What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Favre: The saga continues (for Jets) (1 Viewer)

If Rozelle were still around Jets would lose a 1st round pick and a lot of money - or more.

You can't let this get away - it doesn't take long until the gambling aspect can effect the reputation of the game and Rozelle knew that - Goodell shouldn't either

 
I suspect he said it, because...he was asked the question and answered honestly.No matter what he said, the haters would come out.Nothing to see here, Jets did nothing wrong.
Wait a minute, just because he was only caught once doesn't mean he wasn't lying during every injury report ever written. He should have to come forward with every shred of injury report related evidence, and no matter what that evidence concludes, we should assume that every Jets game is tainted and give them a new nickname like the new york cheats. And :goodposting: at calling anyone who thinks it's wrong to cheat a "hater". I just care about the integrity of the game, and manipulating the injury report is a huge advantage. The Jets did something wrong, and that's why he apologized. I'm thinking two firsts, and suspend the GM for a year. Otherwise Goodell will seem inconsistent.
Love it. :hifive:
 
If LT gets a bruise on his thigh, but isnt expected to miss time why would they list it in the injury report?I swear, too many people make mountains out of molehills sometimes.
Whoa, there, nelly. You can't just say that other teams probably do this too, or imply that it's common knowledge that the Chargers or some other team might doctor the injury report. The Jets were the only team that got caught. They need to pay. As for the mountains out of molehills defense, I'm sorry, but even though I wasn't fully aware of the rules a week ago, I'm outraged now that I think there's a chance they might be punished. In fact, this tarnishes the legacy of everyone involved. Brett Favre and Eric Mangini should not go to the hall of fame. No way.
This is gold. Keep up the good work. :goodposting:
 
sho nuff said:
HmmmJets GM Mike Tannenbaum admits that he erred in not listing Brett Favre on the injury report late last season when the quarterback was playing through a torn right biceps tendon."As general manager of this team I should've handled that differently and listed him on the report," said Tannenbaum. "We didn't because he wasn't getting treatment everyday and we knew he was going to play." The NFL is looking into the matter after Favre hinted on Wednesday that he should have been benched down the stretch last year.Is Favre still the cry baby?
Why is Favre even saying it?Thats the point.Pointing out that they should not have listed him does not change that.I don't think its a big thing...but something that should not have even been said by Favre.It only feeds the people who think he is looking for an excuse in case he plays poorly.
I suspect he said it, because...he was asked the question and answered honestly.No matter what he said, the haters would come out.Nothing to see here, Jets did nothing wrong.
Yes...but at times, his "honesty" would be better served with a no comment.This IMO...was one of them. He is no longer a Jet...even commenting on something that caused any bit of uproar for the former team was not good.Not the first time with him. Plenty got on him for his comments on Walker...and I said then and still say most of his comments were fine...til he said he hoped management did not give in.And another thing...can we stop with the "hater" stuff.It is possible to criticize someone without being a hater. Several of the people in this threads are fans of other teams, I would not call them haters.Lets just stop with that.
now you want to stop with the "hater" after you used it for years on other people who criticized Favre :(
 
I said "hater" for those who would criticize him EITHER way, no matter what he said. That is surely some subset of those criticizing him now.

"No comment" would be okay, and probably would be best to move on, but he has gotten a crapload of criticism for playing injured, and it might get old if the reporter were picking at it over and over.

I think the Jets do not get penalized. He was practicing and starting every game.

A first yard pick on a technicality that likely gained them no compettive advantage, but was to avoid PR issues, would be way too much.

 
However, of late he's been quick to then blame an injury for poor play.
When has he blamed an injury other than this case, in which he is simply stating facts?I see him explaining his poor performance while playing hurt, not excusing it. There is a difference.
 
HmmmJets GM Mike Tannenbaum admits that he erred in not listing Brett Favre on the injury report late last season when the quarterback was playing through a torn right biceps tendon."As general manager of this team I should've handled that differently and listed him on the report," said Tannenbaum. "We didn't because he wasn't getting treatment everyday and we knew he was going to play." The NFL is looking into the matter after Favre hinted on Wednesday that he should have been benched down the stretch last year.Is Favre still the cry baby?
Why is Favre even saying it?Thats the point.Pointing out that they should not have listed him does not change that.I don't think its a big thing...but something that should not have even been said by Favre.It only feeds the people who think he is looking for an excuse in case he plays poorly.
Isn't it obvious that he was being questioned about whether or not he'd accept not playing at some point this season even though it would break his streak? And he responded by citing that he was okay with sitting last season as evidence that it won't be a problem for him if it comes to that this year. I suppose you can question whether he is being truthful, but it's clear why he brought it up IMO.
 
Link

Either way, he'll now officially be know in these parts as "Lord Captain Favre, survivor of partially torn biceps tendon, partially torn rotator cuff, cracked rib, sore ankles, swine flu, polio, and/or lupus."
:excited:
 
As many times as Favre played with a bad thumb, and it was detrimental to his team, I have a hard time believing he was open to the idea of sitting.

Show some class Brett.

 
So what is New England not telling us about Wes Welker. Probably should dock them a couple draft choices for hiding the information. No word on EXACTLY how much damage was done to Brady and how much and where the tears are in his shoulder.

There are a lot of injuries being hidden. River had a torn ACL a year or two ago and they kept it under raps also until after the season was over.

 
you know if the jets are pulling this kind of shady bs it's not the first time --- they've gotta have a long ingrained culture of cheating in that front office.

frankly, I don't know how any self respecting football fan could root for that team, or raise his kids to root for those cheaters.

absolute disgrace, imo.

if it was any other team, you know the goodell would be all over it, but I guess it's a nice advantage to have the commissioner in your back pocket as part of the jets extended family.

I guess the rest of the league will just have to work a little harder.

 
Jets fined 125k....

That's a lot of Money.

But, better yet, the Jets canned the Head Coach.

Wonder where he learned how to be such a secretive #####?

 
PFT

Mangini not out of the woods regarding Jets injury report

Posted by Mike Florio on September 16, 2009 12:02 PM ET

Last week, Jets G.M. Mike Tannenbaum took the public fall for the realities of having a head coach with a bad habit of talking too little, and a quarterback with a bad habit of talking too much.

The Jets previously had been in the clear for failing to include Brett Favre on the injury report. After the 2008 season ended, Favre immediately started to talk about an arm injury that hampered his performance down the stretch. As the offseason unfolded, it became more and more clear that Favre was indeed injured.

But the league left it alone until last week, when Favre again revisited the issue, saying it was so bad that coach Eric Mangini should have benched him.

So the league no longer could ignore the situation. And not even Mangini, who like Favre no longer works for the Jets, will escape the investigation.

"Since he was head coach of the Jets at the time, we are reviewing his role in the situation as part of the overall review," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello told the Associated Press on Tuesday.

And, presumably, Mangini can be fined or otherwise punished in his capacity as the head coach of the Browns, if it's determined that he made the decision not to list Favre on the injury report, even though Favre clearly was injured.

Mangini previously has spoken about the competitive advantage that flows from uncertainty regarding injuries, and the league previously has not punished teams for failing to disclose injuries, as long as the player has played.

The problem in this case is that the tenuous facade of open access to information has been disrupted by Favre's candor, and so the league must do something to restore it.

But it likely won't change the reality that the league office typically looks the other way, as long as the player fully participates in practice and plays, when teams like the Steelers don't disclose in the week before the Super Bowl that Ben Roethlisberger as having a rib injury or the Patriots fail to mention that running back Laurence Maroney has a broken shoulder.

Barring a dramatic overhaul of the current system, the league will continue to follow that same approach, unless and until the next Brett Favre repeatedly emphasizes that he played with an injury, in the hopes of ensuring that every American citizen realizes that he has a good excuse for consistently throwing the football to the wrong team.

 
PFT

Barring a dramatic overhaul of the current system, the league will continue to follow that same approach, unless and until the next Brett Favre repeatedly emphasizes that he played with an injury, in the hopes of ensuring that every American citizen realizes that he has a good excuse for consistently throwing the football to the wrong team.
Also Hilarious....
 
ohhhh....I see ---- everybody else is doing it, so why shouldn't we?
According to the league and the way they react.. You CAN do it. If the player plays and nothing comes of it then nothing will be done.But, if the player later on publicly confesses to being more hurt, then be expected to pay a whopping fine of 125k.:shrug:Not sure what else to tell you or if this helps you out.Best wishes.
 
For the integrity of the league I think the Jets and Patriots should be banned from the league. Just to be safe, we should probably torch any teams those cheats have corrupted.

So let's toss the Browns, Broncos out the window as well. We should probably destroy the Cowboys as well, but that's just because I hate them.

 
$75,000 to the Jets seems like small change. So does 25k to Mangini.

No big deal, but Goodell's hand was forcred by Favre's candor.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top