Here's the thing tho, of the comps that have been discussed in this thread Bowe, Nicks, Crabtree, Boldin, Bryant, and Marshall all of them have been late 1st or later picks except the one that you don't want to compare him to in Crabtree.
I don't think the discussion is so much about if he is a good WR prospect or not, he is, but rather whether it makes sense to spend an early first on a guy that simply isn't an early first round caliber talent.
I don't think the discussion is about that at all. This is a FF board. We are talking about his FF potential. If he turns out to be Hakeem Nicks or Brandon Marshall, his draft position will be irrelevant. And for the record, I think he
is an early first round caliber talent. A perennial 1,000 yard guy is worth that kind of pick. That doesn't mean he will go that high. I think I said earlier (maybe in another thread) that it doesn't matter much to me if he's the 1st pick or the 31st pick. What matters is his FF potential, which I'm high on. I'm not here to debate the merits of taking a receiver in the top 10.
He may very well get selected in that range I won't argue that isn't a possibility, but let's be clear that if he is selected in that range it is because there is simply not a truly elite talent and he is the best of a deep group that lacks that truly dominant talent i.e. AJ, Calvin, or Fitz.
According to who? You? Lots of people rate him as one of the top 10 players in the draft. I get a bit tired of seeing people compare every WR prospect to Calvin Johnson and Andre Johnson. NOBODY compares to them from a physical tools standpoint. Not Fitz. Not AJ Green. Not Marshall. Not half a dozen perennial Pro Bowlers. Just because Blackmon doesn't run a 4.3 doesn't mean he isn't an elite prospect. Fitz ran 4.5. AJ Green ran 4.5. Dez ran 4.5. Boldin ran 4.6. The list goes on and on.
Further, you continue to compare him to the highest upside player of the comps thrown out in Nicks, which he could be, but fail to acknowledge the risk of him turning out like Crabs to date or having the consistency issues of Bowe or Bryant, or the hands issues of Marshall.
He is a good prospect but you have to consider the risk in the full range of possible outcomes to determine his draft day value rather than focus only on the best in the group.
If I was concerned about him becoming Crabtree or Bowe, I wouldn't be quite so high on him.
I definitely overrated Crabtree in the past, but I learned a lesson from it. The difference between the two is that
Blackmon is a stronger and more athletically gifted
version of the same type of player. If I think he's clearly better than Crabtree then why do I need to consider the possibility that he turns out like Crabtree? That doesn't make any sense. They're not the same guy. Like any player, his production will hinge to some degree on his situation, but that doesn't mean we can't accurately gauge his abilities before he steps on the field next year. I look at Blackmon and see a guy who will have multiple 1000+ yard seasons in his career. It's called an
opinion. Nobody is forcing you to agree with it.