the next level
Footballguy
I manage a 16-team league. We have four divisions and each year send 6 teams to the playoffs. Each division winner goes, plus two wild cards. The two best teams get a playoff week 1 bye.
Often, however, overall records are the same in one of the races, be it determining a division winner, wild card, or who gets the byes. By design, the rules vary. In the division races if there's a tie we then compare head-to-head (more applicable in division races because all division foes play each other twice during the regular season), then compare division records, then finally overall year-to-date points scored. In the wild card and in the determination of the two bye teams the only layer of tiebreak is YTD points.
The latter is a source of consternation in my league this year, because several scenarios involve the high YTD points teams getting a playoff nod or bye week over a team that beat them in the regular season. The rules are what they are for this year but I'm considering a rules change for 2008 that would compare what tied teams W-L records would have been if we notionally compared their scores for all 13 weeks of the regular season. Sort of a blend of the two philosophies, but one that would still favor the higher-scoring team.
I'm looking for opinions as to what other leagues are doing. I myself am in another 14-team league that sends it's 3 division winners based on record then 3 wild cards strictly based on points scored completely without regard for overall record. Obviously a much different philosophy there.
Often, however, overall records are the same in one of the races, be it determining a division winner, wild card, or who gets the byes. By design, the rules vary. In the division races if there's a tie we then compare head-to-head (more applicable in division races because all division foes play each other twice during the regular season), then compare division records, then finally overall year-to-date points scored. In the wild card and in the determination of the two bye teams the only layer of tiebreak is YTD points.
The latter is a source of consternation in my league this year, because several scenarios involve the high YTD points teams getting a playoff nod or bye week over a team that beat them in the regular season. The rules are what they are for this year but I'm considering a rules change for 2008 that would compare what tied teams W-L records would have been if we notionally compared their scores for all 13 weeks of the regular season. Sort of a blend of the two philosophies, but one that would still favor the higher-scoring team.
I'm looking for opinions as to what other leagues are doing. I myself am in another 14-team league that sends it's 3 division winners based on record then 3 wild cards strictly based on points scored completely without regard for overall record. Obviously a much different philosophy there.