What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

[Dynasty] 2014 Draft Prospects (4 Viewers)

ConnSkins "has the goods" as you would say. I'm in a competitive 14-team dynasty with him. He won our first year and made F4 in Year 2.

So are we debating roster management? Evaluating rookie QBs for my dynasty team is pretty low on my to-do list.
Yeah - who cares about QBs.

Skinny or fat...

Short or tall....

WHO CARES!

Plug and play...

Dime a dozen....
Some of us appreciate the conversation because we play in 2QB leagues. ;)

 
wdcrob said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
How the hell do you hold measurables against Bridgewater and not Manziel?
oh, that's rich.
On my part, or wdcrob's?
the other guy, nothing about either stature says they can't play qb.
If Bridgewater is 195 at 6'3" he'll never be a FF worthy NFL QB.
You're nuts.
I am. I know better than to use the word 'never'.
 
Was Quincy Enunwa's day big enough to get recognized? 6-2 230 lbs and if I had to guess 4.5 wheels. Caught 12 TDs this year. Reminds me of a cross between TO and David Boston before roided out. Seems to be flying way below radar because I have not heard anyone mention him

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Was Quincy Enunwa's day big enough to get recognized? 6-2 230 lbs and if I had to guess 4.5 wheels. Caught 12 TDs this year. Reminds me of a cross between TO and David Boston before roided out. Seems to be flying way below radar because I have not heard anyone mention him
He is a big guy and he looked impressive today. This years crop of rookies is deeper than any crop that I can remember. If more folks come out of the woodwork at the combine (they always do) this could be the deepest draft ever for skill position players.

This draft is so deep on talent!!!

 
wdcrob said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
How the hell do you hold measurables against Bridgewater and not Manziel?
oh, that's rich.
On my part, or wdcrob's?
the other guy, nothing about either stature says they can't play qb.
If Bridgewater is 195 at 6'3" he'll never be a FF worthy NFL QB.
You're nuts.
I am. I know better than to use the word 'never'.
better. I understand your argument, but there are exceptions to every rule. Given his skillset and play on the field I think he could be one of them.
 
Jeremy Hill

If Wednesday's performance – 28 carries, 216 yards, two touchdowns – was Hill's last as a college player, he made it one to remember. Hill is among a host of draft-eligible players on the Tigers' roster who could leave for the NFL. LSU coach Les Miles said afterward that “there's a chance” that star receivers Jarvis Landry and Odell Beckham could declare for the draft, but Hill said while accepting bowl MVP honors that he still must weigh his decision.

LSU's Jeremy Hill earned Outback Bowl MVP honors, rushing for 216 yards and two touchdowns.

Among the factors he said he will consider: the NFL draft advisory board's feedback on where he might be drafted, his family's input and his role within the LSU offense, should he opt to return.

“There's a lot that goes into it. It's a big decision, but like I said, I'm not thinking about it right now,” Hill said. “I'm just enjoying this win and when we get back to Baton Rouge, we'll figure all that out.”

His role on Wednesday was as a battering ram. By becoming the first LSU back since Alley Broussard in 2004 to crack the 200-yard mark in a game, Hill finished the season with 1,401 rushing yards and 16 touchdowns, totals that rank second and fourth on LSU's single-season lists.

The junior tailback hasn't just been an effective clock-eater at the end of a victory since he arrived at LSU. He's been doing this since his days at Redemptorist High School in Baton Rouge, La.

“It's just something that I took way back in high school. Our coaches just put it in my hands and just told me to go win the football game,” Hill said after putting away Iowa in the Tigers' 21-14 victory in Wednesday's Outback Bowl. “You just have to have that mentality. Great players have that mentality. When everyone's looking for someone to make a play, just being in a tight game the whole time … I just took it on my shoulders that I needed to make plays to win this football game, and that's exactly what happened.”

 
Hill is rarely mentioned in talk when discussing the top RB in 2014 (if he declares). He is at the top of my list (and has been for a few months).

 
When Hill is motivated he is difficult to slow down. I'm worried he will be consistently motivated. Went down on first contact too frequently. His highlight reel is scary good, but it's the rest of his tape that leaves some doubt.

 
wdcrob said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
How the hell do you hold measurables against Bridgewater and not Manziel?
oh, that's rich.
On my part, or wdcrob's?
the other guy, nothing about either stature says they can't play qb.
If Bridgewater is 195 at 6'3" he'll never be a FF worthy NFL QB.
what did brady n brees check in at, at the combine?

 
wdcrob said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
How the hell do you hold measurables against Bridgewater and not Manziel?
oh, that's rich.
On my part, or wdcrob's?
the other guy, nothing about either stature says they can't play qb.
If Bridgewater is 195 at 6'3" he'll never be a FF worthy NFL QB.
what did brady n brees check in at, at the combine?
I'm not sure about Brees but I've already posted Brady. 6'5", 210

Skinnier than Teddy.

 
wdcrob said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
How the hell do you hold measurables against Bridgewater and not Manziel?
oh, that's rich.
On my part, or wdcrob's?
the other guy, nothing about either stature says they can't play qb.
If Bridgewater is 195 at 6'3" he'll never be a FF worthy NFL QB.
what did brady n brees check in at, at the combine?
I'm not sure about Brees but I've already posted Brady.6'5", 210

Skinnier than Teddy.
Brady had rocks in his pockets at weight in too

 
For the number crunchers, I just calculated the Production Ratio for this years WR group.....% of teams receiving yards & TDs.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AotIVo4gpWF8dFZBTDhmM01WeU9CMzliOEZMNVByS1E&gid=48
Hey Tony, I didn't know you were on here. Thanks for the link. That doc is unreal. I'll spend a few hours checking out that info!
I always like to visit the FBG and DLF forums. Always something to learn. Another draft season is about to ramp up.....my favorite time of year. Hope all is well with you bro.

 
NFL Draft: Blake Bortles flashes but not flawless in Fiesta Bowl win

Blake Bortles overcomes uneven half to lift UCF in Fiesta BowlRotoworld:

UCF redshirt junior QB Blake Bortles completed 20 of 31 attempts for 301 yards, three touchdowns and two interceptions in Wednesday's 52-42 upset win over Baylor in the Fiesta Bowl.
He also ran for 93 yards and a touchdown on eight attempts. "Source close to Bortles says he's still waiting on draft grade from NFL," NFL.com's Gil Brandt tweeted on Wednesday. "Will make decision after he receives." ESPN's Todd McShay has ranked Bortles (6-foot-5, 230-pounds) as the second-best quarterback prospect. Bortles' movement skills and strength in the pocket remind us of Andrew Luck and Ben Roethlisberger. We think he'll be playing on Sundays next season. Bortles declined to answer after the game when he was asked about his intentions. He faces a Jan. 15 deadline to declare.

Source: Gil Brandt on Twitter
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wdcrob said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
How the hell do you hold measurables against Bridgewater and not Manziel?
oh, that's rich.
On my part, or wdcrob's?
the other guy, nothing about either stature says they can't play qb.
If Bridgewater is 195 at 6'3" he'll never be a FF worthy NFL QB.
what did brady n brees check in at, at the combine?
I'm not sure about Brees but I've already posted Brady.6'5", 210

Skinnier than Teddy.
Brady had rocks in his pockets at weight in too
Leaving aside that he's a completely different type of QB than Bridgewater, remind me...

When did Brady get drafted? And what's his current playing weight? Should we assume that everyone can pack that much productive weight on? Or was the possibility that Brady wouldn't be able to gain that much weight part of the reason he fell? i.e. teams perceived it as a risk factor?

And there's was nothing wrong with Brees's build. Short isn't a problem.

I'm kind of surprised this is controversial: when you spend a top-x (or even first round) pick let some other guy take their chances on a player who doesn't look like other successful players at the position.

Maybe Bridgewater turns out great -- but IMO the fact that there's almost no one like him at QB (assuming 195 is right) should mean that you don't spend a high pick on him. There will be many safer picks available.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
wdcrob said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
MAC_32 said:
ConnSKINS26 said:
How the hell do you hold measurables against Bridgewater and not Manziel?
oh, that's rich.
On my part, or wdcrob's?
the other guy, nothing about either stature says they can't play qb.
If Bridgewater is 195 at 6'3" he'll never be a FF worthy NFL QB.
what did brady n brees check in at, at the combine?
I'm not sure about Brees but I've already posted Brady.6'5", 210Skinnier than Teddy.
Brady had rocks in his pockets at weight in too
Leaving aside that he's a completely different type of QB than Bridgewater, remind me...When did Brady get drafted? And what's his current playing weight? Should we assume that everyone can pack that much productive weight on? Or was the possibility that Brady wouldn't be able to gain that much weight part of the reason he fell? i.e. teams perceived it as a risk factor?And there's was nothing wrong with Brees's build. Short isn't a problem.I'm kind of surprised this is controversial: when you spend a top-x (or even first round) pick let some other guy take their chances on a player who doesn't look like other successful players at the position.Maybe Bridgewater turns out great -- but IMO the fact that there's almost no one like him at QB (assuming 195 is right) should mean that you don't spend a high pick on him. There will be many safer picks available.
What does Brady's draft position have to do with you're original statement? Here it is;"Because there's no evidence that being short has anything to do with being a poor QB, and there's tons of evidence suggesting that being thin does. "

We have seen Brady over his 14 year career and know that he very well can play QB and his thin frame was never an issue.

Brady fell in the draft because he was not a highly impressive player in college. He struggled to get on the field at Michigan, at one point being 7th string. He battled other drafted QBs, Griese and Hanson along the way. As I recall his college career was so lack luster that the only reason he got an invite to the combine was his stellar bowl performance vs. Bama his final year. Once there the QB coach at NE took notice and well, the rest is history.

Brady has put on 15 Pounds since the combine 14 years ago. It's impossible to say when exactly he put each pound but I'd imagine it was over the course of a few years. That seems consistent with other players. Yes, Bridgewater should have no problem added weight as well. There is absolutely no reason to think otherwise. How much weight? I don't know and neither does anyone else. His a kid and will continue to fill out his body. He will train harder and with more focus as a pro and get better, more specialized attention.

Another guy that fits the bill of rail thin but having a great NFL career, Randle Cunningham. Cunningham left college at 6'5", 175. He, like Brady, put on significant weight in the NFL eventually reaching 215.

Some others who where thin at the combine and similar build to Bridgewater;

Anthony Wright - carved out a decent career for himself as a backup and performed well when called to start.

Oscar Davenport - historical known for one of the worst Wonderlic scores of all time, 6. Undrafted and considered too much of a project.

Aaron Brooks - great NFL career.

Joe Hamilton - measured in at 5'10", 192. Too small to play.

Shane Griggs - 6'4", 199 and Undrafted.

Seneca Wallace - 6'1", 196 having a decent career as a backup.

Reggie McNeal - 6'2", 198 drafted to play WR, not QB.

Pat White - 6'1", 197 drafted 44 overall to play QB.

Looking back at the combine results to 1999 these are the best height/weight comps I can find. Nothing in this suggests to me that thin guys can't play. It seems to me that the hit rate on QBs is extremely small to begin with and that simply translate down to this small segment of players as well. On top of that, none of these guys above have the arm talent of Bridgewater and many were considered athlete QBs, not true pocket QBs. Bridgewater is a pocket QB with some athletic ability. I really don't think any of these guys are good comps except for maybe Brooks.

On the contrary there seems to be a slew of evidence to suggest shorter QBs have a harder time.

Quotes about Russell Wilson;

Chris Weinke, "If he was 6-5, he'd probably be the No. 1 pick in the draft."

Jon Gruden, "The only issue with Russell Wilson is his height. That might be the reason he's not picked in the first couple rounds."

From NFL.com profile, "WEAKNESSES Wilson's height will be his biggest inhibitor at the next level and the largest reason for his late-round value. It remains to be seen if he can throw effectively from the pocket at the next level."

Drew Brees;

Quote from the nfldraftscout profile, "Negatives...Plays in the spread offense, taking the bulk of his snaps from the shotgun...Tends to side-arm his passes going deep...Lacks accuracy and touch on his long throws...Seems more comfortable in the short/intermediate passing attack...Does not possess the ideal height you look for in a pro passer, though his ability to scan the field helps him compensate in this area...Will improvise and run when the passing lanes are clogged, but tends to run through defenders rather than trying to avoid them to prevent unnecessary punishment."

Everything I've ever heard is that being short is a detriment to being an NFL QB. It makes it harder to see down field and get through reads. It also makes it harder to get the ball over the Dlineman, the exact reason QBs no matter their height are coached to release it high and tight. This doesn't mean that short guys can't make it. It simply means they have a tougher hill to climb and must compensate for that height with very strong recognition and scanning skills. Brees is a master of that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

CBS Sports' Dane Brugler has spoken with some scouts who have UCF redshirt junior QB Blake Bortles as their top ranked prospect at the position.

"Bortles going top-10 isn't a media creation," Brugler notes. "Because some scouts think he's the top QB, does that mean a GM will draft him top-10? Of course not. But it's not as crazy as most think." We like Bortles, mainly because of his strong pocket movement, but it is difficult to not think he is getting pushed up because of the NFL's obsession with finding a player that fits a certain mold.


Source: Dane Brugler on Twitter
 
Maybe Bridgewater turns out great -- but IMO the fact that there's almost no one like him at QB (assuming 195 is right) should mean that you don't spend a high pick on him. There will be many safer picks available.
What number would make you more comfortable? Most prospects put in work to be at the weight that they think teams want to see them at. If Teddy is 195 right now, he won't be in February. What do his comps look like at 200? 205? 210?

It's not rhetorical question - I'm very interested in hearing what Teddy would need to weigh to measure up to players who have had success at the pro level.

 
Maybe Bridgewater turns out great -- but IMO the fact that there's almost no one like him at QB (assuming 195 is right) should mean that you don't spend a high pick on him. There will be many safer picks available.
What number would make you more comfortable? Most prospects put in work to be at the weight that they think teams want to see them at. If Teddy is 195 right now, he won't be in February. What do his comps look like at 200? 205? 210?

It's not rhetorical question - I'm very interested in hearing what Teddy would need to weigh to measure up to players who have had success at the pro level.
He doesn't need to change at all to measure up with players who have had success. He may not have the atypical bulk of what most guys have, but there doesn't seem to be anything to suggest he can't be successful. I think he will increase his weight none the less. He's going to be spending a lot of time focusing on whatever it is he thinks teams want to see. If weight is one then he will simply hit the gym. On top of that, as he matures he will naturally fill out his body.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe Bridgewater turns out great -- but IMO the fact that there's almost no one like him at QB (assuming 195 is right) should mean that you don't spend a high pick on him. There will be many safer picks available.
What number would make you more comfortable? Most prospects put in work to be at the weight that they think teams want to see them at. If Teddy is 195 right now, he won't be in February. What do his comps look like at 200? 205? 210?

It's not rhetorical question - I'm very interested in hearing what Teddy would need to weigh to measure up to players who have had success at the pro level.
Rob seems to try and put people into molds/modles of his measureables and if they dont meet the criteria, then he isnt going to like them

The kid is a Junior and weights 195, no reason to think he cant add 15 lbs of mussle. 6'3" certainly isnt a detremint, the guys a football player plain and simple, Ill take him.

What was your reasoning on Keenan Allen again? wasnt he basically a "dont draft" based on your models? Well guess what? he was the best rookie WR by far.

 
Any color on how Seastrunk looked last night? Stat line was decent but I didn't get to catch the game.
He looks really good when they give him the ball but they don't throw any passes to him. It doesn't look like they throw to any RB's really. So we don't really know how good he is at catching passes. If he doesn't look good catching passes at the combine I don't see how he can be drafted #1 overall in rookie drafts this year.

 
Rob seems to try and put people into molds/modles of his measureables and if they dont meet the criteria, then he isnt going to like them
Exactly.
is there anything besides his height/weight ratio that you dont like?What was your issue with Keenan Allen again? I remember you saying something like, I feel sorry for any NFL team drafting him or some such
He doesn't seem very intent on adding substance to some strong claims.
 
Any color on how Seastrunk looked last night? Stat line was decent but I didn't get to catch the game.
He looks really good when they give him the ball but they don't throw any passes to him. It doesn't look like they throw to any RB's really. So we don't really know how good he is at catching passes. If he doesn't look good catching passes at the combine I don't see how he can be drafted #1 overall in rookie drafts this year.
Does it bother anyone that Shock looks just as good?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What is it exactly that you are worried about with Bridgewater's weight, taking a hit? Do you question his arm strength or decision making because of his weight? I guess I'm not really sure what the problem is besides him taking punishment, but he's not a rushing QB so why does it matter? Or is it a strictly "successful QBs weight 'X' and he doesn't fit that criteria? " type thought

 
Any color on how Seastrunk looked last night? Stat line was decent but I didn't get to catch the game.
He looks really good when they give him the ball but they don't throw any passes to him. It doesn't look like they throw to any RB's really. So we don't really know how good he is at catching passes. If he doesn't look good catching passes at the combine I don't see how he can be drafted #1 overall in rookie drafts this year.
I'm not impressed either. Never really been a huge fan. But he may turn into a Charles or McCoy. A real gamble in my opinion.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What is it exactly that you are worried about with Bridgewater's weight, taking a hit? Do you question his arm strength or decision making because of his weight? I guess I'm not really sure what the problem is besides him taking punishment, but he's not a rushing QB so why does it matter? Or is it a strictly "successful QBs weight 'X' and he doesn't fit that criteria? " type thought
I think it does come down to injury risk and abililty/willingness to take a hit. You can get away with a lot in college that you can't do in the pros. Arm strength is overrated IMO (at least beyond a threshold), but it makes sense that it's related to bulk, on average.

 
Rob seems to try and put people into molds/modles of his measureables and if they dont meet the criteria, then he isnt going to like them
Exactly.
is there anything besides his height/weight ratio that you dont like?What was your issue with Keenan Allen again? I remember you saying something like, I feel sorry for any NFL team drafting him or some such
I already said that Bridgewater's H/W is a problem because he takes a TON of sacks. Either he's keeping plays alive by moving around or he has terrible pocket awareness. I haven't seen him play so I can't speak to which -- but either will get him killed in the NFL @ 195.

I said Allen would be a mistake as a first rounder. I'll stand by that too. IMO he's not good enough to hang onto the #1 spot for very long and his success will always be tied to a good situation.

i.e. Mike Glennon's not going to chuck the ball to someone like Allen 10x a game. And if he did defenses would be able to shut him out without a surrounding cast. I want guys whose value isn't (as) tied to situation.

 
Rotoworld:

Scouts Inc.'s ranks Louisville junior QB Teddy Bridgewater as the No. 9 overall player in the class.

UCF redshirt junior QB Blake Bortles checks in at No. 15 overall and Johnny Manziel follows these two at No. 22. There is a big drop off before getting to LSU's Zach Mettenberger (45), Brett Hundley (51), A.J. McCarron (54) and Derek Carr (57). The group, made up of Todd McShay, Kevin Weidl, and Steve Muench, might be the highest on Bortles' pro projection at this point in the process.


Source: ESPN
 
Oregon State WR Brandin Cooks declares for 2014 NFL Draft

By Dan Greenspan

College Football 24/7 writer

Oregon State wide receiver Brandin Cooks will enter the 2014 NFL Draft on the heels of his record-setting junior season, making the announcement in a press release issued through the school.

Cooks (5-foot-10, 186 pounds) had 128 receptions for 1,730 yards, breaking the Pac-12 records in each category set by Marqise Lee of USC in 2012. Cooks, who caught 16 touchdowns, also won the Biletnikoff Award as the top receiver in the nation and earned numerous All-America honors, both feats accomplished by Lee the year before.

Essentially Cooks matched Lee in accolades and one-upped his production on the field. Whether Cooks can best Lee by going ahead of him in the draft -- provided Lee does forgo his senior season, as is widely expected -- could be one of the more intriguing plot points in the buildup to next May.

Both Cooks and Lee are electric with the ball in their hands and have largely run the same route tree in their respective pro-style offenses, but one NFC South scout told NFL Media analyst Bucky Brooks that Cooks' superior consistency in catching the ball gives him the edge over Lee.

However, Brooks told the College Football 24/7 podcast that Lee's explosiveness will ultimately set him apart from Cooks, while NFL Media analyst Charles Davis praised the dramatic improvements Lee made despite being limited by shoulder, knee and leg injuries this season.

The more likely result is that Cooks is drafted on Day Two and leads the second tier of wide receiver prospects, selected behind the likes of Lee, Sammy Watkins of Clemson and Mike Evans of Texas A&M. But Cooks has defied expectations before, nearly doubling his receptions and more than tripling his touchdown receptions from his fine sophomore season without Markus Wheaton on the other side to occupy defenses.

Cooks outproducing Lee, injuries or not, was one of this season's biggest surprises in college football. Now Cooks will try to do it again entering the NFL.

Follow Dan Greenspan on Twitter @DanGreenspan.
 
Any color on how Seastrunk looked last night? Stat line was decent but I didn't get to catch the game.
He looks really good when they give him the ball but they don't throw any passes to him. It doesn't look like they throw to any RB's really. So we don't really know how good he is at catching passes. If he doesn't look good catching passes at the combine I don't see how he can be drafted #1 overall in rookie drafts this year.
Does it bother anyone that Shock looks just as good?
We def have to take that into consideration. I wouldn't say Shock Linwood looks just as good but he def looks good which makes you wonder how much Seastunk's numbers are inflated by the wide open offense that Baylor runs.

 
Any color on how Seastrunk looked last night? Stat line was decent but I didn't get to catch the game.
He looks really good when they give him the ball but they don't throw any passes to him. It doesn't look like they throw to any RB's really. So we don't really know how good he is at catching passes. If he doesn't look good catching passes at the combine I don't see how he can be drafted #1 overall in rookie drafts this year.
Does it bother anyone that Shock looks just as good?
We def have to take that into consideration. I wouldn't say Shock Linwood looks just as good but he def looks good which makes you wonder how much Seastunk's numbers are inflated by the wide open offense that Baylor runs.
Shock looks good, but "just as good" might be pushing it.

Remember that Seastrunk was a 5 star recruit out of high school. Even before he stepped on the field in college, he was touted as a special talent. I think Baylor's offense is very friendly (see: Ganaway), but that doesn't also mean the players on the team can't be legit (see: Gordon, Wright).

 
Faust said:
Oregon State WR Brandin Cooks declares for 2014 NFL Draft

By Dan Greenspan

College Football 24/7 writer

Oregon State wide receiver Brandin Cooks will enter the 2014 NFL Draft on the heels of his record-setting junior season, making the announcement in a press release issued through the school.

Cooks (5-foot-10, 186 pounds) had 128 receptions for 1,730 yards, breaking the Pac-12 records in each category set by Marqise Lee of USC in 2012. Cooks, who caught 16 touchdowns, also won the Biletnikoff Award as the top receiver in the nation and earned numerous All-America honors, both feats accomplished by Lee the year before.

Essentially Cooks matched Lee in accolades and one-upped his production on the field. Whether Cooks can best Lee by going ahead of him in the draft -- provided Lee does forgo his senior season, as is widely expected -- could be one of the more intriguing plot points in the buildup to next May.

Both Cooks and Lee are electric with the ball in their hands and have largely run the same route tree in their respective pro-style offenses, but one NFC South scout told NFL Media analyst Bucky Brooks that Cooks' superior consistency in catching the ball gives him the edge over Lee.

However, Brooks told the College Football 24/7 podcast that Lee's explosiveness will ultimately set him apart from Cooks, while NFL Media analyst Charles Davis praised the dramatic improvements Lee made despite being limited by shoulder, knee and leg injuries this season.

The more likely result is that Cooks is drafted on Day Two and leads the second tier of wide receiver prospects, selected behind the likes of Lee, Sammy Watkins of Clemson and Mike Evans of Texas A&M. But Cooks has defied expectations before, nearly doubling his receptions and more than tripling his touchdown receptions from his fine sophomore season without Markus Wheaton on the other side to occupy defenses.

Cooks outproducing Lee, injuries or not, was one of this season's biggest surprises in college football. Now Cooks will try to do it again entering the NFL.

Follow Dan Greenspan on Twitter @DanGreenspan.
Cooks looks amazing on tape but I have to say I have seen him get bullied around a little in some games. I would feel really good about drafting him in the 1st round if he was closer to 195-200 pounds. I don't think he can win on the outside. It doesn't mean he can't be one of the better slot WR in the NFL. It would be great to see him go to a team with an elite/accurate QB like Cobb did. That would help him immensely.

 
I've seen Odell Beckham in the first round of some mocks. As an owner of his in a devy league, I'm intrigued to see where he goes. He'll likely help some team immediately in the return game, where he is electric. Whether he sees the field much as a WR in Year 1 will depend heavily on who drafts him.

Here is an insane catch he made during the Outback Bowl. How big are his freaking hands? There are two clips out there as well that show him one handing kickoffs in the endzone.

 
EBF said:
Shock looks good, but "just as good" might be pushing it.

Remember that Seastrunk was a 5 star recruit out of high school. Even before he stepped on the field in college, he was touted as a special talent. I think Baylor's offense is very friendly (see: Ganaway), but that doesn't also mean the players on the team can't be legit (see: Gordon, Wright).
They both look REALLY good to me. Lache's sample size is much bigger, obviously, and that needs to be taken into account. But I'd say Shock's looked just as good with his touches (watching the OU game as I type this).

I'm trying to understand why our opinion of Seastrunk isn't shared by draftniks. As someone who puts a lot of stock into what the professionals think (TBD, still), it's somewhat concerning to me. I'm just exploring the potential reasoning behind the lack of excitement, outside of the dynasty community.

ETA: And Shock's getting a lot of buzz now, too. CBS has him as the #2 back in his class, behind only Collins and ahead of Tyner. Someone from NFL.com (can't remember the name) called him an LT clone.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any color on how Seastrunk looked last night? Stat line was decent but I didn't get to catch the game.
He looks really good when they give him the ball but they don't throw any passes to him. It doesn't look like they throw to any RB's really. So we don't really know how good he is at catching passes. If he doesn't look good catching passes at the combine I don't see how he can be drafted #1 overall in rookie drafts this year.
Does it bother anyone that Shock looks just as good?
Shock has more strength/power but less long speed and doesn't cut as well. Different style of runners.

 
Seastrunks explosion when he hits a crease is jaw dropping.

I'm not too worried about his lack if use in the pass game. With outside speed like Baylor has why would they use their backs? Keep them fresh to maximize their performance when their number is called.

 
I'm trying to understand why our opinion of Seastrunk isn't shared by draftniks. As someone who puts a lot of stock into what the professionals think (TBD, still), it's somewhat concerning to me. I'm just exploring the potential reasoning behind the lack of excitement, outside of the dynasty community.
Yeah this is bothering me too. I've read some stuff where they are questioning his vision but I can't remember where. Have to look into if he is leaving yards on the field. ......

 
As the owner of the 1.06 pick in a 16-teamer, I'm hoping this Seastrunk questioning continues driving his value down, though I personally believe he's going to absolutely light up the combine and shoot right back up the rankings.

 
Colin Kaepernick was listed at 215 showed up 233 at the combine. Matt Scott was listed at 196 and showed up 213 at the combine. Tyler Bray listed at 215 showed up at 232 (and it looked like "bad" weight).

Louisville lists Bridgewater at 205. He doesn't look 196 to me.

 
Shock has more strength/power but less long speed and doesn't cut as well. Different style of runners.
I agree. However, I really like the way Shock cuts; they're not exaggerated, which is less visually appealing, but they're effective.

I was really surprised at his ability to bounce off of contact. I didn't know much about him prior to the OU game, but have really liked what I have seen in going back. He's very tough in pass protection too. I like seeing that in backs.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top