This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Here's an endless debate my friends and I have. How much does skill and luck play into fantsay football?The general reaction is 70% skill 30% luck.Ive see as high as 90% skill 10% luckand as low as 50% skill 50% luck.What do you guys think?
Here's an endless debate my friends and I have. How much does skill and luck play into fantsay football?The general reaction is 70% skill 30% luck.Ive see as high as 90% skill 10% luckand as low as 50% skill 50% luck.What do you guys think?
By winning a Yahoo public league you could generally consider yourself more skillful than those guys, but if you play with 11 other guys who are just as good as you are, it's 100 % luck.
The skill is that my team is always contending. But, to win the Super Bowl, it comes down to the luck of how players perform on a given week. All you can do is put your team in position to contend.
The question isn't really meaningful. What are the percentages, skill vs. luck, for poker? It doesn't really matter; skill will always win out in the long run. It only looks like luck if your sample size is too small (like looking at the results of one season in one league).
Good posting, this is what I came in here to say. If a team wins the superbowl this year, that's almost entirely luck. If a team makes the playoffs in 9 out of 10 years, that's almost entirely skill. I'd call an owner with 9 playoff appearances in 10 years (but no championships) significantly better than an owner with 4 playoff appearances but 2 championships.I think the NFL playoffs are very similar in that the best teams aren't the teams that win it all, they're the teams that consistently make the dance. Look at Indy- Indy wasn't the best team in the league last year, San Diego was. And Pittsburgh wasn't the best team in the league the year before, Indy was. And New England wasn't the best team in the league the year before that, Pittsburgh was. And so on, and so forth. The best teams aren't necessarily the ones that win it all, they're the teams that are always in contention- which is why we all know that Philadelphia is a significantly better franchise than Tampa Bay, for instance.
The skill is that my team is always contending. But, to win the Super Bowl, it comes down to the luck of how players perform on a given week. All you can do is put your team in position to contend.
The question isn't really meaningful. What are the percentages, skill vs. luck, for poker? It doesn't really matter; skill will always win out in the long run. It only looks like luck if your sample size is too small (like looking at the results of one season in one league).
Good posting, this is what I came in here to say. If a team wins the superbowl this year, that's almost entirely luck. If a team makes the playoffs in 9 out of 10 years, that's almost entirely skill. I'd call an owner with 9 playoff appearances in 10 years (but no championships) significantly better than an owner with 4 playoff appearances but 2 championships.
The skill is that my team is always contending. But, to win the Super Bowl, it comes down to the luck of how players perform on a given week. All you can do is put your team in position to contend.
The question isn't really meaningful. What are the percentages, skill vs. luck, for poker? It doesn't really matter; skill will always win out in the long run. It only looks like luck if your sample size is too small (like looking at the results of one season in one league).
Good posting, this is what I came in here to say. If a team wins the superbowl this year, that's almost entirely luck. If a team makes the playoffs in 9 out of 10 years, that's almost entirely skill. I'd call an owner with 9 playoff appearances in 10 years (but no championships) significantly better than an owner with 4 playoff appearances but 2 championships.
Yup. 50% of first round picks bust. If the second team was entirely incapable of overcoming a first round bust, I would say without hesitation that he's not a skilled owner in the slightest- instead, he relies entirely on LUCK (his starters staying healthy), and fails when he doesn't get it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.