You'll miss out on prospects like Blain Gabbert if you don't.it isn't an awful strategy for the lazyDid someone really just say we should leave prospect evaluation to the experts? LOFL
There were plenty of red flags on Gabbert if you searched for them. Not all "experts" agree on every prospect and that's a good thing. I still believe in gathering as much information from many experts to draw my conclusions on a player, rather than trust my own eyes or the eyes of those on a FF message board. The difference between me and most on these FF boards is that I know I'm not an expert talent evaluator, but I do have good tools in the shed.You'll miss out on prospects like Blain Gabbert if you don't.it isn't an awful strategy for the lazyDid someone really just say we should leave prospect evaluation to the experts? LOFL
a great example of why I put in the workYou'll miss out on prospects like Blain Gabbert if you don't.it isn't an awful strategy for the lazyDid someone really just say we should leave prospect evaluation to the experts? LOFL
I guess work comes in many forms. Rather than watching a lot of Youtube highlight videos, I read a lot.a great example of why I put in the workYou'll miss out on prospects like Blain Gabbert if you don't.it isn't an awful strategy for the lazyDid someone really just say we should leave prospect evaluation to the experts? LOFL
Is JohnnyU still talking??? Pretty sure no one is still listening...I guess work comes in many forms. Rather than watching youtube highlight videos, I read a lot.a great example of why I put in the workYou'll miss out on prospects like Blain Gabbert if you don't.it isn't an awful strategy for the lazyDid someone really just say we should leave prospect evaluation to the experts? LOFL
Good on ya. Stay righteous my friend...Brewtown, I want you to try not taking offense at this--but you're the worst thing that's happened to prospect talk on this board in a long time. And it's not because of your ideas or excessive punctuation. It's your people skills and inability to just accept that not everyone agrees with you.
To each his own. It's fair to say the "experts" usually come to a consensus on most prospects. Some of us here actually have decent track records when it comes to projecting prospect to fantasy football. Heck, if you think about it some of us actually make more money playing FF on average than a "expert." It's a matter of figuring out who opinion is actually worth #### around here and who's is just commentary, just like you'd do with "experts." I'd guarantee you the "experts" are watching highlights too. They do not have a solid opinion on 600+ prospects right now before the combine from breaking down game film. I honestly only have 17 QBs down at this point. If they did breakdown so much film, the mocks you read wouldn't have the same prospects over and over. You're probably wasting your time reading so much, because it's all the same bs recycled. Gabbert is just one example. I could start a thread on the other "NFL" ready prospects mainstream signed off on. Whereas not one went big on someone like Nick Foles. At least there is more accountability here.There was plenty of red flags on Gabbert if you searched for them. Not all "experts" agree on every prospect and that's a good thing. I still believe in gathering as much information from many experts to draw my conclusions on a player, rather than trust my own eyes or the eyes of those on a FF message board. The difference between me and most on these FF boards is that I know I'm not an expert talent evaluator, but I do have good tools in the shed.You'll miss out on prospects like Blain Gabbert if you don't.it isn't an awful strategy for the lazyDid someone really just say we should leave prospect evaluation to the experts? LOFL
I think I was done once he said Jabroni's...Brewtown, I want you to try not taking offense at this--but you're the worst thing that's happened to prospect talk on this board in a long time. And it's not because of your ideas or excessive punctuation. It's your people skills and inability to just accept that not everyone agrees with you.
I didn't think Mason had extraordinary speed either, although I wouldn't call him slow.Some very good WRs. Mason looks slow to me, I think his 40 will be a disappointment. Seastrunk's blocking is ghastly, some plays he can't even get in the way.
Miami QB Stephen Morris was 10 of 18 for a game-high 89 yards but was also intercepted twice in Saturday's Senior Bowl.
Rotoworld's Josh Norris called Morris "undraftable" in his post-game column, writing that the former Hurricanes QB was "solely a vertical passer." NFL.com's Bucky Brooks, another former admirer, was likewise underwhelmed by Morris' performance. "I was disappointed with his lack of accuracy and ball placement. He repeatedly missed open receivers at intermediate range, and tossed a pair of interceptions in the fourth quarter," Brooks wrote.
Source: NFL.com
NFL.com's Bucky Brooks wrote that Eastern Illinois QB Jimmy Garoppolo "has jumped squarely on the radar of every NFL executive with his solid play over the past two weeks."
NFL.com colleague Daniel Jeremiah called Garoppolo the biggest winner of the East-West Shrine Game, and the EUI QB also stood out amongst Senior Bowl signal callers. "Garoppolo showed exceptional footwork making throws inside the pocket, while also displaying remarkable athleticism and body control tossing the ball on the move," Brooks wrote. "In addition, Garoppolo has made quick, decisive reads with the ball, showing a compact delivery and quick release. Although Garoppollo's play won't vault him into consideration as a franchise quarterback, there are several teams that will view him as an intriguing developmental prospect with starting potential based on his strong showing in Mobile."
Source: NFL.com
NFL.com's Chase Goodbread writes that "pocket presence remains an issue for" Virginia Tech QB Logan Thomas.
Thomas struggled mightily in Saturday's Senior Bowl, taking as many sacks, five, as he had pass attempts. "Credit him for being fearless in the pocket and seeking open receivers in the face of a rush, but at some point, he's got to learn to move within the pocket to buy himself an extra second of time to throw. He didn't do that Saturday," Goodbread wrote. The 6-foot-6, 254-pound signal caller will be over-drafted in May because of his body.
Source: NFL.com
Fresno State QB Derek Carr finished 7 of 12 for 45 yards and a touchdown in Saturday's Senior Bowl.
Rotoworld's Josh Norris believed that Carr's draft stock remained steady during the All-Star week. "We know he has an arm to hit every level of the field despite throwing plenty of screens in college," Norris wrote in his Senior Bowl Review. "Carr doesn't always throw from a balanced base, but he has improved willingness to take a hit on release. His footwork can be a mess, though, and that will frustrate the fanbase where he lands, similarly to Jay Cutler or Matthew Stafford. Carr has a great arm and he knows it." Carr measured in at 6'2 and 1/8th of an inch and 215 pounds at the event.
Source: Rotoworld
NFL.com's Daniel Jeremiah spoke with multiple NFL teams who were impressed by Fresno State QB Derek Carr's "maturity and football intelligence" after interviewing him.
Carr exited the event just as he entered it, as the top ranked attendee at the position. Jeremiah ranks Eastern Illinois' Jimmy Garoppolo as the No. 2 passer at the event, followed by David Fales, Tajh Boyd, Logan Thomas, and Stephen Morris. Our own Josh Norris ranked them in the same order, except he placed Thomas at No. 4 and Boyd at No. 5.
Source: NFL.com
Gettiing caught from behind by a defensive lineman made me call him slow. So I'll say 4.6 or above. With his weight @205 running in the high 4.5'range or above doesn't make him attractive to me. Just an eyeball test on my part maybe I'm off base.I didn't think Mason had extraordinary speed either, although I wouldn't call him slow.Some very good WRs. Mason looks slow to me, I think his 40 will be a disappointment. Seastrunk's blocking is ghastly, some plays he can't even get in the way.
To put something quantitative on it, predict his 40 time.
I think he'll run between 4.5-4.6.
I don't watch youtube highlights, I watch games. I read a lot too. Youtube highlights lie.I guess work comes in many forms. Rather than watching a lot of Youtube highlight videos, I read a lot.a great example of why I put in the workYou'll miss out on prospects like Blain Gabbert if you don't.it isn't an awful strategy for the lazyDid someone really just say we should leave prospect evaluation to the experts? LOFL
I think it's just his patient and controlled running style that makes him "look" slow. He'll time similarly to Giovani Bernard, a low 4.5x to 4.50 flat. He's going to have a great 10-yard split. I will say this though, he does look faster when returning kicks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2jNC61J8V4Gettiing caught from behind by a defensive lineman made me call him slow. So I'll say 4.6 or above. With his weight @205 running in the high 4.5'range or above doesn't make him attractive to me. Just an eyeball test on my part maybe I'm off base.I didn't think Mason had extraordinary speed either, although I wouldn't call him slow.Some very good WRs. Mason looks slow to me, I think his 40 will be a disappointment. Seastrunk's blocking is ghastly, some plays he can't even get in the way.
To put something quantitative on it, predict his 40 time.
I think he'll run between 4.5-4.6.
You mean posting stuff from Rotoworldas someone who doesn't have time to watch tons of college football, I will admit to watching Youtube highlights. Couple that with reading a few boards and a couple other web sites, I have a good enough grasp for my level of involvement. I won't pretend to put in the time that EBF, XUE, ZWK and Faust have in watching, but I am very appreciative to them sharing their opinions... as well as anybody else in this thread (and others) that can actually have a discussion and not resort to sophomoric antics.
I have to admit that I am kind of tired of the bashing that goes on towards me on reposting the information that I come across. Yes, a lot does come from Rotoworld, but like it or not, they do a good job collecting a diverse range of material, and I repost their stuff to stimulate discussion on these boards. The Rotoworld commentary sometimes leaves a lot to be desired, and they have their own biases towards players, but they are a good source for current information.You mean posting stuff from Rotoworldas someone who doesn't have time to watch tons of college football, I will admit to watching Youtube highlights. Couple that with reading a few boards and a couple other web sites, I have a good enough grasp for my level of involvement. I won't pretend to put in the time that EBF, XUE, ZWK and Faust have in watching, but I am very appreciative to them sharing their opinions... as well as anybody else in this thread (and others) that can actually have a discussion and not resort to sophomoric antics.![]()
On second thought, that does take up a lot of time I'm sure.
I guess you didn't see the wink. I post stuff from Rotoworld too, but I was kidding the previous poster for implying that you spend a lot of time watching youtube highlights. I don't get that impression at all from reading your posts. Sorry if I hit a nerve.I have to admit that I am kind of tired of the bashing that goes on towards me on reposting the information that I come across. Yes, a lot does come from Rotoworld, but like it or not, they do a good job collecting a diverse range of material, and I repost their stuff to stimulate discussion on these boards. The Rotoworld commentary sometimes leaves a lot to be desired, and they have their own biases towards players, but they are a good source for current information.You mean posting stuff from Rotoworldas someone who doesn't have time to watch tons of college football, I will admit to watching Youtube highlights. Couple that with reading a few boards and a couple other web sites, I have a good enough grasp for my level of involvement. I won't pretend to put in the time that EBF, XUE, ZWK and Faust have in watching, but I am very appreciative to them sharing their opinions... as well as anybody else in this thread (and others) that can actually have a discussion and not resort to sophomoric antics.![]()
On second thought, that does take up a lot of time I'm sure.
The annual threads that I post during training camp actually have very little Rotoworld content if you ever care to check those out.
I also post articles from NFL.com, ESPN, CBS Sports, Twitter, and a number of other avenues that I find across the internet, and yes, it does take quite a bit of time to collect the information; however, I do find it useful to collect it all here in one place, and then let those who have more expertise and insight into these players debate and discuss them. I never claimed to be a film guru, as I just don't have the additional time to commit to this hobby. I enjoy reading the posts from EBF, Xue, and others who clearly are the next step up in the player and film analysis, and I find the debate and discussion helpful to my purposes.
At the end of the day, a lot of what we see can be subjective and the truth is that not everything that will make a players successful in the NFL shows up on the tape and in this analysis we perform, but if it helps us improve our likelihood of hitting on the right players, then it will have all been worth it, and I just hope that the information that I dig up is helpful to some in this process.
Sorry, rant over.
I missed the wink emoticon, sorry! It has been a tough couple of months for me, and I have had a few other posters blast me for rotoworld reposts in the past, so I was a touch cranky on the subject!I guess you didn't see the wink. I post stuff from Rotoworld too, but I was kidding the previous poster for implying that you spend a lot of time watching youtube highlights. I don't get that impression at all from reading your posts. Sorry if I hit a nerve.I have to admit that I am kind of tired of the bashing that goes on towards me on reposting the information that I come across. Yes, a lot does come from Rotoworld, but like it or not, they do a good job collecting a diverse range of material, and I repost their stuff to stimulate discussion on these boards. The Rotoworld commentary sometimes leaves a lot to be desired, and they have their own biases towards players, but they are a good source for current information.You mean posting stuff from Rotoworldas someone who doesn't have time to watch tons of college football, I will admit to watching Youtube highlights. Couple that with reading a few boards and a couple other web sites, I have a good enough grasp for my level of involvement. I won't pretend to put in the time that EBF, XUE, ZWK and Faust have in watching, but I am very appreciative to them sharing their opinions... as well as anybody else in this thread (and others) that can actually have a discussion and not resort to sophomoric antics.On second thought, that does take up a lot of time I'm sure.
The annual threads that I post during training camp actually have very little Rotoworld content if you ever care to check those out.
I also post articles from NFL.com, ESPN, CBS Sports, Twitter, and a number of other avenues that I find across the internet, and yes, it does take quite a bit of time to collect the information; however, I do find it useful to collect it all here in one place, and then let those who have more expertise and insight into these players debate and discuss them. I never claimed to be a film guru, as I just don't have the additional time to commit to this hobby. I enjoy reading the posts from EBF, Xue, and others who clearly are the next step up in the player and film analysis, and I find the debate and discussion helpful to my purposes.
At the end of the day, a lot of what we see can be subjective and the truth is that not everything that will make a players successful in the NFL shows up on the tape and in this analysis we perform, but if it helps us improve our likelihood of hitting on the right players, then it will have all been worth it, and I just hope that the information that I dig up is helpful to some in this process.
Sorry, rant over.
To be fair, he hasn't run the 40 yet.With his weight @205 running in the high 4.5'range or above doesn't make him attractive to me. Just an eyeball test on my part maybe I'm off base.
Nice read.Faust said:
Has more upside than Jordan Matthews.Faust said:
This is a very strong Group and TE is one of the strengths of this draft. Grab one of the top 3 if you need one! Each of the top 3 are going to be big time fantasy producers!Let's talk some TEs. First off my top 5:
1. Eric Ebron
2. Troy Niklas
3. Richard Rodgers
4. Jace Amaro
5. Austin Seferian-Jenkins
6. Colt Lyerla (don't really trust him much)
Everyone else after these guys probably won't be drafted high or don't stand out much to me.
Some sleepers:
AC Leonard, Tennessee State
Transferred from Florida. Could put up nice measurables at the combine. Not a strong blocker considering he played against lesser competition. Very athletic, but I'm not sure on his speed, though.
Gator Hoskins, Marshall
Built very similar to Marcel Reece. Not sure what his future position is in the NFL. Does body catch a lot though.
Anthony Denham, Utah
Played slot WR for Utah. Has been invited to the Combine as a TE, so that's why he's here. Could be a Tim Wright type. Pretty jacked at 6'4" 220: http://distilleryimage3.s3.amazonaws.com/dde33cb4cec211e29aee22000a9f38e6_7.jpg
Any thoughts on Lynch from UGA? I didn't see *much* UGA football this year but Lynch looked good at times, at least to me.Let's talk some TEs. First off my top 5:
1. Eric Ebron
2. Troy Niklas
3. Richard Rodgers
4. Jace Amaro
5. Austin Seferian-Jenkins
6. Colt Lyerla (don't really trust him much)
Everyone else after these guys probably won't be drafted high or don't stand out much to me.
Some sleepers:
AC Leonard, Tennessee State
Transferred from Florida. Could put up nice measurables at the combine. Not a strong blocker considering he played against lesser competition. Very athletic, but I'm not sure on his speed, though.
Gator Hoskins, Marshall
Built very similar to Marcel Reece. Not sure what his future position is in the NFL. Does body catch a lot though.
Anthony Denham, Utah
Played slot WR for Utah. Has been invited to the Combine as a TE, so that's why he's here. Could be a Tim Wright type. Pretty jacked at 6'4" 220: http://distilleryimage3.s3.amazonaws.com/dde33cb4cec211e29aee22000a9f38e6_7.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_NJrX0VAes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ks6l7GYXcl8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsgdGKtAKZc
Reggie Jordan, Missouri Western State
Has been invited to the Combine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2e2hf1OdX7Q
Incredible ball skills. Listed at 6'2" 240+. Reminds me of Jordan Reed. Definitely more athletic than Hoskins.
Lynch reminds me of Zach Miller and Vance McDonald. I don't think there's much upside there.Any thoughts on Lynch from UGA? I didn't see *much* UGA football this year but Lynch looked good at times, at least to me.Let's talk some TEs. First off my top 5:
1. Eric Ebron
2. Troy Niklas
3. Richard Rodgers
4. Jace Amaro
5. Austin Seferian-Jenkins
6. Colt Lyerla (don't really trust him much)
Everyone else after these guys probably won't be drafted high or don't stand out much to me.
Some sleepers:
AC Leonard, Tennessee State
Transferred from Florida. Could put up nice measurables at the combine. Not a strong blocker considering he played against lesser competition. Very athletic, but I'm not sure on his speed, though.
Gator Hoskins, Marshall
Built very similar to Marcel Reece. Not sure what his future position is in the NFL. Does body catch a lot though.
Anthony Denham, Utah
Played slot WR for Utah. Has been invited to the Combine as a TE, so that's why he's here. Could be a Tim Wright type. Pretty jacked at 6'4" 220: http://distilleryimage3.s3.amazonaws.com/dde33cb4cec211e29aee22000a9f38e6_7.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_NJrX0VAes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ks6l7GYXcl8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsgdGKtAKZc
Reggie Jordan, Missouri Western State
Has been invited to the Combine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2e2hf1OdX7Q
Incredible ball skills. Listed at 6'2" 240+. Reminds me of Jordan Reed. Definitely more athletic than Hoskins.
This is a pretty solid set of TEs. I'm losing Witten in a dynasty league and will most certainly draft one of these guys (hoping for Ebron, depending on landing spot) with the hopes that they're the real deal from the get-go. I know rookie TEs are usually not to be relied on (see Eifert, Tyler) but hoping for the best.![]()
No RB's in the top 50. Right now I agree with Frank.Frank Coyle's Top 50
...
Bishop Sankey is their #1 RB.
I'll have to take another look then. In some of the highlights I didn't feel he needed any patients for the holes to open up. The only game I had recorded for OSU was vs. WI, and maybe being his 2nd game back had something to do with it, but I did come away unimpressed. I seem to be in the minority here on Hyde, and his name is rising on many rankings so I will look into it more. Thanks.don't confuse patience for being slow at the line. the boy has plenty of quicks for a back his sizeI'm not as impressed with Hyde as others (Kiper has him #32 overall). Big back, decent speed once he gets moving, but I think he's slow at the line. Andre Williams runs with the more power and toughness, IMO. And has better top end speed and seems to get up to speed quicker than Hyde too.
good deal kleck, check out Michigan State and Northwestern games for sure.I'll have to take another look then. In some of the highlights I didn't feel he needed any patients for the holes to open up. The only game I had recorded for OSU was vs. WI, and maybe being his 2nd game back had something to do with it, but I did come away unimpressed. I seem to be in the minority here on Hyde, and his name is rising on many rankings so I will look into it more. Thanks.don't confuse patience for being slow at the line. the boy has plenty of quicks for a back his sizeI'm not as impressed with Hyde as others (Kiper has him #32 overall). Big back, decent speed once he gets moving, but I think he's slow at the line. Andre Williams runs with the more power and toughness, IMO. And has better top end speed and seems to get up to speed quicker than Hyde too.
Not that I'm an expert by any means, but Kelvin Benjamin at 21 seems assinine. There are at least 3 other WRs I'd rather have, in addition to Watkins, Lee, and Evans.Frank Coyle's Top 50
21. * Kelvin Benjamin - WR - Florida St.
Rotoworld take:
Baylor RB Lache Seastrunk broke as many tackles per rushing attempt as Carlos Hyde and Jeremy Hill, according to Greg Peshek.
Peshek adds Seastrunk is a "slippery back." Hill and Hyde are both widely viewed as backs who consistently break first contact, and we would give the latter the edge in the regard, but Seastrunk likely avoids tackles in a somewhat different way. The Baylor back only recorded nine catches during his time at Baylor, which will be a major question during the draft process.
Source: Greg Peshek on Twitter