CaGamblers
Footballguy
When is it going to be on the FBG site?
No pressure dude, but the QBBC article is the #2 reason why I subscribe to FBG. The #1 reason being I want to support the company who supports this board. Anything you can do to get the QBBC out before next weekend is most apreciated.The DTBC one should be available on the website tomorrow. The QBBC seems unlikely to make it before this weekend, but very likely to make it before next weekend. Give that one about a week or so; until then, consider what Clayton Gray wrote.
Using Draft Dominator last weekend at a live draft, I ended up with a QBBC of Vince Young & Ben Rothelisberger (sp). Ben has an easy schedule starting out, until I feel out how Vince's production will be.No pressure dude, but the QBBC article is the #2 reason why I subscribe to FBG. The #1 reason being I want to support the company who supports this board. Anything you can do to get the QBBC out before next weekend is most apreciated.The DTBC one should be available on the website tomorrow. The QBBC seems unlikely to make it before this weekend, but very likely to make it before next weekend. Give that one about a week or so; until then, consider what Clayton Gray wrote.
Agreed, and my 2QB league drafts this Sunday. I understand if it can't happen, but if there's anyway it can I would love to see it.No pressure dude, but the QBBC article is the #2 reason why I subscribe to FBG. The #1 reason being I want to support the company who supports this board. Anything you can do to get the QBBC out before next weekend is most apreciated.The DTBC one should be available on the website tomorrow. The QBBC seems unlikely to make it before this weekend, but very likely to make it before next weekend. Give that one about a week or so; until then, consider what Clayton Gray wrote.
Neither one posted yet. Help!!Agreed, and my 2QB league drafts this Sunday. I understand if it can't happen, but if there's anyway it can I would love to see it.No pressure dude, but the QBBC article is the #2 reason why I subscribe to FBG. The #1 reason being I want to support the company who supports this board. Anything you can do to get the QBBC out before next weekend is most apreciated.The DTBC one should be available on the website tomorrow. The QBBC seems unlikely to make it before this weekend, but very likely to make it before next weekend. Give that one about a week or so; until then, consider what Clayton Gray wrote.
Front page down?ZzZ said:Neither one posted yet. Help!!Agreed, and my 2QB league drafts this Sunday. I understand if it can't happen, but if there's anyway it can I would love to see it.No pressure dude, but the QBBC article is the #2 reason why I subscribe to FBG. The #1 reason being I want to support the company who supports this board. Anything you can do to get the QBBC out before next weekend is most apreciated.The DTBC one should be available on the website tomorrow. The QBBC seems unlikely to make it before this weekend, but very likely to make it before next weekend. Give that one about a week or so; until then, consider what Clayton Gray wrote.
http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07stuart_dtbc.phpAs promised, DTBC got up on Wednesday. Big thanks for Clayton Gray for getting it formatted so quickly. QBBC should hit the website by Wednesday at the latest.The DTBC one should be available on the website tomorrow. The QBBC seems unlikely to make it before this weekend, but very likely to make it before next weekend. Give that one about a week or so; until then, consider what Clayton Gray wrote.
Chase: I dloaded the file for DTBC but can you briefly explain what the numbers mean? TIAhttp://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07stuart_dtbc.phpAs promised, DTBC got up on Wednesday. Big thanks for Clayton Gray for getting it formatted so quickly. QBBC should hit the website by Wednesday at the latest.The DTBC one should be available on the website tomorrow. The QBBC seems unlikely to make it before this weekend, but very likely to make it before next weekend. Give that one about a week or so; until then, consider what Clayton Gray wrote.
Additionally, there was a special request in the Shark Pool for a user-friendly feature. Just goes to show you, all the requests you guys make are strongly considered. Click here for a pretty cool file to take to your draft.
Sure.If you look at Row 29 (SF) and Column L (Detroit), you see the intersection of the schedules for SF and Detroit. Their combined schedule score is 3404, which isn't very good. If you look one column over to the right, you see the combined schedule score for SF and GB, 3273. So you can tell quickly that SF/GB is a better combo than SF/Det.Chase: I dloaded the file for DTBC but can you briefly explain what the numbers mean? TIAhttp://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07stuart_dtbc.phpAs promised, DTBC got up on Wednesday. Big thanks for Clayton Gray for getting it formatted so quickly. QBBC should hit the website by Wednesday at the latest.The DTBC one should be available on the website tomorrow. The QBBC seems unlikely to make it before this weekend, but very likely to make it before next weekend. Give that one about a week or so; until then, consider what Clayton Gray wrote.
Additionally, there was a special request in the Shark Pool for a user-friendly feature. Just goes to show you, all the requests you guys make are strongly considered. Click here for a pretty cool file to take to your draft.![]()
Two top 10 QBs, nice.Using Draft Dominator last weekend at a live draft, I ended up with a QBBC of Vince Young & Ben Rothelisberger (sp). Ben has an easy schedule starting out, until I feel out how Vince's production will be.No pressure dude, but the QBBC article is the #2 reason why I subscribe to FBG. The #1 reason being I want to support the company who supports this board. Anything you can do to get the QBBC out before next weekend is most apreciated.The DTBC one should be available on the website tomorrow. The QBBC seems unlikely to make it before this weekend, but very likely to make it before next weekend. Give that one about a week or so; until then, consider what Clayton Gray wrote.
You might want to change this. As Chase explains above, lower is better. You might want to try MIN and SMALL as the functions instead.Fun with excel. A few formulas and a few clicks can make the DTBC spreadsheet more colorful and easier for the eyes to pick up the best combos for each team.
1. In cell AI3 enter the formula "=max(B2:AG2)"
2. Highlight cell AI3 and move your cursor towards the box lower right hand corner of AI3. Once your cursor turns from a fat cross into a skinny one, double click. This will copy the formula all the way down.
3. In cell AJ3 enter the formula "=large(B2:AG2,2)" and do the double click auto copy thingy from step 2.
4. In cell AK3 enter the forumla "=large(B2:AG2,3)" and do the double clicky thing again.
...
Hey Ramblin,It's possible, but the article already gets so long and the important stuff (what the other top combos are) is specifically addressed in the body of the article, that I never add the full grid of two-man QBBC. If you want it though, I could shoot you an e-mail with that. Just say the word.ChaseI see the QBBC article is out. Is there any way to attach the full grid of two man QBBC like the TDBC article has?
That would be awesome. PM sent with my e-mail address.Hey Ramblin,It's possible, but the article already gets so long and the important stuff (what the other top combos are) is specifically addressed in the body of the article, that I never add the full grid of two-man QBBC. If you want it though, I could shoot you an e-mail with that. Just say the word.ChaseI see the QBBC article is out. Is there any way to attach the full grid of two man QBBC like the TDBC article has?
That would be awesome. PM sent with my e-mail address.Hey Ramblin,It's possible, but the article already gets so long and the important stuff (what the other top combos are) is specifically addressed in the body of the article, that I never add the full grid of two-man QBBC. If you want it though, I could shoot you an e-mail with that. Just say the word.ChaseI see the QBBC article is out. Is there any way to attach the full grid of two man QBBC like the TDBC article has?![]()
Headbutts, was that you who e-mailed me? I just sent you a reply.The jist of it is playing in this type of league doesn't lend itself to a committee strategy at all. You will simply start your 2 QBs each week. The only advice I can give is to use the SOS charts found at the bottom of the article. I think that's pretty useful, though, and will point you towards guys with easy/hard schedules.Any thoughts on how to sort this data for a 2-start QB team with only 2 QBs on the roster? We can add a sub if one of our starters is on a bye or listed as OUT on the injury report for that week only. 12-team league, just to make it that much more challenging.