Love it.Wait a minute, just because he was only caught once doesn't mean he wasn't lying during every injury report ever written. He should have to come forward with every shred of injury report related evidence, and no matter what that evidence concludes, we should assume that every Jets game is tainted and give them a new nickname like the new york cheats. AndI suspect he said it, because...he was asked the question and answered honestly.No matter what he said, the haters would come out.Nothing to see here, Jets did nothing wrong.at calling anyone who thinks it's wrong to cheat a "hater". I just care about the integrity of the game, and manipulating the injury report is a huge advantage. The Jets did something wrong, and that's why he apologized. I'm thinking two firsts, and suspend the GM for a year. Otherwise Goodell will seem inconsistent.
This is gold. Keep up the good work.Whoa, there, nelly. You can't just say that other teams probably do this too, or imply that it's common knowledge that the Chargers or some other team might doctor the injury report. The Jets were the only team that got caught. They need to pay. As for the mountains out of molehills defense, I'm sorry, but even though I wasn't fully aware of the rules a week ago, I'm outraged now that I think there's a chance they might be punished. In fact, this tarnishes the legacy of everyone involved. Brett Favre and Eric Mangini should not go to the hall of fame. No way.If LT gets a bruise on his thigh, but isnt expected to miss time why would they list it in the injury report?I swear, too many people make mountains out of molehills sometimes.
now you want to stop with the "hater" after you used it for years on other people who criticized Favre :(Yes...but at times, his "honesty" would be better served with a no comment.This IMO...was one of them. He is no longer a Jet...even commenting on something that caused any bit of uproar for the former team was not good.Not the first time with him. Plenty got on him for his comments on Walker...and I said then and still say most of his comments were fine...til he said he hoped management did not give in.And another thing...can we stop with the "hater" stuff.It is possible to criticize someone without being a hater. Several of the people in this threads are fans of other teams, I would not call them haters.Lets just stop with that.I suspect he said it, because...he was asked the question and answered honestly.No matter what he said, the haters would come out.Nothing to see here, Jets did nothing wrong.sho nuff said:Why is Favre even saying it?Thats the point.Pointing out that they should not have listed him does not change that.I don't think its a big thing...but something that should not have even been said by Favre.It only feeds the people who think he is looking for an excuse in case he plays poorly.HmmmJets GM Mike Tannenbaum admits that he erred in not listing Brett Favre on the injury report late last season when the quarterback was playing through a torn right biceps tendon."As general manager of this team I should've handled that differently and listed him on the report," said Tannenbaum. "We didn't because he wasn't getting treatment everyday and we knew he was going to play." The NFL is looking into the matter after Favre hinted on Wednesday that he should have been benched down the stretch last year.Is Favre still the cry baby?
When has he blamed an injury other than this case, in which he is simply stating facts?I see him explaining his poor performance while playing hurt, not excusing it. There is a difference.However, of late he's been quick to then blame an injury for poor play.
Isn't it obvious that he was being questioned about whether or not he'd accept not playing at some point this season even though it would break his streak? And he responded by citing that he was okay with sitting last season as evidence that it won't be a problem for him if it comes to that this year. I suppose you can question whether he is being truthful, but it's clear why he brought it up IMO.Why is Favre even saying it?Thats the point.Pointing out that they should not have listed him does not change that.I don't think its a big thing...but something that should not have even been said by Favre.It only feeds the people who think he is looking for an excuse in case he plays poorly.HmmmJets GM Mike Tannenbaum admits that he erred in not listing Brett Favre on the injury report late last season when the quarterback was playing through a torn right biceps tendon."As general manager of this team I should've handled that differently and listed him on the report," said Tannenbaum. "We didn't because he wasn't getting treatment everyday and we knew he was going to play." The NFL is looking into the matter after Favre hinted on Wednesday that he should have been benched down the stretch last year.Is Favre still the cry baby?
That's hilarious!Link
Either way, he'll now officially be know in these parts as "Lord Captain Favre, survivor of partially torn biceps tendon, partially torn rotator cuff, cracked rib, sore ankles, swine flu, polio, and/or lupus."![]()
Also Hilarious....PFT
Barring a dramatic overhaul of the current system, the league will continue to follow that same approach, unless and until the next Brett Favre repeatedly emphasizes that he played with an injury, in the hopes of ensuring that every American citizen realizes that he has a good excuse for consistently throwing the football to the wrong team.
According to the league and the way they react.. You CAN do it. If the player plays and nothing comes of it then nothing will be done.But, if the player later on publicly confesses to being more hurt, then be expected to pay a whopping fine of 125k.ohhhh....I see ---- everybody else is doing it, so why shouldn't we?