What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Dynasty Rookie #9 (1 Viewer)

Who is the #9 rookie in FF?

  • Matt Stafford

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mark Sanchez

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Darius Heyward-Bey

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Brandon Pettigrew

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • James Davis

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kenny Britt

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Javon Ringer

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hakeem Nicks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

jeter23

Footballguy
For those of you who own the 1.09 rookie pick in your dynasty league, or those that would like to own it, who are you taking?

Feel free to take your league rules and other details into account, as they are not specified. PPR, scarcity of RBs and obviously, team need would affect each vote.

1.01 Michael Crabtree, WR 38% (Moreno, 27%)

1.02 Knowshon Moreno, RB 62% (Wells, 17%)

1.03 Chris Wells, RB 45% (McCoy, 35%)

1.04 LeSean McCoy, RB 71% (Greene, 17%)

1.05 Shonn Greene, RB 52% (Maclin, 21%)

1.06 Jeremy Maclin, WR 58% (Harvin, 19%)

1.07 Percy Harvin, WR 44% (Brown, 17%)

1.08 Donald Brown, RB 40% (Stafford, 29%)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Glad you are continuing the thread.

As I previously mentioned I am sticking with Stafford but am interested in how the next tier of players fall out and when we will begin seeing more "others".

 
Cover2 said:
MAC_32 said:
I'm torn between Nicks, Britt, and Collie here. All could be special players.
It looks like Collie didnt actually declare:http://www.gbnreport.com/
:goodposting: Maybe he backed out for similar reasons as LaFell? Fear of being buried in this deep class. I think Collie would have seperated himself, but can't fault the kid for wanting to go back and prove it one more time and hope to be a 1st rounder in 010.

 
Cover2 said:
MAC_32 said:
I'm torn between Nicks, Britt, and Collie here. All could be special players.
It looks like Collie didnt actually declare:http://www.gbnreport.com/
:goodposting: Maybe he backed out for similar reasons as LaFell? Fear of being buried in this deep class. I think Collie would have seperated himself, but can't fault the kid for wanting to go back and prove it one more time and hope to be a 1st rounder in 010.
Paul Krueger, and Austin Collie all are in the draft as special exemptions because of Mormon missions thus not being included on the NFL.com list. If you read the link posted above it says this, maybe that page just got updated but they are in the draft.
 
Cover2 said:
MAC_32 said:
I'm torn between Nicks, Britt, and Collie here. All could be special players.
It looks like Collie didnt actually declare:http://www.gbnreport.com/
:goodposting: Maybe he backed out for similar reasons as LaFell? Fear of being buried in this deep class. I think Collie would have seperated himself, but can't fault the kid for wanting to go back and prove it one more time and hope to be a 1st rounder in 010.
Paul Krueger, and Austin Collie all are in the draft as special exemptions because of Mormon missions thus not being included on the NFL.com list. If you read the link posted above it says this, maybe that page just got updated but they are in the draft.
I'm firewalled from that link at work, thanks. Now, please add Collie to the next list. Although I'm going to keep voting for Britt in the meantime, seems to be the consensus favorite of the three and since I'm torn between them will just vote for the one that has the best chance to win.
 
Even if my team was desperate for a QB, I still wouldn't consider taking one until the later part of the 2nd round.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Other: Rashad Jennings has more upside than Ringer or Davis who I see as career backups. Or at best short end of committees.

In PPR I might get Nicks just because of my UNC fandom.

 
Stafford - even though I don't think this year's QB class is great, he's the best of the rest. Top-15 or 20 is his upside, nowhere near Ryan and I don't like him as much Flacco either, but again - I think he'll be a starting QB in 2 years or less.

 
I will leave this one up until around 9 eastern, then call a winner at that point.
I don't think there's a point to doing a separate #10 poll.....overwhelming number for 2 guys. DHB = #9, Stafford = #10.Next poll should be for pick #11.
 
I will leave this one up until around 9 eastern, then call a winner at that point.
I don't think there's a point to doing a separate #10 poll.....overwhelming number for 2 guys. DHB = #9, Stafford = #10.Next poll should be for pick #11.
thats poor logic imo. The people voting Hey-Bey could be thinking that its bad strategy to take a QB in the 1st round, for example. And the people voting Stafford could also think Hey-Bey is terrible and they would vote for Sanchez or someone else.
 
I will leave this one up until around 9 eastern, then call a winner at that point.
I don't think there's a point to doing a separate #10 poll.....overwhelming number for 2 guys. DHB = #9, Stafford = #10.Next poll should be for pick #11.
+1
This is obviously one of the closest polls we have had since these polls have been going the past few years. I did not start a new one last night since they were both still vlose. I will give it a bit longer and then call it a draw if neither has a lead on the other.
 
I will leave this one up until around 9 eastern, then call a winner at that point.
I don't think there's a point to doing a separate #10 poll.....overwhelming number for 2 guys. DHB = #9, Stafford = #10.Next poll should be for pick #11.
thats poor logic imo. The people voting Hey-Bey could be thinking that its bad strategy to take a QB in the 1st round, for example. And the people voting Stafford could also think Hey-Bey is terrible and they would vote for Sanchez or someone else.
Although not a perfect solution I believe offdee has a valid point and it is far more unlikely the scenario you described would occur. It would be different if the #3 option wasn't so far behind.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top