Only thing I know is he uses a lot of RB's.Are the Eagles and Doug Pederson too egalitarian to make Miles Sanders or anyone else a viable RB1 Fantasy Running Back?
Agreed, I believe Eagles will ease Sanders slowly, allowing him to learn from his rookie mistakes. Howard will have countless opportunity especially with goal-line package.Howard will start the beginning of the year and be a closer the whole year in games they have a big lead. They kept both Sproles and Clement who both take passing down and 2 minute offense. Howard will not be retained, so next year is more of a blank slate. But I think they like one year rentals for depth, it has done them good.
short answer: yes.Are the Eagles and Doug Pederson too egalitarian to make Miles Sanders or anyone else a viable RB1 Fantasy Running Back?
Big Balls Doug loves using ALL HIS RBs. It's a pretty much hit and miss but I'd say Howard/Sanders get the majority of snaps. Look for Sproles Pederson's love child it seems like to be the 3rd down back on passing downs and possible Corey Clement stealing carries and catches. If Someone gets hot over the others during a game Doug likes to usually roll with them while they are hot too. I think RB 2 for Sanders/Howard and Sproles/Clement as a desperate Flex. Now if guys start getting injured then you might be seeing more worth out of some of the guys. Clement over the past two seasons when Healthy has been also used as a KR during kickoffs so if your league counts return yards too he could have a bit more value. Sproles similar for PR but I think DeSean and possible one other could steal some there.oct8vious said:Are the Eagles and Doug Pederson too egalitarian to make Miles Sanders or anyone else a viable RB1 Fantasy Running Back?
I don’t think it’s a matter of protecting him - he’s a football player not a nuclear scientist. Rather it’s a matter of protecting Wentz and making sure Sanders is up to the task of all the nuances of the position.modogg said:i'm guessing Howard starts the year with Miles getting 8-10 carries. maybe mid-year Sanders will get more carries, but i also could see them not trying to kill Sanders this early in his career
Mostly the nuance of not fumbling. He's had issues in college and camp. He'll need to knock that off before he sees significant time.I don’t think it’s a matter of protecting him - he’s a football player not a nuclear scientist. Rather it’s a matter of protecting Wentz and making sure Sanders is up to the task of all the nuances of the position.
That’s always a tough choice.Mostly the nuance of not fumbling. He's had issues in college and camp. He'll need to knock that off before he sees significant time.
Go to the Ertz thread and tell me why you didn’t target him.That’s always a tough choice.
Hand it to the reliable plodder Howard, take your 3 yards & a cloud of dust & move on to the next play, or hand it to your exciting rookie who could as easily take it to the house as put it on the ground.
Decisions, decision.
I also avoided this backfield. The only Eagles I targeted this year were Wentz & DJax, and sadly I missed on the latter.
It wasn’t so much that I didn’t target Ertz.Go to the Ertz thread and tell me why you didn’t target him.
Iggles have by many accounts the best OL in the NFL, an elite QB (if/when healthy), a solid D, a creative HC/OC, three underwhelming RBs, and one rookie with multi-faceted skills plus college production and draft pedigree.I wouldn't want any part of that backfield, not today, not week 14.no thanks
Did he actually have issues with fumbling in camp? I feel like I followed his camp very closely and never heard any rumble about it other than “this was a problem in college that he needs to prove isn’t a problem now”. I don’t recall ever hearing about him having a bad day of fumbling unlike, say, Sony Michel last year who put the ball on the ground in one of his 1st practices and took a lot of laps.Mostly the nuance of not fumbling. He's had issues in college and camp. He'll need to knock that off before he sees significant time.
It's not about having ANY part of that backfield. Sanders or Howard could be a viable 4th/5th back for a fantasy team with Sanders having more upside as the season wears on.I wouldn't want any part of that backfield, not today, not week 14.no thanks
Yea, maybe it's just that throughout camp they keep bringing up his college fumbling issuesDid he actually have issues with fumbling in camp? I feel like I followed his camp very closely and never heard any rumble about it other than “this was a problem in college that he needs to prove isn’t a problem now”. I don’t recall ever hearing about him having a bad day of fumbling unlike, say, Sony Michel last year who put the ball on the ground in one of his 1st practices and took a lot of laps.
ha...said essentially the same thing seconds ago.Whatever gives them the best chance to win and compete for a Super Bowl will eventually emerge.
Sanders/Clement long term with a sprinkle of Sproles if he has anything left. Howard IMO is JAG. Sanders has a ton more talent. Howard will get the early chances but when Sanders comes in and out plays him the inevitable will happen.
I took Sanders later in a redraft (round 7) with the idea he will emerge over the course of a season and be a lead back when it counts. Hope it plays out like that. Maybe I took him a round early.....but he would not have been there in the 8th.
and this is not a surprise to the Eagles who drafted the kid.Mostly the nuance of not fumbling. He's had issues in college and camp. He'll need to knock that off before he sees significant time.