Nick Vermeil
Footballguy
Know it well. Bad lanes. Cheap drinks.LOL - the pale he went bowling is "The Gutter".
Know it well. Bad lanes. Cheap drinks.LOL - the pale he went bowling is "The Gutter".
I would like to welcome the flood of New Yorkers to our little thread.
uke:Is it the same place?I'll always remember Bellevue as a crazy house.
We have divided ourselves into two camps. Most of you will want to join the "OMG EBOLA IS IN NEW YORK, WERE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!" side. Don't worry in 2 weeks or so the symptoms will pass and you will move on to the "I was never in a panic, I just want a travel ban is all" stage. That stage may last for a while. Good luck all.I would like to welcome the flood of New Yorkers to our little thread.uke:
Glad to be here. Daily L train rider. Not worried.I would like to welcome the flood of New Yorkers to our little thread.
The man loves to bowl.So he's out bowling last night and has 103 fever this morning... I see nothing wrong here.
She'd better self-quarantine.Glad to be here. Daily L train rider. Not worried.I would like to welcome the flood of New Yorkers to our little thread.
My wife on the other hand is ####ting herself.
dont get any feces on yourselfGlad to be here. Daily L train rider. Not worried.I would like to welcome the flood of New Yorkers to our little thread.
My wife on the other hand is ####ting herself.
internet porn downI just don't understand why anyone, but especially healthcare workers treating Ebola patients, would not self-quarantine for 21 days to a month. If I were treating Ebola patients, I would not go near anyone.
I get that it's probably boring, but #######it, tv has like 8 million channels. Or ####in read a few books.
It's in the lanes!The man loves to bowl.So he's out bowling last night and has 103 fever this morning... I see nothing wrong here.
I think you are confusing Vermeil for Dentist.dont get any feces on yourselfGlad to be here. Daily L train rider. Not worried.I would like to welcome the flood of New Yorkers to our little thread.
My wife on the other hand is ####ting herself.
Yes. You are correct. Minus the mistake of putting hours instead of days. And I've stated this a couple of times in this thread. Amazingly, if we would have done it the way I've suggested, we wouldn't have had an infected doctor walking around NYC, riding subways and going bowling.Personally, I don't think that's what Sheik is saying.
I think it's more "They should quarantine for 21 hours, if they display symptoms get properly medivac'd out to a US hospital prepared for it and treated.
I think there is legitimately a 3-4 percent chance of this happening on a given day in NYC. I don't know if thats a "thing" but I've seen the efforts of what I can only hope are homeless in the morning in the financial district. Almost like a game to see who can leave the most landmines on the sidestreets there.dont get any feces on yourselfGlad to be here. Daily L train rider. Not worried.I would like to welcome the flood of New Yorkers to our little thread.
My wife on the other hand is ####ting herself.
Ah - the old guilty until proven innocent, eh?Yes. You are correct. Minus the mistake of putting hours instead of days. And I've stated this a couple of times in this thread. Amazingly, if we would have done it the way I've suggested, we wouldn't have had an infected doctor walking around NYC, riding subways and going bowling.Personally, I don't think that's what Sheik is saying.
I think it's more "They should quarantine for 21 hours, if they display symptoms get properly medivac'd out to a US hospital prepared for it and treated.
I'm not saying they shouldn't come back. Just seems irresponsible to have someone handling Ebola patients just be allowed to come back to the US and mingle within the population until they do or do not develop the disease themselves.
Not sure it has anything to do with being guilty. But if you're handling Ebola feces and Ebola puke while caring for Ebola patients, yeah, I'm thinking maybe you should wait out the incubation period before you return home.Ah - the old guilty until proven innocent, eh?Yes. You are correct. Minus the mistake of putting hours instead of days. And I've stated this a couple of times in this thread. Amazingly, if we would have done it the way I've suggested, we wouldn't have had an infected doctor walking around NYC, riding subways and going bowling.Personally, I don't think that's what Sheik is saying.
I think it's more "They should quarantine for 21 hours, if they display symptoms get properly medivac'd out to a US hospital prepared for it and treated.
I'm not saying they shouldn't come back. Just seems irresponsible to have someone handling Ebola patients just be allowed to come back to the US and mingle within the population until they do or do not develop the disease themselves.
Yeah, I effed this up. Mea culpa. Totally wrong on my part -- Spencer was self-monitoring his temperature and vitals, but was NOT self-quarantining.Is going bowling part of the standard self-quarantine?The doctor being tested in NYC now has been in voluntary self-quarantine since he returned to the U.S. from Guinea. I am thiking most all returning health-care workers will be doing that -- might as well wait out the self-quarantine at home rather than in West Africa if you can catch your flight(s) before symptoms start (if infected).D'oh! Yes, 21 days but it does look like that, but I'm ok with precautions, just don't go crazy.
There are none. Not direct from the affected countries to the U.S., anyway.If you want to stop ebola from coming from West Africa, ban flights from West Africa. Pretty simple stuff.
Solid stool or diarrhea? Also, T&P.My wife on the other hand is ####ting herself.I would like to welcome the flood of New Yorkers to our little thread.
God complexI'm more surprised that these doctors, who are being so selfless by going over there to help people and putting themselves in harm's way,
don't apply the same mindset when coming back before kissing their girlfriends or spending a night with friends. It just seems so inconsistent.
Because it's currently accepted as iron-clad fact that ebola cannot be spread by a asymptomatic carrier. If new information ever comes in to change that understanding, hopefully behaviors will change as well.I'm more surprised that these doctors, who are being so selfless by going over there to help people and putting themselves in harm's way, don't apply the same mindset when coming back before kissing their girlfriends or spending a night with friends. It just seems so inconsistent.
What a strange comment.Ah - the old guilty until proven innocent, eh?Yes. You are correct. Minus the mistake of putting hours instead of days. And I've stated this a couple of times in this thread. Amazingly, if we would have done it the way I've suggested, we wouldn't have had an infected doctor walking around NYC, riding subways and going bowling.Personally, I don't think that's what Sheik is saying.
I think it's more "They should quarantine for 21 hours, if they display symptoms get properly medivac'd out to a US hospital prepared for it and treated.
I'm not saying they shouldn't come back. Just seems irresponsible to have someone handling Ebola patients just be allowed to come back to the US and mingle within the population until they do or do not develop the disease themselves.
What a strange comment.Ah - the old guilty until proven innocent, eh?Yes. You are correct. Minus the mistake of putting hours instead of days. And I've stated this a couple of times in this thread. Amazingly, if we would have done it the way I've suggested, we wouldn't have had an infected doctor walking around NYC, riding subways and going bowling.Personally, I don't think that's what Sheik is saying.
I think it's more "They should quarantine for 21 hours, if they display symptoms get properly medivac'd out to a US hospital prepared for it and treated.
I'm not saying they shouldn't come back. Just seems irresponsible to have someone handling Ebola patients just be allowed to come back to the US and mingle within the population until they do or do not develop the disease themselves.
You are asking someone to give up 21 days of their life, without any indication that they are a risk to others. You are essentially saying we are going to assume you have ebola until you prove otherwise.If you have been taking care of Ebola patients sounds about right.What a strange comment.Ah - the old guilty until proven innocent, eh?Yes. You are correct. Minus the mistake of putting hours instead of days. And I've stated this a couple of times in this thread. Amazingly, if we would have done it the way I've suggested, we wouldn't have had an infected doctor walking around NYC, riding subways and going bowling. I'm not saying they shouldn't come back. Just seems irresponsible to have someone handling Ebola patients just be allowed to come back to the US and mingle within the population until they do or do not develop the disease themselves.Personally, I don't think that's what Sheik is saying.
I think it's more "They should quarantine for 21 hours, if they display symptoms get properly medivac'd out to a US hospital prepared for it and treated.You are asking someone to give up 21 days of their life, without any indication that they are a risk to others. You are essentially saying we are going to assume you have ebola until you prove otherwise.
You mean besides having treated people with an infectious disease?What a strange comment.Ah - the old guilty until proven innocent, eh?Yes. You are correct. Minus the mistake of putting hours instead of days. And I've stated this a couple of times in this thread. Amazingly, if we would have done it the way I've suggested, we wouldn't have had an infected doctor walking around NYC, riding subways and going bowling.Personally, I don't think that's what Sheik is saying.
I think it's more "They should quarantine for 21 hours, if they display symptoms get properly medivac'd out to a US hospital prepared for it and treated.
I'm not saying they shouldn't come back. Just seems irresponsible to have someone handling Ebola patients just be allowed to come back to the US and mingle within the population until they do or do not develop the disease themselves.You are asking someone to give up 21 days of their life, without any indication that they are a risk to others. You are essentially saying we are going to assume you have ebola until you prove otherwise.
Yes. That's how quarantines work.What a strange comment.Ah - the old guilty until proven innocent, eh?Yes. You are correct. Minus the mistake of putting hours instead of days. And I've stated this a couple of times in this thread. Amazingly, if we would have done it the way I've suggested, we wouldn't have had an infected doctor walking around NYC, riding subways and going bowling.Personally, I don't think that's what Sheik is saying.
I think it's more "They should quarantine for 21 hours, if they display symptoms get properly medivac'd out to a US hospital prepared for it and treated.
I'm not saying they shouldn't come back. Just seems irresponsible to have someone handling Ebola patients just be allowed to come back to the US and mingle within the population until they do or do not develop the disease themselves.You are asking someone to give up 21 days of their life, without any indication that they are a risk to others. You are essentially saying we are going to assume you have ebola until you prove otherwise.
No woman, no cry?Put it out on the table, everyone:
Do you or do you not believe the official line re: ebola: "No symptoms, no spread "?
Why not?Put it out on the table, everyone:
Do you or do you not believe the official line re: ebola: "No symptoms, no spread "?
I believe this. But it's not a black and white issue. The problem, for me, is the gray area. People don't go from not sick to sick instantaneously. At what point does it become contagious? I've gone to work before thinking I was just slightly under the weather, then had to leave early because it turned out I had the flu.Put it out on the table, everyone:
Do you or do you not believe the official line re: ebola: "No symptoms, no spread "?
I'm a believerPut it out on the table, everyone:
Do you or do you not believe the official line re: ebola: "No symptoms, no spread "?
Why not what? Why not believe that asymptomatic carriers can't spread Ebola? Or are you doubtful/curious and asking for the reasons asymptomatic carriers can't spread Ebola?Why not?Put it out on the table, everyone:
Do you or do you not believe the official line re: ebola: "No symptoms, no spread "?
Of course I don't believe that. Why would I?Put it out on the table, everyone:
Do you or do you not believe the official line re: ebola: "No symptoms, no spread "?
I believe the line as long as there is a clear distinction between no symptoms and symptoms. But if the person can be confusing their normal "feeling kinda run down" at the end of a long workday, with the very initial onset of Ebola symptoms, that's obviously an issue. I am completely ignorant on that though, maybe this hits you like a ton of bricks.Put it out on the table, everyone:
Do you or do you not believe the official line re: ebola: "No symptoms, no spread "?
I think the fact that they are treating ebola patients puts them at risk to others.What a strange comment.Ah - the old guilty until proven innocent, eh?Yes. You are correct. Minus the mistake of putting hours instead of days. And I've stated this a couple of times in this thread. Amazingly, if we would have done it the way I've suggested, we wouldn't have had an infected doctor walking around NYC, riding subways and going bowling.Personally, I don't think that's what Sheik is saying.
I think it's more "They should quarantine for 21 hours, if they display symptoms get properly medivac'd out to a US hospital prepared for it and treated.
I'm not saying they shouldn't come back. Just seems irresponsible to have someone handling Ebola patients just be allowed to come back to the US and mingle within the population until they do or do not develop the disease themselves.You are asking someone to give up 21 days of their life, without any indication that they are a risk to others. You are essentially saying we are going to assume you have ebola until you prove otherwise.
Treating people with an infection does not equate to contracting the disease. You are making assumptions about a person, not supported by the facts.You mean besides having treated people with an infectious disease?What a strange comment.Ah - the old guilty until proven innocent, eh?Yes. You are correct. Minus the mistake of putting hours instead of days. And I've stated this a couple of times in this thread. Amazingly, if we would have done it the way I've suggested, we wouldn't have had an infected doctor walking around NYC, riding subways and going bowling.Personally, I don't think that's what Sheik is saying.
I think it's more "They should quarantine for 21 hours, if they display symptoms get properly medivac'd out to a US hospital prepared for it and treated.
I'm not saying they shouldn't come back. Just seems irresponsible to have someone handling Ebola patients just be allowed to come back to the US and mingle within the population until they do or do not develop the disease themselves.You are asking someone to give up 21 days of their life, without any indication that they are a risk to others. You are essentially saying we are going to assume you have ebola until you prove otherwise.
I'm not saying a quarantine is necessarily worth it -- I'm not qualified to even have an opinion on that. But this isn't a "personal liberty" issue.
Nobody's girlfriend or family member has been infected. Just the health workers who had direct contact with Ebola patients or specimens. The doctor monitoring temperature and symptoms is 100% the proper protocol. You're not contagious until symptoms manifest, so he likely was not contagious while bowling. Should you maybe not take public transit or go out of feeling rundown within 21 days of handling Ebola poop? Probably, but probably not necessary either.I'm more surprised that these doctors, who are being so selfless by going over there to help people and putting themselves in harm's way, don't apply the same mindset when coming back before kissing their girlfriends or spending a night with friends. It just seems so inconsistent.
This is also a mental nag that I share. I don't worry at all about the gray area around the onset of the fever, though. I worry about the very early coughing and sneezing. However, I rationalize that by telling myself I'd have to both be very close and fairly gross (e.g. getting sneezed on and then not washing up immediately) to have any risk of contraction.I believe this. But it's not a black and white issue. The problem, for me, is the gray area. People don't go from not sick to sick instantaneously. At what point does it become contagious? I've gone to work before thinking I was just slightly under the weather, then had to leave early because it turned out I had the flu.Put it out on the table, everyone:
Do you or do you not believe the official line re: ebola: "No symptoms, no spread "?
They don't know for sure. Ebola, and especially this strain of ebola, has a lot of unknown quantities. Do I believe it's very unlikely to get it from an asymptomatic person? Yes.I believe the line as long as there is a clear distinction between no symptoms and symptoms. But if the person can be confusing their normal "feeling kinda run down" at the end of a long workday, with the very initial onset of Ebola symptoms, that's obviously an issue. I am completely ignorant on that though, maybe this hits you like a ton of bricks.Put it out on the table, everyone:
Do you or do you not believe the official line re: ebola: "No symptoms, no spread "?