What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dr. Gobbler welched out on his bet from year ago in this thread (1 Viewer)

The 5th most points in NBA History

1. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 38387

2. Karl Malone 36928

3. Michael Jordan 32292

4. Wilt Chamberlain 31419

5. Kobe Bryant 28597

6. Shaquille O'Neal 28596

7. Moses Malone 27409

8. Elvin Hayes 27313

9. Hakeem Olajuwon 26946

10.Oscar Robertson 26710
So awesome, seriously, OMG!!!!! He went 1 for 9 in the fourth, hogging the ball down the stretch, and they lose, AGAIN, but who cares!!!!!!!!!!!! GO KOBE!!!!
I have to admit, this is a just criticism. The Lakers were having great success with Bynum and Gasol. But in the last few minutes with Williams red hot, Kobe tried to match him, and he really did hog the ball down the stretch. And yes, he does that too much.
The problem is defense. Particularly the old PG who you don't want to retire.
2:52 90-85 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

2:44 LAL Offensive Foul turnover on Kobe Bryant

2:19 90-87 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

1:41 90-90 LAL Kobe Bryant missed 3-pt. Jump Shot

1:27 90-90 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

1:09 92-92 LAL Kobe Bryant made Fadeaway Jump Shot

36.0 92-92 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

7.0 92-94 LAL Kobe Bryant missed 3-pt. Jump Shot
Clearly Fisch was the problem
Are we just making up play by play summaries now? :lmao:
Nope. Just edited out the non-Kobe plays.HTH
Makes sense. At least put a little effort into it next time, the final score was 95-90. When lying about the play by play, just put a little more effort and edit the score too.
Point out where I lied in the post. It was a straight cut and past from the play-by-play.
 
The 5th most points in NBA History

1. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 38387

2. Karl Malone 36928

3. Michael Jordan 32292

4. Wilt Chamberlain 31419

5. Kobe Bryant 28597

6. Shaquille O'Neal 28596

7. Moses Malone 27409

8. Elvin Hayes 27313

9. Hakeem Olajuwon 26946

10.Oscar Robertson 26710
So awesome, seriously, OMG!!!!! He went 1 for 9 in the fourth, hogging the ball down the stretch, and they lose, AGAIN, but who cares!!!!!!!!!!!! GO KOBE!!!!
I have to admit, this is a just criticism. The Lakers were having great success with Bynum and Gasol. But in the last few minutes with Williams red hot, Kobe tried to match him, and he really did hog the ball down the stretch. And yes, he does that too much.
The problem is defense. Particularly the old PG who you don't want to retire.
2:52 90-85 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

2:44 LAL Offensive Foul turnover on Kobe Bryant

2:19 90-87 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

1:41 90-90 LAL Kobe Bryant missed 3-pt. Jump Shot

1:27 90-90 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

1:09 92-92 LAL Kobe Bryant made Fadeaway Jump Shot

36.0 92-92 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

7.0 92-94 LAL Kobe Bryant missed 3-pt. Jump Shot
Clearly Fisch was the problem
Are we just making up play by play summaries now? :lmao:
Nope. Just edited out the non-Kobe plays.HTH
Makes sense. At least put a little effort into it next time, the final score was 95-90. When lying about the play by play, just put a little more effort and edit the score too.
Point out where I lied in the post. It was a straight cut and past from the play-by-play.
That wasn't the play by play of the 76ers game, none of those plays happened.

 
So awesome, seriously, OMG!!!!! He went 1 for 9 in the fourth, hogging the ball down the stretch, and they lose, AGAIN, but who cares!!!!!!!!!!!! GO KOBE!!!!
I have to admit, this is a just criticism. The Lakers were having great success with Bynum and Gasol. But in the last few minutes with Williams red hot, Kobe tried to match him, and he really did hog the ball down the stretch. And yes, he does that too much.
The problem is defense. Particularly the old PG who you don't want to retire.
2:52 90-85 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

2:44 LAL Offensive Foul turnover on Kobe Bryant

2:19 90-87 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

1:41 90-90 LAL Kobe Bryant missed 3-pt. Jump Shot

1:27 90-90 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

1:09 92-92 LAL Kobe Bryant made Fadeaway Jump Shot

36.0 92-92 LAL Kobe Bryant missed Jump Shot

7.0 92-94 LAL Kobe Bryant missed 3-pt. Jump Shot
Clearly Fisch was the problem
Are we just making up play by play summaries now? :lmao:
Nope. Just edited out the non-Kobe plays.HTH
Makes sense. At least put a little effort into it next time, the final score was 95-90. When lying about the play by play, just put a little more effort and edit the score too.
Point out where I lied in the post. It was a straight cut and past from the play-by-play.
That wasn't the play by play of the 76ers game, none of those plays happened.
Every one of those plays happened. The clock is off by a few seconds and the running score is off for some reason. That is what I get for pulling it from sportsline.My link

I guess that makes it a good close out for Kobe then, right? He actually had a decent last 3 minutes last night 2-3. That makes him 4-20 during crunch time for the month with 2 boards 1 assist and 3 TOs (including the OT).

 
Don't feed the trolls JMon.

On another note, Jeremy Lin, street free agent PG just lit up the Lakers. What's the over/under on how much longer can Laker management ignore the PG spot? 2 years?

 
Don't feed the trolls JMon.On another note, Jeremy Lin, street free agent PG just lit up the Lakers. What's the over/under on how much longer can Laker management ignore the PG spot? 2 years?
Transition from the triangle to another offense. Hopefully by the deadline.
 
Don't feed the trolls JMon.On another note, Jeremy Lin, street free agent PG just lit up the Lakers. What's the over/under on how much longer can Laker management ignore the PG spot? 2 years?
Transition from the triangle to another offense. Hopefully by the deadline.
It's just pathetic. I didn't think it'd be possible, but Aaron Brooks is probably a significant upgrade at this point - guys in L.A. radio have just started talking about him. Would you rather have him as a F.A. (assuming he'd sign for the peanuts which the Lakers can offer) or spend more resources to get a guy like Sessions? Not making some kind of move to shore up the PG spot would tell me the Lakers aren't serious about winning this year.
 
Don't feed the trolls JMon.

On another note, Jeremy Lin, street free agent PG just lit up the Lakers. What's the over/under on how much longer can Laker management ignore the PG spot? 2 years?
Transition from the triangle to another offense. Hopefully by the deadline.
It's just pathetic. I didn't think it'd be possible, but Aaron Brooks is probably a significant upgrade at this point - guys in L.A. radio have just started talking about him. Would you rather have him as a F.A. (assuming he'd sign for the peanuts which the Lakers can offer) or spend more resources to get a guy like Sessions? Not making some kind of move to shore up the PG spot would tell me the Lakers aren't serious about winning this year.
Agree completely. Wish I knew what the Cavs wanted for Sessions. I've always been impressed with his game. I can't imagine Fish would put up a stink. He's such a smart guy that he has to be aware that he's probably the worst starting G in pro hoops.

 
Don't feed the trolls JMon.

On another note, Jeremy Lin, street free agent PG just lit up the Lakers. What's the over/under on how much longer can Laker management ignore the PG spot? 2 years?
Transition from the triangle to another offense. Hopefully by the deadline.
It's just pathetic. I didn't think it'd be possible, but Aaron Brooks is probably a significant upgrade at this point - guys in L.A. radio have just started talking about him. Would you rather have him as a F.A. (assuming he'd sign for the peanuts which the Lakers can offer) or spend more resources to get a guy like Sessions? Not making some kind of move to shore up the PG spot would tell me the Lakers aren't serious about winning this year.
Agree completely. Wish I knew what the Cavs wanted for Sessions. I've always been impressed with his game. I can't imagine Fish would put up a stink. He's such a smart guy that he has to be aware that he's probably the worst starting G in pro hoops.
And when the Lakers move for a PG he will be the worst 2nd PG.
 
KOBE!!!!!!!Unbelievable last 2 minutes!!!
This is why I razz you. Lakers had a monster lead and blew it, to freaking Toronto. They got lucky at the end with the inbounds violation. Oh and what about Kobe missing a free throw at the end that allowed Toronto life?
Perhaps you failed to watch the part when the Lakers were down by 4, Kobe sank a huge 3, had a huge assist, then sank another key basket to win the game?
 
Don't feed the trolls JMon.

On another note, Jeremy Lin, street free agent PG just lit up the Lakers. What's the over/under on how much longer can Laker management ignore the PG spot? 2 years?
Transition from the triangle to another offense. Hopefully by the deadline.
It's just pathetic. I didn't think it'd be possible, but Aaron Brooks is probably a significant upgrade at this point - guys in L.A. radio have just started talking about him. Would you rather have him as a F.A. (assuming he'd sign for the peanuts which the Lakers can offer) or spend more resources to get a guy like Sessions? Not making some kind of move to shore up the PG spot would tell me the Lakers aren't serious about winning this year.
He's an RFA, surely the Suns would match a low offer. Sessions would be a poor fit because he can't shoot or play off ball effectively.

 
'Kev4029 said:
Sessions would be a poor fit because he can't shoot or play off ball effectively.
I'd like to think he'd be something more than a statue on D, which would make him a great fit all by itself. Anything he could do on offense would be gravy.
 
I guess the Lakers worked out Gilbert Arenas over the weekend. :unsure:
I gotta think this guy is toast at this point. With all the 5th and 6th chances most players get to prove themselves, somebody surely would have taken a chance on him by now. No?
 
I guess the Lakers worked out Gilbert Arenas over the weekend. :unsure:
I gotta think this guy is toast at this point. With all the 5th and 6th chances most players get to prove themselves, somebody surely would have taken a chance on him by now. No?
Probably. But to put things in perspective, the only guy they have off the bench who's a threat to score off anything but a put back is Goudelock at this point. And they're still starting Fisher. I.e. beggars can't be choosers.
 
I guess the Lakers worked out Gilbert Arenas over the weekend. :unsure:
Saw that. The fact that his knee was scoped again recently kills any enthusiasm I had for signing him. I wouldn't necessarily be against bringing him in, but I'm not optimistic he would make a difference.
 
I guess the Lakers worked out Gilbert Arenas over the weekend. :unsure:
I gotta think this guy is toast at this point. With all the 5th and 6th chances most players get to prove themselves, somebody surely would have taken a chance on him by now. No?
Probably. But to put things in perspective, the only guy they have off the bench who's a threat to score off anything but a put back is Goudelock at this point. And they're still starting Fisher. I.e. beggars can't be choosers.
Where is Smush when we need him? What kind of shape is Sedale Threatt in?
 
Lakers met with J.R. Smith yesterday. Would he really play for peanuts?
Unless he is starting, no, but hes probably only getting a one year deal this year and it'll only be for about 30 games at most. The difference between a minimum contract for one year (lets just assume $1m) and a $5m contract is about $1.5m for this year and the difference between a minimum and the $2.5m contract that NY is talking about is $0.5m. If he were to go to a team like the Lakers or Clips and play well through the playoffs and behaves himself he is probably looking at a $30-35m contract over 4 years in the offseason. The difference in his contract this year is peanuts compared to what he could make next year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hollinger just reiterating what many of us Laker homers have been saying for a long time now, though i didn't realize exactly how bad Artest has been.

If you're wondering how the Lakers are 17-12 despite having three of the best players in the league, here's your answer. The chart shows that the Lakers lead the league in BAD, with only four players having a PER above 12. Metta World Peace leads the way with 3,553 BAD points (fifth league-wide), but the point guards and frontcourt reserves are also major contributors. In their infinite wisdom, the league's coaches decided to punish Pau Gasol for this by keeping him off the Western Conference All-Star team.Orlando ranks second, with horrid point guard play the main reason, although the Magic have at least begun to remedy a bit of the problem: Larry Hughes, with a horrid minus-4.84 PER in 114 minutes, was one of the worst offenders but has been waived.Unfortunately for Dwight Howard, the grass on the other side of the fence may not be greener: New Jersey is right behind the Magic in this category, with its phenomenally bad small forward play the main culprit. The Nets' BAD from small forwards is worse than that of 18 other entire teams.In each case, this represents an opportunity too. If L.A. or Orlando could just acquire a league-average point guard at the trade deadline (coughRamonSessionscough), it might improve their chances considerably.
 
Uh oh, Pau frustrated.

"There's talks and rumors every day. Today I was reading it was Minnesota is really interested in trying to put a good package together," he said. "[Other teams are] calling, and it seems like things are just waiting for the right offer to come along, for [the Lakers] to pull the trigger."
 
The thing about Metta is that he remains a strong guy. Obviously he should not be shooting from outside; he's simply awful. But he could contribute to the offense by posting up. I don't know why they don't do that a few more times each game. With Bynum and Gasol, chances are Artest would always post up against a potential mismatch, someone smaller and weaker than himself. At the very least he should be able to draw a few fouls going to the basket.

 
That was one of the prettiest 36 point games I've seen in a while. The highlights for me were those shots he was taking left handed :eek: . It sucks that they can't get one of these street free agents on board. All the while McRoberts and his midlevel exception contribute nothing recently. It also sucks that Metta's contract got Ebanks sent to the D league. I'd rather see Ebanks getting the minutes Metta is wasting. They should have amnestied his ### back in December.

 
As I noted in an earlier column on my "BAD" rating, the Lakers get more minutes from awful players than any other team in the league. Metta World Peace has a PER of 6.26 and Derek Fisher has one of 8.33; both of them start. Players like this usually don't play at all, but for L.A. they're out there all the time -- only five players in the entire league have played at least 700 minutes with a PER below nine, and the Lakers employ two of them.
oof.
 
The 5th most points in NBA History

1. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 38387

2. Karl Malone 36928

3. Michael Jordan 32292

4. Wilt Chamberlain 31419

5. Kobe Bryant 28597

6. Shaquille O'Neal 28596

7. Moses Malone 27409

8. Elvin Hayes 27313

9. Hakeem Olajuwon 26946

10.Oscar Robertson 26710
So awesome, seriously, OMG!!!!! He went 1 for 9 in the fourth, hogging the ball down the stretch, and they lose, AGAIN, but who cares!!!!!!!!!!!! GO KOBE!!!!
:lmao: :goodposting:
:goodposting:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top