EBF
Footballguy
Matt Forte will be a top 10 pick in almost every dynasty draft this offseason. If you're the guy who drafts him that high, you deserve to have your fantasy football license suspended. Here's why...
In 16 starts last season, Forte only averaged 4.0 YPC or higher 6 times. He finished the season with a very mediocre 3.9 YPC average. That's worse than the 4.1 YPC Thomas Jones averaged in Chicago and it's only slightly better than the 3.8 YPC Cedric Benson compiled under the same regime. Yet while Jones was widely considered mediocre and Benson an outright disaster, Forte is currently valued alongside some of the best backs in the league. Why?
Because people are confusing fantasy football success with NFL success. Matt Forte had a great FF season in 2008. He was one of the top scoring backs in almost every league. Yet when you take a closer look at the numbers, there's no evidence to suggest that he was an effective NFL player. He had a mediocre YPC average, was bottled up more often than not, and showed no flair for making spectacular plays (only two plays of 30+ yards out of 379 touches).
The only reason Forte's stats look impressive is because he had the second most touches out of any back in the league. When you look at the yards-per-touch, he doesn't stand out. He just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The Bears were a pitiful team last season. Their leading receiver had 665 yards. With no semblance of a passing game, they had no choice but to feed the ball to Forte and hope to keep the score low.
Forte was lucky to get that many touches and he was lucky to score as many TDs as he did. Thomas Jones averaged 7 TDs in three seasons as Chicago's starter. He never had more than 9 in a season. Forte had 12 last year. You can attribute that to his talent if you'd like, but he wasn't breaking long plays or hitting home runs.
Right about now the Forte defenders are probably itching their keyboards...
"Yea, his YPC was low, but he scored a ton of FF points!" That's fine, but his NFL performance was mediocre and mediocre NFL players have a tendency to lose their jobs. 3.9 YPC is lousy. Sure, LaDainian Tomlinson didn't do any better as a rookie, but there were objective reasons to believe that he was a special talent: he had a top 5 pedigree and ideal combine numbers. Forte doesn't have those things working in his favor. He's a second round talent with mediocre measurables.
"Yea, I know his stats look average on paper and I know he wasn't a first round pick, but you have to watch the games!" I watched the games. Forte looked okay. Then again, so did Tashard Choice and I'm not taking him in the top 10 of my dynasty draft. If I draft a player that high, I have to know that he's a special talent. Matt Forte might eventually reach that level, but as of right now there's no objective reason to believe that he's an elite NFL player. If you take him at his ADP in a dynasty league, you might be wearing one of these next season:
In 16 starts last season, Forte only averaged 4.0 YPC or higher 6 times. He finished the season with a very mediocre 3.9 YPC average. That's worse than the 4.1 YPC Thomas Jones averaged in Chicago and it's only slightly better than the 3.8 YPC Cedric Benson compiled under the same regime. Yet while Jones was widely considered mediocre and Benson an outright disaster, Forte is currently valued alongside some of the best backs in the league. Why?
Because people are confusing fantasy football success with NFL success. Matt Forte had a great FF season in 2008. He was one of the top scoring backs in almost every league. Yet when you take a closer look at the numbers, there's no evidence to suggest that he was an effective NFL player. He had a mediocre YPC average, was bottled up more often than not, and showed no flair for making spectacular plays (only two plays of 30+ yards out of 379 touches).
The only reason Forte's stats look impressive is because he had the second most touches out of any back in the league. When you look at the yards-per-touch, he doesn't stand out. He just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The Bears were a pitiful team last season. Their leading receiver had 665 yards. With no semblance of a passing game, they had no choice but to feed the ball to Forte and hope to keep the score low.
Forte was lucky to get that many touches and he was lucky to score as many TDs as he did. Thomas Jones averaged 7 TDs in three seasons as Chicago's starter. He never had more than 9 in a season. Forte had 12 last year. You can attribute that to his talent if you'd like, but he wasn't breaking long plays or hitting home runs.
Right about now the Forte defenders are probably itching their keyboards...
"Yea, his YPC was low, but he scored a ton of FF points!" That's fine, but his NFL performance was mediocre and mediocre NFL players have a tendency to lose their jobs. 3.9 YPC is lousy. Sure, LaDainian Tomlinson didn't do any better as a rookie, but there were objective reasons to believe that he was a special talent: he had a top 5 pedigree and ideal combine numbers. Forte doesn't have those things working in his favor. He's a second round talent with mediocre measurables.
"Yea, I know his stats look average on paper and I know he wasn't a first round pick, but you have to watch the games!" I watched the games. Forte looked okay. Then again, so did Tashard Choice and I'm not taking him in the top 10 of my dynasty draft. If I draft a player that high, I have to know that he's a special talent. Matt Forte might eventually reach that level, but as of right now there's no objective reason to believe that he's an elite NFL player. If you take him at his ADP in a dynasty league, you might be wearing one of these next season:

Last edited by a moderator: