Housh is 30 I believe.. imo that scares me away a bit in a #2 WR.I went after Housh. Some undervalued him because his stats were down last year because of a couple of missed games. Good Value.
Agreed, its guys like this i am looking for.Greg Jennings is a WR i really like right now. With his numbers falling last year after an ankle injury and the Moss rumors, he could be had very cheap.Great Buy Low guys:Caddy WilliamsEli Manning
You're confusing me... is "another Brandon Lloyd" supposed to be a positive?I think Givens would be a great buy low if we knew he was going to be healthy in 2007. Everything I've read has said he is unlikely to be ready to start the season, and that could be a big problem for a guy who signed a big contract in 2006. If he has a bad 2007 he is a candidate to be cut at the end of the year if others develop sufficiently.In Dynasty team with room I have one for ya.. David Givens...another Brandon Lloyd.
I agree, I think TJones will have a good 2007, but chose not to list older players as dynasty targets (unless I think they are grossly undervalued a la LJordan right now). I didn't list Edge for the same reason although I think he'll outperform expectations in 2007. When I think in terms of dynasty players to target I don't like consider older players since they can be swept away so quickly after just one injury or bad year. They fall more into my "redraft" or "win now" section of a dynasty roster. Maybe I'm not making a lot of sense there to some, but I like to allocate my dynasty roster in subgroups, and no longer will aggressively target any player on the back side of his career. For RBs, that age is 28/29, and both TJones and Edge will be 29 before the 2007 season begins.EBF said:I would've said LenDale White two months ago, but now that Henry is out of town, White's price has gone up. The main guys that I like right now are Thomas Jones, Kevin Curtis, and Santonio Holmes. Thomas Jones is particularly underrated. I happen to think he's much better than Leon Washington and that he stands a very realistic chance of having his best season as a pro.
I view him as a strong RB2 if you're in "win now" mode. I think he has 2-3 top notch years left. But I tend to agree with your philosophy. After receiving a lot of criticism from leaguemates in the past for hoarding rookies and young players, it's funny that a good percentage of my worst trades have involved getting that one last player to "win now." The problem with these deals is that there's no margin for error.I agree, I think TJones will have a good 2007, but chose not to list older players as dynasty targets (unless I think they are grossly undervalued a la LJordan right now). I didn't list Edge for the same reason although I think he'll outperform expectations in 2007. When I think in terms of dynasty players to target I don't like consider older players since they can be swept away so quickly after just one injury or bad year. They fall more into my "redraft" or "win now" section of a dynasty roster. Maybe I'm not making a lot of sense there to some, but I like to allocate my dynasty roster in subgroups, and no longer will aggressively target any player on the back side of his career. For RBs, that age is 28/29, and both TJones and Edge will be 29 before the 2007 season begins.EBF said:I would've said LenDale White two months ago, but now that Henry is out of town, White's price has gone up. The main guys that I like right now are Thomas Jones, Kevin Curtis, and Santonio Holmes. Thomas Jones is particularly underrated. I happen to think he's much better than Leon Washington and that he stands a very realistic chance of having his best season as a pro.
I nearly listed him. He looked like a star at times last season and was almost uncoverable. He reminds be a bit of Chad Johnson and Darrell Jackson. Does that mean he'll eventually be worth as much as those guys? Of course not, but he's a free agent after this season. He's going to get a fat payday and if he goes to a team with a real QB then he could light it up.Bernard Berrian can still be had pretty cheap. 230 yards and 2 TDs in the 3 playoff games. Replacing the 3 games he was hurt in the middle of the year and either didn't play or perform well with the 3 from the playoffs and he was a 1000 yard 8 TD Wr last year.
I like both of these picks. I don't think most people realize how good Lee Evans is. He's one of the top WRs in dynasty, IMO. The guy has all of the talent and football skills needed to be an impact player for years. I like Reggie Williams because he's steadily improved throughout his career, he was a star in college, he was a top 10 pick, and he can be had for dirt cheap. Keep in mind that after three NFL seasons he's still only 23 years old!I second Lee Evans. I somehow managed to pick him up in a reasonable deal but I have feeling he'll be a hard guy to pry away from another owner.A guy that SHOULD be cheap is Reggie Williams. He played very well with Leftwich under centre last year. In the first 5 games he got 297 yards and 4 TDs. If they can recreate that chemistry it projects to a decent year for a WR #3. Again, the key thing is getting him cheaply. I guess the other key is whether or not Lefty is going to be sticking around Jax. I saw the post on here a few days ago with rumors he was a malcontent.
Like I said if you have room to stash them. Givens is a fine WR and in a dynasty league he is well young enough to end up a gem. If roster room provides (or a IR option) then an owner has nothing to lose by taking a flier on him. As far as Lloyd I cannot believe the guy is done. I've seen way too many circus catches to believe he isn't highly talented and imo its a matter of time before he is utilized...then stashing him away will have proven itself worthy.. then again thats why he's a deeper sleeper.Couch Potato said:You're confusing me... is "another Brandon Lloyd" supposed to be a positive?I think Givens would be a great buy low if we knew he was going to be healthy in 2007. Everything I've read has said he is unlikely to be ready to start the season, and that could be a big problem for a guy who signed a big contract in 2006. If he has a bad 2007 he is a candidate to be cut at the end of the year if others develop sufficiently.SCGiants said:In Dynasty team with room I have one for ya.. David Givens...another Brandon Lloyd.
Ask any Niners fan about Brandon Lloyd and you'll get the real scoop. The guy is nothing more than complementary player/backup. Yea, he makes a highlight reel grab every now and then, but he's not a very good WR overall.Like I said if you have room to stash them. Givens is a fine WR and in a dynasty league he is well young enough to end up a gem. If roster room provides (or a IR option) then an owner has nothing to lose by taking a flier on him. As far as Lloyd I cannot believe the guy is done. I've seen way too many circus catches to believe he isn't highly talented and imo its a matter of time before he is utilized...then stashing him away will have proven itself worthy.. then again thats why he's a deeper sleeper.Couch Potato said:You're confusing me... is "another Brandon Lloyd" supposed to be a positive?I think Givens would be a great buy low if we knew he was going to be healthy in 2007. Everything I've read has said he is unlikely to be ready to start the season, and that could be a big problem for a guy who signed a big contract in 2006. If he has a bad 2007 he is a candidate to be cut at the end of the year if others develop sufficiently.SCGiants said:In Dynasty team with room I have one for ya.. David Givens...another Brandon Lloyd.
fair enough.. but why would they say that? As a #1 in SF he had no QB to throw him the ball..in Wash I seen he had some unreachable passes more so than drops.. but stats don't tell that. Just because he was targetted doesn't mean he dropped them all. Yes there was some drops as all WRs have but where that ball was placed is another issue completely. Look at who his QBs have been.. how fair of a look has this guy been given? How many different QBs, coaches and teams in how many years? As Lombardi said if you seen him do it he can do it... consistancy though falls on more laps than just his. This year will mark his second (or is it coming on teh third now?) with Wash and his QB is young, a late flier on him to stash him away imo is still a good move. But its all prognostication regardless.Ask any Niners fan about Brandon Lloyd and you'll get the real scoop. The guy is nothing more than complementary player/backup. Yea, he makes a highlight reel grab every now and then, but he's not a very good WR overall.Like I said if you have room to stash them. Givens is a fine WR and in a dynasty league he is well young enough to end up a gem. If roster room provides (or a IR option) then an owner has nothing to lose by taking a flier on him. As far as Lloyd I cannot believe the guy is done. I've seen way too many circus catches to believe he isn't highly talented and imo its a matter of time before he is utilized...then stashing him away will have proven itself worthy.. then again thats why he's a deeper sleeper.Couch Potato said:You're confusing me... is "another Brandon Lloyd" supposed to be a positive?I think Givens would be a great buy low if we knew he was going to be healthy in 2007. Everything I've read has said he is unlikely to be ready to start the season, and that could be a big problem for a guy who signed a big contract in 2006. If he has a bad 2007 he is a candidate to be cut at the end of the year if others develop sufficiently.SCGiants said:In Dynasty team with room I have one for ya.. David Givens...another Brandon Lloyd.
Judging a WR by his circus catches is like judging a basketball player by his dunks. It just doesn't give you the complete picture. Lloyd quite simply isn't an above average NFL WR. He's not especially fast or quick, he's not especially big or strong, he has trouble separating, he's not especially tough, and he's not very consistent. He's just not very good. It's as simple as that.fair enough.. but why would they say that? As a #1 in SF he had no QB to throw him the ball..in Wash I seen he had some unreachable passes more so than drops.. but stats don't tell that. Just because he was targetted doesn't mean he dropped them all. Yes there was some drops as all WRs have but where that ball was placed is another issue completely. Look at who his QBs have been.. how fair of a look has this guy been given? How many different QBs, coaches and teams in how many years? As Lombardi said if you seen him do it he can do it... consistancy though falls on more laps than just his. This year will mark his second (or is it coming on teh third now?) with Wash and his QB is young, a late flier on him to stash him away imo is still a good move. But its all prognostication regardless.Ask any Niners fan about Brandon Lloyd and you'll get the real scoop. The guy is nothing more than complementary player/backup. Yea, he makes a highlight reel grab every now and then, but he's not a very good WR overall.Like I said if you have room to stash them. Givens is a fine WR and in a dynasty league he is well young enough to end up a gem. If roster room provides (or a IR option) then an owner has nothing to lose by taking a flier on him. As far as Lloyd I cannot believe the guy is done. I've seen way too many circus catches to believe he isn't highly talented and imo its a matter of time before he is utilized...then stashing him away will have proven itself worthy.. then again thats why he's a deeper sleeper.Couch Potato said:You're confusing me... is "another Brandon Lloyd" supposed to be a positive?I think Givens would be a great buy low if we knew he was going to be healthy in 2007. Everything I've read has said he is unlikely to be ready to start the season, and that could be a big problem for a guy who signed a big contract in 2006. If he has a bad 2007 he is a candidate to be cut at the end of the year if others develop sufficiently.SCGiants said:In Dynasty team with room I have one for ya.. David Givens...another Brandon Lloyd.
I'll agree with that. EBF and I are both bay area dudes and have seen a lot of Lloyd. Some of those highlight reel catches were unnecessary in the first place, truth be told, as being in better position would have resulted in a more normal catch. Aside from that, he just isn't a consistent route runner and seems to be more intent on his rap music than improving his football skills. The 49ers were happy to see him go (robbed WAS in fact, getting a 3rd in 2006 and a 4th in 2007), and I suspect in another year the Redskins will feel the same after he is let go following another disappointing year.EBF, we ought to get together for a beer one of these days.Ask any Niners fan about Brandon Lloyd and you'll get the real scoop. The guy is nothing more than complementary player/backup. Yea, he makes a highlight reel grab every now and then, but he's not a very good WR overall.Like I said if you have room to stash them. Givens is a fine WR and in a dynasty league he is well young enough to end up a gem. If roster room provides (or a IR option) then an owner has nothing to lose by taking a flier on him. As far as Lloyd I cannot believe the guy is done. I've seen way too many circus catches to believe he isn't highly talented and imo its a matter of time before he is utilized...then stashing him away will have proven itself worthy.. then again thats why he's a deeper sleeper.Couch Potato said:You're confusing me... is "another Brandon Lloyd" supposed to be a positive?I think Givens would be a great buy low if we knew he was going to be healthy in 2007. Everything I've read has said he is unlikely to be ready to start the season, and that could be a big problem for a guy who signed a big contract in 2006. If he has a bad 2007 he is a candidate to be cut at the end of the year if others develop sufficiently.SCGiants said:In Dynasty team with room I have one for ya.. David Givens...another Brandon Lloyd.
I moved to So Cal!I'll agree with that. EBF and I are both bay area dudes and have seen a lot of Lloyd. Some of those highlight reel catches were unnecessary in the first place, truth be told, as being in better position would have resulted in a more normal catch. Aside from that, he just isn't a consistent route runner and seems to be more intent on his rap music than improving his football skills. The 49ers were happy to see him go (robbed WAS in fact, getting a 3rd in 2006 and a 4th in 2007), and I suspect in another year the Redskins will feel the same after he is let go following another disappointing year.EBF, we ought to get together for a beer one of these days.Ask any Niners fan about Brandon Lloyd and you'll get the real scoop. The guy is nothing more than complementary player/backup. Yea, he makes a highlight reel grab every now and then, but he's not a very good WR overall.Like I said if you have room to stash them. Givens is a fine WR and in a dynasty league he is well young enough to end up a gem. If roster room provides (or a IR option) then an owner has nothing to lose by taking a flier on him. As far as Lloyd I cannot believe the guy is done. I've seen way too many circus catches to believe he isn't highly talented and imo its a matter of time before he is utilized...then stashing him away will have proven itself worthy.. then again thats why he's a deeper sleeper.Couch Potato said:You're confusing me... is "another Brandon Lloyd" supposed to be a positive?I think Givens would be a great buy low if we knew he was going to be healthy in 2007. Everything I've read has said he is unlikely to be ready to start the season, and that could be a big problem for a guy who signed a big contract in 2006. If he has a bad 2007 he is a candidate to be cut at the end of the year if others develop sufficiently.SCGiants said:In Dynasty team with room I have one for ya.. David Givens...another Brandon Lloyd.
I traded my first round pick in 07 for Evans last year right before the trade deadline to make a playoff push.it ended up being the 1.07 pick. I am happy with the trade.I second Lee Evans. I somehow managed to pick him up in a reasonable deal but I have feeling he'll be a hard guy to pry away from another owner.