that no one agrees with you that not carrying cash is "an immature and irresponsible decision". Most agree that it's a pretty good idea to carry some "just in case" (I do myself), but that's very different from saying it's an immature and irresponsible decision not to.
Even though I carry cash I basically pay for everything using my CC.We just need to pair up the cash-free with the $100+ crowd, as they’re about equally distributed.
But for anyone who carries money, how do you determine how much is necessary? What’s the expectation for a responsible adult?
Right. Even though I carry insurance I rarely use it.Even though I carry cash I basically pay for everything using my CC.
I play golf with a group of guys..a couple never have cash for skins, or to buy beer from the cart girl. it is always..put me in and I will venmo you,buy this round and I will PayPal you. That gets annoying. How can you go to a golf course knowing we play skins and drink without cash?Right. Even though I carry insurance I rarely use it.
I think whether something is irresponsible depends in it upon the severity of the consequences. In my day to day life, if the store doesn't or can't take credit, I simply go elsewhere or wait until another day. Just an inconvenient. But if I don't wear a seatbelt and need it, the consequences could be death.And I do not understand the push back at that at all. If something literally takes zero effort and it is something that literally has no downside but can provide moderate to substantial upside---how can that not be labelled immature or irresponsible? Is it fair to call the decision of a grown adult choosing not to ever wear a seatbelt irresponsible/immature even though 99.9% of the time they won't get in an accident? I personally think that's a fair way to characterize that decision--do you?
In those scenarios I would carry cash even though I don't typically have cash. Unless you go golfing with no notice, then I'd be out of luck.I play golf with a group of guys..a couple never have cash for skins, or to buy beer from the cart girl. it is always..put me in and I will venmo yo,.buy this round and I will PayPal you. That gets annoying. How can you go to a golf course knowing we play skins and drink without cash?
It isn't true that there is literally no downside (could be lost or stolen as an example), but again, that's not the point.And I do not understand the push back at that at all. If something literally takes zero effort and it is something that literally has no downside but can provide moderate to substantial upside---how can that not be labelled immature or irresponsible? Is it fair to call the decision of a grown adult choosing not to ever wear a seatbelt irresponsible/immature even though 99.9% of the time they won't get in an accident? I personally think that's a fair way to characterize that decision--do you?
If only there was a way to always be prepared so that this doesnt matter.In those scenarios I would carry cash even though I don't typically have cash. Unless you go golfing with no notice, then I'd be out of luck.
Carry your clubs in the trunk?If only there was a way to always be prepared so that this doesnt matter.
Where else do you keep your backup set?Carry your clubs in the trunk?
The psychology of group bills is a whole ‘nother topic. Personally I don’t like it when people insist on splitting the bill, preferring one person just pay the entire thing with the implicit understanding someone else steps up to the plate in the future. Second best is one person pays by cc while everyone else pays (bill + tip)/number of people to the cc user. Splitting it with multiple cc is a little worse, while people who scrutinize the bill and pay exactly their share (usually with a sub-20% tip included, but not always) are beyond irresponsible and immature.So annoying when you are trying to get lunch and people have absolutely no money on them to pay their share.
I get it....most of us have Venmo/PayPal now but at least keep a few smaller bills on you. I don't want to hear "let me go to the ATM, I'll pay you back".
I bring cash to tip hairstylists, and shuttle bus drivers when I travel. But not restaurant servers. Aside from facilitating tax evasion for those who can be paid electronically, why is a cash tip better?Always. For one, I try to always tip my massage therapist and the lady who cuts my hair with cash (always better to tip with cash than on a credit or debit card), and for two, I like having cash on me on the off chance that my credit card doesn't work for some goofy reason. Better to be safe than sorry.