Soaring Eagle
Footballguy
f.y.i.
SA last year and Tatum Bell the year before?supermark_28 said:Gotta know,who's the cover boy this year?
I'm trying to avoid the FF Index curse.SA last year and Tatum Bell the year before?supermark_28 said:Gotta know,who's the cover boy this year?
How does that answer his question?SA last year and Tatum Bell the year before?supermark_28 said:Gotta know,who's the cover boy this year?
Agreed, I like the FBG, but I feel like FFI gives me a very good insight to the views of my leaguemates.Still the only FF mag worth buying.
Thanks, thought there was a pattern building but couldn't recall. I thought they pitched Bell as a top 5 RB and their coverboy.I'm trying to avoid the FF Index curse.SA last year and Tatum Bell the year before?supermark_28 said:Gotta know,who's the cover boy this year?
They did, I believe they had Bell third or fourth.Thanks, thought there was a pattern building but couldn't recall. I thought they pitched Bell as a top 5 RB and their coverboy.I'm trying to avoid the FF Index curse.SA last year and Tatum Bell the year before?supermark_28 said:Gotta know,who's the cover boy this year?
for beginners ONLY.f.y.i.
Doubt it, since it's not on news stands until July 10th...Is that the same mag that had manning picked 5th in a 10 team mock draft? Once I saw that I just laughed it was at the local CVS yesterday
Disagree. Even after all these years, Ian Allan gives FBG's analysis a run for it's money. Yes, that even includes his horrible Tatum Bell debacle. He, unlike the majority of FF prognosticators, at least allows for a few all-or-nothing gambles. People laugh at the Bell bust, but Allan also pimped out Portis more than any other publication in 2002, and that probably won quite a few owners some championships. Allan also avoids spacer-filler b.s. (I'm looking at you, Fanball mag writers) and unearths a lot of interesting stat trends.Anyway, FFI is still the best-written and edited of the bunch. Its like Tolstoy among my FF readings for the crapper -- compared, for instance, to the unbearable pop-culture-snark of Fanball's mag or the amateurish casual fan writings produced by big media (ESPN, Sporting News, CBS Sportsline, et al.)FBG had a nice print edition last year, but Joe needs to devote more attention to the copy editing. A lot of errors got through last year, and while things like that are kind of minor, FBG needs to make its mark in this busy field by pushing its professionalism more.for beginners ONLY.f.y.i.
DamnDisagree. Even after all these years, Ian Allan gives FBG's analysis a run for it's money. Yes, that even includes his horrible Tatum Bell debacle. He, unlike the majority of FF prognosticators, at least allows for a few all-or-nothing gambles. People laugh at the Bell bust, but Allan also pimped out Portis more than any other publication in 2002, and that probably won quite a few owners some championships. Allan also avoids spacer-filler b.s. (I'm looking at you, Fanball mag writers) and unearths a lot of interesting stat trends.Anyway, FFI is still the best-written and edited of the bunch. Its like Tolstoy among my FF readings for the crapper -- compared, for instance, to the unbearable pop-culture-snark of Fanball's mag or the amateurish casual fan writings produced by big media (ESPN, Sporting News, CBS Sportsline, et al.)FBG had a nice print edition last year, but Joe needs to devote more attention to the copy editing. A lot of errors got through last year, and while things like that are kind of minor, FBG needs to make its mark in this busy field by pushing its professionalism more.for beginners ONLY.f.y.i.
My brother used this at our first draft and won the league. Ever since then we call it the Fantasy Football Bible. I will admit its a great magazine but it lost a bit of its luster with the Tatum Bell cover (although I agree I like how they thought outside of the box on that pick).Still the only FF mag worth buying.
All FF mags are for beginners only. FF Index seperates itself from the pack because Ian Allen and his staff are the best writers in the industry. Good mix of humor with the analysis.for beginners ONLY.f.y.i.
yeah , ok..for beginners ONLY.f.y.i.
Tatum Bell "The Key To Your Draft".That was the best.I had an owner who actually picked him 3rd overall because of that propaganda. Hilarious.They did, I believe they had Bell third or fourth.Thanks, thought there was a pattern building but couldn't recall. I thought they pitched Bell as a top 5 RB and their coverboy.I'm trying to avoid the FF Index curse.SA last year and Tatum Bell the year before?Gotta know,who's the cover boy this year?
I tend to think that the fact that such a bold, embarrassing prediction is still talked about is actually testament to how influential Allan still is within the industry.Nobody much cares, frankly, when Fanball or Rotowire blow a projection.Tatum Bell "The Key To Your Draft".That was the best.I had an owner who actually picked him 3rd overall because of that propaganda. Hilarious.
I'll play.....no team names, right? I think that I saw that a few years backFunky oddball PC note - take a look at the pages for Kansas City and Washington and see if you notice anything different.
-QG
I always buy FFI for two reasons:1. It's a great magazine2. It's what got me started with fantasy football. When we were teenagers my buddy came home with a copy of FFI (before they added Index to the title) and said something along the lines of check this book out, this sounds cool, we should try it. That original league is still in existence and heading into our 18th season. Along with myself and the friend who bought the book there are four other guys in the 12 team league that have played 14 or more years in this league (a total of three of us played in the first year). So for sentimental value and as a thanks for getting us started I always buy FFI.![]()
Yeah, I know....The Scientist said:I always buy FFI for two reasons:1. It's a great magazine2. It's what got me started with fantasy football. When we were teenagers my buddy came home with a copy of FFI (before they added Index to the title) and said something along the lines of check this book out, this sounds cool, we should try it. That original league is still in existence and heading into our 18th season. Along with myself and the friend who bought the book there are four other guys in the 12 team league that have played 14 or more years in this league (a total of three of us played in the first year). So for sentimental value and as a thanks for getting us started I always buy FFI.![]()
![]()
I brought that Tatum Bell issue to work with me and used it as propoganda to trade Bell for a first round pick and a 14th round pick in one of my keeper leagues. I told him, "Look, he's on the cover. You don't just put anyone on the cover unless they're gonna breakout." He bought it hook, line and sinker and I won my league that year. I never thanked FFI for that.
Seriously? I can't stand Fanball. Now, okay, granted I've bought the magazine because the design is aesthetically pleasing enough for crapper lit, and some of their statistical analysis is o.k., but their copy is godawful. One long string of jokes about pop culture, none of which are funny. I feel embarrassed for them.I imagine their editorial staff meetings as unbearably dumb, and frankly, I'm kind of tired of "mens' interest" magazines in general being written as if we all think of Maxim-style humor writing as the height of wit.Incogneto said:It's one of 2 I buy every year...FFI and Fanball. I am shocked that there is no fanball praise on here. I don't even like the website, but the mag is one of the most entertaining reads when it comes to Football.