rockaction
Footballguy
Got seven games going at once, and I can't remember watching this uninteresting football in a long time.
What you say?
What you say?
43-3, 38-3, 38-7, one game with a backup QB and not even a replacement-level QB who's a joke, TB playing like garbage, and a JAX game.This thread is pretty lousy.
Both are pretty Lousy.43-3, 38-3, 38-7, one game with a backup QB and not even a replacement-level QB who's a joke, TB playing like garbage, and a JAX game.
No, the early games were much worse than this thread.
The Green Bay/Seattle game might rival all others with respect to the lack of pace of play and snaps taken.The next slate isn't exactly dazzling at the moment if you like socring.
I phoned it in last week a bit, so I can't really comment. The games were lopsided and uninteresting for the most part, and the close ones were because of lousy performances by one team or both.Has football just been bad since November started? I feel like football as a whole has just been bad for a minute.
Yeah, I was too. Just relatively.I was entertained.
Just wait until they start giving each team 2 bye weeks.43-3, 38-3, 38-7, one game with a backup QB and not even a replacement-level QB who's a joke, TB playing like garbage, and a JAX game.
No, the early games were much worse than this thread.
Would that help with the injuries though? Because I feel like injuries are a large part of why the current games are worse than the September games.Just wait until they start giving each team 2 bye weeks.
I don't think so. I remember 1 year long ago they trieda 2 bye week per team (google says 1993) and they gave it up after 1 year because they had too many weeks without good matchups. At least that's what I remember.Would that help with the injuries though? Because I feel like injuries are a large part of why the current games are worse than the September games.
You're right, there was a year they ran a 2 Bye Week schedule which i actually would support if they would spread out the same 16 across 18 weeks, if it means a few weeks with a few less games or premier match ups so be it. People will tune in to 1-8 teams, they don't care.I don't think so. I remember 1 year long ago they trieda 2 bye week per team (google says 1993) and they gave it up after 1 year because they had too many weeks without good matchups. At least that's what I remember.
As someone who exclusively watches redzone on Sunday I know it won't make a single difference to me.You're right, there was a year they ran a 2 Bye Week schedule which i actually would support if they would spread out the same 16 across 18 weeks, if it means a few weeks with a few less games or premier match ups so be it. People will tune in to 1-8 teams, they don't care.