wdcrob said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
How the hell do you hold measurables against Bridgewater and not Manziel?
oh, that's rich.
On my part, or wdcrob's?
the other guy, nothing about either stature says they can't play qb.
If Bridgewater is 195 at 6'3" he'll never be a FF worthy NFL QB.
what did brady n brees check in at, at the combine?
I'm not sure about Brees but I've already posted Brady.6'5", 210Skinnier than Teddy.
Brady had rocks in his pockets at weight in too
Leaving aside that he's a completely different type of QB than Bridgewater, remind me...When did Brady get drafted? And what's his current playing weight? Should we assume that everyone can pack that much productive weight on? Or was the possibility that Brady
wouldn't be able to gain that much weight part of the reason he fell? i.e. teams perceived it as a risk factor?And there's was nothing wrong with Brees's build. Short isn't a problem.I'm kind of surprised this is controversial: when you spend a top-x (or even first round) pick let some other guy take their chances on a player who doesn't look like other successful players at the position.Maybe Bridgewater turns out great -- but IMO the fact that there's almost no one like him at QB (assuming 195 is right) should mean that you don't spend a high pick on him. There will be many safer picks available.
What does Brady's draft position have to do with you're original statement? Here it is;"Because there's no evidence that being short has anything to do with being a poor QB, and there's tons of evidence suggesting that being thin does. "
We have seen Brady over his 14 year career and know that he very well can play QB and his thin frame was never an issue.
Brady fell in the draft because he was not a highly impressive player in college. He struggled to get on the field at Michigan, at one point being 7th string. He battled other drafted QBs, Griese and Hanson along the way. As I recall his college career was so lack luster that the only reason he got an invite to the combine was his stellar bowl performance vs. Bama his final year. Once there the QB coach at NE took notice and well, the rest is history.
Brady has put on 15 Pounds since the combine 14 years ago. It's impossible to say when exactly he put each pound but I'd imagine it was over the course of a few years. That seems consistent with other players. Yes, Bridgewater should have no problem added weight as well. There is absolutely no reason to think otherwise. How much weight? I don't know and neither does anyone else. His a kid and will continue to fill out his body. He will train harder and with more focus as a pro and get better, more specialized attention.
Another guy that fits the bill of rail thin but having a great NFL career, Randle Cunningham. Cunningham left college at 6'5", 175. He, like Brady, put on significant weight in the NFL eventually reaching 215.
Some others who where thin at the combine and similar build to Bridgewater;
Anthony Wright - carved out a decent career for himself as a backup and performed well when called to start.
Oscar Davenport - historical known for one of the worst Wonderlic scores of all time, 6. Undrafted and considered too much of a project.
Aaron Brooks - great NFL career.
Joe Hamilton - measured in at 5'10", 192. Too small to play.
Shane Griggs - 6'4", 199 and Undrafted.
Seneca Wallace - 6'1", 196 having a decent career as a backup.
Reggie McNeal - 6'2", 198 drafted to play WR, not QB.
Pat White - 6'1", 197 drafted 44 overall to play QB.
Looking back at the combine results to 1999 these are the best height/weight comps I can find. Nothing in this suggests to me that thin guys can't play. It seems to me that the hit rate on QBs is extremely small to begin with and that simply translate down to this small segment of players as well. On top of that, none of these guys above have the arm talent of Bridgewater and many were considered athlete QBs, not true pocket QBs. Bridgewater is a pocket QB with some athletic ability. I really don't think any of these guys are good comps except for maybe Brooks.
On the contrary there seems to be a slew of evidence to suggest shorter QBs have a harder time.
Quotes about Russell Wilson;
Chris Weinke, "If he was 6-5, he'd probably be the No. 1 pick in the draft."
Jon Gruden, "The only issue with Russell Wilson is his height. That might be the reason he's not picked in the first couple rounds."
From NFL.com profile, "WEAKNESSES Wilson's height will be his biggest inhibitor at the next level and the largest reason for his late-round value. It remains to be seen if he can throw effectively from the pocket at the next level."
Drew Brees;
Quote from the nfldraftscout profile, "Negatives...Plays in the spread offense, taking the bulk of his snaps from the shotgun...Tends to side-arm his passes going deep...Lacks accuracy and touch on his long throws...Seems more comfortable in the short/intermediate passing attack...Does not possess the ideal height you look for in a pro passer, though his ability to scan the field helps him compensate in this area...Will improvise and run when the passing lanes are clogged, but tends to run through defenders rather than trying to avoid them to prevent unnecessary punishment."
Everything I've ever heard is that being short is a detriment to being an NFL QB. It makes it harder to see down field and get through reads. It also makes it harder to get the ball over the Dlineman, the exact reason QBs no matter their height are coached to release it high and tight. This doesn't mean that short guys can't make it. It simply means they have a tougher hill to climb and must compensate for that height with very strong recognition and scanning skills. Brees is a master of that.