wyattroa said:
Tennessee_ATO said:
wyattroa said:
Tennessee_ATO said:
wyattroa said:
Alright, so I saw so many experts calling for forsett to have a huge day once again. After the last game I said I am staying away from balt all together. Forsett has a terrible day, glad I stayed away. My question is, why, after the previous games and game plans would the experts pick him? I just didnt see it.
I saw guys calling for him to have a good day, I didn't see anyone calling for him to have a huge day.Who did you have pegged to have a huge day out of curiosity?
my guys this week were langford, starks, ingram(breaks off a huge run and then they dont use him anymore), and williams. williams was done once big ben came in and they went to shotgun only to protect ben.Robert
You actually targeted Langford going on the road to face the #4 rated defense against the run?
Yes. They have talked all wee how they wanted to get Langford lots of playing time. Chicago as a team are doing much better and knew he would be getting passing targets out of the backfield with jeffery gimpy.
So you just ignored the whole "on the road facing the #4 rush defense" matchup entirely? Did you think Langford achieved "matchup proof" status based on his body of work before this game (45 rushes for 152 yards and 5 catches for 101 yards) or did you have reason to think STL's defense was primed for a let down?
I'm not trying to come across as snarky, but you do see the reasons for my skepticism in the process, right?
#4 rush defense? They are giving up almost 110 yards a game and have given up 6 rushing tds. They are ranked the 16th worst rushing defense and given up the league most 9 20+yard rushing plays. According to team stats. the number 4 rush defense is arizona giving up 90 yards a game and only 3 tds.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef
Coming into this week, the #4 rush defense, 21.5% better than average. And coming into this week, they had given up 5 rushing TDs all season. At home they had given-up ~77 yards per game with a grand total of 1 rushing TD (actually, 1 TD to RB at all) in 4 games.
Granted, they hardly played the elite running games of the NFL at home, but they did face Seattle to open the season and Leveon (who got the 1 TD). But there's a reason he was a ~2.1% owned player in cash games. The match-up wasn't a good match-up by any objective measure.
I'm not saying he was a bad GPP play (he wasn't, he was a very good GPP play), but if any "expert" said he was a good cash game play he would have had 0 objective data to base that on.
Projections for public consumption are extremely difficult. If the sole basis for a recommendation is that the coaching staff said they want to get him the ball, that's a bad recommendation.