I will and agree. Do you think the Colts front 4 is equal, in the same neighborhood, or not even close?well how about giving the Giants front 4 some credit? that unit is beastly.Eli has certainly improved a great deal even since the last superbowl run
not even close right now. Freeney and Mathias seemed good 2 years ago. NYG has a little bit of it all, a Great Dline, Good run game, Solid trio of WR, a good QB with pedigree.And what else I think is underrated is Webster is a shutdown cornerI will and agree. Do you think the Colts front 4 is equal, in the same neighborhood, or not even close?well how about giving the Giants front 4 some credit? that unit is beastly.Eli has certainly improved a great deal even since the last superbowl run
Umm...yes. This is really a question?Put Peyton in the Giants supporting cast and you would likely re-think this.Eli is top tier, but Peyton is better.
Disagree. Being a team game and all, we saw what happened to Indy without Peyton. Eli has a better receiving corps, coach, running game, defense, special teams, offensive line...pretty much everything outside of (maybe) Dallas Clark. Silly argument really as there are just too many variables involve to compare the two.I don't think there's any doubt now. Disagree?![]()
I don't think it's silly. Eli has a chance to win a second ring, has an above .500 record in the playoffs, neither of which Peyton has. Plus, I'll assume the bolded means "I have nothing to back up my assertion."Disagree. Being a team game and all, we saw what happened to Indy without Peyton. Eli has a better receiving corps, coach, running game, defense, special teams, offensive line...pretty much everything outside of (maybe) Dallas Clark. Silly argument really as there are just too many variables involve to compare the two.I don't think there's any doubt now. Disagree?![]()
So are you saying the two teams are exactly equal? And that they have played against all the same opponents in the playoffs in the same game situations? Come on, guy.I don't think it's silly. Eli has a chance to win a second ring, has an above .500 record in the playoffs, neither of which Peyton has. Plus, I'll assume the bolded means "I have nothing to back up my assertion."Disagree. Being a team game and all, we saw what happened to Indy without Peyton. Eli has a better receiving corps, coach, running game, defense, special teams, offensive line...pretty much everything outside of (maybe) Dallas Clark. Silly argument really as there are just too many variables involve to compare the two.I don't think there's any doubt now. Disagree?![]()
and coachingCaldwell was one of the ####tiest coaches to rise the the level of head coach in ti league.Dungy was adequate only, but Couglin is a very good coach, especially in the playoffs.not even close right now. Freeney and Mathias seemed good 2 years ago. NYG has a little bit of it all, a Great Dline, Good run game, Solid trio of WR, a good QB with pedigree.And what else I think is underrated is Webster is a shutdown cornerI will and agree. Do you think the Colts front 4 is equal, in the same neighborhood, or not even close?well how about giving the Giants front 4 some credit? that unit is beastly.Eli has certainly improved a great deal even since the last superbowl run
Huh? Peyton was surrounded by first round draft picks at the skill positions his entire career (Harrison, Wayne, James, Addai, Brown) and there was plenty of other talent on both offense and defense on his Colts' teams.Peyton is the more skilled player of the two, but Eli has proven to be more of a clutch player.Put Peyton in the Giants supporting cast and you would likely re-think this.
I don't think so, Tim.Peyton had Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark, Brandon Stockley, and Edgerrin James for a while, while having Harrison & Wayne for basically his whole career. Let's not act like Peyton hasn't had top tier players around him his whole career. Eli *only* has two stud WRs but he put up almost 5k yards this year. Peyton may have in the same situation, but I doubt his numbers would be overall that much better. And he certainly isn't as reliable in the playoffs as Eli has been.Put Peyton in the Giants supporting cast and you would likely re-think this.Eli is top tier, but Peyton is better.
But consider that Peyton had Harrison, Wayne, James, Clark, Collie to work with. Eli had Plaxico for 3 1/2 seasons, Toomer on the downside, Shockey and Tiki would be about equal to Edge. Then S. Smith, Nicks, Cruz. I think Peyton has had more continuity in his receiving core.I'd still put Peyton ahead so far. Peyton seemed to master the QB craft faster than Eli did.Put Peyton in the Giants supporting cast and you would likely re-think this.Eli is top tier, but Peyton is better.
Apparently, I've generated some discussion on the topic. You can choose to participate or not; it's up to you.So are you saying the two teams are exactly equal? And that they have played against all the same opponents in the playoffs in the same game situations? Come on, guy.I don't think it's silly. Eli has a chance to win a second ring, has an above .500 record in the playoffs, neither of which Peyton has. Plus, I'll assume the bolded means "I have nothing to back up my assertion."Disagree. Being a team game and all, we saw what happened to Indy without Peyton. Eli has a better receiving corps, coach, running game, defense, special teams, offensive line...pretty much everything outside of (maybe) Dallas Clark. Silly argument really as there are just too many variables involve to compare the two.I don't think there's any doubt now. Disagree?![]()
Its amazing. Everyone saying how great the Giants supporting cast is yet nobody thought they had a shot this year and especially in 2007 and saying how much they sucked.
i remember people saying how the 2007 giants were one of the worst super bowl teams ever. and this year's giants was picked to finish 3rd in the east.Its amazing. Everyone saying how great the Giants supporting cast is yet nobody thought they had a shot this year and especially in 2007 and saying how much they sucked.
Unfortunately, Peyton's hurt right now. Could you pick someone else right now?Eli does some things better than Peyton. But for one game, beginning to end, I'd rather have Peyton. And that's not changing, even if the Giants win in two weeks.
Erroneous. The Colts defense was main reason they won that Super Bowl back in 2006. Peyton's 2nd half against the Patriots was awesome, but he was carried for the remainder of that Super Bowl run. Anyway, Peyton is obviously better all-time, but in the playoffs, Eli has been better. W/o a doubt.Peyton never had a D that could support...
Why would we forget something that never happened.How soon we forget that the Giants won that Super Bowl despite Eli, not because of him.
Over the period both have played, the Giants D was much better than the Colts. When I say supporting cast, I'm not referring solely to the offensive skill positions (which currently, the Giants have better skill positions - although I would say the Colts over the same 7-8 year period had better SP on average). Even with a less than stellar D, Manning continually carried the Colts to 10+ win seasons. You can't say the same for Eli. Right now, Eli is in top form but I am still of the opinion that with Peyton (if healthy) at QB, the Giants would be a better team.Huh? Peyton was surrounded by first round draft picks at the skill positions his entire career (Harrison, Wayne, James, Addai, Brown) and there was plenty of other talent on both offense and defense on his Colts' teams.Peyton is the more skilled player of the two, but Eli has proven to be more of a clutch player.Put Peyton in the Giants supporting cast and you would likely re-think this.
Thought he was 9-10 int he playoffs?Its amazing. Everyone saying how great the Giants supporting cast is yet nobody thought they had a shot this year and especially in 2007 and saying how much they sucked.The fact is Peyton went into the playoffs each year with a talented lineup and was constantly thought of as the "team to beat". Yet, he's 6-10 in the playoffs with 1 SB ring. Eli has now led 2 Giant teams on extraordinary runs to the Super Bowl and has a record over .500. Winner.
You'd better hope that game isn't in the playoffs, then.Eli does some things better than Peyton. But for one game, beginning to end, I'd rather have Peyton. And that's not changing, even if the Giants win in two weeks.
Regular season stats and January tee times.I'd like to wait until both players are done with thier careers before I can say for sure BUT I am biased as a Giants fan and I think that at the end of both careers Eli will prove to be the better one. A lot depends on what you think matters.
lmfao. making stuff up now?'spider321 said:How soon we forget that the Giants won that Super Bowl despite Eli, not because of him.
I think multiple Superbowl wins trumps everything. Id take Montana over Marino any time. This could open a whole other debate.'Zeff said:Regular season stats and January tee times.'The_Fonz said:I'd like to wait until both players are done with thier careers before I can say for sure BUT I am biased as a Giants fan and I think that at the end of both careers Eli will prove to be the better one. A lot depends on what you think matters.
Harrison, Wayne, James were good.. Addai and Brown are average at best.. Very poor argument..Huh? Peyton was surrounded by first round draft picks at the skill positions his entire career (Harrison, Wayne, James, Addai, Brown) and there was plenty of other talent on both offense and defense on his Colts' teams.Peyton is the more skilled player of the two, but Eli has proven to be more of a clutch player.Put Peyton in the Giants supporting cast and you would likely re-think this.
Unfortunately, Peyton's hurt right now. Could you pick someone else right now?Eli does some things better than Peyton. But for one game, beginning to end, I'd rather have Peyton. And that's not changing, even if the Giants win in two weeks.
Apparently, I've generated some discussion on the topic. You can choose to participate or not; it's up to you.![]()
Addai was very good for that offense. They also had Rhodes who was solid in their playoff run. Name all the studs Eli was surrounded with. This post was only in reference to the revisionist history where Eli is surrounded by studs while poor Peyton Manning was asked to win games with scrubs.Before this season started was everyone saying that an undrafted second year player (who missed his rookies season) out of UMASS was some stud of that a later round draft pick at TE was the a great option in the passing game?Over the years Peyton played with:HarrisonWayneStokelyClarkCollieGarconJamesAddaiEli played with:NicksCruzManninghamBurressToomerBossShockeyBallardBarberBradshawJacobsIt was a "poor argument" in the first place. Peyton worked with plenty of talent - most of those players were first through third round picks. Eli played with some talent as well - but anyone acting like he was better set up for success than Peyton was is being disingenuous.ETA: and in no way do I think Eli is better than Peyton - but in the context of the OP in which we are talking playoffs I do think Eli has been more clutch in big games than his older brother and it's not because he had the better supporting cast.Harrison, Wayne, James were good.. Addai and Brown are average at best.. Very poor argument..Huh? Peyton was surrounded by first round draft picks at the skill positions his entire career (Harrison, Wayne, James, Addai, Brown) and there was plenty of other talent on both offense and defense on his Colts' teams.Peyton is the more skilled player of the two, but Eli has proven to be more of a clutch player.Put Peyton in the Giants supporting cast and you would likely re-think this.
Also I like how future Hall of Famers that were drafted in the first round of the NFL draft were only "good".Harrison, Wayne, James were good.. Addai and Brown are average at best.. Very poor argument..Huh? Peyton was surrounded by first round draft picks at the skill positions his entire career (Harrison, Wayne, James, Addai, Brown) and there was plenty of other talent on both offense and defense on his Colts' teams.Peyton is the more skilled player of the two, but Eli has proven to be more of a clutch player.Put Peyton in the Giants supporting cast and you would likely re-think this.
Doubtful, since Coughlin is a great coach and not a clueless dope like Caldwell, and the Giants have done a better job of building a good team around Eli than the Colts have recently done around Peyton.Comical thread - I guess that if Eli is hurt next year, then the Giants go 2-14.
Peyton wouldn't have one ring if the Bears had anybody at QB besides Rex Grossman. So there's that.Eli and Peyton on the same team, same coach, Peyton would have way more rings. The Giants have just had better coaching over the years than the Colts and a better all around team.
Harrison is HOF material.. Not so sure the other 2 are a lock.. I'd actually be surprised if Edge gets in..And if you prefer a different adjective, then insert it.. You read the word 'good' as 'bad'?Also I like how future Hall of Famers that were drafted in the first round of the NFL draft were only "good".Harrison, Wayne, James were good.. Addai and Brown are average at best.. Very poor argument..Huh? Peyton was surrounded by first round draft picks at the skill positions his entire career (Harrison, Wayne, James, Addai, Brown) and there was plenty of other talent on both offense and defense on his Colts' teams.Peyton is the more skilled player of the two, but Eli has proven to be more of a clutch player.Put Peyton in the Giants supporting cast and you would likely re-think this.