Wally Llama
Footballguy
OK folks, long-time lurker here who's feeling pretty guilty about taking tons of great info. and providing very little. I'm a professional lurker. So here's my attempt at contribution. What this post lacks in quality I'll make up for in quantity.
2009 has been reported to be the year when stud WRs have increased in importance and RBBCs are so common that the traditional "Stud RB" theory no longer holds, especially in PPR leagues. Several posts on this board have promoted drafting WRs earlier and earlier, and VBD seems to support this idea.
Last night I had my last draft of the year in a friendly 12-team league with friends/coworkers. I decided that I would try out the idea of drafting WRs early to see how things would come out. Anyone can do this in a mock draft, but in this case I'll get to reap the rewards/penalties over the course of the season. In addition, I had this post in mind as I was drafting. Below are my observations on the day after the draft.
This league is a 12-team, standard PPR scoring league. We start 1QB, 2RB, 3WR, 1TE, 1K and 1 D/ST. We only get 14 roster spots, though, so we have to be economical with backups.
A quick sidenote: this is definitely not a shark league - most participants are new to FF in the last 2-3 years. I counted 4 of us that have been doing it for 10+ years.
Another quick sidenote: this is not a disguised RMT post. FBG's RMT app is way too cool for me to waste Shark Pool space with that. This is meant to be a lead-in for a discussion about the thought process behind and consequences of a WR-focused draft.
To cut to the chase, here's my team as drafted:
QB: J. Cutler (8.09), C. Palmer (11.04)
RB: D. McFadden (4.09), M. Lynch (5.04) R. Bush (6.09), R. Rice (7.04), M. Bush (13.04)
WR: A. Johnson (1.04), C. Johnson (2.09), R. White (3.04), D. Hester (9.04)
TE: T. Scheffler (14.09)
K: N. Rackers (12.09)
D/ST: San Diego (10.09)
OK, buckle in guys, as we go round-by-round:
1.04 - A. Johnson, WR, HOU
I didn't find out until 15 minutes before the draft that I was picking from the 4th position. I'm not sure this was a great value pick with his ADP closer to the end of round 1, but I wanted to try the strategy. AD and MJD were already off the board, as well as Turner. The RB stud theory in me really wanted to grab Forte or SJax here, but I decided to stick to my plan.
2.09 - C. Johnson, WR, DET
In the 16 picks between my 1st and 2nd round pick I watched 11 more RBs disappear along with Brady, Manning, Moss and Fitzgerald. After double-cheking my scoring system to make sure it was 3WR & PPR, I grabbed Megatron. I was actually stunned he was still on the board. I felt good about this, but I was really getting nervous about my RBs. 14 off the board already....
3.04 - R. White, WR, ATL
I'm ecstatic about having R. White as my WR3. I may have 3 of the top 5 WRs in my starting lineup now. He shouldn't have lasted this long but this draft was turning into a traditional RB-heavy draft. S. Smith, Wayne and Jennings all went before White, so the WR dropoff was pretty steep after him.
At this point I'm still having mixed feelings. I know that the 2nd and 3rd round picks were the best picks by VBD, by far. I now have the best WR corps by far in my league, but while I've hoarded stud WRs, RBs are disappearing quickly. All the stud RBs are long gone, but I expected that. I didn't expect that many of the "good enough" RBs would be disappearing, too. Guys like Jacobs, Portis, MBIII and Grant were all gone before the end of round 2. Perhaps I had taken the plan a little too far.
Anyway, with the WR situation taken care of, it was time to fill the rest of my roster.
4.09 - D. McFadden, RB, OAK
Does anyone else have this guy as your RB1? Fortunately the pace of RB hoarding dropped as other teams started to fill their WR requirements. Only 2 RBs were taken between 3.04 and 4.09 - R. Brown and K. Smith. 8 WRs were taken. By this time 18 RBs had been taken. Also, just to increase my anxiety, I've noticed that 8 QBs are off the board already. And I had 0 RBs and 0 QBs. VBD (and common sense) dictated I look to get some RB help, so McFadden is my top RB. (Mental note - grab M. Bush later)
5.04 - M. Lynch, RB, BUF
5 of the 6 picks between my 4th and 5th rounder are WRs, with Thomas Jones also taken. This pick was a bit of a brain fart as I let the suspension slip my mind. In hindsight, Addai was the proper pick here. The takeaway is that there's still good RB talent available here, as the RB craze has mostly ended and I can play catchup.
6.09 - R. Bush, RB, NO
Again, WRs are now flying off the board. 9 of the 16 picks between 5.04 and 6.09 are WRs. Moreno, Stewart (?) and Addai (poop) are also taken, but all in all there's not a huge dropoff in RBs. Now with 3 RBs, I'm starting to think that, if I play the right matchups, I could still scratch out a pair of top-20 RBs each week. Hey - maybe that WILL be enough to complement my WRs. My confidence rises a bit.
7.04 - R. Rice, RB, BAL
I really had planned to look at QB here, but with 2 more QBs being taken before 7.04 suddenly every team except me had a starting QB. As such, the QB urgency dropped. I'm also a big Ray Rice fan and I just felt that he was too good to let slip past this point. I'm not sure I needed a 4th RB here but the other positions could all wait. Of course, after I realized by "'dis my son" SNAFU, I was thankful I did this. As it turned out, though, this pick was right in the middle of the TE run. 6 TEs went in the span of 12 picks in the late-6th/early-7th. I knew this was way too early, but now I'm left picking off the scrap heap in a TE-required league.
8.09 - J. Cutler, QB, CHI
My hunch about waiting on a QB turned out to be correct. Happily I watched one of the noobs start the D/ST run early in the 8th round. I felt pretty good about this pick as I'm certain he won't be the worst starter in my league even though he was 12th off the board. Still no TE, but I needed a starting QB before the backup QB run starts and the TEs are a crapshoot at this level, anyway. Again, a decent starter that shouldn't cause me to lose too many points to those who took QBs 3-4 rounds earlier.
9.04 - D. Hester, WR, CHI
Still choosing to ignore TE, I decided to grab my bye-week fill-in WR. Fortunately none of my top 3 share a bye week so I should be able to get by with 4 WRs on the season. Again, with the benefit of hidsight, I probably shouldn't have done the QB-WR "hookup" here - especially with a boom/bust player like Hester. I'm not fond of the pick, but other options like Breaston, Morgan and Ginn didn't get me fired up, either. Coles may have been a better pick here. Maybe.
10.09 - San Diego, D/ST
Ds were getting thin so I'm happy to get them as the 10th D off the board, esp. with Sproles returning kicks (hopefully).
11.04 - C. Palmer, QB, CIN
I had my eye on Palmer, Schaub and Garrard as possible complements to Cutler. When Schaub and Garrard went at 10.12 and 11.02, respectively, I knew it was time. I think this may turn out to be another nice value pick, even though I would have rather had Schaub. It turns out his schedule meshes nicely with Cutler's, too.
12.09 - N. Rackers, K, ARI
I still need to get M. Bush, but the guys between me and my next pick are loaded with RBs already, but need kickers. So, kicker in the 12th.
13.04 - M. Bush, OAK, RB
Mmmmm...handcuff
14.09 - T. Scheffler, DEN, TE
Zzzzzzz... This is the situation I'm least happy with. I thought I could do better later in teh draft, but it turned out that 5 teams drafted backup TEs before I grabbed a starter. I'm guessing that a few of those backups will be dropped as bye weeks come into play, so an in-season upgrade is a real possibility.
Final thoughts:
Man, I can blabber.
More to the point, I'm pretty happy with the way this team has come out. I discovered that the value RBs available in rounds 4-8 can be serviceable, allowing one to depart from the tried-and-true-but-not-as-true-as-it-used-to-be Stud RB Theory. (By "discovered" I mean proved to myself what others have already said to be true.) I think this also gived more validation to the VBD theory, as my picks were pretty much on par with VBD. Stud RB may be giving way to Stud WR, which may give way to another theory in time, but VBD is holding true even as the NFL changes.
If I can be bothered, I'll try to report out on how this team fares, if anyone can be bothered to express some interest.
2009 has been reported to be the year when stud WRs have increased in importance and RBBCs are so common that the traditional "Stud RB" theory no longer holds, especially in PPR leagues. Several posts on this board have promoted drafting WRs earlier and earlier, and VBD seems to support this idea.
Last night I had my last draft of the year in a friendly 12-team league with friends/coworkers. I decided that I would try out the idea of drafting WRs early to see how things would come out. Anyone can do this in a mock draft, but in this case I'll get to reap the rewards/penalties over the course of the season. In addition, I had this post in mind as I was drafting. Below are my observations on the day after the draft.
This league is a 12-team, standard PPR scoring league. We start 1QB, 2RB, 3WR, 1TE, 1K and 1 D/ST. We only get 14 roster spots, though, so we have to be economical with backups.
A quick sidenote: this is definitely not a shark league - most participants are new to FF in the last 2-3 years. I counted 4 of us that have been doing it for 10+ years.
Another quick sidenote: this is not a disguised RMT post. FBG's RMT app is way too cool for me to waste Shark Pool space with that. This is meant to be a lead-in for a discussion about the thought process behind and consequences of a WR-focused draft.
To cut to the chase, here's my team as drafted:
QB: J. Cutler (8.09), C. Palmer (11.04)
RB: D. McFadden (4.09), M. Lynch (5.04) R. Bush (6.09), R. Rice (7.04), M. Bush (13.04)
WR: A. Johnson (1.04), C. Johnson (2.09), R. White (3.04), D. Hester (9.04)
TE: T. Scheffler (14.09)
K: N. Rackers (12.09)
D/ST: San Diego (10.09)
OK, buckle in guys, as we go round-by-round:
1.04 - A. Johnson, WR, HOU
I didn't find out until 15 minutes before the draft that I was picking from the 4th position. I'm not sure this was a great value pick with his ADP closer to the end of round 1, but I wanted to try the strategy. AD and MJD were already off the board, as well as Turner. The RB stud theory in me really wanted to grab Forte or SJax here, but I decided to stick to my plan.
2.09 - C. Johnson, WR, DET
In the 16 picks between my 1st and 2nd round pick I watched 11 more RBs disappear along with Brady, Manning, Moss and Fitzgerald. After double-cheking my scoring system to make sure it was 3WR & PPR, I grabbed Megatron. I was actually stunned he was still on the board. I felt good about this, but I was really getting nervous about my RBs. 14 off the board already....
3.04 - R. White, WR, ATL
I'm ecstatic about having R. White as my WR3. I may have 3 of the top 5 WRs in my starting lineup now. He shouldn't have lasted this long but this draft was turning into a traditional RB-heavy draft. S. Smith, Wayne and Jennings all went before White, so the WR dropoff was pretty steep after him.
At this point I'm still having mixed feelings. I know that the 2nd and 3rd round picks were the best picks by VBD, by far. I now have the best WR corps by far in my league, but while I've hoarded stud WRs, RBs are disappearing quickly. All the stud RBs are long gone, but I expected that. I didn't expect that many of the "good enough" RBs would be disappearing, too. Guys like Jacobs, Portis, MBIII and Grant were all gone before the end of round 2. Perhaps I had taken the plan a little too far.
Anyway, with the WR situation taken care of, it was time to fill the rest of my roster.
4.09 - D. McFadden, RB, OAK
Does anyone else have this guy as your RB1? Fortunately the pace of RB hoarding dropped as other teams started to fill their WR requirements. Only 2 RBs were taken between 3.04 and 4.09 - R. Brown and K. Smith. 8 WRs were taken. By this time 18 RBs had been taken. Also, just to increase my anxiety, I've noticed that 8 QBs are off the board already. And I had 0 RBs and 0 QBs. VBD (and common sense) dictated I look to get some RB help, so McFadden is my top RB. (Mental note - grab M. Bush later)
5.04 - M. Lynch, RB, BUF
5 of the 6 picks between my 4th and 5th rounder are WRs, with Thomas Jones also taken. This pick was a bit of a brain fart as I let the suspension slip my mind. In hindsight, Addai was the proper pick here. The takeaway is that there's still good RB talent available here, as the RB craze has mostly ended and I can play catchup.
6.09 - R. Bush, RB, NO
Again, WRs are now flying off the board. 9 of the 16 picks between 5.04 and 6.09 are WRs. Moreno, Stewart (?) and Addai (poop) are also taken, but all in all there's not a huge dropoff in RBs. Now with 3 RBs, I'm starting to think that, if I play the right matchups, I could still scratch out a pair of top-20 RBs each week. Hey - maybe that WILL be enough to complement my WRs. My confidence rises a bit.
7.04 - R. Rice, RB, BAL
I really had planned to look at QB here, but with 2 more QBs being taken before 7.04 suddenly every team except me had a starting QB. As such, the QB urgency dropped. I'm also a big Ray Rice fan and I just felt that he was too good to let slip past this point. I'm not sure I needed a 4th RB here but the other positions could all wait. Of course, after I realized by "'dis my son" SNAFU, I was thankful I did this. As it turned out, though, this pick was right in the middle of the TE run. 6 TEs went in the span of 12 picks in the late-6th/early-7th. I knew this was way too early, but now I'm left picking off the scrap heap in a TE-required league.
8.09 - J. Cutler, QB, CHI
My hunch about waiting on a QB turned out to be correct. Happily I watched one of the noobs start the D/ST run early in the 8th round. I felt pretty good about this pick as I'm certain he won't be the worst starter in my league even though he was 12th off the board. Still no TE, but I needed a starting QB before the backup QB run starts and the TEs are a crapshoot at this level, anyway. Again, a decent starter that shouldn't cause me to lose too many points to those who took QBs 3-4 rounds earlier.
9.04 - D. Hester, WR, CHI
Still choosing to ignore TE, I decided to grab my bye-week fill-in WR. Fortunately none of my top 3 share a bye week so I should be able to get by with 4 WRs on the season. Again, with the benefit of hidsight, I probably shouldn't have done the QB-WR "hookup" here - especially with a boom/bust player like Hester. I'm not fond of the pick, but other options like Breaston, Morgan and Ginn didn't get me fired up, either. Coles may have been a better pick here. Maybe.
10.09 - San Diego, D/ST
Ds were getting thin so I'm happy to get them as the 10th D off the board, esp. with Sproles returning kicks (hopefully).
11.04 - C. Palmer, QB, CIN
I had my eye on Palmer, Schaub and Garrard as possible complements to Cutler. When Schaub and Garrard went at 10.12 and 11.02, respectively, I knew it was time. I think this may turn out to be another nice value pick, even though I would have rather had Schaub. It turns out his schedule meshes nicely with Cutler's, too.
12.09 - N. Rackers, K, ARI
I still need to get M. Bush, but the guys between me and my next pick are loaded with RBs already, but need kickers. So, kicker in the 12th.
13.04 - M. Bush, OAK, RB
Mmmmm...handcuff
14.09 - T. Scheffler, DEN, TE
Zzzzzzz... This is the situation I'm least happy with. I thought I could do better later in teh draft, but it turned out that 5 teams drafted backup TEs before I grabbed a starter. I'm guessing that a few of those backups will be dropped as bye weeks come into play, so an in-season upgrade is a real possibility.
Final thoughts:
Man, I can blabber.
More to the point, I'm pretty happy with the way this team has come out. I discovered that the value RBs available in rounds 4-8 can be serviceable, allowing one to depart from the tried-and-true-but-not-as-true-as-it-used-to-be Stud RB Theory. (By "discovered" I mean proved to myself what others have already said to be true.) I think this also gived more validation to the VBD theory, as my picks were pretty much on par with VBD. Stud RB may be giving way to Stud WR, which may give way to another theory in time, but VBD is holding true even as the NFL changes.
If I can be bothered, I'll try to report out on how this team fares, if anyone can be bothered to express some interest.
Last edited by a moderator: